REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology
12.12.2012 - (COM(2011)0817 – C7‑0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Rapporteur: Philippe Lamberts
Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Chrysoulia Paliadeli, Committee on Culture and Education
(*) Associated Committee - Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology
(COM(2011)0817 – C7‑0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2011)0817),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 173(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7‑0467/2011),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 28 March 2012[1],
– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Culture and Education, the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0403/2012),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth assigns a prominent role to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (hereinafter referred to as the EIT) which contributes to a number of flagship initiatives. |
(1) The Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth assigns a prominent role to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (hereinafter referred to as the EIT) which aims at contributing to a number of flagship initiatives, in particular, the flagships for an Innovation Union and Youth on the Move. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) During the period 2014-2020 the EIT should contribute to ‘Horizon2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ established by Regulation No XX/XXXX of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter referred to as ‘Horizon 2020’) objectives by integrating the knowledge triangle of research, innovation and education. |
(2) During the period 2014-2020 the EIT should contribute to ‘Horizon2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ established by Regulation No XX/XXXX of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter referred to as ‘Horizon 2020’) objectives by integrating the knowledge triangle of research, innovation and education in order to stimulate excellence and to accelerate innovation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The objective of the EIT is to integrate the three parts of the knowledge triangle, in order to stimulate excellence which accelerates innovation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) The rules concerning the management of intellectual property rights are defined in the Rules for Participation. |
(4) The rules concerning the dissemination of results through open access, licensing and the management of intellectual property rights are defined in the Rules for Participation and in the Strategic Innovation Agenda of the EIT. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4a) As a leading European institute for innovation, the EIT and the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (hereinafter referred to as KICs) should play an innovative role in identifying and fostering innovative practices for the management of intellectual property rights, promoting transparency, knowledge transfer and dissemination. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) The EIT should directly engage with national and regional representatives and other stakeholders from across the innovation chain, generating beneficial effects on both sides. In order to render such dialogue and exchange more systematic, an EIT Stakeholder Forum should be organised, bringing together the wider community of stakeholders around cross-cutting issues. |
(6) The EIT should directly engage with national and regional representatives and other stakeholders from across the innovation chain, generating beneficial effects on both sides. In order to render such dialogue and exchange more systematic, an EIT Stakeholder Forum should be organised, bringing together under a common platform, all KICs and the wider community of stakeholders, around cross- cutting issues. To ensure wider stakeholder engagement, the EIT should conduct relevant information campaigns targeting European universities, national, regional and local authorities involved in R&D&I policies. KICs should also set up processes for regular stakeholders' consultation in their particular field of action. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6a) The EIT should pay attention to a good balance being achieved between the different actors from the knowledge triangle involved in the KICs, paying attention especially to smaller actors and private sector involvement. In particular it should seek to engage more closely with SMEs to ensure their active participation in the activities of the KICs. Furthermore, public companies and local authorities, as well as non-profit organizations, should be involved in the KICs, as appropriate. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6a) The EIT should further promote recognition by the Member States of EIT degrees and diplomas bearing its label of excellence. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6b) The EIT should promote, by its very nature and composition, multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary approaches to innovation and entrepreneurship, including the development of non-technological solutions, organizational approaches, new business models, systems innovation and public sector innovations, as a necessary complement to technological and technical innovation activities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6c) Social enterprises, being very innovative in nature through the goods and services they offer, may contribute to addressing the major societal challenges. Social innovation and social entrepreneurship should therefore constitute, as appropriate, an important part of the EIT's and the KICs' activities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) The scope of the EIT contribution to the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (hereinafter referred to as KICs) should be defined and the origins of KICs' financial resources clarified. |
(7) The scope of the EIT contribution to the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (hereinafter referred to as KICs) should be defined and the origins of KICs' financial resources clarified. In particular, the EIT should act as an investor and its funding aim at leveraging other sources of private and public funding, including other EU funds. The level of this leverage should be clearly defined. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) The composition of the EIT bodies should be simplified. The functioning of the EIT Governing Board should be streamlined and the respective roles and tasks of the Governing Board and the Director should be further clarified. |
(8) The composition of the EIT bodies should be simplified, should reflect the three dimensions of the knowledge triangle, and gender balance should be sought. The functioning of the EIT Governing Board should be streamlined and the respective roles and tasks of the Governing Board and the Director should be further clarified. The Governing Board and the Director should act in the interests of the EIT in an independent, impartial and transparent way. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) New KICs, including their priority fields and the organisation and timing of the selection process, should be launched on the basis of modalities defined in the Strategic Innovation Agenda. |
(9) The EIT may allocate its budget to already established KICs or to newly selected KICs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As of 2014, the EIT should launch the selection of up to four new KICs in the thematic priority areas as defined in the Strategic Innovation Agenda (SIA). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As of 2018, according to the budget available and following a stakeholders’ consultation, the EIT should launch further calls for the selection of KICs in the remaining themes identified in the SIA or newly identified themes falling within the scope of Horizon 2020 objectives. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(9a) New KICs should be launched and selected by the EIT on the basis of an open, transparent and competitive process, providing clarity and predictability for potential participants. The KICs selection process should be based on minimum conditions of eligibility criteria and fulfil selection criteria demonstrating the potential, quality and viability of the proposal. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(9b) The EIT should take into account the fact not all KICs will have the same financial needs, some being more capital intensive than others. The EIT should therefore define the amount of financial support it will provide to the KICs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) The KICs should broaden their educational activities, by providing professional training courses. |
