REPORT on the role of EU cohesion policy and its actors in implementing the new European energy policy

21.12.2012 - (2012/2099(INI))

Committee on Regional Development
Rapporteur: Lena Kolarska-Bobińska

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

on the role of EU cohesion policy and its actors in implementing the new European energy policy

(2012/2099(INI))

The European Parliament,

–   having regard to Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–   having regard to the communication of 10 November 2010 entitled ‘Energy 2020 – A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy’ (COM(2010)0639),

–   having regard to the communication of 15 December 2011 entitled ‘Energy Roadmap 2050’ (COM(2011)0885),

–   having regard to the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (COM(2011)0370),

–   having regard to Rule 48 of its Rules of Procedure,

–   having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0437/2012),

A. whereas the common objectives of European energy policy are security of supply, sustainability and competitiveness;

B.  whereas European energy policy should also ensure the safety of energy resources, diversification of supplies, and affordable prices for end users;

C. whereas the primary objectives of the EU cohesion policy are the economic, social and territorial cohesion of Europe’s regions through investment in growth and jobs;

D. whereas the cohesion policy investments in the area of energy should contribute to the realisation of the objectives of both policies;

E.  whereas these policies should promote growth and local job creation in all regions, while ensuring sustainable sources of energy, and guaranteeing security of energy supply across the whole EU;

F.  whereas the European Union’s energy markets are increasingly extending beyond national borders and this trend is set to gain considerable pace in the period ahead;

G.       whereas, under the original Commission proposal, at least 80 % of ERDF resources in more developed regions and 50% in less developed regions are to be allocated to a ‘low-carbon economy‘;

H. whereas, in this thematic area, a minimum of 20 % and 6 % respectively is required to be allocated to energy efficiency and renewables, which is a significant amount of funding;

I.   whereas the price of energy has risen significantly in recent years and has now reached historic levels, posing major problems for European industries;

J.   whereas the minimum amount for an ELENA eligible project is EUR 50 million and the minimum for the Intelligent Energy programme is greater than EUR 6 million, which is more than the cost of many projects in small and rural communities;

K. whereas the Energy Roadmap 2050 identifies renewable energy as playing a major part in the future energy policy;

General approach

1.  Welcomes the general approach of linking cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 objectives and flagship initiatives in order to move towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to support the shift towards a low-carbon, energy-efficient economy in all sectors; recalls, in addition, the importance of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund in achieving these short- and long‑term objectives in accordance with the spirit of solidarity between Member States as enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty, and in combating energy poverty in the less developed regions of the EU and the most vulnerable households;

2.  Emphasises, as a consequence of the current crisis’ negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe, the need for strong EU support for economic, social and territorial cohesion;

3.  Believes that European energy projects could contribute to regional development and stronger cross-border cooperation by helping regions increase their capacity to manage energy resources; believes that investment in low-emission and renewable energy sources, energy efficiency and other measures can result in supporting regional growth and jobs;

4.  Stresses the need to distinguish between cohesion policy goals that contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy, on the one hand, and the EU’s wider energy policy goals, on the other, which also affect the countries eligible for cohesion funding; emphasises that cohesion funds may be used as an additional source of funding for energy projects only if a project contributes to cohesion policy goals;

5.  Believes that the regions of Europe should promote smart, sustainable and inclusive growth that takes into account local specificities and conditions, allowing the regions of Europe sufficient flexibility to focus on those sustainable energy sources which are best suited to local and regional conditions and resources, in order to achieve the EU 2020-targets, and that the EU should start measuring and implementing European energy objectives on an EU-wide scale;

6.  Calls for the deployment of renewable sources of energy within the EU to be made more efficient by striving towards a system of EU-wide incentives for renewable sources, on which basis specific types of renewables would be deployed in those parts of the EU where they are most efficient, thereby lowering the cost of promoting them and guaranteeing the efficient allocation of funding;

7.  Recommends taking into account the fact that Europe’s energy markets are organised in regional groups and takes the view that greater attention should continue to be paid to the specific features of national and regional markets so that the proper enforcement of legislative regulations can be guaranteed;

8.  Takes the view that the European Union should act as quickly as possible to secure its energy future and protect its interests in this field, which will entail exerting additional pressure on local and regional representatives to comply with EU guidelines; takes the view that they should at the same time be offered substantial financial support for drawing up projects;

