REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on new psychoactive substances
13.3.2014 - (COM(2013)0619 – C7‑0272/2013 – 2013/0305(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Rapporteur: Jacek Protasiewicz
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on new psychoactive substances
(COM(2013)0619 – C7‑0272/2013 – 2013/0305(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0619),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7‑0272/2013),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the United Kingdom House of Commons and the United Kingdom House of Lords, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 21 January 2014 [1],
– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0172/2014),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Member States' competent public authorities introduce various restriction measures on these new psychoactive substances to address the risks that they pose or may pose when consumed. As new psychoactive substances are often used in the production of various goods or of other substances which are used for manufacturing goods, such as medicines, industrial solvents, cleaning agents, goods in the hi-tech industry, restricting their access for this use can have an important impact on economic operators, potentially disrupting their business activities in the internal market. |
(3) Member States' competent public authorities introduce various restriction measures on these new psychoactive substances to address the risks that they pose or may pose when consumed. As new psychoactive substances are often used for scientific research and development purposes and in the production of various goods or of other substances which are used for manufacturing goods, such as medicines, industrial solvents, cleaning agents, goods in the hi-tech industry, restricting their access for this use can have an important impact on economic operators, potentially disrupting their business activities in the internal market and can also impede sustainable scientific research and development. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) The increasing number of new psychoactive substances available in the internal market, their growing diversity, the speed with which they emerge on the market, the different risks that they may pose when consumed by humans and the growing number of individuals who consume them, challenge the capacity of public authorities to provide effective responses to protect public health and safety without hampering the functioning of the internal market. |
(4) The increasing number of new psychoactive substances available in the internal market, their growing diversity, the speed with which they emerge on the market, the different risks that they may pose when consumed by humans, the growing number of individuals who consume them and the lack of general public knowledge and awareness about the risks associated with their consumption, challenge the capacity of public authorities to provide effective responses to protect public health and safety without hampering the functioning of the internal market. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) Restriction measures vary significantly in different Member States, meaning that economic operators that use them in the production of various goods must comply, in the case of the same new psychoactive substance, with different requirements, such as pre-export notification, export authorisation, or import and export licences. Consequently, the differences between the Member States' laws, regulations and administrative provisions on new psychoactive substances hinder the functioning of the internal market, by causing obstacles to trade, market fragmentation, lack of legal clarity and of an even level playing field for economic operators, making it difficult for companies to operate across the internal market. |
(5) As conditions and circumstances differ in Member States with regard to psychoactive substances, restriction measures vary accordingly in different Member States, meaning that economic operators that use them in the production of various goods must comply, in the case of the same new psychoactive substance, with different requirements, such as pre-export notification, export authorisation, or import and export licences. Consequently, the differences between the Member States' laws, regulations and administrative provisions on new psychoactive substances could potentially hinder to some extent the functioning of the internal market, by causing obstacles to trade, market fragmentation, lack of legal clarity and of an even level playing field for economic operators, making it more difficult for companies to operate across the internal market. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) Restriction measures not only cause barriers to trade in the case of new psychoactive substances that already have commercial, industrial or scientific uses, but can also impede the development of such uses, and are likely to cause obstacles to trade for economic operators that seek to develop such uses, by making access to those new psychoactive substances more difficult. |
(6) Restriction measures could not only cause barriers to trade in the case of new psychoactive substances that already have commercial, industrial or scientific uses, but could also impede the development of such uses, and are likely to cause obstacles to trade for economic operators that seek to develop such uses, by making access to those new psychoactive substances more difficult. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) The disparities between the various restriction measures applied to new psychoactive substances can also lead to displacement of harmful new psychoactive substances between the Member States, hampering efforts to restrict their availability to consumers and undermining consumer protection across the Union. |
(7) The disparities between the various restriction measures applied to new psychoactive substances, while they are legitimate since they respond to each Member State's particularities with regard to psychoactive substances, could also lead to displacement of harmful new psychoactive substances between the Member States, hampering efforts to restrict their availability to consumers and undermining consumer protection across the Union, if efficient information exchange and coordination among Member States is not strengthened. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7a) Such disparities facilitate illegal trafficking of such substances by criminals, in particular organised criminal gangs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) Such disparities are expected to increase as Member States continue to pursue divergent approaches to addressing new psychoactive substances. Therefore, the obstacles to trade and market fragmentation, and the lack of legal clarity and of a level playing field are expected to increase, further hindering the functioning of the internal market. |
(8) Such disparities are expected to continue as Member States adopt divergent approaches to addressing challenges with regard to new psychoactive substances. Therefore, the obstacles to trade and market fragmentation, and the lack of legal clarity and of a level playing field are expected to continue, further hindering the functioning of the internal market if Member States do not coordinate and cooperate more efficiently. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) Those distortions to the functioning of the internal market should be eliminated and, to that end, the rules relating to new psychoactive substances that are of concern at Union level should be approximated, while, at the same time, ensuring a high level of health, safety and consumer protection. |
(9) Where distortions to the functioning of the internal market are identified they should be addressed and, to that end, the rules relating to new psychoactive substances that are of concern at Union level should be approximated, while, at the same time, ensuring a high level of health, safety and consumer protection and flexibility for Member States to respond to local situations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) New psychoactive substances and mixtures should be able to move freely in the Union when intended for commercial and industrial use, as well as for scientific research and development. This Regulation should establish rules for introducing restrictions to this free movement. |
