Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
15 September 2017
E-005765-17
Question for written answer
to the Commission
Rule 130
Dominique Martin (ENF)

 Subject:  Regulated professions: French Parliament objects to Commission proposal

In January 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal for a directive which would allow it to carry out proportionality tests before the adoption of any new regulations of professions by Member States.

The proposal states that 700 000 jobs would be created across the EU.

The French, Austrian and German parliaments objected to this proposal for a directive.

On 4 August, the Commission stated that it had responded to the various parliaments(1).

Why were the Commission responses not sent to the MEPs responsible for amending this new directive(2) before the deadline for submitting amendments, 7 September 2017?

(1) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2017-003554&language=EN
(2) Or to the secretariats of the Parliament’s relevant committees?

Original language of question: FR 
Last updated: 28 September 2017Legal notice