Procedure : 2010/2289(INI)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A7-0083/2011

Texts tabled :

A7-0083/2011

Debates :

PV 06/04/2011 - 4
PV 06/04/2011 - 6
CRE 06/04/2011 - 4
CRE 06/04/2011 - 6

Votes :

PV 06/04/2011 - 8.18
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P7_TA(2011)0144

REPORT     
PDF 249kWORD 161k
23 March 2011
PE 456.686v03-00 A7-0083/2011

on Governance and Partnership in the Single Market

(2010/2289(INI))

Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

Rapporteur: Sandra Kalniete

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
 OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
 OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs
 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

on Governance and Partnership in the Single Market

(2010/2289(INI))

The European Parliament,

–      having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Towards a Single Market Act for a highly competitive social market economy: 50 proposals for improving our work, business and exchanges with one another’ (COM(2010)0608),

–      having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Europe 2020 – a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM(2010)2020),

–      having regard to the Commission Communication ‘A single market for 21st century Europe’ (COM(2007)0724) and the accompanying Commission staff working document ‘The Single Market: review of achievements’ (SEC(2007)1521),

–      having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on the Single Market review(1) and the Commission staff working document ‘The Single Market review: one year on’ (SEC(2008)3064),

–     having regard to the Commission Communication on ‘Smart Regulation in the European Union’ (COM(2010)0543),

–      having regard to the Commission’s 27th Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of EU Law and to the accompanying Commission staff working document entitled ‘Situation in the different sectors’ (SEC(2010)1143),

–      having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 29 June 2009 on measures to improve the functioning of the single market (C(2009)4728),

–      having regard to the Council Conclusions of 10 December 2010 on the Single Market Act,

–      having regard to Professor Mario Monti’s report to the Commission on revitalising the single market,

–      having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on delivering a single market to consumers and citizens(2),

–      having regard to the Internal Market Scoreboard No 21 (2010), and to its resolutions of 9 March 2010(3) and 23 September 2008(4) on the Internal Market Scoreboard,

–      having regard to the Commission Communication on ‘A Europe of Results - Applying Community Law’ (COM(2007)0502),

–      having regard to Articles 258 to 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),

–      having regard to Articles 7, 10 and 15 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–      having regard to Rule 48 of its Rules of Procedure,

–      having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0083/2011),

A. whereas relaunching the Single Market requires the active support of all citizens, European institutions, Member States and stakeholders,

B.  whereas in order to gain the active support of all stakeholders, it is essential that during consultations and dialogue with the Commission, as well as in expert groups, effective representation of civil society and SMEs is ensured,

C. whereas the proper dissemination, articulation and management of the various EU Institutions’ consultations and reports (EU 2010, the Citizenship Report 2010, the Integrated Industrial Policy, the Digital Agenda for Europe, the Monti report, Parliament’s Resolution on ‘delivering a Single Market to consumers and citizens’, the Gonzales and IMCO reports, etc.) are of particular importance for the successful relaunch of the Single Market,

D. whereas a substantial gap still persists between the single market rules and the benefits that citizens and businesses can draw from them in practice,

E.  whereas the EU’s average transposition deficit amounts to 1.7% when taking into account the cases in which the transposition time of a directive exceeds the deadline and in which infringement proceedings for non-conformity have been initiated by the Commission,

I.  Introduction

1.  Welcomes with interest the Commission Communication ‘Towards a Single Market Act’, especially its third chapter and the global approach which it proposes in order to rebalance the single market between enterprises and citizens and to improve the democracy and transparency of the decision-making process; stresses that this approach seeks to guarantee the best balance between the proposals in the three parts of the communication;

2.  Considers that the three chapters of the Communication are equally important and interconnected, and should be dealt with in a consistent approach without isolating the different issues at stake from each other;

3.  Urges the Commission and the Council to reinforce the holistic approach to relaunching the Single Market, mainstreaming Single Market priorities to all policy areas which are crucial to achieving the Single Market for the benefit of European citizens, consumers and businesses;

4.  Believes that enhancement of European economic governance, implementation of the EU 2020 strategy and the relaunch of the Single Market are equally important for revitalising the European economy and should be seen in combination;

5.  Considers that a barrier-free and competitive single market should be completed in order to bring concrete advantages for workers, students, pensioners and citizens in general, and for businesses, particularly SMEs, in their daily lives;

