Procedure : 2017/0326(COD)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A8-0153/2018

Texts tabled :

A8-0153/2018

Debates :

Votes :

PV 25/10/2018 - 13.10

Texts adopted :

P8_TA(2018)0426

REPORT     ***I
PDF 632kWORD 78k
27.4.2018
PE 616.660v02-00 A8-0153/2018

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

(COM(2017)0734 – C8‑0420/2017 – 2017/0326(COD))

Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

Rapporteur: Burkhard Balz, Pervenche Berès

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
 OPINION of the Committee on Budgets
 OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

(COM(2017)0734 – C8‑0420/2017 – 2017/0326(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2017)0734,

–  having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0420/2017),

–  having regard to Article 295 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as well as the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Better Law-Making, which are committed to sincere and transparent cooperation throughout the entire legislative cycle and the equality of both co-legislators;

–  having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–  having regard to the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on decentralised agencies from 19 July 2012,

–  having regard to the Procedure leading up to a decision on the relocation of the European Medicines Agency and the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (EBA) in the context of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the Union, as endorsed in the margins of the European Council (Article 50 TEU format) on 22 June 2017;

–  after consulting the European Central Bank;

–  having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 17 January 2018(1),

–  having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A8-0153/2018),

1.  Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

2.   Calls for an immediate review of the Common Approach annexed to the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012 in order to take due account of the role of Parliament in the decision-making process on the location of agencies in view of its prerogatives as co-legislator under the ordinary legislative procedure and calls therefore for a close involvement of Parliament in that decision-making process;

3.  Recalls criteria defined by the Commission and endorsed by the Heads of State or Government of the EU27 at the European Council (Article 50 TEU format) on 22 June 2017 for relocation of Union agencies from London in the context of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the Union, namely: i. the assurance that the agency can be set up on site and take up its functions at the date of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union; ii. the accessibility of the location; iii. the existence of adequate education facilities for the children of agency staff; iv. appropriate access to the labour market, social security and medical care for both children and spouses; v. business continuity and vi. geographical spread;

4.  Deplores that Parliament was not involved in the definition and the weighting of the criteria to select the location of the seat of the EBA despite Parliament's prerogatives, whereby Parliament and the Council are equal co-legislators on Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010(2) establishing EBA and defining its location;

5.  Recalls that the 2010 decision on the location of EBA, along with the decision on the location of EIOPA and ESMA, was concluded in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure following a full-fledged trilogue procedure; observes that the seat of the agency equally concerned by a relocation from London was decided by a common agreement between the representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting at Head of State and Government level; points to the fact that the Council (Article 50 TEU format) selected the new seat of the EBA on the basis of the Joint Statement on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012 which is of a lower legal order compared to Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010;

6.  Deplores the lack of transparency and accountability, in the voting procedure the Council has undertaken on the 20 November 2017, leaving final decisions to the drawing of lots; points to the fact that the agencies are currently partly funded by the Union budget and that also relocation costs may partly occur at the expense of the Union budget which are subject to ongoing negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom; highlights therefore the need for democratic accountability as well as a transparent and understandable decision-making in the interest of the European public; Requests further details on the weighting of the criteria applied by the Council in the selection procedure for the location of EBA;

7.  Believes that Parliament should be systematically and on equal terms with the Commission and Council involved in defining and weighting the criteria for the location of all Union bodies and agencies; requests the Commission and Council to launch a revision of the Joint Statement of 19 July 2012 on decentralised agencies with the aim of ensuring a strong involvement of Parliament whilst respecting in particular its co-decision powers;

8.  Highlights the different tasks and areas of competence of the European Supervisory Authorities EBA, EIOPA and ESMA; recalls the deliberate decision of the co-legislators to set up three authorities with separate tasks and fields of competence, one for banking, one for securities and one for insurance and pensions; demands that this separation remains to be reflected in the regulatory and supervisory competences and the governance, the main organisation and main financing of their activities independent of their location, while allowing for sharing, where applicable, administrative support services and facility management services which are not related to core activities, requests the Commission and Council to safeguard the current set-up of the three authorities during and after the relocation of EBA; demands a regular update from the Commission in this regard, in particular during the ongoing legislative procedure on the review of the European Supervisory authorities (COM(2017)536); recalls that Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 is part of the legislative procedure under review of the European Supervisory Authorities (COM(2017)536);

9.   Underlines that the relocation and the new premises need to be ready and fit by the time the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union comes into effect;

10.  Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

11.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Amendment    1

AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT(3)*

to the Commission proposal

---------------------------------------------------------

Proposal for a

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 13(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank(4),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Social and European Committee(5),

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

Whereas:

(1)  In the context of the United Kingdom's notification on 29 March 2017 of its intention to leave the Union, pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the other 27 Member States, meeting in the margins of the General Affairs Council (‘Article 50’), selected Paris, France, as the new seat of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (EBA).

