Procedure : 2018/2202(DEC)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A8-0124/2019

Texts tabled :

A8-0124/2019

Debates :

PV 26/03/2019 - 12
CRE 26/03/2019 - 12

Votes :

PV 26/03/2019 - 13.21

Texts adopted :

P8_TA(2019)0262

REPORT     
PDF 187kWORD 67k
1.3.2019
PE 626.790v02-00 A8-0124/2019

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority (EBA) for the financial year 2017

(2018/2202(DEC))

Committee on Budgetary Control

Rapporteur: Petri Sarvamaa

1. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

1. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017

(2018/2202(DEC))

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017,

–  having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017, together with the Authority’s reply(1),

–  having regard to the statement of assurance(2) as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2017, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–  having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 12 February 2019 on discharge to be given to the Authority in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2017 (05825/2019 – C8‑0092/2019),

–  having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–  having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002(3), and in particular Article 208 thereof,

–  having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012(4), and in particular Article 70 thereof,

–  having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority),amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC(5), and in particular Article 64 thereof,

–  having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), and in particular Article 108 thereof,

–  having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0124/2019),

1.  Grants the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2017;

2.  Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3.  Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the resolution forming an integral part of it, to the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

2. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

on the closure of the accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017

(2018/2202(DEC))

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017,

–  having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017, together with the Authority’s reply(7),

–  having regard to the statement of assurance(8) as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2017, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–  having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 12 February 2019 on discharge to be given to the Authority in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2017 (05825/2019 – C8‑0092/2019),

–  having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–  having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002(9), and in particular Article 208 thereof,

–  having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012(10), and in particular Article 70 thereof,

–  having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority),amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC(11), and in particular Article 64 thereof,

–  having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council(12), and in particular Article 108 thereof,

–  having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0124/2019),

1.  Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017;

2.  Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017

(2018/2202(DEC))

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017,

–  having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0124/2019),

A.  whereas, according to its statement of revenue and expenditure(13), the final budget of the European Banking Authority (the ‘Authority’) for the financial year 2017 was EUR 38 419 554 representing an increase of 5.28 % compared to 2016; whereas the Authority is financed by a contribution from the Union (EUR 14 543  000, representing 38 %), and contributions from national supervisory authorities of the Member States and observers (EUR  23 876 555 representing 62 %);

B.  whereas the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2017 (the ‘Court’s report’) has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Authority’s annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;

Budget and financial management

1.  Observes that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2017 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 95,90 %, representing a decrease of 0,85 % compared to 2016; notes that the rate of execution of payment appropriations was 87,27 %, representing a decrease of 1,41 % compared to the previous year;

2.  Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from regulatory tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budgetary and personnel resources should be reallocated internally; stresses, in this respect, the need to ensure an appropriate level of prioritisation as regards resource allocation;

Cancellation of carry-overs

3.  Acknowledges that the cancellation of carry-overs from 2016 to 2017 amounted to EUR 76 566, representing 2,6 % of the total amount carried over, showing a notable decrease of 7,13 % compared to 2016;

Performance

4.  Notes with satisfaction that the Authority uses 14 key performance indicators to assess the results of its activities, as far as the limitations of the Authority to control these results allow, and to improve its budget management;

5.  Notes with satisfaction that the Authority delivered the regulatory products in line with its Work Programme and achieved all the targets stated in the applications of the Authority’s service level agreements;

6.  Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments resulting from the regulatory framework laid down by the European Parliament and the Council are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority should fulfil the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council and should stay within the mandate of those assignments, so as to achieve optimal use of resources and achievement of objectives; calls on the Authority to ensure a proper follow-up and implementation of the Court’s recommendations;

7.  Stresses that the authority should pay particular attention to the principle of proportionality in carrying out its mandate; underlines that, in particular when formulating Level 2 and Level 3 measures, attention should be devoted to specific features of national financial markets;

8.  Notes that the recent Authority stress tests have highly debatable results; calls on the Authority, the European Systemic Risk Board, the European Central Bank and the Commission to use consistent methodologies, scenarios and assumptions when defining the stress tests in order to avoid as much as possible potential distortions of the results;

9.  Notes that an external evaluation of the three European Supervisory Authorities was carried out in 2017; calls on the Authority to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken (by the Authority) to address the shortcomings identified by the external evaluation;

10.  Stresses the need to allocate more resources to anti-money laundering tasks to fulfil the Authority’s oversight functions and inquiries into national institutions; urges the Authority to ensure that competent authorities and credit and financial institutions apply the European Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (the ‘AML/CFT’) legislation effectively and consistently; requests the Authority to develop common guidance in cooperation with the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’) on how to integrate AML/CFT risks in prudential supervision; welcomes the Commission’s proposal to extend the supervisory powers of the Authority related to AML/CFT from the banking sector to the financial sector as a whole, thereby giving it a leading role on the relevant tasks and supervisory powers; furthermore in this context welcomes the adoption of the whistleblowing policy and stresses the need for national supervisory authorities to adopt similar policies;

11.  Requests the Authority to conduct an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex in order to assess potential threats to the integrity of financial markets and to national budgets; to establish the nature and magnitude of actors in these schemes; to assess whether there were breaches of either national or Union law; to assess the actions taken by financial supervisors in Member States; and to make appropriate recommendations for reform and for action to the competent authorities concerned;

12.  Welcomes the fact that the Authority shares practices and templates with ESMA and EIOPA, with which the Authority holds regular meetings and forms a Joint Committee;

Staff policy

13.  Notes that, on 31 December 2017, the establishment plan was 100 % executed, with 134 temporary agents authorised under the Union budget, compared with 127 authorised posts in 2016; notes that in addition 41 contract agents and 15 seconded national experts worked for the Authority in 2017;

14.  Notes that the Authority has adopted the Commission’s model decision on the policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing harassment in April 2017;

15.  Recalls that, following the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, the Authority will relocate from London to Paris; notes with concern that this relocation affected the recruitment of staff due to an increasing number of resignations in 2017; acknowledges that the Authority has published ten vacancy notices to establish a reserve list that will be used to fill any vacancies following resignations;

16.  Welcomes the suggestion of the Court to publish vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office as well as on the website of the Authority in order to increase publicity;

Procurement

17.  Notes with satisfaction that the Authority participates in several inter-institutional procurement procedures with Commission directorates-general and with other agencies;

18.  Notes with concern that, according to the Court’s report, in four out of five audited open procurement procedures, the procedure to identify the most economically advantageous solution was not satisfactory; observes the Authority’s reply and notes its reasoning; invites the Authority to find a more balanced approach between quality and price criteria in order to improve the economy of its procurements;

19.  Notes that, according to the Court´s report, by the end of 2017 the Authority was not yet using all of the tools for all its procedures, launched by the Commission aimed to introduce a single solution for the electronic exchange of information with third parties participating in public procurement procedures (e-procurement); notes from the Authority that it implemented e-submission in August 2018; calls on the Authority to report to the discharge authority on the progress made regarding the implementation of the remaining tools;

Prevention and management of conflicts of interests and transparency

20.  Acknowledges the measures the Authority already has in place and its ongoing efforts to secure transparency, to prevent and manage conflicts of interests, and to protect whistle-blowers; welcomes the further steps taken in order to enhance the transparency of the Authority’s activities by reporting the meetings that the Authority’s staff have with external stakeholders, and their availability on the Authority’s website;

21.  Notes with satisfaction that the Authority has developed an Anti-Fraud Strategy for the period 2015–2017; notes that, according to the fraud risk assessment undertaken by the Authority, the risk is low to medium and that for thirteen scenarios the risk has been considered material or even significant; notes that the internal controls, IT security standards and other measures proposed after that evaluation aim to mitigate the risks; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority about the developments in this regard;

22.  Considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing measures, the Authority needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the European Parliament and Council about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency, not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well;

Other Comments

23.  Highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding, that would allow the Authority to fulfil its mandate consistently, independently and efficiently;

24.  Notes that due to the United Kingdom`s decision to withdraw from the Union, the seat of the Authority will be moved to Paris, France at the beginning of 2019; notes that the Authority’s accounts include provisions for related costs amounting to EUR 6,7 million and disclose EUR 11,2 million remaining future contractual payments as scheduled for the office in London; notes that the building costs include inter alia the continued payment of rent and building charges for the London offices until the break of the lease at the end of 2020, whereas the Authority intends to offset those costs by capitalisation of the rent-free period received from the landlord and by using the French government contribution to ensure that the Authority pays rent and charges on only one office in 2019 and 2020;

o

o o

25.  Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of ... 2019(14) on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.

