Parliament is at the heart of European democracy. Directly-elected representatives of European citizens debate and decide on laws together with Council.
But lawmaking is only one of Parliament’s roles. MEPs discuss and set the political agenda in key debates with national and international leaders, investigate areas of concern, assess the need for action and initiate revisions of laws and new rules.
Furthermore, they assess the work of the EU Commission, keep track of how EU laws are implemented in member states and hold powerful institutions and organizations to account, in particular where fundamental rights come under threat. Close to citizens’ concerns, they use their right – and duty - of scrutiny to check the results of EU policies on the spot, monitor (and vote on) negotiations for international agreements and veto Commission acts when necessary. Read FAQ on the work of MEPs
Parliament also changed its internal rules to enable more efficient and ever more transparent EU lawmaking over the past four years. Urgent matters, especially measures to help member states recover from the financial crisis, were dealt with in fast-track procedures. Learn more about the “Better Lawmaking agreement”.
State of the Union
Since 2010, the Commission President’s “State of the Union” speech at Parliament’s September plenary session has become the annual public evaluation of the EU Commission’s work before citizens’ representatives in Strasbourg.
In the debate with the Commission President, MEPs hold the Commission to account on delivery, past promises and outline their political views on the work ahead.
Legislative work to date
Almost 600 legislative proposals by the Juncker Commission have been discussed, improved and concluded successfully after negotiations with the Council since the 2014 elections.
Major legislative decisions during Parliament’s 8th term
Get the full picture: step-by-step lawmaking in all policy areas since 2014
Investigating and initiating new rules
To prepare the way for legislative changes, Parliament voted resolutions that feed the concerns and expectations of the citizens they represent into new Commission proposals and trigger revisions of existing laws.
When scandals or abuses of potential large-scale impact emerged (such as Luxleaks, Panama Papers, carmakers’ cheating on emissions, pesticide authorisations), Parliament set up special committees to conduct in-depth investigations, inquiries and hearings by MEPs to hold those in charge to account. Their findings and detailed recommendations feed into new Commission proposals.
EU budget vote and control
Parliament and Council share the budgetary authority for the Union’s annual budget. Parliament also has a say in the EU’s long-term budget, the multiannual financial framework, which needs its approval to take effect, and acts as the “discharge” authority. This means it must check how the annual budget is spent and then grant, postpone or withhold approval for each EU institution’s budget management.
MEPs in all Parliament’s committees also kept a close eye on how EU laws are implemented and how they affect citizens’ lives. They held the EU Commission to account for its executive work and the spending of EU money. Fact-finding missions and ad-hoc delegations gathered evidence on the spot to assess thoroughly before deciding further steps to be taken
MEPs also question the Commission in writing on urgent matters, sometimes followed by a resolution tabled in plenary session by political groups.
Where needed, Parliament vetoed Commission decisions (in delegated and implementing acts) when MEPs considered that the executive had overstepped its powers.
Furthermore, MEPs closely followed the Commission’s negotiations of international treaties and issued detailed resolutions to allow for more transparency and a stronger involvement of Parliament, ahead of any final deal which needs Parliament’s consent (i.e. approval or rejection vote) before entering into force.
Parliament’s Petitions Committee has registered around 6,400 petitions since July 2014, and dealt with complaints, requests, and observations by citizens on the application of EU law. The committee serves as a mediator between petitioners and member states in order to resolve a specific problem. Petitions are sometimes followed up in plenary session through debates, oral questions and resolutions.
Examples: precarious employment practices in the EU, the rights of persons with disabilities, non-discrimination of minorities in the EU, children’s rights.
What Europe does for you : find out about impact of EU laws on specific groups of population
What has the EU ever done for me (VIDEO)
Legislative votes to watch out for before the end of the 8th term
About 328 legislative files (including 46 files on the multiannual financial framework) are still in the making (as of September 2018). Important decisions are ahead, such as
In-depth analysis by EP Research: Issues to watch in 2018