European Parliament Fact Sheets

4.7.1.     General principles of EU industrial policy

LEGAL BASIS

While the ECSC Treaty and the Euratom Treaty may be regarded as having established policy for two key industrial sectors, the EC Treaty, which covers all sectors of the economy, does not make any reference to an industrial policy. However, the Treaties contain many provisions on which a common industrial policy can be based. An industrial policy may be construed as the overall application to industry or to certain sectors of industry of all the general Treaty provisions with a view to accelerating the process of resource allocation among and within the various sectors. The Maastricht Treaty modified the EC Treaty [Article 157 (130)] in order to provide a legal basis for a common industrial policy. It enables the Commission to propose measures to improve the competitiveness of European industry. However, the Commission must have the Council's unanimous support to conduct industrial policy operations.

OBJECTIVES

Broadly speaking, industrial policy consists of:

  • general measures for the further development of the internal market and for the establishment of a European economic and monetary union (in this sense, industrial policy forms part of the general economic policy);
  • external commercial policy (anti-dumping policy; bilateral and multilateral trade agreements with implications for individual industrial sectors);
  • social and regional policy (when the industrial reconversion process has unacceptable social and regional consequences);
  • competition policy (legal instruments for intervention in market mechanisms that are not functioning well and for monitoring state aid);
  • research and development policy;
  • the strengthening of cooperation among European enterprises.

In a narrower sense, the Community's industrial policy extends to specific measures for certain industrial sectors and the resources provided for this purpose.

The Community has become involved in certain European industries because of their relatively poor performance in the world market. The competitive challenges, in both high-tech and traditional industries, can no longer be met by national industrial policies. The process of industrial restructuring is thus closely linked to the phenomenon of economic interdependence.

ACHIEVEMENTS

1. Overall conception

Given the problems posed by industrial restructuring, the EU pursues a policy designed to achieve two objectives. Firstly, the Commission has adopted certain criteria for direct action in order to resolve the crisis in the Community's main industrial sectors. They are designed, in particular, to prevent distortions of competition and to enable the sectors concerned to be restructured within a given period. At the same time, the criteria should ensure that this restructuring is coordinated and that the strategy for deliberately creating the conditions for promoting sectors capable of competing with their counterparts in other industrialized or newly industrializing countries is assessed. Secondly, increasing Europeanization in the field of research, innovation and industrial structures is an important element of European industrial policy strategy. Examples of this type of European cooperation are the EU programmes:

  • ESPRIT (European Strategic Programme for Research and Development in Information Technology);
  • BRITE-EURAM (Basic Research in Industrial Technological for Europe/ European Research on Advanced Materials);
  • JET (Joint European Torus) and
  • RACE (Research and Development in Advanced Communications Technology in Europe).

The Community is also coordinating its R&D programmes with EUREKA (European Research Coordination Agency) projects. The Commission actively monitors developments in the various industrial sectors, as is evident from the Panorama of EU Industry.

2. Major documents

a. The initiatives taken to complete the internal market, which were announced in the Commission's White Paper 'Completing the Internal Market' (COM(85)310), gave the Community's industrial policy a major boost. An integrated market will give European industry the advantages already enjoyed by its American and Japanese competitors in their large internal markets. These advantages include opportunities for mass production, specialization, economies of scale, transnational cooperation among enterprises, technical harmonization, research, innovation, investment and Community-wide tendering.

The Community is also able to grant direct aid to industry:

  • by providing resources from the Community budget (ERDF, Social Fund, R&D Funds);
  • by approving loans under the ECSC, which are financed from interest on other loans and are intended for undertakings in the coal and steel sector;
  • by European Investment Bank, European Investment Fund loans and guarantees;
  • by granting aid through the New Community Instrument (NCI), which is particularly important for small and medium-sized enterprises.

b. In 1990 the Commission proposed a coherent industrial policy concept in its communication 'Industrial Policy in an open and competitive environment' (COM(90) 556).

c. In its White Paper 'Growth, competitiveness, employment - the challenges and ways forward into the 21st century' published in late 1993 (COM(93) 700) the Commission referred to the particular importance of expanding research and technological development, adjusting education and training systems and accelerating the installation of trans-European networks, especially in the areas of transport, telecommunications and energy, in a partnership between the public and private sectors.

d. In March 1995, the Commission submitted its report (SEC(95)437 final) on "Implementation of Council Resolutions and Conclusions on Industrial Policy". The Council had called for this report in its Resolution of 21 November 1994. It showed that action taken by the Community on industrial policy contributes to a general improvement in competitiveness by means of measures under all the relevant Community policies. Following the Council resolution the Commission published its report "The Competitiveness of European Industry" (1997). In December 1995, the Commission adopted the Green Paper on innovation (COM(95)688 final), the aim of which is to identify factors which encourage or hamper innovation in the European Union and to propose, at all decision-making levels, practical measures to step up the Unions overall innovation capacity, with special emphasis on SMEs. On 6 June 1996, the European Parliament endorsed the main principles of the Commission's conclusions concerning innovation. The Commission reviews the state of competitiveness of European industry in an annual report.

e. In its Communication on the "Competitiveness of European Enterprises in the face of globalisation" (COM(98)718 final), the Commission invited industry, trade unions and the EU institutions to define a new industrial policy and proposed measures for improving the competitiveness of the European companies in the global market.

The Commission publishes regular surveys on state aid in the European Union in manufacturing and certain other sectors (e.g. Seventh Survey, COM(99)148 final).

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The Maastricht Treaty deals with the question of industrial policy for the first time, an achievement that can be attributed to initiatives by Parliament. Parliament has helped to stimulate the process of reorganizing the steel sector and has called for a more dynamic policy to be followed in industrial sectors. The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy is responsible for this area and has examined numerous reports of both a legislative and non-legislative nature. A few examples of recent reports adopted in plenary are given below.

  • Resolution of 29 June 1995 [1] concerning an industrial competitiveness policy stressed the importance of coordination of national industrial policies, the need for social dialogue and environmental protection in the EU's industrial strategy.
  • Resolution of 27 October 1995 [2] on Industrial Competitiveness Policy of the European Union approved the proposed Action Programme on industrial competitiveness). The Programme was adopted on 25 June 1996 by the Council (Decision 96/413/EC). Following the Commission Communication on benchmarking, the Parliament endorsed, in its resolutions of 9 April 1997 [3] and 19 December 1997 [4], benchmarking as an appropriate technique identifying best practice in European Industry and the establishment of a high-level group on benchmarking. In its conclusion of 24 April 1997, the Council evaluated a follow-up mechanism for benchmarking and competitiveness. On 13 November 1997, Council agreed to a medium-term programme for the organization of an ongoing debate on competitiveness. The Parliament adopted a resolution on industrial restructuring and relocation on 13 November 1996.
  • Resolution of 14 May 1998 on the Commission paper "Competitiveness of European Industry" [5] indentified weaknesses in the European economy ( e.g. inadequate presence in new areas of IT, low investment, unfriendly tax systems causing company relocations, a fragmented single market coupled with a lack of a European company identity) and called on the Commission to come forward with a genuine European industrial policy. This policy should be based on a mix between incentives to encourage investments, loans or direct financial aid to help old industries modernise and the use of venture capital.
  • In its Resolution of 15 January 1999 the EP called on the Commission for a detailed analysis of the effects of international financial crisis on EU industry, expecially for textiles, steel and shipbuilding.

PRODECURE REFERENCES

[1] Consultation procedure: COS0191
[2] Consultation procedure: CNS95081
[3] Consultation procedure: COS0491
[4] Consultation procedure: COS0600
[5] Consultation procedure: COS0516

01/10/2000