(10) New psychoactive substances and mixtures should be able to move freely in the Union when intended for commercial and industrial use, as well as for scientific research and development, by duly authorised persons in establishments which are directly under the control of Member States' authorities or specifically approved by them. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) No risk assessment should be conducted under this Regulation on a new psychoactive substance if it is subject to an assessment under international law, or if it is an active substance in a medicinal product or in a veterinary medicinal product. |
(14) No risk assessment should be conducted under this Regulation on a new psychoactive substance if it is subject to an assessment under international law, or if it is an active substance in a medicinal product or in a veterinary medicinal product, unless there are sufficient data available at Union level to suggest the need for a joint report of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and Europol. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(18) No restriction measures should be introduced at Union level on new psychoactive substances which pose low health, social and safety risks. |
(18) On the basis of existing evidence and on predefined criteria, no restriction measures should be introduced at Union level on new psychoactive substances which pose low health, social and safety risks, but Member States may introduce further measures that are deemed appropriate or necessary depending on the specific risks that the substance poses in their territories taking into account national circumstances and any social, economic, legal, administrative or other factor they may consider relevant. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(19) Those new psychoactive substances which pose moderate health, social and safety risks should not be made available to consumers. |
(19) On the basis of the existing evidence and on predefined criteria, those new psychoactive substances which pose moderate health, social and safety risks should not be made available to consumers. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(20) Those new psychoactive substances which pose severe health, social and safety risks should not be made available on the market. |
(20) On the basis of the existing evidence and on predefined criteria, those new psychoactive substances which pose severe health, social and safety risks should not be made available on the market. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(21) This Regulation should provide for exceptions in order to ensure the protection of human and animal health, to facilitate scientific research and development, and to allow the use of new psychoactive substances in industry, provided that they cannot be abused or recovered. |
(21) This Regulation should provide for exceptions in order to ensure the protection of human and animal health, to facilitate scientific research and development, and to allow the use of new psychoactive substances in industry, provided that they are not liable to have ill effects and that they cannot be abused or recovered. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(21a) Member States should take appropriate measures to prevent the diversion to the illicit market of new psychoactive substances used for research and development purposes or for any other authorised uses. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(23) The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) established by Regulation 1920/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 200618 should have a central role in the exchange of information on new psychoactive substances and in the assessment of the health, social and safety risks that they pose. |
(23) The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) established by Regulation 1920/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 200618 should have a central role in the exchange and coordination of information on new psychoactive substances and in the assessment of the health, social and safety risks that they pose. Given that within the scope of this Regulation there is an increase in the amount of information expected to be collected and managed by EMCDDA, specific support should be envisaged and provided. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 1. |
18 OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(24) The mechanism for rapid exchange of information on new psychoactive substances has proved to be a useful channel for sharing information on new psychoactive substances, on new trends in the use of controlled psychoactive substances and on related public health warnings. That mechanism should be further strengthened to enable a more effective response to the rapid emergence and spread of new psychoactive substances across the Union. |
(24) The mechanism for rapid exchange of information on new psychoactive substances (the 'European Union Early Warning System on New Psychoactive Substances' ('EWS')) has proved to be a useful channel for sharing information on new psychoactive substances, on new trends in the use of controlled psychoactive substances and on related public health warnings. To enable a more effective response to the rapid emergence and spread of new psychoactive substances across the Union, the mechanism should be maintained and further developed, in particular as regards to the collection and management of data on the detection and identification of new psychoactive substances, adverse events associated with their use, and the involvement of criminal groups in the market through the Union new psychoactive substances database (the 'European Database on New Drugs'). The media, particularly scientific and medical literature, can be an important source of information on adverse event case reports. In order to enhance the efficiency of reporting, the EMCDDA should monitor all new psychoactive substances and enter this information in the European Database on New Drugs. Data sets essential to the functioning of this Regulation include data on the detection and identification of new psychoactive substances, adverse events associated with their use, and the involvement of criminal groups in the market. A core data set should be defined. The core data set should be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that it reflects the information required for the effective functioning of the Regulation. Suspected serious adverse events, including fatal adverse events, should be subject to expedited reporting. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to have a scientific monitoring and analysis of the risks that these substances may or may not pose, it is essential to have a solid information system behind. The text proposed by the Commission gives much attention to the regulatory system (at the end of the process) but neglects the information base on which the decision is based. This recital restates the balance in the text between need for solid evidence and decision making, and is linked with art.5 information exchange, 20 research and analysis and 15 Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(24a) In order to allow Member States to receive, access simultaneously and share information on new psychoactive substances in the Union, the European Database on New Drugs should be fully and permanently accessible to the Member States, the EMCDDA, Europol and the Commission. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is essential for a quick spread of the information on new molecules and mixtures found out in the market, that authorities in MS and institution can access easily and simultaneously this information and that can share their knowledge. The European Database on New Drugs is an asset to the rapidity of the system | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(24b) The EMCDDA should issue health alerts to all Member States, through the system for rapid exchange of information on new psychoactive substances if, on the basis of information received on a new psychoactive substances, this seems to cause public health concerns. Those health alerts should also contain information regarding prevention, treatment and harm reduction measures that could be taken to address the risk of the substance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(24c) In order to protect public health, the EWS activities of EMCDDA and Europol should be adequately funded. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Commission proposal does not foresees support from the EU to cope with an expected increase and complexity of work for the EMCDDA. This preambular paragraph states the principle that the activities of the European Union Early Warning System on New Psychoactive Substances must be adequately funded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(25) Information from Member States is crucial for the effective functioning of the procedures leading to decision on market restriction of new psychoactive substances. Therefore, Member States should collect, on a regular basis, data on the use of new psychoactive substances, related health, safety and social problems and policy responses, in accordance with the EMCDDA framework for data collection for the key epidemiological indicators and other relevant data. They should share this data. |
(25) Information from Member States is crucial for the effective functioning of the procedures leading to a decision on market restriction of new psychoactive substances. Therefore, Member States should monitor and collect, on a regular basis, data on the emergence and use of any new psychoactive substances, related health, safety and social problems and policy responses, in accordance with the EMCDDA framework for data collection for the key epidemiological indicators and other relevant data. They should share those data notably with the EMCDDA, Europol and the European Commission. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(25a) Information on new psychoactive substances provided by and exchanged among Member States is crucial for their national health policies, both in terms of drug prevention and of the treatment for psychoactive drug users in recovery services. Member States should make use of all the available information in an effective manner and monitor the relevant developments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(26) A lack of capacity to identify and anticipate the emergence and spread of new psychoactive substances and a lack of evidence about their health, social and safety risks hamper the provision of an effective response. Therefore, support should be provided, including at Union level, to facilitate cooperation between the EMCDDA, research institutes and forensic laboratories with relevant expertise, in order to increase the capacity to assess and address effectively new psychoactive substances. |
(26) A lack of capacity to identify and anticipate the emergence and spread of new psychoactive substances and a lack of evidence about their health, social and safety risks hamper the provision of an effective response. Therefore, support and the necessary resources should be provided, at Union and national level, to facilitate regular and systematic cooperation between the EMCDDA, National Focal Points, health care and law enforcement representatives at national and regional level, research institutes and forensic laboratories with relevant expertise, in order to increase the capacity to assess and address effectively new psychoactive substances. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(26a) Appropriate safeguards, such as data anonymisation, should be put in place in order to ensure a high level of protection of personal data, in particular when sensitive data are collected and shared. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(28a) Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable to the dangers presented by such substances, the risks of which are still largely unknown. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(29) Prevention, treatment and harm reduction measures are important for addressing the growing use of new psychoactive substances and their potential risks. The internet, which is one of the important distribution channels through which new psychoactive substances are sold, should be used for disseminating information on the health, social and safety risks that they pose. |
(29) Prevention, early detection and intervention, treatment risk and harm reduction measures are important for addressing the growing use of new psychoactive substances and their potential risks. Member States should improve the availability and effectiveness of prevention programmes and raise awareness about the risk of the use of new psychoactive substances and related consequences. To that end, prevention measures should include early detection and intervention, promotion of healthy lifestyles and targeted prevention directed also at families and communities. The internet, which is one of the important and rapidly developing distribution channels through which new psychoactive substances are advertised and sold, should be used for disseminating information on the health, social and safety risks that they pose , and for the prevention of misuse and abuse. It is essential for children, adolescents and young adults to be made aware of those risks, including by means of information campaigns in schools and other educational environments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(29a) The Commission and the Member States should also promote educational and awareness-rising activities, initiatives and campaigns, targeting the health, social and safety risks associated with the misuse and abuse of new psychoactive substances. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(30a) The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending the criteria regarding low, moderate and severe risks substances. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(32) The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to a rapid increase in the number of reported fatalities in several Member States associated with the consumption of the new psychoactive substance concerned, imperative grounds of urgency so require. |
(32) The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to a rapid increase in the number of reported fatalities and severe health consequences or incidents posing a grave threat to health in several Member States associated with the consumption of the new psychoactive substance concerned, imperative grounds of urgency so require. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(33) In the application of this Regulation, the Commission should consult Member States' experts, relevant Union agencies, civil society and economic operators. |
(33) In the application of this Regulation, the Commission should consult Member States' experts, relevant Union agencies, in particular the EMCDDA, civil society , economic operators and any other relevant stakeholder. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(36) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including the freedom to conduct a business, the right to property and the right to an effective remedy, |
(36) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, including the freedom to conduct a business, the right to property, the right of access to preventive healthcare and the right to benefit from medical treatment, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) ‘new psychoactive substance’ means a natural or synthetic substance that, when consumed by a human, has the capacity to produce central nervous system stimulation or depression, resulting in hallucinations, alterations in motor function, thinking, behaviour, perception, awareness or mood, which is intended for human consumption or is likely to be consumed by humans even if not intended for them with the purpose of inducing one or more of the effects mentioned above, which is neither controlled under the 1961 United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, nor the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances; it excludes alcohol, caffeine and tobacco, as well as tobacco products within the meaning of Council Directive 2001/37/EC of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products24; |