6.  Calls on the Commission to indicate the implementation timetable for the Single Market Act and to publish regular updates of tangible progress in order to make the EU public more aware of the Act’s implementation and highlight its benefits;

II. General Assessment

Strengthening political leadership and partnership

7.  Is convinced that one of the main challenges in relaunching the Single Market is ensuring political leadership, commitment and coordination; believes that comprehensive guidance from the highest political level is crucial for the relaunch of the Single Market;

8.  Suggests that the President of the Commission should be given the mandate to coordinate and supervise the relaunch of the Single Market, in close cooperation with the President of the European Council and the competent authorities in the Member States; urges the Presidents of the Commission and of the European Council to coordinate closely their respective actions that are to boost economic growth, competitiveness, the social market economy and sustainability in the Union;

9.  Highlights the enhanced role of the EP and the national parliaments under the Lisbon Treaty; urges that Parliament’s role in the single market legislation process be strengthened; encourages national parliaments to engage with Single Market rules throughout the legislative cycle and participate in joint activities with the European Parliament, leading to a better synergy between the two parliamentary levels;

10. Welcomes the Commission’s approach which puts dialogue and partnership at the core of the renewed single market, and calls for strengthened efforts by all stakeholders to ensure that this approach is put into practice so that the single market can play its full role in promoting growth and a highly competitive market economy;

11. Calls on the Commission jointly with the Presidency to organise a yearly Single Market Forum involving stakeholders from the EU institutions, Member States, civil society and business organisations to assess progress in relaunching the Single Market, exchange best practices and address the top concerns of European citizens; encourages the Commission to continue the exercise of identifying the top 20 single-market-related sources of dissatisfaction and frustration which citizens encounter; proposes that the Single Market Forum could be used by the Commission to present these problems and their respective solutions;

12. Urges Member States’ governments to take ownership of the relaunch of the Single Market; welcomes initiatives taken by Member States to optimise the way in which they deal with Single Market directives in terms of improving coordination, creating incentive structures and increasing the political importance given to transposition; considers it crucial, when discussing priorities for new legislation, to enhance focus on and incentives for timely and correct transposition, correct application and better enforcement of single market legislation;

13. Notes that Single Market rules are frequently implemented by local and regional authorities; stresses the need for greater involvement of regional and local authorities in the construction of the single market, in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and partnership, at all stages of the decision-making process; proposes, in order to emphasise this decentralised approach, the establishment of a ‘Territorial Pact of Local and Regional Authorities on the Europe 2020 Strategy’ in every Member State to create stronger ownership in the implementation of the EU 2020 Strategy;

14. Believes that the ‘good governance’ of the single market must respect the role of the two advisory institutions existing at European level – the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – as well as that of the social partners;

15. Emphasises that dialogue with the social partners and civil society is of the essence in restoring confidence in the single market; expects new and bold ideas from the Commission as to how this dialogue can actually be improved; demands that the social partners be involved and consulted in all relevant single market legislation affecting the labour market;

16. Welcomes the intention of the Commission to enhance an open, transparent and regular dialogue with civil society;

17. Calls on the Commission to publish a Green Paper on guidelines for the consultations of the EU institutions with representative associations and civil society, ensuring that these consultations are broad, interactive and add value to the proposed policies;

18. Calls on the Commission to adapt dialogue and communication to the needs of ordinary citizens to the fullest extent possible, for example by making all its public consultations available in all EU official languages or by using language in such a way that the ordinary citizen can understand;

19. Urges the Commission to launch an information and education campaign on the essence of the single market and the objectives set in order to increase its dynamism while incorporating the dimensions of social and regional cohesion; stresses the need for this communication campaign to favour better participation – and a better ability to participate – by each citizen, worker and consumer in bringing about a competitive, just and balanced market;

20. Considers that the use of the new collaborative tools and approaches of Web 2.0 offers an opportunity to achieve more open, accountable, responsive and efficient governance of the Single Market;

Regulating the Single Market

21. Takes the view that initiatives by single Member States cannot be effective without coordinated action at EU level, and that it is thus of fundamental importance that the European Union should speak with a strong single voice and implement common actions; considers that solidarity, on which the European social economy model is based, and the coordination of national responses have been crucial to avoiding protectionist measures of short duration by single Member States; expresses its concern that the re-emergence of economic protectionism at national level would most probably result in fragmentation of the internal market and a reduction in competitiveness, and therefore needs to be avoided; is concerned that the current economic and financial crisis could be used to justify reviving protectionist measures in various Member States, whereas the downturn calls for common safeguard mechanisms instead;

