Guido Milana, rapporteur for the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries. – (IT) Madam President, the Committee on Fisheries has carried out an exhaustive job, considering that this is a post-Lisbon codecision matter.

In this sense, the execution rate was 97.20%, hence a good execution rate as recorded in the accounts. Despite this, however, under one of the headings, a specific heading, the heading for fish markets, number 1102, had very little execution, for which the Commission gave some quite satisfactory explanations, but these do not suggest that there will be much change in the following years.

Equally, one of the issues underlined is the execution of international fishing agreements. In these, the commercial aspect is too dominant compared with the aspect linked to growth in the sector: 72% is a commercial agreement. Therefore, the fishing agreements probably need to have a slightly different execution that takes into account the policy objectives of these agreements.

I will close, Madam President, with just one more small comment, which is that there are reports that have been challenged for almost a decade, the closure of which is still being delayed. This is a just a point of form with regard to the execution as a whole. Thank you in particular for the time allowed to me.