(a) ‘new psychoactive substance’ means a natural or synthetic substance that, when consumed by a human, has the capacity to produce central nervous system stimulation or depression, resulting in hallucinations, alterations in motor function, thinking, behaviour, perception, awareness or mood, whether or not it is intended for human consumption with the purpose of inducing one or more of the effects mentioned above, which is neither controlled under the 1961 United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, nor the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances; it excludes alcohol, caffeine and tobacco, as well as tobacco products within the meaning of Council Directive 2001/37/EC24; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_________________________ |
__________________________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 OJ L 194, 18.7.2001, p. 26. |
24 Council Directive 2001/37/EC of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products (OJ L 194, 18.7.2001, p. 26). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. No risk assessment shall be carried out where the new psychoactive substance is at an advanced stage of assessment within the United Nations system, namely once the World Health Organisation expert committee on drug dependence has published its critical review together with a written recommendation, except where there is significant information that is new or of particular relevance for the Union and that has not been taken into account by the United Nations system. |
1. No risk assessment shall be carried out where the new psychoactive substance is at an advanced stage of assessment within the United Nations system, namely once the World Health Organisation expert committee on drug dependence has published its critical review together with a written recommendation, except where there is significant and concrete information that is new or of particular relevance for the Union and that has not been taken into account by the United Nations system, which is to be mentioned in the assessment report. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. No risk assessment shall be carried out where the new psychoactive substance has been assessed within the United Nations system, but it has been decided not to schedule it under the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, or the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, except where there is significant information that is new or of particular relevance for the Union. |
2. No risk assessment shall be carried out where the new psychoactive substance has been assessed within the United Nations system, but it has been decided not to schedule it under the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, or the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, except where there is significant and concrete information that is new or of particular relevance for the Union, the reasons for which shall be indicated in the assessment report. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4. However, the risk assessment shall be carried out if at Union level there are sufficient data available to suggest the need for a joint report of the EMCDDA and Europol. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a regulation Article 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a regulation Article 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a regulation Article 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a regulation Article 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a regulation Article 20 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a regulation Article 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a regulation Article 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- [1] Not yet published in the Official Journal.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
New psychoactive substances (NPS) are substances that mimic the effects of controlled substances, but are not covered by the UN Drug Control Conventions. They can often have commercial and industrial use, as well as are explored for scientific and development purposes. When consumed by humans NPS can pose health, social or safety risks. Rapid increase of their sale as well as consumption has been observed in several Member States over the recent years. There is evidence to show that NPS are in particular popular amongst younger age groups. According to the 2011 Eurobarometer "Youth attitudes on drugs", 5% of young people in the EU have used such substances at least once in their life, with a peak of 16% in Ireland, and close to 10% in Poland, Latvia and the United Kingdom. More than 300 NPS are currently in use across the EU. New notifications from Member States are currently running at around 1 per week.
Member States have responded to the rapid emergence and spread of these substances by using a variety of methods within their legislative frameworks and by attempting to put single substances or their analogues under different control measures. That may pose obstacles to the proper functioning of the single market.
The Commission Communication "Towards a stronger European response to drugs", adopted in October 2011, identified the spread of new psychoactive substances as one of the most challenging developments in drugs policy requiring a firmer EU response. It is also worth to indicate that new psychoactive substances, as replacement drugs, are considerably cheaper to manufacture and according to the law enforcements representatives are already one of the biggest challenges in the EU's fight against the organized crime.
The rising number of new psychoactive substances available in the EU internal market, their growing diversity, both in type and risk level, the speed with which they emerge and the growing number of individuals who consume them, challenge the capacity of public authorities to provide effective responses to protect public health and safety without hampering legitimate trade.
In this context, the rapporteur welcomes the Commission's proposal and believes that the need for more effective and better coordinated action between the Member States and EU agencies concerning new psychoactive substances has been proven. The rapporteur underlines in this context that among others, more accurate, tighter timetable for information exchange and swifter decision making process as well as more nuanced classification of the level of risks the NPS can pose, are an added value of the Regulation.
The Regulation will replace the Council Decision 2005/387/JHA. It aims at ensuring that trade in new psychoactive substances having industrial and commercial uses is not hindered and that the functioning of this market is improved, while the health and safety of individuals are protected from harmful substances, which cause concern at the EU level.
The proposal is accompanied by a proposal for a Directive amending Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking.
The main elements of the proposal for a Regulation are as follows:
• Exchange of information and temporary consumer market restrictions: this proposal sets up a robust system for exchanging rapidly information on new psychoactive substances emerging on the market, including on their commercial and industrial uses, for assessing the risks of substances that cause EU-wide concern and for withdrawing from the market those substances that pose risks.
• The substances suspected to pose immediate public health risk will be withdrawn from the consumer market temporarily, pending their risk assessment carried out by the scientific committee of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Once the risk assessment is completed, measures will be taken proportionate to the risks of substances.