22. Takes the view that progress in the internal market should not be based on the lowest common denominator; encourages the Commission, therefore, to take the lead and come forward with bold proposals; encourages the Member States to use the method of enhanced cooperation in areas where the process of reaching an agreement among 27 is not achievable; notes that other countries would be free to join these spearhead initiatives at a later stage;

23. Believes that the overall efficiency and legitimacy of the Single Market suffers because of the complexity of Single Market governance;

24. Considers that more attention should be paid to the quality and clarity of EU legislation in order to facilitate the implementation of the Single Market rules by the Member States;

25. Considers that the use of regulations instead of directives where appropriate would contribute to a clearer regulatory environment and reduce the transaction costs associated with transposition; calls on the Commission to develop a more targeted approach to choosing legislative instruments, depending on the legal and substantial characteristics of the provisions to be implemented, while respecting the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;

26. Encourages the Commission and the Council to intensify their efforts to implement the Smart Regulation strategy to further enhance the quality of regulation, fully respecting the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;

27. Urges the Commission to continue independent ex-ante and ex-post evaluation of legislation with the participation of stakeholders to improve the effectiveness of legislation;

28. Suggests that the Commission systematises and refines the SME test, taking into account the diversity of their situations, to evaluate the consequences of legislative proposals on these businesses;

29. Believes that correlation tables contribute to better transposition and significantly facilitate enforcement of the Single Market rules; urges Member States to create and make publicly available correlation tables on all Single Market legislation; points out that in future Parliament may not include reports on compromise texts agreed with Council on the plenary agenda if provisions on correlation tables are not provided for;

Administrative coordination, problem-solving mechanisms and information

30. Supports the proposals of the Single Market Act that aim at developing further administrative cooperation between the Member States, including extending the Internal Market Information (IMI) System to other relevant legislative areas taking into account the security and usability of the system; calls on the Commission to support Member States by providing training and guidance;

31. Considers that local and regional authorities could be involved in developing and expanding the Internal Market Information System after thorough evaluation of the benefits and problems such an expansion of the system may cause;

32. Stresses the importance of better communication and extension of the internal market information system as it is essential to provide SMEs in particular with clear information on the internal market;

33. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to cooperate with Member States to consolidate and strengthen informal problem solving tools like SOLVIT, the EU Pilot project and European Consumer Centres; calls on the Commission to come up with a roadmap regarding the development and interlinking of different problem-solving tools to ensure efficiency and user friendliness and avoid unnecessary overlaps; calls on the Member States to provide these problem-solving tools with adequate resources;

34. Calls on the Commission to further develop and promote the Your Europe website so that it offers a single gateway to all the information and help services citizens and businesses need to make use of their rights in the single market;

35. Calls on Member States to develop points of single contact under the Services Directive into user-friendly and easily accessible e-Government centres where businesses can obtain all the necessary information in the relevant EU languages, deal with all formalities and complete the necessary steps by electronic means in order to provide services in the respective Member State;

36. Acknowledges the important role of EURES in facilitating the free movement of workers within the Union and ensuring close cooperation between national employment services; calls on the Member States to increase public awareness of this useful service to enable more EU citizens to fully benefit from employment opportunities across the EU;

37. Calls on the national Parliaments, regional and local authorities and social partners to take an active part in communicating the benefits of the Single Market;

Transposition and enforcement

38. Calls on the Commission to use all powers under the Treaties to improve transposition, application and enforcement of the rules of the Single Market to the benefit of European citizens, consumers and businesses; calls on the Member States to step up their efforts in order to fully and correctly implement Single Market rules;

39. Believes that the infringement procedure remains a key tool to ensure the functioning of the single market, but stresses that consideration should be given to additional instruments which are less time-consuming and cumbersome;

40. Calls on the Commission to resist any political interference and immediately launch infringement procedures where pre-litigation problem-solving mechanisms fail;

41. Notes that the recent Court of Justice case law opens new scenarios for the Commission to pursue ‘general and structural infringements’ of Single Market rules by Member States;

42. Calls on the Commission to make full use of the changes introduced by Article 260 of the TFEU which are designed to simplify and speed up the imposition of financial penalties in the context of infringement proceedings;