(1a)  The costs of the relocation of the seat of the EBA arise as a result of the unilateral decision of the United Kingdom to leave the Union. Nevertheless, on the basis of the joint report from the negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government agreed on 8 December 2017 and of the commitment of the United Kingdom to contribute to the general budget of the Union for the financial years 2019 and 2020 as if it remained in the Union and to contribute to its share of the financing of the commitments outstanding at 31 December 2020, those costs are to be borne by all Union taxpayers through the general budget of the Union. The United Kingdom has offered to discuss with those Union agencies that are located in London how they could reduce their withdrawal costs.

(2)  Having regard to Article 50(3) TEU, the EBA should take its new seat as from the date on which the Treaties cease to apply to the United Kingdom or from 30 March, 2019, whichever is the earlier.

(3)  To ensure the proper functioning of the EBA in its new location, a headquarters agreement should be concluded and a building project in accordance with Article 88 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013(6) should be approved before the EBA takes up its new seat. The new premises should be ready and fit for the purpose of permanent relocation by the time the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union comes into effect. The headquarters agreement should reflect the responsibility of the French authorities to provide the most appropriate conditions and the most efficient solution for the location of the EBA.

(3a)  The transfer of the seat of the EBA does not call into question the establishment plan as adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, nor the application of the Staff Regulations to officials or other agents who work at the EBA.

(4)  To give the EBA sufficient time to relocate, this Regulation should enter into force as a matter of urgency while taking into account the co-decision powers of the European Parliament and the Council.

(4a)  In order to acknowledge that it is possible for the location of a decentralised agency to be set out in a Union legislative act which is subject to the ordinary legislative procedure, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission are committed to concluding, by 31 December 2018, a revision of the Joint Statement on decentralised agencies. The location of a Union agency should be selected in a transparent procedure which reinforces democratic accountability and by jointly defining and weighting the selection criteria.

(4b)  The relocation of the EBA should not have any consequences with regard to executing the distinct mandate or maintaining the separate legal status of the European Supervisory Authorities. The relocation might allow, where applicable, for the sharing of administrative support services and facility management services among Union agencies which are not related to core activities. To address the efficiency of those agencies, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should, when revising the Joint Statement on decentralised agencies, also build on the recommendations of the Interinstitutional Working Group on decentralised agencies' resources.

(5)  Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council(7) should therefore be amended accordingly.

(5a)   Article 13(2) TEU requires relations between the institutions of the Union to be carried out in mutual sincere cooperation, while each of them is acting within the limits of the powers conferred on it in the Treaties and in conformity with the procedures, conditions and objectives set out in them. The European Parliament is to be fully informed and involved throughout all steps of the ordinary legislative procedure,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 is replaced by the following:

Article 7

Seat

The Authority shall have its seat in Paris, France.

The Authority, the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) shall separately execute their powers and tasks, organise their governance structure, operate their main organisation, and ensure the main financing of their activities, which all are different in their field of competence, independent of their location, while, where applicable, allowing for the sharing of administrative support services and facility management services among Union agencies which are not related to core activities. By ... [date of application of this Regulation] and every 12 months thereafter, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the compliance of those Authorities with that requirement.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall apply from the date on which the Treaties cease to apply to the United Kingdom or from 30 March 2019, whichever is the earlier.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament  For the Council

The President          The President

ATTACHMENT TO REGULATION 2018/...

STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The European Parliament regrets that its role of co-legislator has not been duly taken into account since it was not involved in the procedure leading to the selection of the new seat of the European Banking Authority (EBA).

The European Parliament wishes to recall its prerogatives as co-legislator and insists on the full respect of the ordinary legislative procedure in relation to the location of bodies and agencies.

As the only directly elected Union institution and representative of the Union’s citizens, it is the first guarantor of the respect of the democratic principle in the Union.

