European Parliament

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Press release
 

Services directive: Parliament's second reading gets under way

Free movement of services - 14-09-2006 - 14:04
Share / Save
Social networking sites
Favorites
 

Parliament has only limited room for manoeuvre as it embarks on its second reading of the services directive. On Wednesday the rapporteur unveiled eleven amendments to the Council's common position, provoking a mixed response from members of the Internal Market Committee.

 
"Nearly all the amendments I will table are technical", said the rapporteur, Evelyne Gebhardt (PES, DE).  But some MEPs, mainly of the EPP-ED and ALDE groups, argued that many of her amendments were in fact political. They would thus threaten the compromise between the EPP-ED and PES groups (which enabled Parliament to adopt a resolution at first reading) and were likely to be rejected by the Council (which also struggled to arrive at the common position it has sent to Parliament for second reading).
The rapporteur's amendments in detail
 
Ms Gebhardt's amendments concern the following articles: 1.6 and 1.7 (exclusion of the right to work and to exercise fundamental rights from the scope of the directive), 2.2 (exclusion of services of general interest and social services), 3 (link between the directive and consumer protection rules), 28-31 (regulation of service providers and their services by the Member States), 39.5 (requirement for the European Commission to issue guidelines on the application of the directive). One amendment introduces a new passage, replacing the Council's text, on possible conflicts between the directive and other Community instruments.
 
These amendments, says the rapporteur, are justified by the need to "discuss the remaining 10% of difference" between the EP and the Council, the latter having accepted "90% of the first-reading vote".
 
The Finnish Council presidency, while not wishing to analyse the rapporteur's amendments in detail yet, said it had no wish to jeopardise the balance of the current text. "Several of the amendments touch on the heart of the compromise and the Council's common position. It would be difficult, perhaps impossible, to accept them", said the presidency's representative.
 
Among the amendments attracting particular criticism are those concerning the directive's scope (Article 2), consumer protection (Article 3) - one of the main bones of contention in the negotiations within Parliament - and the role of the Commission in assessing the implementation of the directive (Article 39.5).
 
Mrs Gebhardt also announced she would table eight or nine amendments on the preamble to the directive.  The next two meetings of the Internal Market Committee take place on 4-5 and 9-10 October, with the committee vote scheduled for 23 October. The plenary vote takes place in November.
 
13/09/2006
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Chair : Arlene MCCARTHY (PES, UK)
Procedure: Co-decision, second reading
Plenary vote: November
REF.: 20060914IPR10685