(10) The KICs should broaden their educational activities, by providing professional and summer training courses, distance learning courses and internships to post-graduate students. The EIT should invest in cultivating a world-class EIT brand-name in the area of innovative entrepreneurial education. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10 a) The EIT and the KICs should develop educational synergies with the EU and Member States policies, in order to support the future availability of the necessary human capital that is essential to fulfil Europe's path towards scientific, technological and innovation leadership. To this end, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education should be promoted and entrepreneurial coaching, internships and grants for young Europeans and top high-school and university students should be created. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) Cooperation on the organisation the monitoring and evaluations of the KICs between the Commission and the EIT is required to ensure coherence with overall EU level monitoring and evaluation system. |
(11) Cooperation on the organisation the monitoring and evaluations of the KICs between the Commission and the EIT is required to ensure coherence with overall EU level monitoring and evaluation system. In particular, the principles for monitoring the KICs and the EIT should be clarified. Cross-KIC coordination and cooperation should be ensured by the EIT in order to achieve synergies and added-value creation from the interaction of the numerous EIT partners. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) The KICs should seek synergies with relevant European Union initiatives. |
(12) The KICs should seek synergies with relevant research and innovation initiatives and instruments established at European level, including with the European Innovation Partnerships, the European Industrial Initiatives under the SET-Plan and other public-private partnerships. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(12a) The KICs should act as "innovation catalysts", capable of producing a significant number of much-needed innovators, who will be the bearers of entrepreneurial culture and experience and able to create innovative, knowledge-based SMEs and transform existing businesses. The KICs should function as a reference and an easy-to-replicate collaboration model for other European, regional and national R&D&I communities and for consolidating Structural Funds for achieving the Union's innovation objectives. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(12b) The spending of Union and Member States’ funds on research, innovation and education should be better coordinated in order to ensure complementarity, better efficiency and visibility, as well as to achieve better budgetary synergies. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(13) In order to assure broader participation of organizations from different Members States in the KICs, the partner organizations should be established in at least three different Member States. |
(13) In order to assure broader participation of organizations from different Members States in the KICs, the partner organizations should be established in at least three different Member States. The EIT should promote a widening of participation and stimulate excellence across Europe. It should ensure access to all high quality European universities, research communities, small research groups and private sector actors, including highly innovative startups. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13a) The EIT and the KICs should develop outreach activities and establish communication and information exchange channels with institutions and other partners in emerging and potential centres of excellence, in particular where there is demonstrated demand so that they may engage and participate in their activities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) The criteria and procedures for the financing, monitoring and evaluation of the activities of the KICs should be adopted by the EIT prior to launching the KIC selection process. |
(14) The criteria and procedures for the financing, monitoring and evaluation of the activities of the KICs should be adopted by the EIT prior to launching the KIC selection process. In particular, a substantial part of the yearly financial contribution to the KICs should be allocated on the basis of a competitive review mechanism. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(14a) It is important to ensure sound financial management of the EIT and the implementation of the KICs in the most effective and user-friendly manner possible. The EIT should seek to reduce administrative burdens for the KICs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(15) The EIT Triennial Work Programme should take into account the Commission's opinion concerning the EIT's specific objectives, as defined in Horizon 2020, and its complementarities with European Union policies and instruments. |
(15) The EIT Triennial Work Programme should take into account the Commission's opinion and the views expressed by European Parliament and the Council. A regular dialogue between the EIT and the European Parliament should be established. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(17) The evaluation of the EIT should provide timely input to the evaluation of Horizon 2020 in 2017 and 2023. |
(17) The evaluation of the EIT should allow for direct comparisons of performance and key-indicators with relevant Horizon 2020 instruments and should provide timely input to the evaluation of Horizon 2020 in 2017 and 2023. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(18) The Commission should strengthen its role in monitoring the implementation of specific aspects of EIT activities. |
(18) The Commission should improve its monitoring of the implementation of specific aspects of EIT activities, while the EIT should improve its monitoring of the KICs. That monitoring should be results-oriented. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(19a) EIT activities should ensure the utmost transparency, accountability and democratic scrutiny of contributions from the Union budget, especially as regards their contribution, both expected and achieved, to attain Union objectives. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 - point 1 - point -aa (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point -a b (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To fully embedd the EIT as an instrument to implement Horizon 2020 it is important to stress the link between the role of KICs and the specific objectives of Horizon 2020. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point aa (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point b a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point b b (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 9 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point c Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point d Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A balance between actors from education, research, innovation and business is necessary in the EIT bodies. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 5 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 - point 5 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The KICs have a large autonomy however it is necessary to clarify what minimum features, general principles and tasks the KICs should have. