REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
30.3.2017 - (COM(2016)0582 – C8‑0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Budgets
Rapporteur: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial
Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Nirj Deva, Committee on Development
(*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
(COM(2016)0582 – C8‑0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0582),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Articles 209 and 212 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0374/2016),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on International Trade (A8-0132/2017),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 | |||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(2) The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors. |
(2) The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors. The annual payment should not be to the detriment of existing activities under heading 4. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | |||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(4) The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migration. |
(4) The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing the migratory pressures stemming from poverty, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities, climate change and the long term consequences of forced displacement. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 | |||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record. |
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments and should be carried out under the highest standards of transparency and democratic accountability. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and further strengthening its track record. The transfer of management should lead to cost savings for the general budget of the Union and should enable the Commission to provide to the European Parliament better and more accurate information about the management and situation of the Guarantee Fund. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 7 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
OPINION of the Committee on Development(*) (24.3.2017)
for the Committee on Budgets
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
(COM(2016)0582 – C8‑0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))
Rapporteur: Nirj Deva
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The Guarantee Fund for External Action (GFEA) protects the EU budget from shocks that might otherwise occur in case of defaults on loans that are guaranteed by the EU. It is intended to cover the activation of general budget guarantees for third countries in order to avoid possible disruptions to the implementation of the budget in the event of default. The Commission entrusted so far the financial management of the GFEA to the EIB, however the funds in it remain the property of the EU.
The Commission’s proposal to take over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB is part of a larger plan to eventually internalise all asset management. Taking into account the fact that the Commission already manages seven billion euros, it is of the opinion that it already has the staff and expertise to manage the fund, while saving the yearly fees paid to the EIB for the asset management; in 2015 the fee amounted to EUR 861 000. The Commission claims that the transfer of the asset management to the Commission would generate over a full MFF period savings allowing the financing of a volume of investments of EUR 66 million.
While the Rapporteur agrees in principle with the Commission’s proposal to take over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Rapporteur believes it of crucial importance that the European Parliament and the Court of Auditors monitor the Guarantee Fund and the transition of the asset management to the Commission. To that effect, the Rapporteur believes that an external impact assessment and evaluation by the Court of Auditors should take place two years after the transfer of the asset management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB to the Commission. In the event of a significant performance gap, the asset management of the Guarantee Fund shall be moved back to the EIB.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | |
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(4) The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migration. |
(4) The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing migratory pressures stemming from poverty, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities, climate change and the long term consequences of forced displacement. |
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 | |
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record. |
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments, and should be carried out in accordance with the highest standards of transparency and democratic accountability. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record. |
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
|
Title |
Guarantee Fund for external actions |
||||
|
References |
COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD) |
||||
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 6.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
DEVE 6.10.2016 |
||||
|
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Nirj Deva 16.12.2016 |
||||
|
Discussed in committee |
28.2.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
21.3.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
19 2 0 |
|||
|
Members present for the final vote |
Raymond Finch, Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Enrique Guerrero Salom, György Hölvényi, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Arne Lietz, Linda McAvan, Norbert Neuser, Maurice Ponga, Lola Sánchez Caldentey, Eleni Theocharous, Paavo Väyrynen, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Željana Zovko |
||||
|
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Frank Engel, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Florent Marcellesi, Louis Michel, Jan Zahradil |
||||
|
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Martina Werner |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
|
19 |
+ |
|
|
ALDE |
Louis Michel, Paavo Väyrynen |
|
|
ECR |
Eleni Theocharous, Jan Zahradil |
|
|
PPE |
Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Frank Engel, György Hölvényi, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Maurice Ponga, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Željana Zovko |
|
|
S&D |
Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Arne Lietz, Linda McAvan, Norbert Neuser, Martina Werner |
|
|
VERTS/ALE |
Florent Marcellesi |
|
|
2 |
- |
|
|
EFDD |
Raymond Finch |
|
|
GUE/NGL |
Lola Sánchez Caldentey |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (22.3.2017)
for the Committee on Budgets
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
(COM(2016)0582 – C8‑0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))
Rapporteur: Eduard Kukan
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The Commission proposal amends the Regulation establishing the Guarantee Fund for external actions in the context of the revision of the External Lending Mandate of the European Investment Bank, bringing some technical adjustments.
The Rapporteur agrees with these adjustments, with the exception of the proposed transfer of the management of the Guarantee Fund to the Commission.
