Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2006/0165(CNS)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A6-0148/2007

Texts tabled :

A6-0148/2007

Debates :

PV 22/05/2007 - 20
CRE 22/05/2007 - 20

Votes :

PV 23/05/2007 - 5.4
CRE 23/05/2007 - 5.4
Explanations of votes
PV 10/07/2007 - 8.36
CRE 10/07/2007 - 8.36
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P6_TA(2007)0324

Debates
Wednesday, 23 May 2007 - Strasbourg OJ edition

5.4. Excise duty on alcohol (vote)
PV
  

– Report: Lulling (A6-0148/2007)

- After the rejection of the Commission proposal:

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Ieke van den Burg (PSE). – I should like to request that the document be referred back to committee, because now we have contradictory voting outcomes.

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  President. Because the Commission has not made any proposals, it will automatically be referred back to committee. That will happen anyway.

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Astrid Lulling (PPE-DE), rapporteur. – (FR) Mr President, I proposed to my group and to many of my fellow Members who supported me that they reject the report, because the line that I had proposed has not been followed and because I have the impression that, in view of the close outcome of the vote, certain Members of this House did not know what they were voting for.

(Protests)

Sorry, were unaware of the significance of their votes.

Furthermore, Mr President, given that the Commission is keeping quiet – even though Commissioner Kovács spoke twice last night while I, the rapporteur, was not allowed to respond to him – I really must highlight its powerlessness.

We made a proposal in order to break the deadlock. Unfortunately, we have not been supported, Mr President. Therefore, there is no report by Parliament on this proposal, and the Commission and the Council can persist in maintaining the status quo and persevere in their state of deadlock.

(Applause)

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  President. There will of course be a debate when the matter comes back before the House.

 
Last updated: 3 August 2007Legal notice