European Parliament

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Press release
 

Asylum package: MEPs deplore lack of progress in Council

Asylum policy - 06-10-2009 - 20:34
Committees
Share / Save
Social networking sites
Favorites
 

Solidarity among EU Member States should be enhanced by compulsory instruments to assist Member States receiving large numbers of asylum applications, MEPs reiterated in a debate today, deploring the reluctance of the Council of Ministers to introduce a binding mechanism.

Civil Liberties Committee MEPs debated the ongoing discussions with the Council of Ministers on the five "Asylum package" proposals, on which the EP adopted its first reading position in May 2009.
 
On the revision of the reception of asylum seekers directive, EP rapporteur Antonio Masip-Hidalgo (S-D, ES) asked “why is it a dead end in Council? We should deal with this matter expeditiously”. The Council representative replied that “we are far from having any common position that could be taken even to informal talks with the EP”.
 
"Voluntary solidarity is really a joke"
 
“I don’t want to hear about voluntary measures”, said Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert (ALDE, NL), rapporteur on the revision of the Dublin regulation (on which Member State is responsible for processing an asylum application). So far, the Council has preferred a system for voluntarily sharing this work with Member States at the EU's southern borders, whereas the EP has advocated a compulsory solidarity ("burden-sharing") mechanism. “We have to strike a balance between better conditions for migrants and the speediness of procedures”, the Council Presidency representative replied.
 
“This is a defining dossier, and the ball is clearly in the Council’s court”, said Simon Busuttil (EPP, MT). “This matter is all about solidarity, and voluntary solidarity is really a joke. Some countries don´t want to help".
 
Asylum support office: what role for the EP ?
 
EP rapporteur on the establishment of a European Asylum Support Office, Jean Lambert (Greens/EFA, UK), explained that the EP's role within the Office is still a subject to disagreement with EU ministers, as is the degree of involvement of civil society. “Some Member States have difficulties to deal with this matter in co-decision”, she said.
 
On the Eurodac (asylum seekers' finger print data base) regulation, the European Commission has tabled a new proposal that would allow law enforcement authorities to access the database. Monica Luisa Macovei (EPP, RO) argued that its access rules need to be clarified. Sophia In 't Veld (ALDE, NL), asked for more guarantees that that data is not going to be accessible to third countries.
 
On the proposal for an EU resettlement programme, tabled in September, the question is "how to make this programme attractive to Member States?", said the rapporteur on this dossier, Rui Tavares (GUE/NGL, PT). And as to those resettled, "What happens to them afterwards? It's what I'm worried about", he said.
 
Background
 
The asylum package aims to improve the way the EU asylum system works and strengthen asylum seekers' rights. In its first reading, last May, the EP adopted amendments to enhance solidarity among Member States when managing asylum applications, and called for a binding mechanism to be set up before 2012.
 
The proposals seek to guarantee higher standards of protection for individuals and to cope better with situations in which the reception capacity of asylum systems of the Member States are under particular pressure.
 
06/10/2009
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
In the chair : Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR (S-D, ES)
REF.: 20091005IPR61866