Parlament EuropejskiChoisissez la langue de votre document :
- bg - български
- es - español
- cs - čeština
- da - dansk
- de - Deutsch
- et - eesti keel
- el - ελληνικά
- en - English (wybrano)
- fr - français
- ga - Gaeilge
- hr - hrvatski
- it - italiano
- lv - latviešu valoda
- lt - lietuvių kalba
- hu - magyar
- mt - Malti
- nl - Nederlands
- pl - polski
- pt - português
- ro - română
- sk - slovenčina
- sl - slovenščina
- fi - suomi
- sv - svenska
 |
 | Ten dokument nie jest dostępny w Państwa języku i został zaproponowany w innym języku spośród dostępnych w pasku języków. |
| Parliamentary questions | ||
| 14 February 2006 |
| |
| ORAL QUESTION for Question Time at the part-session in March 2006 pursuant to Rule 109 of the Rules of Procedure by Claude Moraes to the Commission | ||
 Subject: Appealing against an EU audit |
| ||
|
Could the Commission outline the process of appealing against an EU audit? A constituent of mine was nearly forced into bankruptcy due to demands by the EC, despite his case being under review by the European Ombudsman. What protection is offered to small businesses when trying to appeal against the results of an audit, and what guarantees are offered? | |||
| Ostatnia aktualizacja: 21 lutego 2006 | Informacja prawna |