European Parliament

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
4 September 2012
E-007793/2012
Question for written answer
to the Commission
Rule 117
Jörg Leichtfried (S&D)

 Subject: Ban on the marketing of cosmetics tested on animals
 Answer(s) 

A ban on the sale in Europe of cosmetics produced overseas using animal testing is due to come into force in March 2013. According to media reports, Health Commissioner John Dalli wants to permit exemptions to the total ban on these cosmetic products, including those manufactured outside the EU, thereby postponing the date for the ban (March 2013) to a later date.

1. Does the Commission really intend to postpone the implementation deadline of March 2013?

2. Why are alternatives to animal testing that are already available not permitted?

3. How does the Commission justify such disregard for existing legislation?

4. What special exemptions is the Commission planning?

Original language of question: DEOJ C 234 E, 13/08/2013
Last updated: 21 September 2012Legal notice