John David Edward TENNANT : Pisemne wyjaśnienia dotyczące sposobu głosowania 

Posłowie mogą przedkładać pisemne wyjaśnienie na temat stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu na posiedzeniu plenarnym. Art. 194 Regulaminu

Skutki upadłości Grupy Thomas Cook (RC-B9-0118/2019, B9-0118/2019, B9-0119/2019, B9-0120/2019, B9-0121/2019, B9-0122/2019, B9-0124/2019) EN  
 

I voted against many of the amendments on this motion for resolution concerning the effects of bankruptcy of Thomas Cook Group. Many of these are calling for more EU action to be taken and funds to be created in the event of similar events happening in the travel and tourism sector. Whilst I am of course sympathetic to those who have been affected by the collapse of Thomas Cook, more EU legislation is not the answer.

Porozumienie o współpracy między Eurojustem a Serbią (A9-0009/2019 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) EN  
 

The Brexit Party have voted to abstain on this report. Whilst data exchanges and cooperation, particularly for the purpose of combatting serious crime, are very important we do not support this being facilitated at EU level. However, if the sovereign nation of Serbia wishes to participate it would not be appropriate to block their decision. Therefore, as we support the underlying principle of cooperation and data sharing to combat serious crime, but not the EU facilitating it, we felt that abstaining was most suitable.

Projekt budżetu korygującego nr 4 na rok budżetowy 2019: Zmniejszenie środków na zobowiązania i środków na płatności zgodnie ze zaktualizowanymi potrzebami w zakresie wydatków i aktualizacją dochodów (zasoby własne) (A9-0012/2019 - John Howarth) EN  
 

The Brexit Party voted against this budgetary proposal. The original Commission proposal we would have supported as it reduced the amount of money in a number of EU budget lines and would lead to a reduction in Member states contributions for this year, thereby saving British Taxpayers’ money. However, the rapporteur UK Labour MEP amended this resolution to redeploy the savings meaning it would be spent in other areas of the EU budget instead of saving taxpayers’ money, so we voted against.

Dostosowania kwot uruchamianych z instrumentu elastyczności na 2019 r. do wykorzystania w związku z migracją, napływem uchodźców i zagrożeniami bezpieczeństwa (A9-0013/2019 - John Howarth) EN  
 

The Brexit Party voted in favour of this budgetary proposal. The original Commission proposal was to reduce a payment plan for future EU spending in the field of migration and security. This proposal was linked to the Draft Amending Budget Number 4, which should have led to a reduction in Member States contributions, however a Labour MEP managed to make amendments to reverse this. In this case, however, the proposition was to support the original proposal to cut EU funding, not on the amendments by the rapporteur so we voted in favour.

Sprzeciw na podstawie art. 112 Regulaminu: Substancje czynne, w tym flumioksazyna (B9-0103/2019) EN  
 

The Brexit party abstained on this motion for resolution on active substances including flumioxazine. The report criticises the Commission, as they continue to extend regulated acts on allowing this substance when there are concerns as to how safe it is. The Brexit party believe that the Commission should not act in an undemocratic way without being held accountable; however, we cannot support the motion as it also calls on the Commission to create new legislation.

Sprzeciw na podstawie art. 112 Regulaminu: Genetycznie zmodyfikowana kukurydza MZHG0JG (SYN-ØØØJG-2) (B9-0107/2019) EN  
 

I voted against this resolution because it should be a decision made at nation state level and not by the EU for all 28 member states.

Sprzeciw na podstawie art. 112 Regulaminu: Genetycznie zmodyfikowana soja A2704-12 (ACS-GMØØ5-3) (B9-0105/2019) EN  
 

I voted against this resolution because it should be a decision made at nation state level and not by the EU for all 28 member states.

Sprzeciw na podstawie art. 112 Regulaminu: Zmodyfikowana genetycznie kukurydza MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 × DAS-40278-9 oraz zmodyfikowana genetycznie kukurydza łącząca dwie, trzy lub cztery modyfikacje MON 89034, 1507, MON 88017, 59122 i DAS-40278-9 (B9-0106/2019) EN  
 

I voted against this resolution because it should be a decision made at nation state level and not by the EU for all 28 member states.

Zewnętrzna ingerencja w wybory i dezinformacja w procesach demokratycznych państw członkowskich i Unii Europejskiej (B9-0108/2019, B9-0111/2019) EN  
 

The Brexit Party have voted against this non-legislative resolution. The Brexit Party wholeheartedly supports free and fair elections, free speech and democratic accountability. These principles, in part, are integral in our cause to leave the European Union. We believe that reports of Russian electoral interference have already been exposed as baseless propaganda in order to shut down debate and discredit legitimate democratic exercises, such as the UK referendum. Furthermore, The Brexit Party voted against amendment 3 because it maliciously - and incorrectly - stated that the Leave.eu campaign received funding from foreign actors despite the National Crime Agency clearing Leave.eu of these allegations in September.

Wieloletnie ramy finansowe na lata 2021-2027 i zasoby własne: czas, by spełnić oczekiwania obywateli (B9-0110/2019, B9-0112/2019, B9-0113/2019) EN  
 

The Brexit Party voted against this non-legislative, non-binding resolution. The Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) is the long-term budget for the EU. The resolution called for an MFF of over €1.3 trillion and more EU action and funding in areas such as defence, climate change, migration, foreign affairs to name a few. They will also be seeking to phase out national rebates and bring in new ways to fund the EU budget such as “Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base” and a single use plastic tax.

Kontakt