Index 
 Înapoi 
 Înainte 
 Text integral 
Procedură : 2018/2112(INI)
Stadiile documentului în şedinţă
Stadii ale documentului : A8-0038/2019

Texte depuse :

A8-0038/2019

Dezbateri :

PV 11/02/2019 - 16
CRE 11/02/2019 - 16

Voturi :

PV 12/02/2019 - 9.16
CRE 12/02/2019 - 9.16
Explicaţii privind voturile

Texte adoptate :

P8_TA(2019)0077

Dezbateri
Marţi, 12 februarie 2019 - Strasbourg Ediţie revizuită

10.9. Punerea în aplicare a dispozițiilor tratatului privind cooperarea consolidată (A8-0038/2019 - Alain Lamassoure)
Înregistrare video a intervenţiilor
 

Suulliset äänestysselitykset

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – Madam President, we must be careful with the tool of enhanced cooperation. First of all, by design it undermines the unity of the EU action and it has repercussions internally and externally. Second, the unanimity rule inside the coalition of the willing allows one Member State to sabotage the whole process, creating the conditions for a Trojan horse to undermine relations among Member States. Third, the real impact on enhanced cooperation is relative. Just take the example of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. It will not have jurisdiction over Hungary, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Britain and Denmark, which opt out. As a result, combating fraud at EU level will have limited effect because these countries will be free riding. I was the shadow rapporteur of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs’ opinion to this report and I voted in favour, but I’m convinced that enhanced cooperation must aim for full cooperation, which is the ultimate goal.

 
Ultima actualizare: 28 iunie 2019Notă juridică