Procedure : 2018/0336(COD)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A8-0435/2018

Texts tabled :

A8-0435/2018

Debates :

Votes :

PV 12/03/2019 - 9.21
CRE 12/03/2019 - 9.21

Texts adopted :

P8_TA(2019)0155

REPORT     ***I
PDF 597kWORD 88k
6.12.2018
PE 629.558v02-00 A8-0435/2018

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 as regards a verification procedure related to infringements of rules on the protection of personal data in the context of elections to the European Parliament

(COM(2018)0636 – C8‑0413/2018 – 2018/0336(COD))

Committee on Constitutional Affairs

Rapporteur: Mercedes Bresso, Rainer Wieland

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
 OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 as regards a verification procedure related to infringements of rules on the protection of personal data in the context of elections to the European Parliament

(COM(2018)0636 – C8‑0413/2018 – 2018/0336(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2018)0636),

–  having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 224 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0413/2018),

–  having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

–  having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–    after consulting the European Economic and Social Committee,

–  after consulting the Committee of the Regions,

–  having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and also the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0435/2018),

1.  Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

2.  Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

3.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Amendment  1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

(5a)  When the Authority imposes a sanction on the European political party or foundation pursuant to the verification procedure, it shall take due account of the ne bis in idem principle, to avoid that the same infringement is sanctioned twice, on the national level following the decision of the supervisory authority, and on the European level following the verification procedure.

Amendment    2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(6)  Since the new procedure is triggered by a decision of a competent data protection supervisory authority, it should be possible for the European political party or European political foundation concerned to request that the sanction be reviewed if the decision of the supervisory authority is repealed or a remedy against that decision is successful.

(6)  Since the new procedure is triggered by a decision of a competent data protection supervisory authority, it should be possible for the European political party or European political foundation concerned to be heard before that decision is delivered and to request that the sanction be reviewed if the decision of the supervisory authority is repealed or a remedy against that decision is successful.

Amendment    3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3

Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014

Article 10a – paragraph 1

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

If the Authority becomes aware of a decision of a supervisory authority within the meaning of point 21 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 finding that a natural or legal person has infringed applicable rules on the protection of personal data and if it follows from that decision, or where there are otherwise reasonable grounds to believe, that the infringement is linked to political activities by a European political party or a European political foundation in the context of elections to the European Parliament, the Authority shall refer this matter to the committee of independent eminent persons established by Article 11. The committee shall give an opinion as to whether the European political party or the European political foundation concerned has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of that infringement. The Authority shall request the opinion without undue delay and no later than 1 month after the decision of the supervisory authority. The committee shall deliver its opinion within a short, reasonable deadline set by the Authority.

1.  A European political party or a European political foundation shall not influence or attempt to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement, by a natural or legal person, of the applicable rules on the protection of personal data. This paragraph shall only apply if a supervisory authority of a Member State, within the meaning of point 21 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council17, has established, by an enforceable decision, that an infringement of the applicable rules on data protection has occurred.

 

2.  When the Authority becomes aware of a conduct covered by the first paragraph, and is notified the enforceable decision of the supervisory authority referred to in that first paragraph, it shall refer this matter to the committee of independent eminent persons established by Article 11 without undue delay and no later than 3 months after that notification. The committee shall give an opinion, within a short, reasonable deadline set by the Authority, as to whether or not the European political party or European political foundation concerned has violated paragraph 1.

 

Having regard to the committee's opinion, the Authority shall decide, pursuant to Article 27(2)(a), whether to impose financial sanctions on the European political party or European political foundation concerned. The decision of the Authority shall be duly reasoned, in particular with regard to the committee’s opinion, and shall be published expeditiously.

_________________

_________________

17 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5. 2016, p. 1).

17 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5. 2016, p. 1).

Amendment    4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a

Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014

Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point a – point vii

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(vii)  where, in accordance with Article 10a, the committee issues an opinion finding that a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on the protection of personal data.;

(vii)  where a European political party or European political foundation has violated Article 10a(1).”;

Amendment    5

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b

Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014

Article 27 – paragraph 7

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

7.  Where a decision of the supervisory authority as referred to in Article 10a has been repealed or where a remedy against such decision has been successful, the Authority shall review any sanction imposed pursuant to point (a)(vii) of paragraph 2 at the request of the European political party or European political foundation concerned.

7.  Where a decision of the national supervisory authority as referred to in Article 10a has been definitively repealed or where a remedy against such decision has been successful and is final, the Authority shall review any sanction imposed pursuant to point (a)(vii) of paragraph 2 at the request of the European political party or European political foundation concerned.


OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (5.12.2018)

for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of personal data in the context of elections to the European Parliament

(COM(2018)0636 – C8‑0413/2018 – 2018/0336(COD))

Rapporteur for opinion: Sophia in 't Veld

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment    1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(4)  To that end, a verification procedure should be established whereby the Authority must, in certain circumstances, ask the committee of independent eminent persons to assess whether a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on protection of personal data. Where the committee finds that to be the case, the Authority should impose sanctions in line with the effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctioning system established by the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014.

