Index 
 Vorige 
 Volgende 
 Volledige tekst 
Procedure : 2018/2112(INI)
Stadium plenaire behandeling
Documentencyclus : A8-0038/2019

Ingediende teksten :

A8-0038/2019

Debatten :

PV 11/02/2019 - 16
CRE 11/02/2019 - 16

Stemmingen :

PV 12/02/2019 - 9.16
CRE 12/02/2019 - 9.16
Stemverklaringen

Aangenomen teksten :

P8_TA(2019)0077

Debatten
Dinsdag 12 februari 2019 - Straatsburg Herziene uitgave

10.9. Tenuitvoerlegging van de Verdragsbepalingen inzake nauwere samenwerking (A8-0038/2019 - Alain Lamassoure)
Video van de redevoeringen
 

Suulliset äänestysselitykset

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – Madam President, we must be careful with the tool of enhanced cooperation. First of all, by design it undermines the unity of the EU action and it has repercussions internally and externally. Second, the unanimity rule inside the coalition of the willing allows one Member State to sabotage the whole process, creating the conditions for a Trojan horse to undermine relations among Member States. Third, the real impact on enhanced cooperation is relative. Just take the example of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. It will not have jurisdiction over Hungary, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Britain and Denmark, which opt out. As a result, combating fraud at EU level will have limited effect because these countries will be free riding. I was the shadow rapporteur of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs’ opinion to this report and I voted in favour, but I’m convinced that enhanced cooperation must aim for full cooperation, which is the ultimate goal.

 
Laatst bijgewerkt op: 28 juni 2019Juridische mededeling