Daniel DALTON
  • Daniel
    DALTON
  • Europski konzervativci i reformisti
  • Član
  • Ujedinjena Kraljevina Conservative Party
  • Datum rođenja: 31. siječnja 1974., Oxford

Govor(i) na plenarnoj sjednici

267

Slobodan protok neosobnih podataka u Europskoj uniji (rasprava)

03-10-2018 P8_CRE-PROV(2018)10-03(17)

Autorska prava na jedinstvenom digitalnom tržištu (rasprava)

11-09-2018 P8_CRE-PROV(2018)09-11(12)

Gnojidbeni proizvodi s oznakom CE (rasprava)

23-10-2017 P8_CRE-REV(2017)10-23(17)

Izvješće/Izvješća ‒ u svojstvu izvjestitelja

4

Izvješće/Izvješća ‒ u svojstvu izvjestitelja u sjeni

15

IZVJEŠĆE o prijedlogu uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o utvrđivanju pravila i postupaka za poštovanje i provedbu zakonodavstva Unije o usklađivanju u području proizvoda te o izmjeni uredbi (EU) br. 305/2011, (EU) br. 528/2012, (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426 i (EU) 2017/1369 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća i direktiva 2004/42/EZ, 2009/48/EZ, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2013/53/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, 2014/68/EU i 2014/90/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća

IMCO
06-09-2018 A8-0277/2018

IZVJEŠĆE o zatvorskim sustavima i uvjetima u zatvorima

LIBE
06-07-2017 A8-0251/2017

IZVJEŠĆE o internetskim platformama i jedinstvenom digitalnom tržištu

IMCO ITRE
31-05-2017 A8-0204/2017

Mišljenja ‒ u svojstvu izvjestitelja

4

MIŠLJENJE Ususret strategiji digitalne trgovine

IMCO
12-10-2017 IMCO_AD(2017)606248

MIŠLJENJE o spašavanju života: poboljšanje sigurnosti automobila u EU-u

IMCO
28-09-2017 IMCO_AD(2017)606030

MIŠLJENJE o nacrtu općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2018.

IMCO
20-07-2017 IMCO_AD(2017)604889

MIŠLJENJE o mandatu za trijalog o nacrtu proračuna za 2018.

IMCO
09-06-2017 IMCO_AD(2017)602828

Mišljenja ‒ u svojstvu izvjestitelja u sjeni

25

MIŠLJENJE o Prijedlogu Uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o procjeni zdravstvenih tehnologija i izmjeni Direktive 2011/24/EU

IMCO
20-07-2018 IMCO_AD(2018)622139

MIŠLJENJE o Prijedlogu direktive Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o izmjeni Direktive 2009/33/EZ o promicanju čistih i energetski učinkovitih vozila u cestovnom prijevozu

TRAN
11-07-2018 TRAN_AD(2018)618318

MIŠLJENJE o Prijedlogu uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o uvozu kulturnih dobara

LIBE
04-07-2018 LIBE_AD(2018)620997

MIŠLJENJE o uvođenju infrastrukture za alternativna goriva u Europskoj uniji: Vrijeme je za djelovanje!

IMCO
05-06-2018 IMCO_AD(2018)619168

MIŠLJENJE o prijedlogu uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o ENISA-i (Agenciji EU-a za kibersigurnost) i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EU) 526/2013 te o kibersigurnosnoj certifikaciji u području informacijske i komunikacijske tehnologije („Akt o kibersigurnosti”)

LIBE
16-03-2018 LIBE_AD(2018)615394

MIŠLJENJE o Europskoj strategiji za kooperativne inteligentne prometne sustave

IMCO
05-12-2017 IMCO_AD(2017)609467

MIŠLJENJE o prijedlogu direktive Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o autorskim pravima na jedinstvenom digitalnom tržištu

LIBE
22-11-2017 LIBE_AD(2017)604830

MIŠLJENJE Ususret strategiji digitalne trgovine

LIBE
24-10-2017 LIBE_AD(2017)609526

MIŠLJENJE o Prijedlogu uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o poštovanju privatnog života i zaštiti osobnih podataka u elektroničkim komunikacijama te stavljanju izvan snage Direktive 2002/58/EZ (Uredba o privatnosti i elektroničkim komunikacijama)

IMCO
06-10-2017 IMCO_AD(2017)604857

MIŠLJENJE o prijedlogu Direktive Europskog Parlamenta i Vijeća o Europskom zakoniku elektroničkih komunikacija

IMCO
08-09-2017 IMCO_AD(2017)602838

Institucijski prijedlozi rezolucija

14

Pisana izjava/Pisane izjave

2

Pisana izjava o poticanju uvođenja većeg broja WC-a za osobe s invaliditetom u EU-u

