Tillbaka till Europarl-webbplatsen

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Detta dokument finns inte på ditt språk, men du kan välja ett annat språk i språkraden ovan.

 Index 
 All text 
Verbatim report of proceedings
Thursday, 2 February 2012 - Brussels OJ edition

Objection pursuant to Rule 88(2): ‘List of nutrition claims’ (B7-0045/2012)
MPphoto
 

  Renate Sommer (PPE).(DE) Mr President, if I may, I would like to make a brief comment that there is some confusion surrounding this vote.

How should one vote if one is against consumers being misled? If you are against consumers being misled by advertising claims, then you should vote in favour of the recommendation by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety; the recommendation by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety is the resolution.

In other words, if you are against consumers being misled by advertising on food packaging, then you need to vote ‘Yes’. I say that only as an explanation, because some very confusing lobbying information is doing the rounds.

 
Rättsligt meddelande - Integritetspolicy