9.  Stresses that projected increases in energy pricing may place citizens in the less developed EU regions at a particular disadvantage; asks, therefore, that this be considered within cohesion policy planning and for Member States to take additional measures to diminish the effects, especially on protected consumers;

Capacity building

10. Stresses that the current climate and energy targets and any future energy goals beyond 2020 should be based on fair burden sharing between European regions and should allow them the possibility of future development which is needed;

11. Emphasises that bureaucracy and lack of procedural clarity have made access to the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund difficult and discouraged those actors most in need of such funding from applying; supports, therefore, the simplification of rules and procedures, the removal of red tape, and increased flexibility in allocating these funds at both EU and national level; believes that simplification will contribute to the efficient allocation of funds, higher absorption rates, fewer errors and reduced payment periods and allow the poorest Member States and regions to take full advantage of the financial instruments intended to reduce regional and inter-state disparities; considers that a balance needs to be struck between simplification and the stability of rules and procedures;

12. Stresses the importance of increasing administrative capacity – but without increasing the administrative burden – in the Member States, at regional and local level and among stakeholders in order to make full and effective use of the funding that will be allocated to energy projects (including in the areas of energy efficiency and renewable energy) under cohesion policy, to overcome barriers to effective synergies between the Structural Funds and other funds and to support effective policy design and implementation; calls on the Member States to make further efforts to attract and retain qualified staff to manage EU funds;

13. Points out, with regard to large-scale energy projects, the possible capacity deficiencies of various regional and local authorities, which might seriously hamper implementation; believes, therefore, not only that JESSICA, ELENA and IEE-MLEI should be strengthened, but that any funding allocations for low-emission economy thematic concentrations within the cohesion policy should be reviewed by 2018 in light of their absorption rate and adjusted as needed, and at the latest within the framework of prospective general review of the MFF;

14. Welcomes the launch of the Smart Cities and Communities European Innovation Partnership and calls on the relevant partners involved in planning processes for sustainable urban development to do more to promote, and take fuller advantage of, the benefits available under the JESSICA and ELENA initiatives for sustainable energy investment at local level, with a view to helping cities and regions embark on viable investment projects in the fields of energy efficiency, clean-burning fuel, renewable energy sources and sustainable urban transport;

15. Stresses the importance of regularly reviewing the allocation of cohesion funding for energy projects, in order to increase the absorption rate and channel the funds into programmes which have a proven record of absorption, added value and effectiveness;

16. Stresses, while supporting new financial instruments (loans, loan guarantees and equity), that this should be in addition to direct grants and co-financing of energy projects and not a replacement for them;

17. Draws the attention of the Member States and the Commission to the fact that towns, especially small and medium-sized towns and rural communities, should be eligible for direct funding aid for energy efficiency, and building renovation projects as well as transregional and cross-border projects as they are likely to lack the necessary administrative capacity to use other financial instruments fully; suggests to the Commission, in this regard, that an energy-efficiency strategy needs to be drawn up for small communities;

18. Believes that initiatives supporting local and regional capacities to deal with energy savings should be supported, inter alia by ERDF and ESF investments;

19. Calls on the Commission to establish an EU-wide cooperation programme, based on the experience of the twinning programme, in order to improve cooperation between regions with high rates of absorption of EU funds and those with low absorption rates and to facilitate the dissemination of best practices;

Partnership agreements

20. Notes that, for projects to be properly implemented, regional and local authorities should be consulted on partnership agreements in such a way as to give them a real opportunity to influence their goals, the content of expenditure and their implementation; calls, therefore, for the partnership principle to be strengthened;

21. Supports, therefore, a multi-level governance and decentralised approach to energy policy and energy efficiency, including, among other things, the Covenant of Mayors and the further development of the Smart Cities initiative as well as the promotion of the best solutions at regional and local level by means of information campaigns;

22. Points out that cohesion policy funding arrangements should ensure that the differing economic, social and territorial features of regions are fully taken into consideration; highlights, in this connection, the role of the regions located on the external borders of the European Union;