43. Believes that the Commission should take a more active role in the enforcement of Single Market rules, by carrying out more systematic and independent monitoring in order to speed up and expedite infringement proceedings;

44. Regrets that too many infringement proceedings take a long time before they are closed or brought before the Court of Justice; asks the Commission to set a benchmark of 12 months for the maximum average time taken to process infringements, from opening the file to sending the application to the Court of Justice; deeply regrets that such procedures have no direct effect on EU citizens or residents who may have been victims of lack of EU law enforcement;

45. Asks the Commission to provide better information, in a transparent manner, about ongoing infringement procedures;

46. Calls on the Commission to propose a benchmark for Member States’ compliance with the rulings of the Court of Justice;

47. Supports the Commission’s initiatives to further improve the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), with a view to ensuring quick and efficient access to simple and low-cost out-of-court dispute resolution for consumers and enterprises in national and cross-border disputes involving both online and offline purchases; welcomes the consultation launched by the Commission; insists on the necessity of better information for citizens on the existence of ADR;

48. Calls on the Commission to focus also on the prevention of disputes, for example through stronger measures that prevent unfair commercial practices;

49. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to launch a public consultation on a European approach to collective redress, and opposes the introduction of collective redress mechanisms along the lines of the US model, which contains strong economic incentives to bring unmeritorious claims to court;

50. Notes that any proposal on collective redress for infringements of competition law must respect Parliament’s view expressed in its resolution of 26 March 2009 on damages actions for breach of the EU antitrust rules; insists that Parliament must be involved in the adoption of any such act by means of the ordinary legislative procedure and calls on the Commission to consider the case for minimum standards in relation to the right to compensation for damage resulting from a breach of EU law more generally;

Monitoring, evaluation and modernisation

51. Supports a focused and evidence-based approach to market monitoring and evaluation; invites the Commission to continue developing its market monitoring tools, such as that of the alert mechanism in the Services Directive, by improving methodology, indicators and data collection, whilst observing the principles of practicality and cost-effectiveness;

52. Points out the need to evaluate the state of implementation of all Single Market legislation by Member States in a faster and clearer manner;

53. Highlights the mutual evaluation provided for in the Services Directive as an innovative way of using peer pressure to improve the quality of transposition; supports where appropriate using mutual evaluation in other areas, e.g. in the area of free movement of goods;

54. Encourages Member States to regularly review national rules and procedures which have an impact on free movement of services and goods in order to simplify and modernise national rules and remove overlaps; considers that the process of screening national law used for the implementation of the services directive could be an efficient tool in other areas to remove overlaps and unjustified national barriers to free movement;

55. Urges the Commission to support the efforts of the public sector to adopt innovative approaches, exploiting new technologies and procedures and disseminating best practices in the public administration which will lower bureaucracy and embrace citizen-centred policies;

III. Key priorities

56. Asks that each spring session of the European Council should be devoted to assessing the state of the Single Market, backed by a monitoring process;

57. Calls on the Commission to publish a Green Paper on guidelines for the consultations of the EU institutions with representative associations and civil society ensuring that these consultations are broad, interactive, transparent and add value to the proposed policies;

58. Urges Member States to create and make publicly available correlation tables on all Single Market legislation;

59. Calls on the Member States to reduce the transposition deficit of Single Market Directives to 0.5%for outstanding legislation and 0.5% for incorrectly transposed legislation by the end of 2012;

60. Calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution in the EU by the end of 2011 and underlines the importance of its quick adoption;

61. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

(1)

OJ C 187E, 27.7.2008, p. 80.

(2)

Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0186.

(3)

OJ C 349E, 22.12.2010, p. 25.

(4)

OJ C 8E, 14.1.2010, p. 7.


EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Strengthening political leadership and partnership

Your Rapporteur believes that one of the key challenges in relaunching the Single Market is ensuring political leadership, commitment and coordination. The 50 proposals for relaunching the Single Market encompass numerous portfolios, crucially involving the competences of several commissioners in the Commission and touch upon jurisdiction of various committees in the European Parliament. In the Council the Single Market Act is furthermore split into different Council configurations whose role and effectiveness vary a great deal. National institutions also differ a lot in the ways that they are configured and in their organisational cultures.

Your Rapporteur considers that enhancing the role of the Competitiveness Council as proposed in the Council Conclusions on the Single Market Act of 10.12.2010 is a necessary but not a sufficient condition to ensure political leadership, commitment and coordination.