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 Regulation EC/294/2008 Article 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 a (new) Regulation EC/294/2008 Article 7 -a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Article 14 of the Regulation is moved to Article 7-a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For sake of clarity funding sources (Article 14) and financing principles have been consolidated in a unique article and amended to include the KIC leverage effects principles (maximum 25% EIT contribution, and maximum 50% total EU funds contribution) as well as the competitive review mechanism for the yearly KICs allocations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 7 Regulation EC/294/2008 Article 7 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 8 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 7b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 9 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 13 – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – introductory part Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(See Article 7-a new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For sake of clarity funding sources (Article 14) and financing principles have been consolidated in a unique article (Article 7-a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 12 Regulation N° 294/2008 Article 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 14 – point-a a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 17 – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 14 – point b (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 17 – paragraph 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 15 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 1 – point 2 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Commission shall have regard to the balance between higher education, research, innovation and business experience as well as to gender balance and an appreciation of the higher education, research and innovation environments across the Union. |
The Commission shall have regard to the balance between higher education, research, innovation and business experience as well as to gender balance and the widening participation of the higher education, research and innovation environments across the Union. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 1 – point 2 – paragraph 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Commission shall appoint the member(s) and inform the European Parliament and the Council about the selection process and the final appointment of those members of the Governing Board. |
The Commission shall appoint the member(s) after informing the European Parliament and the Council about the selection process and the final appointment of those members of the Governing Board. Before the Commission makes any such appointments, the European Parliament and the Council may express an opinion concerning the candidates selected. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The aim is to ensure the transparency of the procedure for appointing Board members. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 1 – point 2 – paragraph 6 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Commission shall dismiss any member or members of the Governing Board who fail to perform the duties of their office in accordance with the interests of the Union. It shall do so on the basis of the opinion of the European Parliament and the Council. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 1 – point 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Governing Board members shall act in the interests of the EIT, safeguarding its goals and mission, identity and coherence, in an independent way. |
The Governing Board members shall act in the interests of the EIT, safeguarding its goals and mission, identity, autonomy and coherence, in an independent, transparent and impartial way. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point o | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(o) decide on EIT’s language regime, taking into account the existing principles on multilingualism and the practical requirements of its operations; |
(o) ensure that the EIT complies with the existing principles on multilingualism; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point p | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(p) promote the EIT globally, so as to raise its attractiveness and make it a world-class body for excellence in higher education, research and innovation. |
(p) promote the EIT globally, so as to raise its scientific, academic and in particular business attractiveness and make it a world-class body for excellence in higher education, research and innovation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 56 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point p a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(pa) promote the Union through the EIT. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 57 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 4 – point 3 – point m (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(m) ensure sound communications with the Union's institutions; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 58 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 4 – point 3 – point n (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(n) act in the interests of the EIT, safeguarding its goals and mission, identity, autonomy and coherence, in an independent, transparent and impartial way. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 59 Proposal for a regulation Annex I a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Annex I a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-exhaustive list of general performance indicators for monitoring the KICs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Input: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a) Breakdown of partner contributions (in kind and in cash) to the annual budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b) Breakdown of the budget by type of activity (research, education, innovation, overheads) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Output and impact: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a) Number of curricula developed and students trained | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b) Number of research projects and publications | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
c) Number of participating companies, including the share of SMEs, research institutes and universities; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
e) Number of patents granted per euro invested and number of patents transferred | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
g) Number of spin-off companies created | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
h) Number of innovation activities undertaken in participating businesses. |
- [1] OJ C 181, 21.6.2012, p. 122.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Introduction
To recover from the multiple crises it is currently facing, Europe must find ways to develop its innovation capacity, towards the delivery of sustainable and efficient solutions to the societal challenges such as those identified in Horizon 2020, but also employment and value creation.
In the framework of the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs, the European Institute of Technology (EIT) was established in 2008 with the aim of reinforcing Europe's innovation capacity.
It represents the first EU attempt to integrate the three sides of the Knowledge Triangle (higher education, research and innovation). The EIT became operational in 2010 with an EU budgetary contribution of € 309 millions over 2008-13.
Through the activities of the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs), the EIT promotes closer interaction between universities, research centres and enterprises with the objective to close the gap between research, education, and the entrepreneurial activities to enhance EU's innovation capacity.
Three KICs are up and running since 2010 (Climate-KIC, EIT ICT Labs and the KIC InnoEnergy) through 16 “co-location centres” in 12 EU Countries and engaging more than 200 partners.
The experiences so far with KICs have shown increasing number of participants (including industry), good leverage effect, streamlining effects and already tangible outputs (students trained, start-ups).