• No restriction measures would be introduced on the EU level on new psychoactive substances posing low health, social and safety risks.
• For substances posing moderate risks, the Commission shall prohibit the making available on the market to consumers of these substances. They cannot be sold to consumers (except for uses specifically authorised, for instance by medicines legislation) but their trade would be allowed for commercial and industrial purposes as well as for scientific research and development.
• For substances posing severe risks: the Commission shall prohibit the production, manufacture, making available on the market including the transport, importation or exportation of new psychoactive substances which pose severe health, social and safety risks. The substances posing severe risks will be subjected to permanent market restriction, covering both the consumer and commercial markets, and their use will only be possible for specifically authorised industrial and commercial purposes, as well as for scientific research and development. In addition, these substances will be subjected to EU criminal law provisions.
The rapporteur considers that the temporary market restriction is an important novelty in the new mechanism and once introduced by the Commission, should be in place until the permanent measures are implemented by the Member States. Having in mind the dynamics of the phenomena and opting for an efficiency of the system, the rapporteur amends the Article 9 provisions to avoid possible gaps between the temporary market restriction and implementation of the permanent measures.
With regard to Article 11 and 12 the rapporteur underlines that Members States should not be prohibited from introducing or maintaining the appropriate measures regarding the specific risks the new psychoactive substance poses within their territory, irrelevantly to the classification of the substance by the Commission as posing low or moderate risks on the EU level. National technical regulation going beyond the EU action should be notified to the Commission. The national and EU control systems should be complementary.
The rapporteur considers that for a comprehensive assessment of the level of risks that new psychoactive substance poses, the detailed information should be provided at the earliest stage of the process. The rapporteur underlines also that the information exchange should be timely and all parties encountering the NPS negative effects in their professional activity should be invited to contribute. Therefore improved and better resourced collection of the relevant data should be encouraged while highest level of the data protection should be ensured.
Referring to the criteria being taken into account the rapporteur points out that the methods of use of the NPS, including the use in a mixture or polydrug are an important factor to define the risks and apply adequate measures, since often the new psychoactive substance can be harmful or lethal when consumed with another one.
In order to guarantee access to the psychoactive substances for the authorised use, Member States are invited to introduce highest level of safeguards in order to prevent their diversion for illegal activities.
For the proper functioning of the Regulation adequate resources should be provided on the national and EU level. This should also be taken into account when the Commission evaluates the implementation, application and effectiveness of this Regulation.
Community method to address the issue of the control over the most dangerous NPS within the single market is the appropriate one and if implemented correctly will provide for an effective and structural response to the new psychoactive substances challenge in the EU.
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (31.1.2014)
for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on new psychoactive substances
(COM(2013)0619 – C7‑0272/2013 – 2013/0305(COD))
Rapporteur: Elena Oana Antonescu
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
New psychoactive substances, which may have numerous commercial and industrial uses, as well as scientific uses, can pose health, social and safety risks when consumed by humans. Consumption of new psychoactive substances appears to be increasing in Europe and use is predominant among young people. According to the 2011 Eurobarometer "Youth attitudes on drugs", 5% of young people in the EU have used such substances at least once in their life, with a peak of 16% in Ireland, and close to 10% in Poland, Latvia and the United Kingdom.
The consumption of new psychoactive substances can cause harms to the health and safety of individuals and can pose risks and burdens on society, as it may lead to violent behaviour and crime. The rapid emergence and spread of these substances, have led national authorities to subject them to various restriction measures. Hundreds such substances or mixtures of substances have been subjected to different restriction measures in the Member States in the past years.
The Commission Communication "Towards a stronger European response to drugs", adopted in October 2011, identified the spread of new psychoactive substances as one of the most challenging developments in drugs policy requiring a firmer EU response.
The rising number of new psychoactive substances available in the EU internal market, their growing diversity, both in type and risk level, the speed with which they emerge and the growing number of individuals who consume them, challenge the capacity of public authorities to provide effective responses to protect public health and safety without hampering legitimate trade.
In this context, the case for swifter, more effective and more proportionate action on new psychoactive substances at EU level is compelling, considering the rapid changes in this market, which put national authorities under pressure to act.
The proposed Regulation is intended to replace Council Decision 2005/387/JHA. It aims at ensuring that trade in new psychoactive substances having industrial and commercial uses is not hindered and that the functioning of this market is improved, while the health and safety of individuals are protected from harmful substances, which cause concern at the EU level.
The proposal is accompanied by a proposal for a Directive amending Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking.
The main elements of the proposal for a Regulation are as follows:
• Exchange of information and temporary consumer market restrictions: this proposal sets up a robust system for exchanging rapidly information on new psychoactive substances emerging on the market, including on their commercial and industrial uses, for assessing the risks of substances that cause EU-wide concern and for withdrawing from the market those substances that pose risks.
• The substances suspected to pose immediate public health risk will be withdrawn from the consumer market temporarily, pending their risk assessment carried out by the scientific committee of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Once the risk assessment is completed, measures will be taken proportionate to the risks of substances.
• No restriction measures would be introduced on new psychoactive substances posing low health, social and safety risks.
