Tagasi Europarli portaali

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (valitud)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
See dokument ei ole Teie keeles kättesaadav ja pakutakse Teile keelteribalt mõned muus keeles.

 Märksõnaregister 
 Terviktekst 
Verbatim report of proceedings
Wednesday, 26 February 2014 - Strasbourg Revised edition

Situation in Ukraine (debate)
MPphoto
 

  Adrian Severin (NI). - Madam President, in recent months we have been witnessing an optimistic tragedy in Ukraine, whose last acts are still to be performed.

Ukraine currently has three main challenges to cope with, namely to avoid anarchy, to avoid economic bankruptcy and to avoid state partition. All other priorities, no matter how justified and legitimate, should be considered of secondary importance.

A united, trustworthy state needs a united, stable society able to mobilise all its human resources in support of a truly all-nation agenda. Therefore now is the time for reconciliation and inclusion and not for revenge and lustration. Justice should be done in the courts and not on the streets.

Nobody respects Romania, my country, for the way in which its former authoritarian leader was tried and executed. Ukrainians should not repeat this mistake, which still burdens the conscience of my compatriots. An era of true justice cannot be started by acts of precipitate retaliation.

Ukraine needs help to overcome the threats it faces. If it fails, the EU security would be in jeopardy. To prevent that, the European Union should firstly, together with the United States and others, offer Ukraine a financial package for economic stabilisation and transformation. Secondly, together with Russia, it should agree on a true partnership, based on the harmonisation of their vital interests, including those related to their common neighbourhood, thus bringing to an end a geostrategic contest which has brought so many hardships not only to Ukrainians, but also to Belarusians, Moldovans, Azeris and Georgians. Thirdly, proclaim Ukraine’s eligibility for EU membership at an appropriate time after due preparation.

A final remark, if I may. With all due respect for German diplomacy, as a Romanian European, I would feel better if decisive external actions on issues of common interest were to be pursued by our EU Foreign Minister and European institutions and not by national ministers from selected member states.

 
Õigusteave - Privaatsuspoliitika