Proposal by the Commission
The Commission proposes to provide the EIT with a budget of about € 3 billions and integrate the EIT scope under the Horizon 2020 Programme. The budget would be released in 2 allocations: the first to finance the consolidation of the existing KICs and establish 3 new ones in 2014; the second following a review at the end of 2017, to continue activities of the created KICs and to start 3 more.
The proposed Commission amendments to the EIT Regulation further clarify the scope of EIT contributions to the KICs, the criteria for establishing them and the principles for their evaluation, duration and termination.
The Strategic Innovation Agenda (to be adopted in a separate document) accompanying the EIT Regulation, outlines, on the other hand, the EIT priorities for the period 2014-2020, the work programme and the modalities for its operation and funding of the KICs.
Position of the rapporteur
1. The EIT budget and objectives
The EIT appears so far a successful and promising instrument to perform innovation-oriented activities in a comprehensive and straightforward way, engaging private and public sector / university partners in a dynamic process of innovation.
Also, compared to other forms of public-private partnership initiatives, the interlinking of research, innovation with the education component gives the EIT an added value that currently other initiatives do not have.
The rapporteur therefore supports the gradual scaling up of the budget over 2014-2020 as proposed by the Commission and the launching of new KICs.
The new KICs should be established in priorities fields of Horizon 2020 and in particular under the “societal challenges” and “leadership in enabling and industrial technology” pillars.
These are the areas where the EU needs to put its effort together to find and implement innovative solutions and promote entrepreneurial initiatives.
The rapporteur supports the proposal of a mid-term evaluation of the EIT to assess its performance, however, being embedded in Horizon 2020 there is no specific reason why it should be subject to a differentiated assessment compared to other parts of the Horizon 2020 programme.
2. Principles for selecting the KICs
The rapporteur believes that the subject and number of KICs that the EIT should establish should not be prescribed.
The phasing and prioritisation of new KICs currently proposed by the Commission is not sufficiently well justified. Other themes can be deemed as urgent or as promising than those put forward.
The rapporteur proposes that the KIC selection should instead be subject to an open, transparent and competitive procedure. Based on the received proposal, the EIT would designate as many KICs as financially possible, provided they meet selection and quality criteria and their scope falls under priorities of Horizon 2020.
In the selection, the EIT should also take into account that some KICs may not necessarily be as capital intensive as others.
3. Principles for financing the KICs
Competitive review mechanism
As already initiated in 2012 by the EIT, the KICs should compete yearly for the available budget. This would ensure that only the most promising and valuable projects effectively get funded, avoiding the potential windfall effect that a predetermined allocation could generate.
Yearly contribution would be based on the evaluation of KICs yearly business plans, objectives, obtained results and further potential.
The rapporteur suggests that the principles of the competitive allocation should be included in the Regulation.
Leverage effect
The EIT has provided so far about 25% of the KICs budget, with 75% to be matched by other public or private partners (including partner's own resources, public funding from Member States, funds from other EU initiatives such as the FP7 and structural funds and, in the future, Horizon 2020).
The rapporteur proposes to include this principle in the Regulation.
There is moreover a need to prevent undermining the EIT synergic effect by using too widely EU funds to "leverage" other EU funds. The rapporteur proposes a further threshold of maximum 25% of EU funds to be raised by the KICs in addition to the EIT contribution.
Ensuring sustainability
Finally, to ensure sustainability of funding in the long-term, the Commission envisages self-financing of some KICs activities in the medium-term. To achieve this, developing a strategy for financing should be clearly a part of the tasks of the KICs.
4. Programming, monitoring and evaluation
The rapporteur proposes that in the future, the SIA is adopted by the Governing Board and integrated in the future framework for research and innovation (Horizon 2021and beyond). On the other hand more oversight should be given to the decision-makers on the adoption of the EIT triennial work-programmes.
In the EIT initial phase, the first draft triennial work-programme was submitted for comment to the Parliament, the Council and the Commission. The rapporteur believes this should be again the case for the next EIT triennial work-programmes.
In addition, a regular dialogue with the EIT Director and the European Parliament at the occasion of the publication of the EIT annual report is suggested.
The EIT furthermore foresees to establish a monitoring system addressing the four activity levels (the Horizon 2020 level, the EIT level, the cross-KIC level, the individual KIC level). The rapporteur proposes to include these principles in the Regulation.
5. Broadening the concept of innovation
More than technological solutions
Today, the EIT activities are mostly oriented towards supporting the delivery of technological and industrial solutions. Although these are necessary they are by no means sufficient to address the challenges that the EU faces today.
The rapporteur believes that non-technological, organisational, systems innovation and public sector innovation require the same attention as technology driven solutions.
Similarly, the promotion of social entrepreneurship should be considered as social enterprises are usually very innovative in nature, through the goods or services they offer or their organisational models.
Intellectual property rights
In a context where China is becoming the first depositary of patents, the EU needs to develop a "smart" intellectual property rights policy that would allow it to make its mark.[1]
Market failures related to IPR practices are penalising particularly SMEs, for instance preventing participation to IPRs exchanges, happening generally between bigger market players, and suffer from the judiciary valorisation of patents.
