Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
 Index 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2016/2522(RSP)
Document stages in plenary
Select a document: :

Texts tabled :

RC-B8-0085/2016

Debates :

PV 21/01/2016 - 12.1
CRE 21/01/2016 - 12.1

Votes :

PV 21/01/2016 - 14.1

Texts adopted :

P8_TA(2016)0022

Debates
Thursday, 21 January 2016 - Strasbourg Revised edition

12.1. EU citizens under detention in India, notably Italian, Estonian and UK citizens
Video of the speeches
PV
MPphoto
 

  Nirj Deva (ECR ), blue-card question . Will you accept that, in modern times, to keep people incarcerated for two years without bring them to trial is not acceptable? That is all I am saying: that it took two years for the Indian authorities to bring these people to trial and to sentence them, and I made the point that some of them should not have been sentenced because they were carrying out orders and if they had not carried out those orders they would have been shot for mutiny. Would it not be correct to say that, under habeas corpus and other matters, they should have been brought to trial sooner?

 
Last updated: 22 March 2016Legal notice