Index 
 Précédent 
 Suivant 
 Texte intégral 
Procédure : 2018/2112(INI)
Cycle de vie en séance
Cycle relatif au document : A8-0038/2019

Textes déposés :

A8-0038/2019

Débats :

PV 11/02/2019 - 16
CRE 11/02/2019 - 16

Votes :

PV 12/02/2019 - 9.16
CRE 12/02/2019 - 9.16
Explications de votes

Textes adoptés :

P8_TA(2019)0077

Débats
Mardi 12 février 2019 - Strasbourg Edition révisée

10.9. Mise en œuvre des dispositions du traité concernant la coopération renforcée (A8-0038/2019 - Alain Lamassoure)
Vidéo des interventions
 

Suulliset äänestysselitykset

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – Madam President, we must be careful with the tool of enhanced cooperation. First of all, by design it undermines the unity of the EU action and it has repercussions internally and externally. Second, the unanimity rule inside the coalition of the willing allows one Member State to sabotage the whole process, creating the conditions for a Trojan horse to undermine relations among Member States. Third, the real impact on enhanced cooperation is relative. Just take the example of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. It will not have jurisdiction over Hungary, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Britain and Denmark, which opt out. As a result, combating fraud at EU level will have limited effect because these countries will be free riding. I was the shadow rapporteur of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs’ opinion to this report and I voted in favour, but I’m convinced that enhanced cooperation must aim for full cooperation, which is the ultimate goal.

 
Dernière mise à jour: 28 juin 2019Avis juridique