It is the Rapporteur’s belief that for the on-going period, the Guarantee Fund should remain under the management of the European Investment Bank. The rapporteur is of the opinion that re-internalization of the Guarantee Fund to the Commission would need to be properly prepared within a broader framework of management of the EU’s financial toolbox under the next Multiannual Financial Framework.
At the moment the rapporteur has not received conclusive evidence that moving the Fund under the management of the Commission would bring significant advantages and would not create unnecessary overlaps between the EU institutions. The Rapporteur is of the opinion that potential costs and benefits should be evaluated in more detail before such change is made.
Therefore, it is also Rapporteur’s opinion that broader discussion on future structure of the external lending should start well in advance the next financial period running from 2020.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(2) The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors. |
(2) The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, which cannot go to the detriment of existing activities under heading IV, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record. |
(5) The possibility of transferring the financial management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB to the Commission should be evaluated in terms of associated costs and benefits in order to ensure maximum efficiency of the use of Union financial resources in view of the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 2 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
|
Title |
Guarantee Fund for external actions |
||||
|
References |
COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD) |
||||
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 6.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
AFET 6.10.2016 |
||||
|
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Eduard Kukan 2.12.2016 |
||||
|
Discussed in committee |
9.2.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
21.3.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
43 3 5 |
|||
|
Members present for the final vote |
Lars Adaktusson, Francisco Assis, Bas Belder, Goffredo Maria Bettini, Victor Boştinaru, Klaus Buchner, James Carver, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Javier Couso Permuy, Andi Cristea, Arnaud Danjean, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Eugen Freund, Michael Gahler, Iveta Grigule, Sandra Kalniete, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Tunne Kelam, Andrey Kovatchev, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Arne Lietz, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Andrejs Mamikins, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Alex Mayer, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Demetris Papadakis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Tonino Picula, Julia Pitera, Jozo Radoš, Jordi Solé, Jaromír Štětina, Dubravka Šuica, Charles Tannock, László Tőkés, Geoffrey Van Orden, Boris Zala |
||||
|
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Neena Gill, Marek Jurek, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Eleni Theocharous, Traian Ungureanu, Bodil Valero |
||||
|
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Heidi Hautala, Romana Tomc, Ivan Štefanec |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
|
43 |
+ |
|
|
ALDE |
Iveta Grigule, Jozo Radoš, Marietje Schaake |
|
|
ECR |
Bas Belder, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Marek Jurek, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Charles Tannock, Eleni Theocharous, Geoffrey Van Orden |
|
|
GUE/NGL |
Javier Couso Permuy, Sabine Lösing, Helmut Scholz |
|
|
PPE |
Lars Adaktusson, Arnaud Danjean, Michael Gahler, Sandra Kalniete, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Tunne Kelam, Andrey Kovatchev, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Julia Pitera, Romana Tomc, László Tőkés, Traian Ungureanu, Ivan Štefanec, Jaromír Štětina, Dubravka Šuica |
|
|
S&D |
Francisco Assis, Goffredo Maria Bettini, Victor Boştinaru, Andi Cristea, Eugen Freund, Neena Gill, Arne Lietz, Andrejs Mamikins, Alex Mayer, Demetris Papadakis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Tonino Picula, Boris Zala |
|
|
3 |
- |
|
|
EFDD |
James Carver, Fabio Massimo Castaldo |
|
|
PPE |
José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra |
|
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
Verts/ALE |
Klaus Buchner, Heidi Hautala, Ulrike Lunacek, Jordi Solé, Bodil Valero |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade (22.3.2017)
for the Committee on Budgets
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
(COM(2016)0582 – C8‑0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))
Rapporteur: Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The proposal amends Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions and forms part of the ambitious External Investment Plan announced by the Commission on 7 June 2016 with the aim to further consolidate the European Agenda on Migration. The proposal introduces 4 amendments to the existing Regulation.
1. It adds the risk premium revenues generated under the financing operations of the EIB as a new fourth source of income for the Guarantee Fund.
2. The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% (instead of currently 9%) of the total outstanding of loans will be paid back to the budget. This aims at giving higher financial capabilities to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB operations related to migration crisis.
3. The management of the assets of the Guarantee Fund shall be transferred from the EIB to the Commission. The Commission is already entrusted with the management of the Guarantee Fund for the EFSI. The proposed transfer aims at further consolidating the asset management activities of the Commission.
4. The Commission will annually submit to the Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors a detailed report on the situation and management of the Guarantee Fund. This could bring better and more accurate information based on the existing structures between these Institutions.