27-04-2016 P8_DCL(2016)0044 Ne razmatra se

Pojedinosti

Daniel DALTON , Lucy ANDERSON , Mairead McGUINNESS , Marian HARKIN , Julia REDA , Anthea McINTYRE , Helga STEVENS , Anneleen VAN BOSSUYT , Olga SEHNALOVÁ , Antanas GUOGA , Brando BENIFEI

Datum otvaranja : 27-04-2016
Datum isteka roka : 27-07-2016
Broj potpisnika : 124 - 28-07-2016

Pisana izjava o sigurnosti zračnog prometa i opasnim letovima vojnih zrakoplova

05-10-2015 P8_DCL(2015)0052 Ne razmatra se

Pojedinosti

Urmas PAET , Kaja KALLAS , Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS , Cecilia WIKSTRÖM , Heidi HAUTALA , Marju LAURISTIN , Tunne KELAM , Indrek TARAND , Artis PABRIKS , Anna Elżbieta FOTYGA , Ilhan KYUCHYUK , Filiz HYUSMENOVA , Jozo RADOŠ , Pavel TELIČKA , Svetoslav Hristov MALINOV , Gabrielius LANDSBERGIS , Bronis ROPĖ , Norica NICOLAI , Inese VAIDERE , Pál CSÁKY , Tibor SZANYI , Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI , Jussi HALLA-AHO , Milan ZVER , Marian-Jean MARINESCU , Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI , Henna VIRKKUNEN , Ian DUNCAN , Patricija ŠULIN , Ivan JAKOVČIĆ , Benedek JÁVOR , Dubravka ŠUICA , Jeppe KOFOD , Hilde VAUTMANS , Ivan ŠTEFANEC , Beata GOSIEWSKA , Mircea DIACONU , Daniel DALTON , Daniel BUDA , Krišjānis KARIŅŠ , Sandra KALNIETE , Pavel SVOBODA

Datum otvaranja : 05-10-2015
Datum isteka roka : 05-01-2016
Broj potpisnika : 106 - 06-01-2016

Pisana pitanja

65

  Advertising ban in the Czech Republic

10-07-2018 E-003767/2018 Komisija

  Minimum durability of cosmetic products and associated labelling

18-05-2018 E-002682/2018 Komisija

  Public procurement for the Gronda di Genova bypass project

18-04-2018 E-002189/2018 Komisija

  Restriction on right-hand drive cars in Albania

05-02-2018 P-000654/2018 Komisija

  Impact of possible Catalan independence on EU citizens' rights

18-10-2017 E-006540/2017 Komisija

  Currency sales

18-10-2017 E-006539/2017 Komisija

  Airport delays

04-08-2017 E-005174/2017 Komisija

  Thalidomide resolution response

20-06-2017 P-004078/2017 Komisija

  ZTL restricted traffic zones in Italy

27-02-2017 E-001271/2017 Komisija

Usmena pitanja

5

Odgovori Komisije na pitanja za pisani odgovor

10-01-2017 O-000003/2017 Komisija

Njemački zakon o minimalnoj plaći

24-05-2016 O-000081/2016 Komisija

Odgovori Komisije na pitanja za pisani odgovor

05-05-2015 O-000046/2015 Komisija

Inovacijski sustavi u poljoprivredi EU-a

30-04-2015 O-000045/2015 Komisija

Obrazloženja glasovanja (napisan.)

6

 

Prigovor na Delegiranu uredbu Komisije o izmjeni Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2017/118 o utvrđivanju mjera očuvanja ribarstva radi zaštite morskog okoliša u Sjevernome moru (B8-0299/2018)

14-06-2018

(On behalf of the UK Conservative Delegation in the European Parliament) On 28 February 2017, Belgium, along with the UK, the Netherlands, France, Germany and Denmark submitted a joint recommendation to the Commission on fisheries management measures to improve the condition of the seabed by reducing the use of fishing gear that has contact with the seabed. The delegated act permits the testing of ‘alternative seabed- impacting fishing gear with specific authorisation’. Belgium initiated this joint recommendation to achieve good environmental status under the marine strategy framework directive. The Belgian Government has made it clear that no pulse technology will be used or tested in the four zones that this delegated act is to apply to. The Conservative Delegation therefore, see no good reason to oppose this delegated act. The Conservative Delegation fully supports the aims and objectives of the Belgian Government and the relevant North Sea Member States, including the UK, in improving the integrity of the seabed.