23. Believes that, while the Common Provisions Regulation, provides for general earmarking and other thematic targets, these measures should be applied in a flexible manner within partnership agreements to allow Member States and their regions to pursue their most effective path towards achieving the EU 2020 goals and cohesion policy objectives;

24. Singles out the need to apply the broad criteria for assessing energy projects put forward for cohesion policy funding; notes, in particular, that different geographical conditions mean that there cannot be a ‘one-size-fits-all’ energy policy for all regions;

Implementation and policy suggestions

25. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU‘s climate goals, many regions are still dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that all these regions ought to be encouraged to use sources of energy compatible with the goals of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, including those of a transitional nature, if they are proved not to have side-effects or negative consequences on people and the areas where they are produced or used;26.  Stresses the need to select local sources of energy generation prudently and in such a manner as to ensure that they fit in as well as possible with the regional landscape;

27. Takes the view that consistent rules are needed at European level along with a mechanism for authorities to access information from across the Union in order to fully understand energy market developments;

28. Takes the view that cohesion policy can play a key role in exploiting the potential offered by innovation, research and development, so that future challenges in the field of energy can be turned into an opportunity that will revitalise the Union‘s economic strength;

29. Supports the use of cohesion and energy policy funds for cross-border projects with third partner countries and connections between national networks; stresses that bordering regions should be incorporated into the EU system as much as possible to ensure sustainable development on both sides of the border; stresses that such funding should be subject to the application of the EU energy market rules, including the third energy package;

30. Welcomes the new proposal on the Connecting Europe Facility as an additional and complementary instrument to cohesion policy, aimed at addressing the extensive need for investment in modernising and expanding Europe’s energy infrastructure, thereby contributing to the Europe 2020 strategy targets; urges the Commission to maximise the degree of coordination between the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, on the one hand, and the Connecting Europe Facility, on the other;

31. Encourages use of the European territorial cooperation objective and the Connecting Europe Facility to implement cross-border strategies on efficient energy production, distribution and use; emphasises the importance of adapting EU rules on energy infrastructure managers to the cross-border context;

32. Believes that cohesion policy funds should be available to provide information to local and regional authorities, SMEs and individuals on national renewable energy schemes in a structured way; notes that this is needed, in particular, in those Member States where a ‘certificate of origin’ system has been adopted, which might favour only large-scale energy projects;

33. Calls for full use to be made of synergies between public and private funds in financing energy projects;

34. Supports the revision of the EU VAT Regulation (2006/112/EC) to allow for a reduction of the VAT rate applied to regional, local and cross-border projects seeking to increase energy efficiency and to the purchase of products in the highest energy efficiency class under Directive 2010/30/EU;

35. Believes that only greenhouse gas reduction projects targeting the installations listed in Annex 1 to Directive 2003/87/EC should be excluded from the ERDF and the CF, so as not to engender a disproportionate effect on less developed regions and delay their transition to low-emission regions; asks the Commission to further clarify and define which energy sectors would not be eligible for cohesion policy funding and to withdraw this exclusion from projects located in convergence regions;

36. Notes that district heating and cogeneration plants are widely present especially in Central and Eastern Europe; believes that the upgrade of such plants and of their distribution network, and where necessary the creation of high efficiency new plants, would have a positive environmental impact and should therefore be encouraged and supported by the cohesion policy;

Energy efficiency, renewables and infrastructure

37. Agrees that energy efficiency is vital to the EU’s energy goals and should be promoted above all within the thematic concentration structure and Operational Programmes; believes that EU measures should support energy efficiency in the energy production, distribution and consumption phases; notes that, while cohesion policy energy funding is at present mainly spent on renewables, a better balance must be reached to enable a greater percentage of funding to be targeted at energy-efficiency projects;

38. Considers it to be of paramount importance for investments to be made in energy efficiency and renewable energy use, in particular in the housing sector;

39. Takes the view that, by making intelligent use of Community funds for the forthcoming programming period 2014-2020, it will be possible to achieve the 20 % target for energy efficiency and thus the sustainability and competitiveness objectives in the European Union; stresses that cutting consumption by means of energy efficiency is the most sustainable way of reducing dependence on fossil fuels, leading to a reduction in imports of around 25 %;

40. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy storage and transmission infrastructure and networks (with particular reference to smart grids and distribution) between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions, for the completion and functioning of the internal energy market, for the provision of an affordable, secure and sustainable energy supply and for achieving the goal of convergence among EU regions, taking into the account the needs of EU citizens in every Member State; stresses that no region of the Member States should remain isolated from European gas and electricity networks after 2015 or suffer from inadequate connection to energy networks;

41. Stresses the need to develop an integrated and interconnected energy system, and local and regional smart distribution and transmission networks for electricity and gas, together with storage facilities; believes that the energy thematic concentration should support grid creation, and renovation for renewable sources of energy, i.e. sustainable production of biogas;

42. Considers, taking into account regional demands, that funding for renewables should focus primarily on the local distribution of the power/fuel produced and small-scale renewable projects; notes that large-scale renewable energy projects often either focus on the transmission of this energy outside the region of its production or find that local grids do not have the capacity to absorb this intermittent energy;

43. Points out that the cohesion policy should contribute to a balance of energy flows across borders of Member States in order to avoid possible threats of black-outs (e.g. by means of transformers);

44. Notes the need for energy efficiency and development of renewable energy in rural areas; stresses the increasing energy saving potential in rural households, which might require innovative funding schemes as these communities lack the necessary financial institutions with the ability to support such projects; supports steps to facilitate access to new technologies for rural areas, especially in the area of microgeneration;

45. Asks the Commission to ensure that energy policy is ‘rural proof’ by addressing in a more comprehensive and coordinated way the challenges and opportunities that rural areas face when it comes to energy use and production;

46. Emphasises that, for obvious financial reasons, the natural gas grid will never cover certain parts of the rural territory in the EU and thus LPG and LNG could play a back-up role for renewable energies in these off-grid areas, bringing the same environmental benefits as natural gas;

47. Points out that energy efficiency potential remains unrealised in the construction and transport sectors, where investments in the heating of buildings and energy‑efficient public transport represent an opportunity to increase employment in the sectors concerned; believes that multiannual objectives should be set in this regard;

48. Notes the imbalance in sustainable resource use between different Member States; stresses the economies of scales possible through cross-border cooperation on sustainable use of resources and energy efficiency; takes the view that measures to support resource efficiency and the recycling of materials should be stepped up; underlines the risk of carbon leakage and its effect on regional development and social cohesion, and therefore believes that a balance must be struck between the implementation of our climate objectives and the energy security of Europe’s regions, which is necessary for sustainable and competitive growth;

49. Stresses the significant advantage of using the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of the information and communication networks needed in order to develop a secure and robust smart EU energy grid;

Competitiveness, jobs and fighting energy poverty

50. Stresses that investments in energy infrastructure and energy‑efficient construction and transport will lead directly to the creation of new jobs;

51. Calls for the EU‑wide exchange of best practices so that the impact on energy poverty of policies adopted in the area of energy may be monitored;

52. Highlights the need to address the fragmentation of the EU energy market by removing barriers and bottlenecks in the relevant legislative frameworks and in the system of access to public and private funds for project development and implementation;

53. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Committee of the Regions.

OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY (8.11.2012)

for the Committee on Regional Development

on the role of EU cohesion policy and their actors in implementing the new European energy policy
(2012/2099(INI))

Rapporteur: Ioan Enciu

SUGGESTIONS

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:

1.  Welcomes the general approach of linking cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 objectives and its flagship initiatives in order to move towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to support the shift towards a low-carbon, energy-efficient economy in all sectors; recalls, in addition, the importance of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for achieving these short- and long‑term objectives in accordance with the spirit of solidarity between Member States as enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty, and for combating energy poverty in the less developed regions of the EU and the most vulnerable households;

2.  Takes the view that the European territorial cooperation objective of cohesion policy, together with macro-regional strategies, can increase cooperation opportunities for cross-border projects with a view to achieving efficient and intelligent interconnections between local and regional energy sources and large energy grids; highlights, therefore, the need for effective regional cooperation when identifying regional infrastructure priorities and implementing projects of common interest; emphasises the need for cooperation at national and European level between municipalities and regions, which can contribute to the elimination of energy islands, the completion of the internal energy market and the implementation of energy infrastructure projects; calls on the Commission to establish a EU-wide cooperation programme, based on the experience of the twinning programme, in order to improve cooperation between regions with high rates of absorption of EU funds and those with low absorption rates and to facilitate the dissemination of best practices;

