Retour au portail Europarl

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (sélectionné)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Ce document n'est pas disponible dans votre langue et vous est proposé dans une autre langue parmi celles disponibles dans la barre des langues.

Parliamentary questions
2 October 2017
P-006162-17
Question for written answer
to the Commission
Rule 130
Kateřina Konečná (GUE/NGL) , Jiří Maštálka (GUE/NGL)

 Subject:  I/11 Rudná extension/Opava District boundary project
 Answer(s) 

Last year, the Czech Republic negotiated with the Commission a list of priority transport projects and the future approach to be taken in the EIA approval process in the revision of Law No 100/2001 Sb. relating to environmental impact assessment and amending certain relevant Acts (the Environmental Impact Assessment Act), as amended. Originally included in that list was a construction site known as ‘I/11 Prodloužená Rudná, hranice okresu Opava’ (the I/11 Rudná extension/Opava District boundary).

We wish to ask the following questions concerning this project.

1. Is the I/11 Rudná extension/Opava District boundary project part of the TEN-T network of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU? (For information, this is a critical transport link under construction on the territory of the city of Ostrava. Under Annex II of this regulation, Ostrava is a node of the TEN-T core network.) 2. Did the Commission agree or not to the I/11 Rudná extension/Opava District boundary site being included in the list of priority transport construction projects? (Please state the reasons for the Commission’s agreement or disagreement.)

Original language of question: CS 
Dernière mise à jour: 5 octobre 2017Avis juridique