• For substances posing moderate risks, the Commission shall prohibit the making available on the market to consumers of these substances. They cannot be sold to consumers (except for uses specifically authorised, for instance by medicines legislation) but their trade would be allowed for commercial and industrial purposes as well as for scientific research and development.
• For substances posing severe risks: the Commission shall prohibit the production, manufacture, making available on the market including the transport, importation or exportation of new psychoactive substances which pose severe health, social and safety risks. The substances posing severe risks will be subjected to permanent market restriction, covering both the consumer and commercial markets, and their use will only be possible for specifically authorised industrial and commercial purposes, as well as for scientific research and development. In addition, these substances will be subjected to EU criminal law provisions.
The rapporteur considers that regulatory interventions are very important and that they should be complemented by other activities including research and monitoring psychoactive substances.
In order to address the growing use of new psychoactive substances and their potential risks, Member States should improve the availability and effectiveness of prevention programmes and raise awareness about the risk of the use of these substances and the related consequences.
With regard to the information exchange process described in Article 5 of the proposal, the rapporteur considers that the information which will be provided by the National Focal Points and Europol National Units to the EMCDDA and Europol, should also refer to the detection and identification of the substances that appear to be new psychoactive substances or mixtures, consumption patterns, information on non-fatal intoxication and deaths caused by the consumption of such substances.
The rapporteur considers that besides the European Chemicals Agency and the European Food Safety Authority, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control should also be involved in the collection of the data and information on new psychoactive substances.
The determination of the level of the health, social and safety risks posed by the new psychoactive substance on which a risk assessment report was drafted shall be done by the Commission without undue delay.
Contraindications with other substances should also be taken into account by the Commission when determining the level of the health, social and safety risks posed by the new psychoactive substances on which a risk assessment report was drafted.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(3) Member States' competent public authorities introduce various restriction measures on these new psychoactive substances to address the risks that they pose or may pose when consumed. As new psychoactive substances are often used in the production of various goods or of other substances which are used for manufacturing goods, such as medicines, industrial solvents, cleaning agents, goods in the hi-tech industry, restricting their access for this use can have an important impact on economic operators, potentially disrupting their business activities in the internal market. |
(3) Member States' competent public authorities introduce various restriction measures on these new psychoactive substances to address the risks that they pose or may pose when consumed. As new psychoactive substances are often used for scientific research and development purposes and in the production of various goods or of other substances which are used for manufacturing goods, such as medicines, industrial solvents, cleaning agents, goods in the hi-tech industry, restricting their access for this use can have an important impact on economic operators, potentially disrupting their business activities in the internal market and can also impede sustainable scientific research and development. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(4) The increasing number of new psychoactive substances available in the internal market, their growing diversity, the speed with which they emerge on the market, the different risks that they may pose when consumed by humans and the growing number of individuals who consume them, challenge the capacity of public authorities to provide effective responses to protect public health and safety without hampering the functioning of the internal market. |
(4) The increasing number of new psychoactive substances available in the internal market, their growing diversity, the speed with which they emerge on the market, the different risks that they may pose when consumed by humans, the growing number of individuals who consume them and the lack of general public knowledge and awareness about the risks associated with their consumption, challenge the capacity of public authorities to provide effective responses to protect public health and safety without hampering the functioning of the internal market. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(7) The disparities between the various restriction measures applied to new psychoactive substances can also lead to displacement of harmful new psychoactive substances between the Member States, hampering efforts to restrict their availability to consumers and undermining consumer protection across the Union. |
(7) The disparities between the various restriction measures applied to new psychoactive substances can also lead to displacement of harmful new psychoactive substances between the Member States, hampering efforts to restrict their availability to consumers, undermining consumer protection across the Union and the efforts to combat potential criminal activities and organised crime activity associated with their distribution. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(8) Such disparities are expected to increase as Member States continue to pursue divergent approaches to addressing new psychoactive substances. Therefore, the obstacles to trade and market fragmentation, and the lack of legal clarity and of a level playing field are expected to increase, further hindering the functioning of the internal market. |
(8) Such disparities are expected to increase as Member States continue to pursue divergent approaches to addressing new psychoactive substances. Therefore, the obstacles to trade and market fragmentation, and the lack of legal clarity and of a level playing field are expected to increase, further hindering the functioning of the internal market and the protection of public health and safety. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(10) New psychoactive substances and mixtures should be able to move freely in the Union when intended for commercial and industrial use, as well as for scientific research and development. This Regulation should establish rules for introducing restrictions to this free movement. |
(10) New psychoactive substances and mixtures should be able to move freely in the Union when intended for commercial and industrial use, as well as for scientific research and development. This Regulation should establish rules for introducing restrictions to this free movement. In addition, however, illicit distribution of these substances and mixtures should be prevented. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(17) Certain new psychoactive substances pose immediate public health risks, requiring urgent action. Therefore, their availability to consumers should be restricted for a limited time, pending their risk assessment. |
(17) Certain new psychoactive substances pose immediate public health risks, requiring urgent action. Therefore, their availability to consumers should be restricted for a sufficient period of time, pending their risk assessment. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(24) The mechanism for rapid exchange of information on new psychoactive substances has proved to be a useful channel for sharing information on new psychoactive substances, on new trends in the use of controlled psychoactive substances and on related public health warnings. That mechanism should be further strengthened to enable a more effective response to the rapid emergence and spread of new psychoactive substances across the Union. |