The European Parliament condemns the procedure followed for the selection of the new location of the seat, which has de facto deprived the European Parliament of its prerogatives since it was not effectively involved in the process, but is now expected to simply confirm the selection made for the new location of the seat by means of the ordinary legislative procedure.

The European Parliament recalls that the Common Approach annexed to the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, Council and European Commission on decentralised agencies signed in 2012 is legally non-binding, as acknowledged in the Statement itself and that it was agreed without prejudice to the legislative powers of the institutions.

Therefore, the European Parliament insists that the procedure followed for the selection of a new location for the agencies will be revised and not used anymore in this form in the future.

Finally, the European Parliament wishes to recall as well that in the Inter-institutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making(8), the three institutions committed to sincere and transparent cooperation while recalling the equality of both co-legislators as enshrined in the Treaties.

(1)

(2)

Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p.12).

(3)

* Amendments: new or amended text is highlighted in bold italics; deletions are indicated by the symbol ▌.

(4)

  […]

(5)

  […]

(6)

  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42).

(7)

  Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).

(8)

  OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.


OPINION of the Committee on Budgets (21.3.2018)

for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

(COM2017/0734 – C8‑420/2017 – 2017/0326(COD))

Rapporteur: Jens Geier

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment    1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(1a)  The costs of the relocation of the seat of the European Banking Authority arise as a result of the unilateral decision of the United Kingdom to leave the Union. Nevertheless, on the basis of the joint report from the negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government agreed on 8 December 2017 and the commitment of the United Kingdom to contribute to the general budget of the Union for the financial years 2019 and 2020 as if it remained in the Union and to contribute to its share of the financing of the commitments outstanding at 31 December 2020, those costs are to be borne by all Union taxpayers through the general budget of the Union. The United Kingdom has offered to discuss with those agencies of the Union that are located in London how they could reduce their withdrawing costs.

Amendment    2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3)   To ensure the proper functioning of the European Banking Authority in its new location, a headquarters agreement should be concluded before the European Banking Authority takes up its new seat.

(3)  To ensure the proper functioning of the European Banking Authority in its new location, a headquarters agreement should be concluded, and a building project in accordance with Article 88 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/20131a should be approved, before the European Banking Authority takes up its new seat. The headquarters agreement should reflect the special responsibility of the French authorities in providing the most appropriate conditions and the most efficient solution for the location of the European Banking Authority.

 

________________

 

1a Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42)

Amendment    3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3a)  The relocation of the European Banking Authority to Paris, France, opens a window of opportunity to create synergies in areas such as administration, IT and security between the European Banking Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority, having regard to their distinct mandate and legal status.

Amendment    4

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Compromise Amendment

(3b) The Commission has made separate legislative proposals for a revision of the overall framework of the three European Supervisory Authorities, in order to upgrade them and provide a more resilient regulatory oversight.

Amendment    5

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

(3c)  The transfer of the European Banking Authority seat does not call into question the establishment plan as adopted by the budgetary authority, nor the application of the Staff Regulations to officials or other agents who work at the European Banking Authority.

Amendment    6

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3 d (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3d)  The Union institutions have agreed to facilitate further cooperation among agencies of the Union and to explore further possible efficiency gains within the framework of the Interinstitutional Working Group on decentralised agencies’ resources.

Amendment    7

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Regulation 2010/1093/EU

Article 7 – paragraph 1

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Authority shall have its seat in Paris, France.

The Authority shall have its seat in Paris, France. The Authority shall seek close cooperation with other agencies of the Union, especially those that are based in its immediate proximity, in order to achieve efficiency gains.

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Title

Location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

References

COM(2017)0734 – C8-0420/2017 – 2017/0326(COD)

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

ECON

11.12.2017

 

 

 

Opinion by

       Date announced in plenary

BUDG

11.12.2017

Rapporteur

       Date appointed

Jens Geier

11.12.2017

Date adopted

21.3.2018

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

28

4

1

Members present for the final vote

Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis, Richard Ashworth, Gérard Deprez, Manuel dos Santos, André Elissen, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Ingeborg Gräßle, Iris Hoffmann, Monika Hohlmeier, John Howarth, Bernd Kölmel, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Vladimír Maňka, Siegfried Mureşan, Liadh Ní Riada, Jan Olbrycht, Younous Omarjee, Pina Picierno, Răzvan Popa, Paul Rübig, Jordi Solé, Patricija Šulin, Eleftherios Synadinos, Indrek Tarand, Inese Vaidere, Daniele Viotti, Tiemo Wölken, Marco Zanni

