Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 104kWORD 28k
17 March 2016
E-002294-16
Question for written answer E-002294-16
to the Commission
Rule 130
Péter Niedermüller (S&D)

 Subject:  Corporation tax relief for sport in Hungary
 Answer in writing 

The Commission’s reply to Question P-014616/2015 signed by Commissioner Margrethe Vestager regrettably does not provide a substantive answer to the questions raised.

The fact that in 2001, in state aid case SA.31722, on the basis of the information then available, the Commission gave permission for the introduction of the system in accordance with the rules does not absolve the Commission from the obligation to proceed with the appropriate care thereafter and to monitor whether the system is operating in accordance with the objectives originally set.

In view of the key role played by observant civil-society organisations in revealing abuses of public funding, it is regrettable that the Commission is not familiar with the report by the Hungarian branch of Transparency International. That report may be accessed at http://transparency.hu/uploads/docs/sport_web.pdf

1. How will the Commission monitor whether corporation tax relief for sport in Hungary operates in accordance with the objectives originally set?

2. If it becomes clear that the system is not serving the purposes originally announced, what further action will the Commission take?

Original language of question: HU 
Legal notice