Main menu (press 'Enter')
Access to page content (press 'Enter')
Direct access to list of other websites (press 'Enter')

EP spells out legal steps to fight aggressive corporate tax planning and evasion

Plenary Session Press release - Taxation16-12-2015 - 13:58
 

Parliament spells out the legal steps needed to improve corporate tax transparency, coordination and EU-wide policy convergence in a resolution voted on Wednesday., Parliament’s drive to persuade EU member states to act to counter aggressive corporate tax planning and evasion by multinationals in Europe was triggered by the November 2014 “Luxleaks” revelations about Luxembourg’s dubious tax deals with them.


The resolution, prepared in Parliament's Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, was passed by 500 votes to 122, with 81 abstentions. The EU Commission will have to respond to every legal recommendation, even if it does not submit a legislative proposal.


“This report shows the determination of both the European Parliament and the people of Europe to see real legislative change to prevent companies jumping across borders to reduce their tax bills to almost zero. The 'Luxleaks' scandal showed how much these corporations have been getting away with, dodging tax that could have been used to build schools, hospitals or pay down national debt”, said co-rapporteur Anneliese Dodds (S&D, UK).


"Corporate tax avoidance represents tens of billions in losses to national budgets every year, leads to unfair competition between firms and undermines the trust of European citizens in states and governments", said co-rapporteur Luděk Niedermayer (EPP, CR), adding that "Rapid adoption of measures proposed by Parliament and the OECD would provide an unique opportunity not only to improve national tax collection, but also to guarantee fairer corporate tax competition and to reduce compliance costs for businesses."


Recommended legal steps


The recommended legal steps build on the work of Parliament’s Special Committee on Tax Rulings, whose recommendations were approved at the 26 November plenary session.


MEPs ask the Commission, inter alia, to:


  • table a proposal for country-by-country reporting on profit, tax and subsidies by June 2016

  • table a proposal for introducing a "Fair Tax Payer" label,

  • introduce a Common Tax Base (CCTB) as a first step, which later on should be consolidated as well (CCCTB),
  • table a proposal for a common European Tax Identification Number,

  • table a proposal for legal protection of whistle-blowers,

  • improve cross-border taxation dispute resolution mechanisms,

  • table a proposal for a new mechanism whereby member states should inform each other if they intend to introduce a new allowance, relief, exception, incentive, etc. that may affect the tax base of others,

  • estimate the corporate tax gap (corporate taxes owed minus what has been paid),

  • strengthen the mandate and improve transparency of the Council Code of Conduct Working Group on Business Taxation,

  • provide guidelines regarding “patent boxes” so as to ensure they are not harmful,

  • come up with common definitions for "permanent establishment" and "economic substance" so as to ensure that profits are taxed where value is generated,

  • come up with an EU definition of "tax haven" and counter-measures for those who use them, and

  • improve the transfer pricing framework in the EU

What's next?


The Commission will have three months to respond to the recommendations, either with a legislative proposal or with an explanation for not doing so.


Meanwhile, Parliament has agreed on a new six-month mandate for the Special Committee on Tax Rulings, which includes close monitoring of the legal initiatives related to corporate taxation and further fact finding. The new committee will also follow up on on-going work by international institutions, including the OECD and G20.



Procedure: Legislative Resolution

Press conference: 16 December at 14:30

Watch the press conference

 

REF. : 20151210IPR06812
Updated: ( 17-12-2015 - 15:49)
 
 
Contacts
 
 
   
Who's involved
Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to corporate tax policies