Whose money should be used to prop up failing banks? Shareholders' money and not that of small depositors - believes Parliament's economic committee. Read...(read more) Facebook
What do you and the person in this picture have in common? You're both just a mouse-click away from following the plenary live! Click here:...(read more) Facebook
Your data online reveals more about you than you're willing to share. New EU rules aim to put you back in control. Find out more about it in a chat this...(read more) Facebook
Do you know what happens today at 17.00 CET? The plenary starts in Strasbourg! It will be a busy week with banking supervision, discussion on tax fraud and...(read more) Facebook The European Parliament has blocked changes to nutrition labelling that would have allowed new "percentage less" claims on sugar, salt and fat content. The new labels could have confused or misled consumers, said a resolution voted by MEPs on Thursday.
Parliament's veto (393 votes in favour, 161 against and 21 abstentions) sends the European Commission proposal back to the drawing board.
"I am pleased that the European Parliament has defended the interests of health-conscious consumers, who need to be able to make clear comparisons when shopping for food", said Matthias Groote, Chair of the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee.
The proposal would have allowed, for example, a "15% less sugar" claim, which would be based on a previous formulation of the same product. MEPs say this would be hard to compare - or could misleadingly appear healthier - than a "reduced sugar" label, which must contain 30% less than other similar products, under existing EU legislation on health and nutrition claims.
The MEPs' rejection resolution says the Commission's proposal could have provided a disincentive for companies to reformulate their products with substantially lower sugar, salt and fat content.
Procedure: Legislative resolution