Index 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2006/2209(REG)
Document stages in plenary
Select a document: :

Texts tabled :

A6-0027/2009

Debates :

PV 05/05/2009 - 17
CRE 05/05/2009 - 17

Votes :

PV 19/02/2009 - 5.2
CRE 19/02/2009 - 5.2
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes
PV 06/05/2009 - 4.6
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P6_TA(2009)0353

Debates
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 - Strasbourg OJ edition

16. Explanations of vote
Video of the speeches
PV
MPphoto
 

- Report: Janusz Wojciechowski (A6-0185/2009 )

  Neena Gill (PSE ). - Mr President, the time of killing is one of the most important but potentially one of the most sensitive issues we can legislate for in this House. But we cannot just walk on by, because many of my constituents in the West Midlands are concerned that the legislation will affect their religious rights.

The decision about whether or not an animal should be stunned before slaughter is not something that should be decided here but at Member State level, through open dialogue and consultation with religious communities.

We need to walk, not run. This seems to me the best approach on this issue. The role of this House is not to impose norms and values but to represent and reflect the views of its constituents and get a balance. We can work it out together. While most MEPs would prefer it if all animals were stunned before slaughter, we should uphold the right of religious communities to eat meat killed in accordance with their religious beliefs.

Finally, Mr President, can I thank you for all those who are here tonight, because I think only the lonely are here tonight, and we are all hopelessly devoted to you because that is why we are here tonight.

 
Last updated: 8 July 2009Legal notice