24.1.2019

OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

for the Committee on Budgetary Control

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2017

(2018/2202(DEC))

Rapporteur for opinion: Doru‑Claudian Frunzulică

SUGGESTIONS

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:

1.  Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the 'Court’), the European Banking Authority’s (the ‘Authority’) transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2017 are legal and regular in all material aspects; notes, however, that the Court’s assessment is very brief and that it observed weaknesses in the Authority’s public procurement procedures, mostly relating to services that lack an adequate balance between price and quality aspects; highlights that such procedures indicate that the Authority puts an over-emphasis on quality criteria and do not allow the identification of the most economically advantageous solutions, which should show a fair balance between quality and price ; calls on the Authority to improve these procedures;

2.  Underlines the central role of the Authority in ensuring better oversight of the Union financial supervisory system to ensure financial stability, the necessary transparency, a better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union, in particular by promoting coordination of an enhanced supervision with national and international supervisory authorities.

3.  Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments resulting from the regulatory framework laid down by the European Parliament and Council are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority should fulfil the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council and should stay within the mandate of those assignments, so as to achieve optimal use of resources and achievement of objectives; calls on the Authority to ensure a proper follow-up and implementation of the Court’s recommendations;

4.  Considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing measures, EBA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the European Parliament and Council about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency, not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well;

5.  Stresses that the authority should pay particular attention to the principle of proportionality in carrying out its mandate; underlines that, in particular when formulating Level 2 and Level 3 measures, attention should be devoted to specific features of national financial markets;

6.  Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from regulatory tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budgetary and personnel resources should be reallocated internally; stresses, in this respect, the need to ensure an appropriate level of prioritisation as regards resource allocation;

7.  Notes that the recent EBA stress tests has highly debatable results; calls on EBA, the ESRB, the ECB and the Commission to use consistent methodologies, scenarios and assumptions when defining the stress tests in order to avoid as much as possible potential distortions of the results;

8.  Notes that the total number of staff stood at 190 at the end of 2017, compared to 161 at the end of 2016;

9.  Stresses the need to allocate more resources to anti-money laundering tasks to fulfil the Authority’s oversight functions and inquiries into national institutions; urges the Authority to ensure that competent authorities and credit and financial institutions apply the European Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation effectively and consistently; requests the Authority to develop common guidance in cooperation with ESMA and EIOPA on how to integrate AML/CFT risks in prudential supervision; welcomes the Commission’s proposal to extend the supervisory powers of the Authority related to AML/CFT from the banking sector to the financial sector as a whole, thereby giving it a leading role on the relevant tasks and supervisory powers; furthermore in this context welcomes the adoption of the whistleblowing policy and stresses the need for national supervisory authorities to adopt similar policies;

10.  Requests the European Banking Authority to conduct an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex in order to assess potential threats to the integrity of financial markets and to national budgets; to establish the nature and magnitude of actors in these schemes; to assess whether there were breaches of either national or Union law; to assess the actions taken by financial supervisors in Member States; and to make appropriate recommendations for reform and for action to the competent authorities concerned;

11.  Emphasizes that the Authority’s budget is financed 40% from European Union funds and 60% through direct contributions from the Member States’ supervisory authorities and that this mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to its independence and supervisory tasks; highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding, that would allow the Authority to fulfil its mandate consistently, independently and efficiently;

12.  Takes note of the decision of the UK to leave the EU and of the financial, administrative, human and other implications of that decision; notes that the EBA Regulation has been amended to reflect the decision to move the seat of the Authority to Paris, France and acknowledges that the removal is planned for the beginning of 2019 ;notes that its accounts and notes have been drawn up using the information available at the time of signing the accounts and draws the attention to its budgetary implications; notes that the Authority’s accounts include provisions for related costs amounting to 6,7 million euros and disclose 11,2 million euros remaining future contractual payments as scheduled for the office in London; Calls on the EBA to examine the possibility of reducing these reserves for inherited costs in London ; recalls the importance of a smooth and cost-effective relocation of the Authority.

