Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
4 May 2017
E-003148-17
Question for written answer
to the Commission
Rule 130
Nessa Childers (S&D)

 Subject:  Civil society's views on ancillary rights in response to the public consultation on the role of publishers in the copyright value chain
 Answer(s) 

In its synopsis report on the public consultation on the role of publishers in the copyright value chain, the Commission outlines the results of this consultation on the role of publishers, particularly as it relates to ancillary rights.

The report states that ‘some consumer organisations recognised that a neighbouring right could have a positive impact on the quality of press content and in terms of media pluralism’.

Could the Commission indicate what share of consumer organisations’ submissions recognised this potential positive impact?

Could the Commission further indicate how many submissions from such organisations expressed reservations or concerns about the introduction of the neighbouring right, as well as the share of submissions from ‘users/consumers/citizens’ that expressed reservations or concerns about this right?

Last updated: 16 May 2017Legal notice