 

Promicanje uporabe energije iz obnovljivih izvora (A8-0392/2017 - José Blanco López)

17-01-2018

Explanation of vote by the UK Conservative Delegation in the ECR Group:
The UK delegation shares with the rapporteur the ambition to build a cleaner, more sustainable Europe, however we are not able support this package due to some of the measures included in it.
We recognise the benefits that renewable energy brings to our economies and our societies, but do not think that arbitrary, unrealistic targets imposed at EU level are the way to bring that about.
We feel that the renewable energy targets risk derailing Member States from finding their own cost-effective ways of meeting their climate targets, and impose costs on consumers.
Furthermore, we think the various sub-targets are overly complex, carry high administrative burdens, and do not give investors certainty.
We are supportive of the long-term goal of a decarbonised Europe, but we think the way to achieve this is by letting Member States discover their own most cost-effective way to do so.
Finally, we could not support an arbitrary ban on palm oil, which will have an inflationary effect on food prices and cause significant economic damage to developing countries.
For these reasons, though supportive of renewables and other actions in this package, we abstained.

 

Trenutačno stanje pregovora s Ujedinjenom Kraljevinom (B8-0676/2017, B8-0677/2017)

13-12-2017

The Brexit negotiations are at a crucial stage and the UK Conservative Delegation in the ECR Group is heartened by the excellent progress made in recent weeks through the hard work and goodwill of both sides. The joint report agreed by the EU and the UK Government last week was a major step forward and should provide the basis for discussion of our future relationship. In this spirit, we welcome Parliament’s recommendation that the European Council agrees to open the second phase of talks. We also note Parliament’s wish that the UK and the EU maintain ‘as close a relationship as possible’ following Brexit. However, the motion for resolution goes further and attempts to tie the hands of the EU’s Brexit negotiators by, for instance, dictating arrangements for the transitional period. This is not Parliament’s role at this stage of the process. We need to enter the next round of talks in a spirit of cooperation, not confrontation, and be open to innovative thinking if we are to secure an outcome that enables both sides to prosper. For this reason we supported the recommendation that talks move forward, but abstained on the resolution.

 

Stanje pregovora s Ujedinjenom Kraljevinom (B8-0538/2017, B8-0539/2017)

03-10-2017

. – British Conservatives believe that both the EU and the UK have a duty to ensure that an agreement on citizens’ rights is found as soon as possible, based on the principles of equality, fairness and reciprocity.
However, whilst the European Parliament has the right to express its opinion and will vote on the final deal, it must be made clear that it is not the role of the European Parliament to set red lines and undermine the negotiating positions of the EU 27 and the UK Government.
Conservatives wish to make it clear that they fully support the mandate pursued by the UK Prime Minister and look forward to a constructive, prosperous and cooperative future relation with the EU once the UK has exited.

 

Višegodišnji okvir Agencije Europske unije za temeljna prava za 2018. – 2022. (A8-0177/2017 - Angelika Mlinar)

01-06-2017

. – Whereas the UK delegation of the ECR Group fully supports fundamental rights, equality and the fight against discrimination for all; however, the UK delegation of the ECR Group does not believe extending the scope of EU agencies is the most effective way of achieving this with respect to fundamental rights.
The report also calls on the Commission and Council to include police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (i.e. ‘ex-third pillar’ matters) in its draft Decision. The UK opts out of a large number of these matters and the UK delegation of the ECR Group believes these matters, with respect to fundamental rights, are most effectively dealt with at Member State level.
Therefore, the UK delegation of the ECR Group could not vote in favour of this report.

 

Višegodišnji okvir Agencije Europske unije za temeljna prava za 2018. – 2022. (B8-0384/2017)

01-06-2017

Whereas the UK delegation of the ECR Group fully supports fundamental rights, equality and the fight against discrimination for all; however, the UK delegation of the ECR Group does not believe extending the scope of EU agencies is the most effective way of achieving this with respect to fundamental rights.
The report also calls on the Commission and Council to include police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (i.e. ‘ex-third pillar’ matters) in its draft Decision. The UK opts out of a large number of these matters and the UK delegation of the ECR Group believes these matters, with respect to fundamental rights, are most effectively dealt with at Member State level.
Therefore, the UK delegation of the ECR Group could not vote in favour of this report.

Kontakt

Bruxelles

  • Parlement européen
    Bât. Willy Brandt
    05M075
    60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
    B-1047 Bruxelles/Brussel

Strasbourg

  • Parlement européen
    Bât. Louise Weiss
    T11032
    1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
    CS 91024
    F-67070 Strasbourg Cedex

Poštanska adresa

  • European Parliament
    Rue Wiertz
    Willy Brandt 05M075
    1047 Brussels