Substitutes present for the final vote

Jean-Paul Denanot, Georgios Kyrtsos, Ivana Maletić, Tomáš Zdechovský

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

28

+

ALDE

Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis, Gérard Deprez

ECR

Zbigniew Kuźmiuk

GUE/NGL

Liadh Ní Riada, Younous Omarjee

PPE

Ingeborg Gräßle, Monika Hohlmeier, Georgios Kyrtsos, Ivana Maletić, Siegfried Mureşan, Jan Olbrycht, Paul Rübig, Inese Vaidere, Tomáš Zdechovský, Patricija Šulin

S&D

Jean-Paul Denanot, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Iris Hoffmann, John Howarth, Vladimír Maňka, Pina Picierno, Răzvan Popa, Daniele Viotti, Tiemo Wölken, Manuel dos Santos

Verts/ALE

Jordi Solé, Indrek Tarand

4

-

ECR

Bernd Kölmel

ENF

André Elissen, Marco Zanni

NI

Eleftherios Synadinos

1

0

PPE

Richard Ashworth

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention


OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (27.2.2018)

for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

(COM(2017)0734 – C8‑0420/2017 – 2017/0326(COD))

Rapporteur: Fabio Massimo Castaldo

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment    1

Draft legislative resolution

Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft legislative resolution

Amendment

 

1a.   Calls for an immediate review of the Common Approach annexed to the joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012 in order to take due account of the role of the European Parliament in the decision-making process on the location of agencies in view of its prerogatives as co-legislator under the ordinary legislative procedure and calls therefore for a close involvement of the European Parliament in that decision-making process;

Amendment    2

Draft legislative resolution

Paragraph 1 b (new)

Draft legislative resolution

Amendment

 

1b.   Approves its statement annexed to this resolution;

For information, the statement reads as follows:

‘The European Parliament regrets that its role of co-legislator has not been duly taken into account in the procedure leading to the selection of the new seat of the European Banking Authority (EBA).

The European Parliament wishes to recall its prerogatives as co-legislator and insists on the full respect of the ordinary legislative procedure in relation to the location of bodies and agencies.

As the only directly elected Union institution it is the first guarantor of the respect of the democratic principle in the Union.

The European Parliament condemns the procedure followed for the selection of the new location of the seat, which has de facto deprived the European Parliament of its prerogatives since it was not effectively involved in the process, but is now expected to simply confirm the selection made for the new location of the seat by means of the ordinary legislative procedure.

The European Parliament recalls that the Common Approach annexed to the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, Council and European Commission on decentralised agencies signed in 2012 is legally non-binding, as acknowledged in the Statement itself and that it was agreed without prejudice to the legislative powers of the institutions.

The European Parliament welcomes that the selection procedure of the new seat of the agency was based on selection criteria referred to in the Common Approach, but deplores that it was eventually concluded by drawing lots. The Parliament insists therefore that the procedure followed for the selection of the new location of the seat will be reformed in the future.

The European Parliament underlines that the procedure followed for the selection of the new location of the seat, which has its basis in the Common Approach, is of a pure inter-governmental nature and that asking for confirmation of the selection made by means of the ordinary legislative procedure reflects the friction between this intergovernmental process and the community method, bearing the risk to undermine the community method.

Finally, the European Parliament wishes to recall as well that in the Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 20161 the three institutions committed to sincere and transparent cooperation while recalling the equality of both co-legislators as enshrined in the Treaties.’

______________________

OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.

Amendment    3

Proposal for a regulation

Citation 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 13(2) thereof,

Justification

Reference to the duty of mutual sincere cooperation amongst EU institutions

Amendment    4

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

(5a)   Article 13(2) of the Treaty on European Union requires relations among the institutions of the Union to be carried out in mutual sincere cooperation while each of them is acting within the limits of the powers conferred on it in the Treaties and in conformity with the procedures, conditions and objectives set out in them. The European Parliament is to be fully informed and involved throughout all steps of the ordinary legislative procedure.

