Press release
 

Lisbon Treaty at the heart of reports on CFSP and ESDP

External relations - 05-06-2008 - 13:36
Plenary sessions
Share / Save
Social networking sites
Favorites
 
An Italian soldier, a member of peacekeeping mission in Bosnia, secures perimeter for a helicopter take off, during medical evacuation exercise near the eastern Bosnian town of Kalinovik, 65 kms east of Sarajevo, 03 May 2006. ©BELGA/AFP PHOTO/ELVIS BARUKCIC

EU "hard power": the sharp end of external policy in Bosnia

The impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and its European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) was at the core of two reports voted in the European Parliament on Thursday (5 June). While pointing to the increased effectiveness the new Treaty could give to the EU's foreign policy, the reports also pointed to the need for increased parliamentary scrutiny and democratic legitimacy of these policies.

The own-initiative report by Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Jacek Saryusz-Wolski (EPP-ED, PL) on the Council's 2006 Annual Report on CFSP points out that "the future office of High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission will derive its legitimacy directly from the European Parliament."  It also stresses the need for "transparency and democratic input" into the process of setting up the planned European External Action Service (EEAS), and calls for a mechanism to be set up to provide confidential information to select Foreign Affairs Committee Members. Finally, it notes that "further efforts are needed in order to streamline the decision-making process as regards foreign policy with a view to overcoming the veto power and introducing qualified majority voting."
 
Energy security and the EU's neighbourhood high on the agenda
 
The report considers that "stability in the Western Balkans should be the top priority for the EU in 2008."  It says the "dialogue with Serbia should be intensified" to take concrete steps, for example on visa liberalisation, and considers that the EU should "initiate appropriate processes in order to avoid Serbia's isolation."  MEPs also said the "EULEX mission in Kosovo must safeguard the interests of national minorities," and voice their concern at the stalemate in transferring responsibilities from UNMIK to EULEX in Kosovo.
 
The report "is of the view that the importance of the foreign policy dimensions of energy security [...] will continue increasing," and calls for diversification of supply, increase in energy efficiency and EU solidarity, while also deploring "the uncoordinated signing of bilateral energy agreements by Member States."  In addition, Members note that strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) should be a "main objective for 2008,"  especially in three key regional cooperation areas: the Mediterranean, the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea, the latter two of which should be "assured by finding new organisational structures for regional cooperation."
 
Russia and China
 
The House "considers the review in 2008 by the Union of its relations with Russia as very important," and asks Member States to "coordinate relations with the Russian Federation on the basis of the Union's common interests."  The report recommends that "political and economic relations with China be deepened in 2008, on condition that substantial progress be made in the field of democracy and human rights, and that China heed the EU's grave concerns about its conduct in Tibet." 
 
European Security Strategy and European Security and Defence Policy
 
Helmut Kuhne's (PES, DE) own-initiative report on the implementation of the European Security Strategy (ESS) and the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) calls on the High Representative to "assess in a White Paper the progress made, and any shortcomings, in the implementation of the ESS since 2003," and to "include in that White Paper proposals for improving and complementing the ESS."  The House adds that a future assessment of the ESS "has to be carried out with greater democratic accountability and therefore be made in close consultation" with the Parliament. Members also stressed the need to "have a European Parliament position available before an ESDP operation," to add democratic legitimacy to EU military operations.
 
Battle Groups, EUROCORPS, and a European Peace Corps
 
The report deplores the fact that partly due to "narrowly defined terms of deployment," the Battle Group concept has "not solved the force generation problem for concrete operations."  It therefore calls for urgent clarification of the Battle Group concept. The House "proposes to place EUROCORPS as a standing force under EU command and invites all Member States to contribute to it."  In addition, MEPs call on the Council and Commission to "establish an EU Civil Peace Corps for crisis management and conflict prevention."  Finally, an idea to urge the Council to "examine options for the setting up of an integrated civil-military 'Human Security Response Force' to carry out human security operations"  was voted down by a significant majority of MEPs (418-205-7).
 
Non-proliferation and weapons exports
 
The report reiterates the Parliament's long-standing position that it "finds it embarrassing that, despite the fact that the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports will celebrate its tenth anniversary in 2008, it is not yet legally binding, and uncontrolled arms exports from EU Member States seem to be continuing without much hindrance."  Members also call for Europe to be made a "nuclear-weapon-free zone," and for a "global convention banning nuclear weapons."  The House is also of the view that "the US plan to establish an anti-missile system in Europe at this time may hamper international disarmament efforts."  With regard to the specific case of Iran, the report "reaffirms that the proliferation risks attaching to the Iranian nuclear programme remain a source of serious concern to the EU and the international community."
 
REF.: 20080605IPR30971