Kazalo 
 Prejšnje 
 Naslednje 
 Celotno besedilo 
Postopek : 2018/2112(INI)
Potek postopka na zasedanju
Potek postopka za dokument : A8-0038/2019

Predložena besedila :

A8-0038/2019

Razprave :

PV 11/02/2019 - 16
CRE 11/02/2019 - 16

Glasovanja :

PV 12/02/2019 - 9.16
CRE 12/02/2019 - 9.16
Obrazložitev glasovanja

Sprejeta besedila :

P8_TA(2019)0077

Razprave
Torek, 12. februar 2019 - Strasbourg Pregledana izdaja

10.9. Izvajanje določb Pogodbe glede okrepljenega sodelovanja (A8-0038/2019 - Alain Lamassoure)
Video posnetki govorov
 

Suulliset äänestysselitykset

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – Madam President, we must be careful with the tool of enhanced cooperation. First of all, by design it undermines the unity of the EU action and it has repercussions internally and externally. Second, the unanimity rule inside the coalition of the willing allows one Member State to sabotage the whole process, creating the conditions for a Trojan horse to undermine relations among Member States. Third, the real impact on enhanced cooperation is relative. Just take the example of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. It will not have jurisdiction over Hungary, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Britain and Denmark, which opt out. As a result, combating fraud at EU level will have limited effect because these countries will be free riding. I was the shadow rapporteur of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs’ opinion to this report and I voted in favour, but I’m convinced that enhanced cooperation must aim for full cooperation, which is the ultimate goal.

 
Zadnja posodobitev: 28. junij 2019Pravno obvestilo