(24) The mechanism for rapid exchange of information on new psychoactive substances has proved to be a useful channel for sharing information on new psychoactive substances, on new trends in the use of controlled psychoactive substances and on related public health warnings. That mechanism should be further strengthened to enable a more effective response to the rapid emergence and spread of new psychoactive substances across the Union, as well as to raise the level of public awareness about the risks associated with their use for any purposes, other than commercial, industrial or scientific. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(29) Prevention, treatment and harm reduction measures are important for addressing the growing use of new psychoactive substances and their potential risks. The internet, which is one of the important distribution channels through which new psychoactive substances are sold, should be used for disseminating information on the health, social and safety risks that they pose. |
(29) Prevention, early detection and intervention, treatment, risk and harm reduction measures are important for addressing the growing use of new psychoactive substances and their potential risks. Member States should improve the availability and effectiveness of prevention programmes and raise awareness about the risk of the use of the new psychoactive substances and related consequences. To this end, prevention measures should include early detection and intervention, promotion of healthy lifestyles and targeted prevention directed also at families and communities. The internet, which is one of the important distribution channels through which new psychoactive substances are advertised and sold, should be used for disseminating information on the health, social and safety risks that they pose, and for the prevention of misuse and abuse. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(29a) The Commission and the Member States should also promote educational and awareness-rising activities, initiatives and campaigns, targeting the health, social and safety risks associated with the misuse and abuse of new psychoactive substances. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(32) The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to a rapid increase in the number of reported fatalities in several Member States associated with the consumption of the new psychoactive substance concerned, imperative grounds of urgency so require. |
(32) The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to a rapid increase in the number of reported fatalities and severe health consequences or incidents posing a grave threat to health in several Member States associated with the consumption of the new psychoactive substance concerned, imperative grounds of urgency so require. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(b) the chemical and physical identity of the new psychoactive substance, the methods and, if known, the chemical precursors used for its manufacture or extraction, and other new psychoactive substances with a similar chemical structure that have emerged; |
(b) the chemical and physical identity of the new psychoactive substance, the methods and, if known, the chemical precursors used for its manufacture or extraction, and any other new psychoactive substance or groups of substances with a similar chemical structure that have emerged; | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) reported fatalities and severe health consequences associated with the consumption of the new psychoactive substance in several Member States, related to the serious acute toxicity of the new psychoactive substance; |
(a) reported fatalities and severe health consequences associated with the consumption of the new psychoactive substance in several Member States, related to the toxicity of the new psychoactive substance; | ||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||
The new psychoactive substances may cause fatalities and severe health consequences even without having acute toxicity. | |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(b) the prevalence and patterns of use of the new psychoactive substance in the general population and in specific groups, in particular frequency, quantities and modality of use, its availability to consumers and the potential for diffusion, which indicate that the scale of the risk is considerable. |
(b) the prevalence and patterns of use of the new psychoactive substance in the general population and in specific groups, in particular frequency, quantities and modality of use, its availability to consumers and the potential for diffusion, which indicate that the scale of the risk is moderate or considerable. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) the harm to health caused by the consumption of the new psychoactive substance associated with its acute and chronic toxicity, abuse liability and dependence-producing potential, in particular injury, disease, and physical and mental impairment; |
(a) the harm to health caused by the consumption of the new psychoactive substance associated with its acute and chronic toxicity, contraindications with other substances, abuse liability and dependence-producing potential, in particular injury, disease, aggression, and physical and mental impairment; | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(c) the risks to safety, in particular the spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, the consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, the impact of the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials on the environment. |
(c) the risks to public safety, in particular the spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, the consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, the impact of the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials on the environment. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) the harm to health caused by the consumption of the new psychoactive substance associated with its acute and chronic toxicity, abuse liability and dependence-producing potential, is limited, as it provokes minor injury and disease, and minor physical or mental impairment; |
(a) the harm to health caused by the consumption of the new psychoactive substance associated with its acute and chronic toxicity, abuse liability and dependence-producing potential, is non-existent or negligible, as it does not provoke injury and disease, aggression and physical or mental impairment; | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(c) the risks to safety are limited, in particular low risk of spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, non-existent or low consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, and the impact of the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials on the environment is low. |
(c) the risks to public safety are limited, in particular low risk of spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, non-existent or low consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, and the impact of the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials on the environment is low. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(c) the risks to safety are moderate, in particular sporadic spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, moderate consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, and the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials results in environmental nuisance. |
(c) the risks to public safety are moderate, in particular sporadic spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, moderate consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, and the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials results in environmental nuisance. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) the harm to health caused by the consumption of the new psychoactive substance associated with its acute and chronic toxicity, abuse liability and dependence-producing potential, is life threatening, as it generally provokes death or lethal injury, severe disease, and severe physical or mental impairment; |