(4)  To that end, a verification procedure should be established whereby the Authority must, following a final decision by the national supervisory authority or European Data Protection Supervisor, ask the committee of independent eminent persons to assess whether a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on protection of personal data. Where the committee finds that to be the case, the Authority should impose sanctions in line with the effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctioning system established by the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014. These sanctions should pursue the objective of guaranteeing free and fair elections to the European Parliament, while possible sanctions imposed by the data protection authorities should pursue the objective of protecting natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. 

Amendment    2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

(5 a)  When the Authority imposes a sanction on the European political party or foundation pursuant to the verification procedure, it shall take due account of the ne bis in idem principle, to avoid that the same infringement is sanctioned twice, on the national level following the decision of the supervisory authority, and on the European level following the verification procedure.

Justification

If the Authority imposes a sanction on the European political party/foundation pursuant to the verification procedure, the sanction could be considered a bis in idem: the decision by the supervisory authority, and the sanction imposed by the Authority. This would be contrary to Article 50 of the Charter and Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights.

Amendment    3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 1141/2014

Article 10a –paragraph 1

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

If the Authority becomes aware of a decision of a supervisory authority within the meaning of point 21 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 finding that a natural or legal person has infringed applicable rules on the protection of personal data and if it follows from that decision, or where there are otherwise reasonable grounds to believe, that the infringement is linked to political activities by a European political party or a European political foundation in the context of elections to the European Parliament, the Authority shall refer this matter to the committee of independent eminent persons established by Article 11. The committee shall give an opinion as to whether the European political party or the European political foundation concerned has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of that infringement. The Authority shall request the opinion without undue delay and no later than 1 month after the decision of the supervisory authority. The committee shall deliver its opinion within a short, reasonable deadline set by the Authority.

If the Authority becomes aware of a final decision of a supervisory authority within the meaning of point 21 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council adopted pursuant to Article 58(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or of a final decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor established in accordance with Article 52 of Regulation (EU) 2018/172517a of the European Parliament and of the Council adopted pursuant to Article 58(2) of Regulation 2018/1725 finding that a natural or legal person has infringed applicable rules on the protection of personal data and if it follows from that final decision or where there are factual grounds indicating that the infringement is linked to political activities by or was committed on behalf of, under instructions from, or with the support of a European political party or a European political foundation in the context of elections to the European Parliament, the Authority shall refer this matter to the committee of independent eminent persons established by Article 11. The committee shall give an opinion as to whether the European political party or the European political foundation concerned has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by infringing the applicable rules on the protection of personal data, or by authorising, instructing or supporting an entity that has infringed the applicable rules, by taking advantage of that infringement. The Authority shall request the opinion without undue delay and no later than 1 month after the decision of the supervisory authority. The committee shall deliver its opinion within a short, reasonable deadline set by the Authority.

__________________

__________________

17 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5. 2016, p. 1).

17 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5. 2016, p. 1).

 

17a Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39)

Justification

If only final decisions can trigger the verification procedures, the principles of legal certainty and respect of the rights to a fair trial and due process are better guaranteed.By including Regulation [2018/xxxx (45/2001)], also EDPS decisions on infringements of data protection rules by EU institutions (including MEPs and staff) can trigger the procedure.Only decisions adopted by DPAs or EDPS based on their corrective powers can lead to this procedure, not investigative or advisory decisions.

Amendment    4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Regulation 1141/2014

Article 11 – paragraph 3 –subparagraph 1 – second sentence

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

When requested by the Authority, the committee shall give an opinion on whether a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on the protection of personal data. In both cases the committee may request any relevant document and evidence from the Authority, the European Parliament, the European political party or European political foundation concerned, other political parties, political foundations or other stakeholders, and it may request to hear their representatives. In the case of opinions on whether a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on the protection of personal data, the supervisory authorities referred to in the Article 10(a) shall cooperate with the committee in accordance with applicable law.

When requested by the Authority, the committee shall give an opinion on whether a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on the protection of personal data, or by authorising, instructing or supporting an entity that has infringed the applicable rules. In both cases the committee may request any relevant document and evidence from the Authority, the European Parliament, the European political party or European political foundation concerned, other political parties, political foundations or other stakeholders, and it may request to hear their representatives. In the case of opinions on whether a European political party or a European political foundation has influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by infringing the applicable rules on the protection of personal data, or by authorising, instructing or supporting an entity that has infringed the applicable rules, the supervisory authorities referred to in the Article 10(a) shall cooperate with the committee in accordance with applicable law and in compliance with the duty of professional secrecy as laid down in Article 54(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in Article 56 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

Justification

The GDPR and new Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 provide that the members and staff of supervisory authorities are bound by professional secrecy. If they will share any confidential information with this committee of eminent persons, this cooperation should respect the duty of professional secrecy.