As the leading European institute for innovation, the EIT should develop and promote innovative practices that are adapted to standard European players.
The EIT and the KICs would be a "laboratory" to support the development of differentiated IPR policies that can answer to the needs and interests of different sectors and actors across Europe, in particular SMEs, universities and public authorities.
6. Governance and participation
Although KICs are innovative types and self-organising business-like structures, some common minimum features should be defined for all KICs, to ensure principles of openness, transparency and balance of interest are met. This need is even more important considering that KICs are partly financed by the public budget.
In particular KICs structure must enable them to evolve and avoid lock-in or close-shop effects. New partners must be able to join the KIC and participate in the activities, while IPR rules proposed must provide the same opportunities for all players.
Widening participation to new entrants and in particular increasing participation of SMEs should be part of the EIT and KICs strategy.
The KICs should, as foreseen for the EIT, also establish a Stakeholder Forum in its particular field of action, to be convened once a year.
The EIT should also give opportunities to less performing regions of Europe to benefit from and participate in the KICs, in particular those currently in most need of innovating themselves out of the crisis.
7. Complementarities with other Horizon 2020 instruments
The complementarities of the KICs with other activities undertaken in Horizon 2020 still need to be further clarified.
There are several open questions concerning the specific role of the KIC’s in the complex EU Research landscape, in particular vs. Joint Programming Initiatives, European Technology Platforms, Joint Technology Initiatives, ERA-Nets but also with Erasmus for all, Knowledge Alliances & Sector Skills Alliances and with the Marie Curie Actions.
The rapporteur believes that the Commission should in particular undertake a comprehensive evaluation of all the different types of public-private partnerships established under its different research and innovation programmes.
The aim should be to assess the most effective partnership models, identify essential features for success and aim at rationalising and simplifying the landscape for research and innovation in the future financing framework.
- [1] In 2010 the ratio of domestic patent applications to total patent volume was 15.1% in Europe (stagnating), 53.6% in the US (decreasing), 82.1% in Japan (stagnating) and 72.7% in China (strongly increasing).
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education (*) (20.9.2012)
for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology
(COM(2011)0817 – C7-0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD))
Rapporteur (*): Chrysoula Paliadeli
(*) Associated committee – Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) was set up in 2008 by a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council, for the purpose of contributing to sustainable economic growth and competitiveness. This goal shall be achieved by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the EU and its Member States. Hence, the EIT aims to foster integration of the knowledge triangle of higher education, research and innovation, mainly via its Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs).
The Commission's Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 294/2008, establishing the EIT, proposes a number of changes.
These changes seek to address issues raised during a consultation on the role and functioning of the EIT, and also take into account the proposed new Strategic Innovation Agenda for the EIT, for the period from 2014 to 2020.
The draftswoman welcomes and fully supports the Commission's intention to give the EIT a distinctive role in implementing the Horizon 2020 programme. This role shall focus on deepening the synergies between the academic, research and business communities, and draw into its ambit a wide range of stakeholders.
However, the draftswoman believes that more work needs to be put into awareness-raising about the role and existence of the EIT.
The EIT, for its part, should further encourage the higher education institutions, part of the KICs, to share their best practices on any common issues which may, and shall inevitably, arise in the course of the coming years. Such issues may include mutual recognition of qualifications, common accreditation processes for degrees and diplomas, teaching practices, and other such matters.
The proposal to include new professional training courses in the educational activities of the KICs should not, for the time being, exceed the framework of postgraduate education.
