Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 102kWORD 18k
7 November 2018
Question for written answer E-005671-18
to the Commission
Rule 130
Martin Schirdewan (GUE/NGL)

 Subject:  New audible warning signals on the Berlin S-Bahn (suburban railway)
 Answer in writing 

The carriages to be brought into service on the Berlin S-Bahn as from 2021 will no longer use the traditional three-tone warning signal, but instead a ‘machine-like beeping’. However, according to a report in the newspaper ‘Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung’, neither Stadler nor Siemens are to blame, but rather an EU requirement which the Federal Railway Authority (EBA) has to observe when certifying trains for use in Germany(1).

What EU rules are applicable as regards audible warning signals in public transport and is there a prescribed EU-wide warning signal?

Are traditional audible warning signals such as those used by the Berlin S-Bahn compatible with EU requirements for the certification of new rolling stock?

What options do regional and national authorities, such as the Federal Railway Authority (EBA), have in order to enable the continued use of traditional audible warning signals when certifying new rolling stock in compliance with EC law?


Original language of question: DE 
Last updated: 20 November 2018Legal notice