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Title

Location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

References

COM(2017)0734 – C8-0420/2017 – 2017/0326(COD)

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

ECON

11.12.2017

 

 

 

Opinion by

       Date announced in plenary

AFCO

11.12.2017

Rapporteur

       Date appointed

Fabio Massimo Castaldo

26.2.2018

Discussed in committee

26.2.2018

 

 

 

Date adopted

26.2.2018

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

18

3

1

Members present for the final vote

Mercedes Bresso, Richard Corbett, Pascal Durand, Danuta Maria Hübner, Diane James, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Morten Messerschmidt, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Pedro Silva Pereira, Barbara Spinelli, Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski

Substitutes present for the final vote

Max Andersson, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Mairead McGuinness, Cristian Dan Preda, Jasenko Selimovic

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Eleonora Evi, Seán Kelly, Jeroen Lenaers, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

18

+

ALDE

Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Jasenko Selimovic

EFDD

Eleonora Evi

GUE/NGL

Barbara Spinelli

PPE

Danuta Maria Hübner, Seán Kelly, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Jeroen Lenaers, Mairead McGuinness, Cristian Dan Preda, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso

S&D

Mercedes Bresso, Richard Corbett, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann

VERTS/ALE

Max Andersson, Pascal Durand

3

-

ECR

Morten Messerschmidt, Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski

NI

Diane James

1

0

S&D

Pedro Silva Pereira

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention


PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Title

Location of the seat of the European Banking Authority

References

COM(2017)0734 – C8-0420/2017 – 2017/0326(COD)

Date submitted to Parliament

29.11.2017

 

 

 

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

ECON

11.12.2017

 

 

 

Committees asked for opinions

       Date announced in plenary

BUDG

11.12.2017

JURI

11.12.2017

AFCO

11.12.2017

 

Not delivering opinions

       Date of decision

JURI

24.1.2018

 

 

 

Rapporteurs

       Date appointed

Burkhard Balz

18.1.2018

Pervenche Berès

18.1.2018

 

 

Discussed in committee

24.1.2018

27.2.2018

9.4.2018

 

Date adopted

24.4.2018

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

53

1

0

Members present for the final vote

Burkhard Balz, Hugues Bayet, Pervenche Berès, Thierry Cornillet, Markus Ferber, Sven Giegold, Neena Gill, Roberto Gualtieri, Brian Hayes, Gunnar Hökmark, Danuta Maria Hübner, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Petr Ježek, Barbara Kappel, Wolf Klinz, Georgios Kyrtsos, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Bernd Lucke, Olle Ludvigsson, Ivana Maletić, Gabriel Mato, Costas Mavrides, Alex Mayer, Bernard Monot, Caroline Nagtegaal, Luděk Niedermayer, Stanisław Ożóg, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Dariusz Rosati, Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner, Alfred Sant, Martin Schirdewan, Molly Scott Cato, Pedro Silva Pereira, Peter Simon, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Paul Tang, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Marco Valli, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Miguel Viegas, Jakob von Weizsäcker, Marco Zanni

Substitutes present for the final vote

Mady Delvaux, Manuel dos Santos, Ashley Fox, Krišjānis Kariņš, Paloma López Bermejo, Thomas Mann, Eva Maydell, Michel Reimon, Romana Tomc

Date tabled

27.4.2018


FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

53

+

ALDE

Thierry Cornillet, Petr Ježek, Wolf Klinz, Caroline Nagtegaal, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells

ECR

Ashley Fox, Bernd Lucke, Stanisław Ożóg, Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner

EFDD

Marco Valli

ENF

Barbara Kappel, Bernard Monot

GUE/NGL

Paloma López Bermejo, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Martin Schirdewan, Miguel Viegas

PPE

Burkhard Balz, Markus Ferber, Brian Hayes, Gunnar Hökmark, Danuta Maria Hübner, Krišjānis Kariņš, Georgios Kyrtsos, Werner Langen, Ivana Maletić, Thomas Mann, Gabriel Mato, Eva Maydell, Luděk Niedermayer, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Dariusz Rosati, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Romana Tomc, Tom Vandenkendelaere

S&D

Hugues Bayet, Pervenche Berès, Mady Delvaux, Neena Gill, Roberto Gualtieri, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Olle Ludvigsson, Costas Mavrides, Alex Mayer, Alfred Sant, Manuel dos Santos, Pedro Silva Pereira, Peter Simon, Paul Tang, Jakob von Weizsäcker

VERTS/ALE

Sven Giegold, Philippe Lamberts, Michel Reimon, Molly Scott Cato

1

-

ENF

Marco Zanni

0

0

 

 

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention

Last updated: 30 April 2018Legal notice