Your rapporteur believes that a top-level political guidance is crucial for the relaunch of the Single Market. She therefore proposes that the President of the European Council should be given the mandate to coordinate and supervise the relaunch of the Single Market, in close cooperation with the President of the Commission. Each spring session of the European Council should be devoted to assessing the state of the Single Market, backed by a monitoring process through which to assess the performance of interim targets. In this context, your Rapporteur observes that the Hungarian Presidency already plans to hold the first ever European Council on a sectoral theme in February 2011.(1)

Your Rapporteur is convinced that Member States' support and commitment will also be crucial for relaunching the Single Market. She commends the Member States on the efforts taken to improve the transposition and implementation of Single Market rules. Such 'best practices' include setting up periodical evaluations of transposition systems, introducing a system of points of contacts in different ministries and setting-up warning systems when nearing the transposition deadline.

Your Rapporteur notes that different measures can be taken by the Member States before the publication of a directive in order to facilitate transposition and implementation. Such measures include developing transposition plans as soon as there is a political agreement, pre-emptive identification of competencies and/or analysis of legislative impact, a regular transmission of information between the departments responsible for negotiating and those involved in transposition and parliamentary involvement at an early state of the negotiations of new European legislation, which seems to ease transposition once the legislation has been adopted.

Your Rapporteur also considers that Member States should set their own priorities and develop their own agenda in accordance with Single Market priorities in order to take true ownership of the Single Market.

Your Rapporteur believes that the partnership approach suggested by the Commission needs to be strengthened by two elements.

Firstly, she considers that partnership with local and regional authorities needs to be broadened from cohesion policy to Single Market policies. Single Market rules are very often implemented and enforced by Member States' authorities at regional or local levels. The experience with the implementation of the Services Directive has clearly shown that involvement of regional and local authorities can be extremely important to ensure that Single Market legislation is properly implemented and applied.

Your Rapporteur notes that some Member States have already taken specific measures in order to develop a partnership with local and regional actors, inter alia, by setting up specific networks, e.g. in the area of public procurement or market surveillance, which link regional and local authorities.

Secondly, your Rapporteur believes that the dialogue and partnership element of Single Market governance should be strengthened by a stronger involvement of National Parliaments. The entering into force of the Lisbon Treaty offers a ‘window of opportunity’ for the National Parliaments to engage with Single Market rules throughout the legislative cycle and participate in joint activities with the European Parliament. She notes that involvement of national parliaments at an early stage in deliberating the Directive proposal at the European level could speed up the adoption of subsequent transposition measures at the member state level. A constant exchange of information with national parliaments on transposition regarding progress of transpositions could also facilitate the transposition process.

Regulating the Single Market

Your Rapporteur considers that the Single Market governance structures and processes are excessively complex. This complicates accountability and undermines the overall efficiency and legitimacy of the Single Market. She believes that in developing further the governance of the Single Market more weight should be given to the principles of transparency and accountability.

Your Rapporteur believes that a more targeted approach to choosing legislative instruments, depending on the legal and substantial characteristics of the provisions to be implemented, would contribute to a clearer regulatory environment and reduce the transaction costs associated with transposition.

Your Rapporteur highlights that in accordance with the Article 4 (3) of the TEU Member States are bound to facilitate the achievement of the Commission’s task of ensuring that the provisions of the Treaties and the measures taken by the institutions are applied. Consequently, Member States should supply the Commission with clear and precise information in relation to the implementation of Directives.

Your Rapporteur considers that Member States should provide correlation tables listing the provisions of Member State rules that transpose the obligations of directives into the national legal system for all Single Market directives and make them publicly available for citizens (SMA proposal no. 47).

Administrative coordination, problem-solving mechanisms

Your Rapporteur supports the SMA proposal no. 45 that aims at developing further the administrative cooperation between the Member States through the IMI system which could be extended to other policy areas, including e-commerce and public procurement.

She believes that increased interaction between Member States' authorities competent for single market issues not only helps to resolve immediate problems in implementing specific Directives, but also contributes to building of mutual trust between MS authorities and to a more viable Single Market in the long term (European dimension of public administration in the MS).

Your Rapporteur observes that a number of Single Market information and problem-solving mechanisms exist to help citizens and businesses. She proposes that the Commission and Member States coordinate and where appropriate consolidate the ‘one-stop-shops’ for information and problem-solving (SMA proposals no. 49 and 50).

