Index 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2006/0197(COD)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A6-0293/2007

Texts tabled :

A6-0293/2007

Debates :

PV 25/09/2007 - 14
CRE 25/09/2007 - 14

Votes :

PV 26/09/2007 - 6.1
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P6_TA(2007)0409

Debates
Tuesday, 25 September 2007 - Strasbourg OJ edition

14. European Institute of Technology (debate)
PV
MPphoto
 
 

  David Hammerstein, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group . – (ES) Mr President, we are really sorry, but this proposal is not serious. Once again Europe wants to act but cannot. The Greens were in favour of the Institute project, but of a real project, and the proposals that are on the table are inadequate and incoherent.

After the negotiations, the question of funding has still not been resolved. The European proposal of EUR 308 million is clearly inadequate and, moreover, it is a much, much lower figure than what the European Commission itself proposed based on its studies. We therefore have before us an invitation to gobble up and weaken other European projects such as the Seventh Research Framework Programme.

If the European Commission really wants to establish the Institute, as we do, the negotiations will have to be restarted on the financial perspective and a real budget will have to be created, a large budget of more than EUR 2 billion, which is what is needed. In short, if we want to promote research and technology, we need to back it, we cannot give cannon fodder to the eurosceptics, as we are doing with such an incoherent project.

There are also problems with the content. We have removed the ceiling on administrative expenditure; we have required a ceiling for all projects, but here we have removed it. We have also removed one of the main issues of life in general – climate change – which was going to be one of the issues, one of the main ones in fact, and has been removed. This is very shocking, very shocking. In short, here we have a project that obviously has no ambition, no money behind it and does not have a coherent project, which we deeply regret.

 
Last updated: 5 June 2008Legal notice