Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2007/2145(INI)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A6-0479/2008

Texts tabled :

A6-0479/2008

Debates :

PV 17/12/2008 - 14
CRE 17/12/2008 - 14

Votes :

PV 14/01/2009 - 4.5
CRE 14/01/2009 - 4.5
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P6_TA(2009)0019

Debates
Wednesday, 14 January 2009 - Strasbourg OJ edition

4.5. Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2004-2008) (A6-0479/2008, Giusto Catania) (vote)
PV
MPphoto
 
 

  President. − Before the vote on the first part of paragraph 32

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Mogens Camre (UEN). - Mr President, it is to complete the text of this amendment. After the text which reads ‘12 December 2006’, we simply wish to add: ‘and on 4 and 17 December 2008’. This is because there were decisions by the Court on these later dates, and it would not be correct to mention the decision in 2006 without mentioning the latest findings of the Court in December 2008.

 
  
 

(The oral amendment was accepted)

- Before the vote on Amendment 25

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Syed Kamall (PPE-DE). - Mr President, according to my voting list it appears that paragraph 36 was withdrawn, so I wonder whether we should have voted on that at all.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  President. − Amendment 8 has been withdrawn, and as a result you cannot vote on paragraph 36.

- Before the vote on paragraph 161

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Marco Cappato (ALDE).(IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, on paragraph 166 I would just like to point out that the original English text is the authentic version, because there are too many translations which completely distort the meaning; for example, the Italian translation speaks of 'morte decorosa' [decent death]. I will not go into the details, but the authentic version is the English version.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  President. − Thank you for reminding us of this. I will mention it again at the appropriate moment without giving the floor again to Mr Cappato, because now we must vote on paragraph 161; we still have to vote on the original text of the paragraph, having rejected the amendment.

 
Last updated: 3 March 2009Legal notice