The draftswoman also supports plans to streamline the EIT governance and administration structures and to clarify further their respective tasks.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Culture and Education calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(4) The rules concerning the management of intellectual property rights are defined in the Rules for Participation. |
(4) The rules concerning the management of intellectual property rights are defined in the Rules for Participation. However, the EIT should play an innovative role in developing tools to manage intellectual property rights that promote transparency and exchanges, to enable public and private players (particularly small and medium-sized undertakings (SMEs)) to become involved in research and take advantage of inventions. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
|
(6a) The EIT should further promote recognition by the Member States of EIT degrees and diplomas bearing its label of excellence. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
|
(6b) The EIT should promote multi-disciplinary approaches to innovation, including the development of non-technological solutions, organizational approaches, new business models, open research and other collaborative approaches. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(8) The composition of the EIT bodies should be simplified. The functioning of the EIT Governing Board should be streamlined and the respective roles and tasks of the Governing Board and the Director should be further clarified. |
(8) The composition of the EIT bodies should be simplified and should reflect the three dimensions of the knowledge triangle. The functioning of the EIT Governing Board should be streamlined and the respective roles and tasks of the Governing Board, the Director and the Executive Committee should be further clarified. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(10) The KICs should broaden their educational activities, by providing professional training courses. |
(10) The KICs should broaden their educational activities, by providing professional training courses to post-graduate students. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(11) Cooperation on the organisation the monitoring and evaluations of the KICs between the Commission and the EIT is required to ensure coherence with overall EU level monitoring and evaluation system. |
(11) Cooperation on the organisation the monitoring and evaluations of the KICs between the Commission and the EIT is required to ensure coherence with overall EU level monitoring and evaluation system. In particular, the principles for monitoring the KICs and the EIT should be clarified. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point c Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 3 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 4 – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 – point b Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 – point a Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 7 – paragraph 1a | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 – point a a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 – point c Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 7 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 12 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 15 – point b | ||||||||||||||||
|
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology |
||||
References |
COM(2011)0817 – C7-0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 13.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
CULT 13.12.2011 |
||||
Associated committee(s) - date announced in plenary |
20.4.2012 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Chrysoula Paliadeli 2.2.2012 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
25.4.2012 |
19.6.2012 |
20.6.2012 |
|
|
Date adopted |
19.9.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
26 1 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Zoltán Bagó, Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Piotr Borys, Jean-Marie Cavada, Silvia Costa, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Petra Kammerevert, Morten Løkkegaard, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Marek Henryk Migalski, Katarína Neveďalová, Doris Pack, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Marco Scurria, Emil Stoyanov, Hannu Takkula, László Tőkés, Marie-Christine Vergiat |
||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
François Alfonsi, Heinz K. Becker, Nadja Hirsch, Iosif Matula, Mitro Repo, Kay Swinburne |
||||
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets (18.9.2012)
for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology
(COM(2011)0817 – C7-0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD))
Rapporteur: Ivars Godmanis
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
1a. Points out that the financial envelope specified in the legislative proposal constitutes only an indication to the legislative authority and cannot be fixed until agreement is reached on the proposal for a regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020; | ||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||
Draft legislative resolution |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
1b. Recalls its resolution of 8 June 2011 on "Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe"1; reiterates that sufficient additional resources are needed in the next MFF in order to enable the Union to fulfil its existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, as well as to respond to unforeseen events; points out that even with an increase in the level of resources for the next MFF of at least 5% compared to the 2013 level only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; challenges the Council, if it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its political priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value; | ||||||||||||
|
_______________ | ||||||||||||
|
1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0266. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1c (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
1c. Recalls, furthermore, its position that next MFF should see a greater concentration of budgetary resources in areas that stimulate economic growth and competitiveness, such as research and innovation, according to the principles of European added value and excellence; | ||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(1) The Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth assigns a prominent role to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (hereinafter referred to as the EIT) which contributes to a number of flagship initiatives. |
(1) The Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth assigns a prominent role to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (hereinafter referred to as the EIT) which aims at contributing to a number of flagship initiatives, in particular the flagships for an Innovation Union and Youth on the Move. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(1a) The EIT will also attract significant private sector funds for its activities, hence, reinforcing the innovation capacity of the EU. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(6a) The impact of Union EIT funding should be maximised by mobilising, pooling and leveraging public and private financial resources. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(7) The scope of the EIT contribution to the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (hereinafter referred to as KICs) should be defined and the origins of KICs' financial resources clarified. |
(7) The scope of the EIT contribution to the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (hereinafter referred to as KICs) should be defined and the origins of KICs' financial resources clarified. EIT should build greater synergy and as much complementarity as possible with the structural funds. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(12) The KICs should seek synergies with relevant European Union initiatives. |