Amendment    5

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 1141/2014

Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point a – point vii

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(vii)  where, in accordance with Article 10a, the committee issues an opinion finding that a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on the protection of personal data.;

(vii)  where, in accordance with Article 10a, the committee issues an opinion finding that a European political party or a European political foundation has deliberately influenced or attempted to influence the outcome of elections to the European Parliament by taking advantage of an infringement of the applicable rules on the protection of personal data. In this case, due account shall be taken of the ne bis in idem principle;

Justification

If the Authority imposes a sanction on the European political party/foundation pursuant to the verification procedure, the sanction could be considered a bis in idem: the decision by the supervisory authority, and the sanction imposed by the Authority. This would be contrary to Article 50 of the Charter and Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights.

Amendment    6

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 1141/2014

Article 27a – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

(6 a)  in Article 27a, the following point is added:

 

(ba)  in the situation referred to in point (a) (vii) of Article 27, where the natural person has been found to be also responsible for the facts and conducts in question pursuant to the procedure established in Article 10a.

Justification

For the sake of consistency, this point needs to be added to Article 27a (Responsibility of natural persons).

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Title

Protection of personal data in the context of elections to the European Parliament

References

COM(2018)0636 – C8-0413/2018 – 2018/0336(COD)

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

AFCO

1.10.2018

 

 

 

Opinion by

       Date announced in plenary

LIBE

1.10.2018

Rapporteur

       Date appointed

Sophia in ‘t Veld

5.11.2018

Discussed in committee

20.11.2018

3.12.2018

 

 

Date adopted

3.12.2018

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

39

2

1

Members present for the final vote

Heinz K. Becker, Monika Beňová, Malin Björk, Michał Boni, Caterina Chinnici, Cornelia Ernst, Romeo Franz, Kinga Gál, Sylvie Guillaume, Monika Hohlmeier, Filiz Hyusmenova, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Dietmar Köster, Barbara Kudrycka, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Roberta Metsola, Claude Moraes, József Nagy, Ivari Padar, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Branislav Škripek, Sergei Stanishev, Helga Stevens, Traian Ungureanu, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Udo Voigt, Josef Weidenholzer, Kristina Winberg, Auke Zijlstra

Substitutes present for the final vote

Carlos Coelho, Gérard Deprez, Anna Hedh, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Emilian Pavel, Morten Helveg Petersen, Christine Revault d’Allonnes Bonnefoy, Barbara Spinelli, Josep-Maria Terricabras

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Max Andersson, France Jamet

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

39

+

ALDE

Gérard Deprez, Filiz Hyusmenova, Sophia in 't Veld, Morten Helveg Petersen

ECR

Branislav Škripek, Helga Stevens, Kristina Winberg

GUE/NGL

Malin Björk, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marie-Christine Vergiat

NI

Udo Voigt

PPE

Heinz K. Becker, Michał Boni, Carlos Coelho, Kinga Gál, Monika Hohlmeier, Barbara Kudrycka, Roberta Metsola, József Nagy

S&D

Monika Beňová, Caterina Chinnici, Sylvie Guillaume, Anna Hedh, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Dietmar Köster, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Claude Moraes, Ivari Padar, Emilian Pavel, Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Birgit Sippel, Sergei Stanishev, Josef Weidenholzer

VERTS/ALE

Max Andersson, Romeo Franz, Judith Sargentini, Josep-Maria Terricabras

2

-

ENF

France Jamet, Auke Zijlstra

1

0

PPE

Traian Ungureanu

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention


PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Title

Protection of personal data in the context of elections to the European Parliament

References

COM(2018)0636 – C8-0413/2018 – 2018/0336(COD)

Date submitted to Parliament

12.9.2018

 

 

 

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

AFCO

1.10.2018

 

 

 

Committees asked for opinions

       Date announced in plenary

BUDG

1.10.2018

JURI

1.10.2018

LIBE

1.10.2018

 

Not delivering opinions

       Date of decision

BUDG

9.10.2018

JURI

24.9.2018

 

 

Rapporteurs

       Date appointed

Mercedes Bresso

24.9.2018

Rainer Wieland

24.9.2018

 

 

Discussed in committee

12.11.2018

 

 

 

Date adopted

6.12.2018

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

21

0

0

Members present for the final vote

Mercedes Bresso, Richard Corbett, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Alain Lamassoure, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, György Schöpflin, Barbara Spinelli, Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski

Substitutes present for the final vote

Max Andersson, Charles Goerens, Siôn Simon

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Albert Deß, Norbert Erdős, Sven Giegold, Krzysztof Hetman, Monika Hohlmeier, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Seán Kelly, Gabriel Mato, Anne-Marie Mineur, Pavel Poc, Gabriele Preuß

Date tabled

6.12.2018


FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

21

+

ALDE

Charles Goerens, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz

GUE/NGL

Anne-Marie Mineur, Barbara Spinelli

NI

Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski

PPE

Albert Deß, Norbert Erdős, Krzysztof Hetman, Monika Hohlmeier, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Seán Kelly, Gabriel Mato, György Schöpflin

S&D

Mercedes Bresso, Richard Corbett, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Pavel Poc, Gabriele Preuß, Siôn Simon

VERTS/ALE

Max Andersson, Sven Giegold

0

-

 

 

0

0

 

 

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention

Last updated: 7 December 2018Legal notice