Your Rapporteur supports the strengthening of informal problem-solving tools, in particular the SOLVIT Network. She considers that the Commission should strengthen SOLVIT in accordance with Parliament's report on SOLVIT of 2 March 2010 (2009/2138(INI)).

Your Rapporteur also suggests that the Member States and the Commission should strive to develop true ‘one-stop-shops’ through which the same target group is able to obtain all necessary information, e.g. to exercise a particular activity. In this context, she suggests that points of single contact under the Services Directive should also provide information on the applicable taxation regime.

Enforcement

Your Rapporteur believes that infringement procedure should remain a key tool to ensure the functioning of the internal market. She encourages the Commission to stringently use infringement procedures where pre-litigation problem-solving mechanisms fail, making full use of the changes introduced by Article 260 of the TFEU which simplify and speed up the imposition of financial penalties in the context of infringement proceedings.

Your Rapporteur furthermore considers that the recent Court of Justice case law provides for new possibilities for the Commission to pursue ‘general and structural infringements’ of Single Market rules by Member States. Traditionally, the Commission has focused on bringing enforcement actions based on individual incidents. However, in Commission v. Ireland case(2), the Court accepted that the Commission can bring proceedings against a Member State not only for specific violations of EU law, but also against a ‘general and structural infringement’ by a Member State of its EU law obligations. Instead of putting forward specific incidents, the Commission aimed to demonstrate the existence of ‘systemic and deficient administrative practices’ and argued that Ireland had systematically failed to comply with the Waste Directive.

The notion of ‘general and structural infringement’ has two important implications. Firstly, the Commission can adduce new examples of infringements of a given EU law obligation during the Court procedures. Secondly, the Member State found in breach needs not merely to remedy the instances of violation, but more fundamentally to change its administrative practice.

Your Rapporteur believes that the notion of ‘general and structural infringement’ could pave the way for a more effective enforcement of the Single Market law obligations in areas such as public procurement.

Your Rapporteur suggests that more work needs to be done not only to ensure timely transposition, but also to step up efforts to ensure correct transposition. She suggests that the Member States should aim at reducing the average transposition deficit to 0,5 per cent by 2012, including both outstanding and incorrect transposition of Single Market Directives.

Your Rapporteur observes that the formal infringement proceedings usually take a long time (the average duration to resolve such proceedings ranging from 28 months for EU 15 to 16 months for EU 12). She urges the Commission to set a benchmark of 12 months for the maximum average time taken to process infringements.

Your Rapporteur notes that national authorities take an average of 17.7 months to comply with the Court judgements, which have found that certain Member States had not complied with their obligations. She asks the Commission to propose a benchmark for Member States’ to comply with the rulings of the Court of Justice.

Monitoring, evaluation and modernization

Your Rapporteur believes that good governance of the Single Market can only be based on good quality information about the functioning of the Single Market. Appropriate instruments for monitoring and evaluation of Single Market policies should be used to link the different stages of the policy cycle from design to implementation.

Your Rapporteur encourages the Commission to work on developing market monitoring tools, building on its experiences with successful tools, including sweeps She considers that priority should be given to improving methodology, indicators and data-collection, while observing the principles of practicality and cost-effectiveness.

Your Rapporteur believes that Member States should become more engaged with evaluation and monitoring of Single Market rules. She encourages Member States in particular to undertake regularly Single Market legislation evaluation exercises, reviewing national rules and procedures which have an impact on free movement of services and goods in order to simplify and modernize national rules and remove overlaps.

(1)

The Hungarian Presidency is planning an European Council summit on EU Energy Policy.

(2)

Case C-494/01 Commission vs Ireland [2005] ECR I-3331.


OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (16.2.2011)

for the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

on Governance and Partnership in the Single Market

(2010/2289(INI))

Rapporteur: Jürgen Creutzmann

SUGGESTIONS

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:

1.  Notes that the internal market requires the support of all as a cornerstone of the European project and the foundation of sustainable wealth creation in the EU;

2.  Welcomes the Commission’s approach putting dialogue and partnership at the core of the renewed single market, and calls for strengthened efforts by all stakeholders to ensure that this approach is put into practice so that the single market can play its full role in promoting growth and a highly competitive market economy;

3.  Takes the view that progress in the internal market should not be based on the lowest common denominator; encourages the Commission, therefore, to take the lead and come forward with bold proposals; encourages the Member States to use the enhanced cooperation method in areas where the process of reaching an agreement among 27 is not achievable, as it is currently doing in the field of patents, leaving other countries free to join these spearhead initiatives at a later stage;

4.  Recommends that the Commission conduct an independent exercise in the framework of proposal No 48 to identify the top 20 single-market-related sources of dissatisfaction and frustration which citizens encounter every day, in particular in relation to e-commerce, cross-border medical care and mutual recognition of professional qualifications;

5.  Considers that a barrier-free and competitive single market should be completed in order to bring concrete advantages for workers, students, pensioners or citizens in general, and for businesses, particularly SMEs, in their daily lives;

6.  Believes that good governance and legal certainty are crucial to achieving the economic and social objectives of the single market, including free movement of workers, as well as the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, a high level of education and training and the portability of pensions;

7.  Highlights that special attention should be devoted to the proper enforcement of health and safety and other legislation in the social remit, such as working time;

8.  Acknowledges the important role of EURES in facilitating the free movement of workers within the Union and ensuring close cooperation between national employment services; calls on the Member States to increase public awareness of this useful service to enable more EU citizens to benefit fully from employment opportunities across the EU;

9.  Emphasises the important role of support networks such as SOLVIT and the European Consumer Centres in making the single market work for European citizens and businesses; believes that SMEs especially have the greatest need of the SOLVIT-network; regrets that SOLVIT is neither known by many stakeholders nor does it enjoy the status it deserves; urges the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to act and improve the deficits;

10. Strongly welcomes the Commission’s announcement that it will continue to promote a one-stop shop, integrating all existing services into one single access point and providing citizens and businesses with information and support concerning their rights in the single market as well as practical information on national rules and procedures; calls on the Member States to increase public awareness of the one-stop shop and its constituent services;

11. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to develop a strategy to enable the wider application of the internal market information system (IMI) and to integrate it with other networks for more efficient administrative cooperation and better implementation of internal market legislation;

12. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative on the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the EU; regrets the growing culture of litigation in the area of industrial relations, which severely threatens the balance between social partners across Europe and, if allowed to develop further, is liable to cause instability and even social unrest; calls on the Commission to broaden the scope of ADRs to cover cross-border disputes in labour issues;

13. Emphasises the importance of a stronger and earlier involvement of stakeholders in designing, adopting, implementing and monitoring the measures to boost growth and citizens’ rights in the single market; notes that many of the measures proposed in the Single Market Act fall within the responsibilities of national or sub-national authorities and thus would require their active involvement at all stages; emphasises furthermore that dialogue with the social partners and civil society is of the essence in restoring confidence in the single market; expects new and bold ideas from the Commission as to how this dialogue can actually be improved; demands that the social partners be involved and consulted in all relevant single market legislation affecting the labour market;

14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work closely with the social partners, particularly in implementing and enforcing the legislation underpinning the single market project; asks the Commission to propose concrete measures for their active and efficient involvement, and to support and encourage them to share knowledge, experience and best practices in these areas;

15. Regrets that the Communication on the Single Market Act does not give more importance to local authorities, which play an essential role in the single market at the economic and social level; recalls that Protocol 26, annexed to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, guarantees a wide discretional capacity to organise, manage and finance services of general economic interest (SGEI); asks the Commission to take initiatives to guarantee the application of this protocol;

16. Considers that the Commission has to anchor fundamental rights in all legislation on the single market; considers that this would ensure that implementation of the economic fundamental freedoms of the single market does not impede collective bargaining rights and the right to strike as defined by national legislation;

17. Underlines the significant contribution of small and medium-sized enterprises in creating jobs and growth and invites the Commission, therefore, to remove barriers to the creation of new SMEs and to stimulate entrepreneurship;

18. Believes that ‘the good governance’ of the single market must respect and reinforce the role of the advisory institutions existing at European level, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, councils for sectoral dialogue and workers’ and consumers’ representatives.

RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

Date adopted

14.2.2011

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

31

5

13

Members present for the final vote

Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Karima Delli, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Patrick Le Hyaric, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu

Substitute(s) present for the final vote

Raffaele Baldassarre, Françoise Castex, Jelko Kacin, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Evelyn Regner, Emilie Turunen

Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote

Catherine Bearder


OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs (1.3.2011)

for the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

on Governance and Partnership in the Single Market

(2010/2289(INI))

Rapporteur: Klaus-Heiner Lehne

SUGGESTIONS

The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:

1.  Welcomes with interest the Commission’s communication on the Single Market Act and the global approach which it proposes in order to rebalance the single market between enterprises and citizens and to improve the democracy and transparency of the decision-making process. Stresses that this approach seeks to guarantee the best balance between the proposals in the three parts of the communication;

2.  Points out that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) should offer fair and quick out-of- court settlements, and regards ADR as an effective means of access to justice and an efficient alternative to collective redress mechanisms;

3.  Calls on the Commission to ensure that ADR mechanisms are available to both consumers and businesses when enforcing their rights, inter alia as part of any future proposals in the area of European Contract Law;

4.  Welcomes the Commission’s intention to launch a public consultation on a European approach to collective redress, and opposes the introduction of collective redress mechanisms along the lines of the US model, which contains strong economic incentives to bring unmeritorious claims to court;

5.  Reiterates that any European approach must respect Parliament’s opinion as expressed in its resolution of 26 March 2009 on the White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, and insists that Parliament must be involved, in the framework of the ordinary legislative procedure, in any legislative initiative in the area of collective redress;

6.  Insists that correlation tables are needed in order to evaluate the correct transposition of single market rules, and points out that in future Parliament may not include reports on compromise texts agreed with Council on the plenary agenda if correlation tables are not provided;

7.  Calls on the Member States finally to accept correlation tables concerning the implementation of legislation in order to make legislation deficits more transparent;

8.  Stresses that the correct application, transposition and enforcement of EU law will benefit both consumers and businesses, and encourages the Commission to use all competences available under the Treaties to enforce the rules of the single market;

9.  Takes the view that initiatives by single Member States cannot be effective without coordinated action at EU level, making it fundamental that the European Union should speak with a strong single voice and implement common actions. Solidarity, on which the European social economy model is based, and the coordination of national responses have been crucial to avoiding protectionist measures of short duration by single Member States. Expresses its concern that the re-emergence of economic protectionism at national level would most probably result in fragmentation of the internal market and a reduction in competitiveness, and therefore needs to be avoided; is concerned that the current economic and financial crisis could be used to justify reviving protectionist measures in various Member States, whereas the downturn calls for common safeguard mechanisms instead;

10. Takes the view that progress in the internal market should not be based on the lowest common denominator. Encourages the Commission, therefore, to take the lead and come forward with bold proposals; encourages the Member States to use the method of enhanced cooperation in areas where the process of reaching an agreement among 27 is not achievable; other countries would be free to join these spearhead initiatives at a later stage;

11. Recalls that Article 14 of the TFEU calls on the European Parliament and the Council to lay down in regulations the principles and conditions for the services of general economic interest (SGEI) to achieve their mission of public service; regrets that the communication on the Single Market act does not give more importance to local authorities, which play an essential role in the single market at the economic and social levels. Recalls that Protocol 26 annexed to the TFEU guarantees a wide discretional capacity to organise, manage and finance the SGEI, and asks the Commission to guarantee the application of these Treaty provisions;

12. Notes the willingness of the Commission to more effectively support social dialogue and to improve the transparency and democracy of decisions; stresses the need to support this willingness with initiatives with the social partners in order to create a European framework for the advance planning of industrial restructuring;

13. Believes that the ‘good governance’ of the single market must respect the role of the two advisory institutions existing at European level – the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions –, as well as that of the social partners.

RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

Date adopted

28.2.2011

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

17

0

1

Members present for the final vote

Raffaele Baldassarre, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Alexandra Thein, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka

Substitute(s) present for the final vote

Piotr Borys, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Sajjad Karim, Eva Lichtenberger, Toine Manders


RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

Date adopted

16.3.2011

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

24

1

12

Members present for the final vote

Pablo Arias Echeverría, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Kurt Lechner, Hans-Peter Mayer, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Catherine Stihler, Eva-Britt Svensson, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud

Substitute(s) present for the final vote

Pascal Canfin, Ashley Fox, María Irigoyen Pérez, Morten Løkkegaard, Emma McClarkin, Konstantinos Poupakis, Olga Sehnalová

Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote

Luís Paulo Alves, Ivo Strejček

Last updated: 24 March 2011Legal notice