(a) the harm to health caused by the consumption of the new psychoactive substance associated with its acute and chronic toxicity, abuse liability and dependence-producing potential, is severe and significant, as it generally provokes death or lethal injury, severe disease, and severe physical or mental impairment; | ||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||
Severe disease and severe physical or mental impairment are not necessarily life threatening, but substances having such consequences should be considered as high risk. | |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(c) the risks to safety are severe, in particular significant spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, severe consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, and the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials result in environmental harm. |
(c) the risks to public safety are severe, in particular significant spread of diseases, including transmission of blood borne viruses, severe consequences of physical and mental impairment on the ability to drive, and the manufacture, transport and disposal of the new psychoactive substance and associated waste materials result in environmental harm. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2a. The Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act where no opinion is delivered by the committee referred to in the Article 19(1). | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation Article -20 (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Article -20 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
National scope | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Where the EU has not acted, or the Commission has decided not to adopt any restriction measures based on the EMCDDA risk assessment of a new psychoactive substance, individual Member States may maintain or introduce in their territory restrictions on the making available of the new psychoactive substance on the market to consumers, without prejudice to legitimate trade in industry, or to medicinal products or veterinary medicinal products that have obtained a marketing authorisation. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Member States shall ensure that such restrictions are immediately communicated to the Commission, the EMCDDA and Europol. | ||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||
As the effects of certain new psychoactive substances can be extremely localised, Member States should be free to introduce consumer bans on substances within their own territories where the EU has not acted, or has decided that a substance poses a low risk at European level and therefore requires no Union action. However, in respect to the principle of free movement of goods and the internal market, legitimate Union trade in such substances, where it exists, should not be compromised. | |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation Article 20 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
The Commission and the Member States shall support the development, sharing and dissemination of information and knowledge on new psychoactive substances. They shall do so by facilitating cooperation between the EMCDDA, other Union agencies, and scientific and research centres. |
The Commission and the Member States shall support the development, sharing and dissemination of information and knowledge on new psychoactive substances. They shall do so by facilitating cooperation between the EMCDDA, other Union agencies (in particular European Medicines Agency, European Chemicals Agency) and scientific and research centres, and by regularly providing these bodies with up to date information on such substances wherever possible. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The Commission and the Member States shall also promote and support the research, including applied research into new psychoactive substances and ensure cooperation and coordination between networks at national and EU level in order to strenghten the understanding of the phenomenon. They shall do so by facilitating cooperation between the EMCDDA, other Union agencies (in particular European Medicines Agency, European Chemicals Agency) and scientific and research centres. In particular, emphasis should be placed on developing forensic and toxicological capacity as well as on improving the availability of epidemiological information. | ||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||
The nature of new psychoactive substances can change rapidly, and therefore Union agencies and scientific and research centres need to be kept as up to date as possible in order to monitor any emerging threats to public health. | |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
The EMCDDA and Europol shall report annually on the implementation of this Regulation. |
The EMCDDA and Europol shall report annually to the Commission and Member States on the implementation of this Regulation, and such reports will be published on a website and made public. |
PROCEDURE
Title |
New psychoactive substances |
||||
References |
COM(2013)0619 – C7-0272/2013 – 2013/0305(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
LIBE 8.10.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 8.10.2013 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Elena Oana Antonescu 10.10.2013 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
16.12.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
30.1.2014 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
50 0 1 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Sophie Auconie, Pilar Ayuso, Sandrine Bélier, Biljana Borzan, Tadeusz Cymański, Spyros Danellis, Chris Davies, Esther de Lange, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Karin Kadenbach, Martin Kastler, Christa Klaß, Claus Larsen-Jensen, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Zofija Mazej Kukovič, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Pavel Poc, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis |
||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Kriton Arsenis, Julie Girling, Jutta Haug, Filip Kaczmarek, James Nicholson, Vittorio Prodi, Christel Schaldemose, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Bart Staes, Rebecca Taylor, Vladimir Urutchev, Andrea Zanoni |
||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Hiltrud Breyer, Vojtěch Mynář, Bill Newton Dunn |
||||
PROCEDURE
Title |
New psychoactive substances |
||||
References |
COM(2013)0619 – C7-0272/2013 – 2013/0305(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
10.9.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
LIBE 8.10.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 8.10.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed |
Jacek Protasiewicz 30.9.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
14.11.2013 |
23.1.2014 |
12.2.2014 |
10.3.2014 |
|
Date adopted |
10.3.2014 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
51 4 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Roberta Angelilli, Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Arkadiusz Tomasz Bratkowski, Salvatore Caronna, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Ioan Enciu, Frank Engel, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Monika Flašíková Beňová, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Monica Luisa Macovei, Svetoslav Hristov Malinov, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu Houillon, Anthea McIntyre, Claude Moraes, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Nils Torvalds, Wim van de Camp, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Josef Weidenholzer, Cecilia Wikström, Auke Zijlstra |
||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Michael Cashman, Jean Lambert, Jan Mulder, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Marie-Christine Vergiat |
||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Josefa Andrés Barea, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Béla Glattfelder, Ádám Kósa, Krzysztof Lisek, Jens Nilsson, Csaba Őry |
||||
Date tabled |
13.3.2014 |
||||