The rapporteur generally agrees with these adjustments with the exception of the following amendments.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
|
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record. |
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities as well as to coordinate all external financing aspects of the European Agenda on Migration, building on existing structures and further strengthening its track record. The transfer of management should lead to cost savings for the Union Budget and better and more accurate information about the management and situation of the Guarantee Fund provided by the Commission to the European Parliament. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 Article 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
|
Title |
Guarantee Fund for external actions |
||||
|
References |
COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD) |
||||
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 6.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
INTA 19.1.2017 |
||||
|
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl 9.11.2016 |
||||
|
Discussed in committee |
28.2.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
21.3.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
30 5 3 |
|||
|
Members present for the final vote |
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Maria Arena, Tiziana Beghin, David Borrelli, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Salvatore Cicu, Marielle de Sarnez, Karoline Graswander-Hainz, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emmanuel Maurel, Anne-Marie Mineur, Sorin Moisă, Franz Obermayr, Artis Pabriks, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Viviane Reding, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Tokia Saïfi, Matteo Salvini, Marietje Schaake, Joachim Schuster, Joachim Starbatty, Adam Szejnfeld, Hannu Takkula, Iuliu Winkler, Jan Zahradil |
||||
|
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Klaus Buchner, Agnes Jongerius, Stelios Kouloglou, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Jarosław Wałęsa |
||||
|
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Philippe Loiseau, Jordi Solé |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
|
30 |
+ |
|
|
ALDE |
Marietje Schaake, Hannu Takkula, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Marielle de Sarnez |
|
|
ECR |
David Campbell Bannerman, Joachim Starbatty, Jan Zahradil |
|
|
EFDD |
Tiziana Beghin |
|
|
GUE/NGL |
Stelios Kouloglou |
|
|
PPE |
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Daniel Caspary, Salvatore Cicu, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Artis Pabriks, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Viviane Reding, Tokia Saïfi, Adam Szejnfeld, Jarosław Wałęsa, Iuliu Winkler |
|
|
S&D |
Maria Arena, Karoline Graswander-Hainz, Agnes Jongerius, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emmanuel Maurel, Sorin Moisă, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Joachim Schuster |
|
|
5 |
- |
|
|
EFDD |
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth |
|
|
ENF |
Philippe Loiseau, Franz Obermayr, Matteo Salvini |
|
|
GUE/NGL |
Anne-Marie Mineur |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
EFDD |
David Borrelli |
|
|
Verts/ALE |
Klaus Buchner, Jordi Solé |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
|
Title |
Guarantee Fund for external actions |
||||
|
References |
COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD) |
||||
|
Date submitted to Parliament |
14.9.2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 6.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
AFET 6.10.2016 |
DEVE 6.10.2016 |
INTA 19.1.2017 |
LIBE 6.10.2016 |
|
|
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
LIBE 4.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Eider Gardiazabal Rubial 10.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
27.3.2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
27 2 1 |
|||
|
Members present for the final vote |
Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis, Reimer Böge, Lefteris Christoforou, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Iris Hoffmann, Monika Hohlmeier, Bernd Kölmel, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Clare Moody, Siegfried Mureşan, Jan Olbrycht, Paul Rübig, Patricija Šulin, Eleftherios Synadinos, Inese Vaidere, Tiemo Wölken, Stanisław Żółtek |
||||
|
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Nicola Caputo, Heidi Hautala, Ivana Maletić, Marco Valli |
||||
|
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Iratxe García Pérez, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Arndt Kohn, Luigi Morgano, Fernando Ruas, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso |
||||
|
Date tabled |
30.3.2017 |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
|
27 |
+ |
|
|
ALDE |
Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis |
|
|
ECR |
Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Bernd Kölmel |
|
|
PPE |
Reimer Böge, Lefteris Christoforou, Ingeborg Gräßle, Monika Hohlmeier, Ivana Maletić, Siegfried Mureşan, Jan Olbrycht, Fernando Ruas, Paul Rübig, Inese Vaidere, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso, Patricija Šulin |
|
|
S&D |
Nicola Caputo, Iratxe García Pérez, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Jens Geier, Iris Hoffmann, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Arndt Kohn, Clare Moody, Luigi Morgano, Tiemo Wölken |
|
|
Verts/ALE |
Heidi Hautala |
|
|
2 |
- |
|
|
ENF |
Stanisław Żółtek |
|
|
NI |
Eleftherios Synadinos |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
EFDD |
Marco Valli |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention