European parliament The Legislative Observatory European Parliament - Procedure file European Parliament - Procedure file
European parliament

Procedure file Procedure file

Procedure file : Etat actuel du dossier

The information here reflects the current status of the procedure
 
See the following factsheets :
  FII/2008/0140        
Identification
Reference CNS/2008/0140  
Title Equal treatment: implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation
Legal Basis EC 013-p1  
Dossier of the committee LIBE/6/65317
Subject(s) 4.10.08 equal treatment between persons, anti-discrimination
Stage reached Awaiting final decision
Stages
Stages Documents: references Dates
Source reference Equivalent references Votes and amendments Joint resolution of document of publication in Official Journal
Commission/Council: initial legislative document Summaries EC COM(2008)0426 C6-0291/2008         02/07/2008  
Document annexed to the procedure   EC SEC(2008)2180           02/07/2008  
Document annexed to the procedure   EC SEC(2008)2181           02/07/2008  
EP: draft report by the committee responsible   EP PE418.014           14/01/2009  
EP: decision of the committee responsible, 1st reading/single reading Summaries               16/03/2009  
EP: tabled legislative report, 1st reading or single reading   EP A6-0149/2009     SP(2009)3507
details...     20/03/2009  
EP: position, 1st reading or single reading Summaries EP T6-0211/2009           02/04/2009  
Committee of the Regions: opinion   CofR CDR0321/2008           17/06/2009  
Forecasts
30/11/2009   Council: final act scheduled
Agents
European Parliament
Committee
Rapporteur / Co-rapporteurs
Political group Appointed
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (responsible, associated committees)
Buitenweg Kathalijne Maria

Verts/ALE

15/09/2008
Employment and Social Affairs (opinion, associated committees)
Lynne Elizabeth

ALDE

06/10/2008
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (opinion)
Sartori Amalia

PPE-DE

07/10/2008
Internal Market and Consumer Protection (opinion)      
Culture and Education (opinion)
Gröner Lissy

PSE

15/09/2008
Legal Affairs (opinion)
Frassoni Monica

Verts/ALE

22/09/2008
Women's Rights and Gender Equality (opinion)
Gottardi Donata

PSE

09/10/2008
European Commission and Council of the Union
European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Transmission date: 02/07/2008
Council of the Union
  Previous Councils
Summaries Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs meeting: 2947 of: 08/06/2009
Links to other sources
National parliaments IPEX
European Commission PreLex
 
08/06/2009 - Council's activities

On the basis of a progress report, the Presidency briefed the Council on the state of play in the discussions on the draft directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. The Commission proposal seeks to extend protection against discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation to areas outside the labour market, including social protection, social advantages, education and access to goods and services.

Under the Czech Presidency, the discussions within the preparatory bodies of the Council concentrated on the provisions aimed at protecting persons with disabilities from discrimination (Article 4 of the proposal). The Presidency tabled drafting suggestions to align the Directive more closely with the text of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and to provide for the progressive implementation of the Directive. Delegations have taken a broadly favourable view of the Czech Presidency's approach as a step in the right direction, particularly welcoming the attempt to clarify the text,  to provide for the gradual implementation of certain provisions and to align the draft Directive more closely with the UN Convention.

However, further work is needed, in particular, on the following issues:

  • the scope of the provisions, including in respect of infrastructures, buildings, transport and the design and manufacture of goods;
  • the financial and practical implications of the provisions;
  • ensuring legal certainty, especially in regard to the concrete obligations created by the Directive, including with respect to terms such as "on an equal basis with others" and "reasonable accommodation";
  • the interrelationship between the draft Directive and more detailed sectoral standards or specifications on the accessibility of particular goods, including public transport;
  • the implementation calendar, particularly in respect of provisions requiring modifications to existing infrastructures and buildings;
  • the possible need for further alignment with the UN Convention, taking into account the need for legal clarity.

Further discussion is needed with a view to demarcating the division of competences between the Member States and the European Community as precisely as possible. More work is also needed to elucidate the delicate distinction between access to fields such as education, healthcare and social protection, and the organisation of such fields, the latter being an area of national competence. Other issues that require additional examination include the cross-border dimension that underlies the Community competences in the fields listed in the scope, the provisions related to family law, and the need to find a balance between anti-discrimination and the rights of individuals in the private sphere.

The current draft text provides for certain differences of treatment that should not be seen as discrimination (for example, cheaper public transport offered to children, disabled persons or pensioners), and contains specific provisions concerning the assessment of risk by the providers of financial services, including insurance. However, further discussion is needed, particularly on the key notion of objective and reasonable justification, so as to distinguish clearly between differences of treatment which would not be permitted and those which are justified.

Lastly, in underlining the importance of legal certainty, delegations have expressed the wish to avoid further cases having to be brought before the European Court of Justice (ECJ). They have consequently stressed the need for the clearest possible wording throughout, including in the definitions of key terms, and have underlined the importance of ensuring consistency with existing legislation.

 
List of summaries
Summaries 08/06/2009 Council's activities
Summaries 02/04/2009 EP: position, 1st reading or single reading
Summaries 16/03/2009 EP: decision of the committee responsible, 1st reading/single reading
Summaries 16/12/2008 Council's activities
Summaries 02/10/2008 Council's activities
Summaries 02/07/2008 Commission/Council: initial legislative document
See the following factsheets :
  FII/2008/0140        
Top