Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 38kWORD 9k
5 January 2020
E-000019/2020
Question for written answer
to the Commission
Rule 138
Patrick Breyer
 Subject: Repeated collection of personal data to combat money laundering?

Article 13 of the EU Money Laundering Directive (2015/849/EU) lays down obligatory due diligence measures such as identifying the customer and verifying the customer’s identity. A further requirement is ‘conducting ongoing monitoring of the business relationship including scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure that the transactions being conducted are consistent with the obliged entity's knowledge of the customer, the business and risk profile, including where necessary the source of funds and ensuring that the documents, data or information held are kept up-to-date.’

Under Article 11 of the Directive, these due diligence measures must be applied when establishing the business relationship and in case of doubt as to the accuracy or suitability of previously-obtained customer identification data.

In the Commission’s view, is there an obligation under the Directive to repeat the verification of the identity of all customers at regular intervals, even if there are no doubts as to the accuracy and currentness of the customer identification data?

Last updated: 15 January 2020Legal notice