(12) The KICs should seek synergies with relevant European Union initiatives. These synergies should not compromise the principle of research, innovation and education excellence that the EIT should pursue. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(12a) The spending of EU and Member States’ funds on research, innovation and education should be better coordinated in order to assure complementarity, better efficiency and visibility, as well as to achieve better budgetary synergies. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(13a) Excellence should be the main driver for EIT as a whole while promoting the widening of participation in order to stimulate excellence across Europe, including the concept of "stairway to excellence", to encourage the participation of strong units of embryonic excellence. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(14) The criteria and procedures for the financing, monitoring and evaluation of the activities of the KICs should be adopted by the EIT prior to launching the KIC selection process. |
(14) The criteria and procedures for the financing, monitoring and evaluation of the activities of the KICs should be adopted by the EIT prior to launching the KIC selection process, being of utmost importance the implementation of simplification measures. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(14a) It is important to ensure sound financial management of the EIT and the implementation of the KICs in the most effective and user-friendly manner possible. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(18) The Commission should strengthen its role in monitoring the implementation of specific aspects of EIT activities |
(18) The Commission should strengthen its role in monitoring the implementation of specific aspects of EIT activities. The Commission should annually monitor the implementation of the programme with the aid of key indicators for assessing results and impacts. These indicators, including relevant baselines, should provide the minimum basis for assessing the extent to which the objectives of the EIT have been achieved. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(19a) EIT activities should ensure utmost transparency, accountability and democratic scrutiny of contributions from the Union budget, especially as regards their contribution, both expected and achieved, to reaching Union objectives. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 – point c Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 10 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 3 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
The EIT’s mission is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the Union. It shall do this by promoting and integrating higher education, research and innovation of the highest standards. The EIT' General Objectives, Specific Objectives and result indicators for the period 2014-2020 are defined in Horizon 2020. |
The EIT’s mission is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the Union. It shall do this by promoting and integrating higher education, research and innovation of excellence. The EIT' General Objectives, Specific Objectives and result indicators for the period 2014-2020 are defined in Horizon 2020. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 7a | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
The EIT, shall on the basis of key performance indicators and in cooperation with the Commission, organise continuous monitoring and periodic external evaluations of the outputs, results and impact of each KIC. |
The EIT shall on the basis of key performance indicators and in cooperation with the Commission, organise continuous monitoring and periodic external evaluations of the outputs, results and impact of each KIC. These indicators, including relevant baselines, shall provide the minimum basis for assessing the extent to which the objectives of the EIT have been achieved. In order to improve the delivery of the EIT outputs, the activities performed by the KICs shall have a measurable impact on the creation of sustainable innovative start ups and spin-offs, notably by way of supporting the networking and entrepreneurial activities of the receivers of EIT degrees and trainings. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 15 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 19 | |||||||||||||
|
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology |
||||
References |
COM(2011)0817 – C7-0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 13.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 13.12.2011 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Ivars Godmanis 6.2.2012 |
||||
Date adopted |
6.9.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
32 2 1 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Marta Andreasen, Richard Ashworth, Reimer Böge, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Jean-Luc Dehaene, Isabelle Durant, James Elles, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazábal Rubial, Jens Geier, Lucas Hartong, Jutta Haug, Monika Hohlmeier, Sidonia Elżbieta Jędrzejewska, Anne E. Jensen, Sergej Kozlík, Jan Kozłowski, Alain Lamassoure, Giovanni La Via, George Lyon, Claudio Morganti, Jan Mulder, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Dominique Riquet, Derek Vaughan, Angelika Werthmann |
||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Burkhard Balz, Maria Da Graça Carvalho, Edit Herczog, Jürgen Klute, Constanze Angela Krehl, Peter Šťastný, Georgios Stavrakakis |
||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Luigi Berlinguer |
||||
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs (13.7.2012)
for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology
(COM(2011)0817 – C7‑0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD))
Rapporteur: Alajos Mészáros
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The European Institute of Technology and Innovation (EIT) has been set up by Regulation (EC) 294/2008 with the aim of reinforcing Europe's innovation capacity. It represents the first EU attempt to integrate higher education, research and innovation, into the so called "knowledge triangle". This integration takes place primarily via the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs), which bring together organisations on a long-term basis around societal challenges. The EIT became operational in 2010 and its seat is in Budapest.
The Commission presents now amendments to the regulation establishing EIT. The proposed changes are based on lessons learnt during the initial period, the recommendations of the external evaluation reports, as well as the results of broad consultations with EIT stakeholders. This amending Regulation is also closely linked to the the proposal for the EIT Strategic Innovation Agenda, which builds on the proposal of the EIT Governing Board.
Your rapporteur focuses in his opinion mainly on the following aspects:
Improving the governance structures of EIT and the dialogue with the EU institutions
The experience shows that the composition of the EIT bodies should be simplified. In particular, tasks of the Governing Board and the Director should be further clarified. The Governing Board and the Director must always act in the interests of the EIT in an independent and impartial way. Your rapporteur also stresses the importance of adequately involving the EU institutions when the EIT Work Programmes are established.
Widening of participation across all Member States and fostering synergies of EIT structures for the benefit of, in particular, SMEs
Principles of openness, transparency and balance of interests need to be at the core of the governance principles and the widening participation to new entrants across the whole EU bringing new ideas and in particular increasing participation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) should therefore be part of the KICs strategy for growth. Even though not all markets have the same structure, it is important to provide for SMEs the opportunity to fully participate in all the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs). Public companies and local authorities, as well as non-profit organisations, should be also involved in the KICs, as appropriate.
