Evropský parlamentChoisissez la langue de votre document :
- bg - български
- es - español
- cs - čeština
- da - dansk
- de - Deutsch
- et - eesti keel
- el - ελληνικά
- en - English (výběr)
- fr - français
- ga - Gaeilge
- it - italiano
- lv - latviešu valoda
- lt - lietuvių kalba
- hu - magyar
- mt - Malti
- nl - Nederlands
- pl - polski
- pt - português
- ro - română
- sk - slovenčina
- sl - slovenščina
- fi - suomi
- sv - svenska
 |
 | Tento dokument není k dispozici ve vašem jazyce a je vám nabízen v jiném, který lze zvolit na liště jazyků. |
| Parliamentary questions | ||
| 20 June 2006 |
| |
| ORAL QUESTION for Question Time at the part-session in July 2006 pursuant to Rule 109 of the Rules of Procedure by Anne Van Lancker to the Commission | ||
 Subject: Workers' right to consultation and review of Directive 94/45/CE |
| |||
|
On 12 May 2006, the company Dim Branded Apparel announced to the European Works Council that it intended to cut 950 jobs in Europe, of which 450 were in France, 300 in Spain and 140 in Italy. The management has undertaken to keep the European Works Council informed, but has refused to enter into any consultation at European level. This case illustrates the importance of the workers' right to information and consultation with a view to the introduction of measures to support restructuring. How does the Commission ensure that the workers' right to consultation is respected in practice? Does it intend to review Council Directive 94/45/EC(1) of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees?
| ||||
| Original language of question: FR | ||||
| Poslední aktualizace: 21. června 2006 | Právní upozornění |