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Date adopted

22.1.2019

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

46

2

4

Members present for the final vote

Hugues Bayet, Esther de Lange, Markus Ferber, Jonás Fernández, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Stefan Gehrold, Sven Giegold, Roberto Gualtieri, Brian Hayes, Gunnar Hökmark, Wolf Klinz, Georgios Kyrtsos, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Bernd Lucke, Olle Ludvigsson, Ivana Maletić, Fulvio Martusciello, Marisa Matias, Gabriel Mato, Alex Mayer, Caroline Nagtegaal, Luděk Niedermayer, Stanisław Ożóg, Ralph Packet, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Dariusz Rosati, Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner, Alfred Sant, Martin Schirdewan, Peter Simon, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Kay Swinburne, Paul Tang, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Ernest Urtasun, Marco Valli, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Miguel Viegas, Babette Winter, Marco Zanni

Substitutes present for the final vote

Eric Andrieu, Manuel dos Santos, Ashley Fox, Jeppe Kofod, Paloma López Bermejo, Thomas Mann, Eva Maydell, Siegfried Mureşan, Lieve Wierinck

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Virginie Rozière, Ricardo Serrão Santos

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

46

+

ALDE

Wolf Klinz, Caroline Nagtegaal, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Lieve Wierinck

ECR

Ashley Fox, Bernd Lucke, Stanisław Ożóg, Ralph Packet, Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner, Kay Swinburne

PPE

Markus Ferber, Stefan Gehrold, Brian Hayes, Gunnar Hökmark, Georgios Kyrtsos, Esther de Lange, Werner Langen, Ivana Maletić, Thomas Mann, Fulvio Martusciello, Gabriel Mato, Eva Maydell, Siegfried Mureşan, Luděk Niedermayer, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Dariusz Rosati, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Tom Vandenkendelaere

S&D

Eric Andrieu, Hugues Bayet, Jonás Fernández, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Roberto Gualtieri, Jeppe Kofod, Olle Ludvigsson, Alex Mayer, Virginie Rozière, Alfred Sant, Manuel dos Santos, Ricardo Serrão Santos, Peter Simon, Paul Tang, Babette Winter

VERTS/ALE

Sven Giegold, Philippe Lamberts, Ernest Urtasun

2

-

ENF

Marco Zanni

GUE/NGL

Miguel Viegas

4

0

EFDD

Marco Valli

GUE/NGL

Paloma López Bermejo, Marisa Matias, Martin Schirdewan

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Date adopted

20.2.2019

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

20

1

0

Members present for the final vote

Nedzhmi Ali, Inés Ayala Sender, Zigmantas Balčytis, Dennis de Jong, Tamás Deutsch, Martina Dlabajová, Ingeborg Gräßle, Jean-François Jalkh, Wolf Klinz, Monica Macovei, Georgi Pirinski, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Petri Sarvamaa, Claudia Schmidt, Bart Staes, Marco Valli, Derek Vaughan, Tomáš Zdechovský

Substitutes present for the final vote

Karin Kadenbach, Marian-Jean Marinescu

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Petra Kammerevert

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

20

+

ALDE

Nedzhmi Ali, Martina Dlabajová, Wolf Klinz

ECR

Monica Macovei

ENF

Jean-François Jalkh

GUE/NGL

Dennis de Jong

PPE

Tamás Deutsch, Ingeborg Gräßle, Marian-Jean Marinescu, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Petri Sarvamaa, Claudia Schmidt, Tomáš Zdechovský

S&D

Inés Ayala Sender, Zigmantas Balčytis, Karin Kadenbach, Petra Kammerevert, Georgi Pirinski, Derek Vaughan

VERTS/ALE

Bart Staes

1

-

EFDD

Marco Valli

0

0

 

 

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention

(1)

OJ C 434, 30.11.2018, p. 51.

(2)

OJ C 434, 30.11.2018, p. 51.

(3)

OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

(4)

OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

(5)

OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12.

(6)

OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

(7)

OJ C 434, 30.11.2018, p. 51.

(8)

OJ C 434, 30.11.2018, p. 51.

(9)

OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

(10)

OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

(11)

OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12.

(12)

OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

(13)

O.J. C 108/52, 22.03.2018, p.248

(14)

Texts adopted, P8_TA-PROV(2019)0000.

Last updated: 12 March 2019Legal notice