Management of Intellectual Property Rights
Your rapporteur is of the view that the rules concerning the management of intellectual property rights must ensure the right balance between the right holders and the users. The rules should provide guidance and models promoting knowledge transfer and dissemination, both within the context of the KICs and more widely across the EU.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
The rules concerning the management of intellectual property rights are defined in the Rules for Participation. |
The rules concerning the management of intellectual property rights and dissemination of results are defined in the Rules for Participation and must ensure the right balance between the right holders and the users. The European Commission, in consultation with the EIT, should provide guidance on innovative intellectual property rights models promoting knowledge transfer and dissemination, both within the context of the KICs and more widely across the EU. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
The EIT should engage closely with small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to ensure their active participation in the activities of the KICs. Public companies and local authorities, as well as non-profit organisations, should be also involved in the KICs, as appropriate. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(7) The scope of the EIT contribution to the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (hereinafter referred to as KICs) should be defined and the origins of KICs' financial resources clarified. |
(7) The scope of the EIT contribution to the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (hereinafter referred to as KICs) should be defined and the origins of KICs' financial resources clarified. In particular, EU funding should be considered as leverage to encourage KICs to pursue other sources of private or public funding, and a review of the use of EU funding as leverage should be considered in future by EU institutions. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(8) The composition of the EIT bodies should be simplified. The functioning of the EIT Governing Board should be streamlined and the respective roles and tasks of the Governing Board and the Director should be further clarified. |
(8) The composition of the EIT bodies should be simplified. The functioning of the EIT Governing Board should be streamlined and the respective roles and tasks of the Governing Board and the Director should be further clarified. The Governing Board and the Director must act in the interests of the EIT in an independent, impartial and transparent way. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
The EIT Triennial Work Programme should take into account the Commission's opinion concerning the EIT's specific objectives, as defined in Horizon 2020, and its complementarities with European Union policies and instruments. |
The EIT Triennial Work Programme should take into account the opinions of the Commission, the European Parliament and the Councilconcerning the EIT's specific objectives, as defined in Horizon 2020, and its complementarities with European Union policies and instruments. These EU institutions should be adequately involved when this programme is established. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 2 – paragraph 10 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Following paragraph 10 as added by the Commission proposal 2011/0384(COD). | |||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 3 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 – point b Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Following paragraph 10 as added by the Commission proposal 2011/0384(COD). | |||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 – point d Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 7 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Following paragraph 10 as added by the Commission proposal 2011/0384(COD). | |||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 12 Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 Article 15 – subparagraph a | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 1 – point 2 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
The Commission shall have regard to the balance between higher education, research, innovation and business experience as well as to gender balance and an appreciation of the higher education, research and innovation environments across the Union. |
The Commission shall have regard to the balance between higher education, research, innovation and business experience as well as to gender balance and the widening participation of the higher education, research and innovation environments across the Union. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 1 – point 4 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
The Governing Board members shall act in the interests of the EIT, safeguarding its goals and mission, identity and coherence, in an independent way. |
The Governing Board members shall act in the interests of the EIT, safeguarding its goals and mission, identity, autonomy and coherence, in an independent, transparent and impartial way. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 2 – point 1 – subparagraph g | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(g) define, with the Commission’s agreement, appropriate honoraria for members of the Governing Board and of the Executive Committee; these honoraria shall be benchmarked against similar provision in the Member States; |
(g) define, with the Commission’s agreement, appropriate honoraria for members of the Governing Board and of the Executive Committee; | ||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 2 – point 1 – subparagraph p | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(p) promote the EIT globally, so as to raise its attractiveness and make it a world-class body for excellence in higher education, research and innovation. |
(p) promote the EIT globally, so as to raise its scientific, academic and in particular business attractiveness and make it a world-class body for excellence in higher education, research and innovation. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 4 – point 3 – subparagraph m (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(m) ensure a sound communication with the EU institutions; | ||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Annex – section 4 – point 3 – subparagraph n (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(n) act in the interests of the EIT, safeguarding its goals and mission, identity, autonomy and coherence, in an independent, transparent and impartial way. |
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology |
||||
References |
COM(2011)0817 – C7-0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 13.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
JURI 13.12.2011 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Alajos Mészáros 19.12.2011 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
30.5.2012 |
19.6.2012 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
10.7.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
23 0 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Giuseppe Gargani, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Sajjad Karim, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Rebecca Taylor, Alexandra Thein, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka |
||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Piotr Borys, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Eva Lichtenberger, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, József Szájer, Axel Voss |
||||
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology |
||||
References |
COM(2011)0817 – C7-0467/2011 – 2011/0384(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
30.11.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 13.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 13.12.2011 |
EMPL 13.12.2011 |
CULT 13.12.2011 |
JURI 13.12.2011 |
|
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
EMPL 19.1.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Associated committee(s) Date announced in plenary |
CULT 20.4.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed |
Philippe Lamberts 20.1.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
23.1.2012 |
18.6.2012 |
17.9.2012 |
8.10.2012 |
|
Date adopted |
28.11.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
46 0 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Amelia Andersdotter, Josefa Andrés Barea, Jean-Pierre Audy, Zigmantas Balčytis, Ivo Belet, Jan Březina, Maria Da Graça Carvalho, Giles Chichester, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Dimitrios Droutsas, Christian Ehler, Vicky Ford, Gaston Franco, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, Edit Herczog, Kent Johansson, Romana Jordan, Krišjānis Kariņš, Lena Kolarska-Bobińska, Philippe Lamberts, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Marisa Matias, Judith A. Merkies, Aldo Patriciello, Herbert Reul, Paul Rübig, Amalia Sartori, Salvador Sedó i Alabart, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Evžen Tošenovský, Catherine Trautmann, Ioannis A. Tsoukalas, Marita Ulvskog, Kathleen Van Brempt, Alejo Vidal-Quadras |
||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Yves Cochet, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Seán Kelly, Vladimír Remek, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău |
||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Alexandra Thein |
||||
Date tabled |
12.12.2012 |
||||