Tagasi Europarli portaali

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

See dokument ei ole Teie keeles kättesaadav ja pakutakse Teile keelteribalt mõned muus keeles.

 Märksõnaregister 
 Terviktekst 
Verbatim report of proceedings
Tuesday, 14 February 2006 - Strasbourg OJ edition

Services (continuation of the debate)
MPphoto
 
 

  Rolandas Pavilionis (UEN).(LT) Everyone agrees that the Services Directive would legalise the movement of services within the territory of the European Union. And if it was adopted without major amendments, it would not discriminate against the new countries. I mean, above all, the preservation of the country of origin principle. On the other hand, particularly when one takes into account the dangers posed by most of the amendments, this directive could drift far from the original draft and become an insurmountable obstacle to the further development of the European Union.

Another question is the range of services. I agree that in reality education, according to both the Community Treaty and the Directive, is, above all, a matter of national responsibility, and the European Union only funds general education programmes. However, if there is a lack of national responsibility and the funding of general European education programmes does not increase, then the Services Directive, by only confirming the responsibility of the national authorities, while neglecting education services, does not help to solve the problems surrounding the expansion of education in Europe, it simply perpetuates them. This, by the way, is confirmed by the decrease in funding of general education and culture programmes for 2007-2013, which was the subject of a persuasive letter by the Committee on Culture and Education to all the group leaders of the European Parliament.

 
Õigusteave - Privaatsuspoliitika