3.  Emphasises that bureaucracy and lack of procedural clarity have made access to the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund difficult and discouraged those actors most in need of such funding from applying; supports, therefore, the simplification of rules and procedures, the removal of red tape, and increased flexibility in allocating these funds at both EU and national level; believes that simplification will contribute to the efficient allocation of funds, higher absorption rates, fewer errors and reduced payment periods and allow the poorest Member States and regions to take full advantage of the financial instruments intended to reduce regional and inter-state disparities; considers that a balance needs to be struck between simplification and the stability of rules and procedures;

4.  Highlights the need to address the fragmentation of the EU energy market by removing barriers and bottlenecks in the relevant legislative frameworks and in the system of access to public and private funds for project development and implementation;

5.  Stresses the need to distinguish between cohesion policy goals that contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy, on the one hand, and the EU’s wider energy policy goals, on the other, which also affect the countries eligible for cohesion funding; emphasises that cohesion funds can be used as an additional source of funding for energy projects only if a project contributes to cohesion policy goals;

6.  Welcomes the launch of the Smart Cities and Communities European Innovation Partnership and calls on the relevant partners involved in planning processes for sustainable urban development to do more to promote, and take fuller advantage of, the benefits available under the JESSICA and ELENA initiatives for sustainable energy investment at local level, with a view to helping cities and regions embark on viable investment projects in the fields of energy efficiency, clean-burning fuel, renewable energy sources and sustainable urban transport;

7.  Stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy storage and transmission infrastructure and networks (with particular reference to smart grids and distribution) between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions, for the completion and functioning of the internal energy market, for the provision of an affordable, secure and sustainable energy supply and for achieving the goal of convergence among EU regions, taking into the account the needs of EU citizens in every Member State; stresses that no region of the Member States should remain isolated from European gas and electricity networks after 2015 or suffer from inadequate connection to energy networks;

8.  Notes that the utilisation of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for programmes which finance energy efficiency and renewable energy projects has so far been successful and contributed to the achievement of the EU’s policy goals;

9.  Considers it to be of paramount importance to be able to use the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund and other financial and leverage instruments to finance energy efficiency and renewable energy use, in particular in the housing sector; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to establish innovative financial mechanisms and to facilitate the use of the aforementioned funds to finance projects in the field of energy-efficient buildings, energy generation and transportation, at local and regional level, by offering incentives, grants and loans, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to disseminate clear, easily accessible information on the financial instruments, incentives, grants and loans available to support energy efficiency service projects; stresses that, in order to improve the energy efficiency of new and existing residential buildings and increase the use of renewable energy sources, the measures planned under the Structural Funds should also appear in the Member States’ regional operational programmes, thereby ensuring that the final decisions are taken at regional level;

10. Stresses the importance of integrating the renewable and energy efficiency dimensions into the research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation that Member States and regions will have to design in order to access innovation funding under the future cohesion policy; notes that regional and local authorities and stakeholders have a key role to play in deploying the most-needed innovations in the energy sector if the EU is to meet its renewables and energy efficiency targets;

11. Highlights the fact that the cohesion policy and the funds allocated to it should be delivered more effectively, on the basis of the principles of proportionality, cost-effectiveness and accountability; supports, therefore, the use of financial instruments as leverage for private‑sector investment, especially in respect of large energy infrastructure, energy efficiency and renewable energy projects;

12. Stresses the importance of regularly reviewing the allocation of cohesion funding for energy projects, in order to increase the absorption rate and channel the funds into programmes which have a proven record of absorption, added value and effectiveness;

13. Stresses the significant advantage of using the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of the information and communication networks needed in order to develop a secure and robust smart EU energy grid;

14. Shares the Commission’s views on encouraging and increasing the use of financial instruments as part of cohesion policy, bearing in mind the current financial scarcity and the EU’s financial needs in order to complete the Europe 2020 strategy; considers that these instruments can provide efficient and effective support for investment in projects with potential economic viability and create a leverage effect by mobilising additional public or private co-investments in order to address market failures in the energy sector while minimising market distortions; believes that financial instruments should be tailored to the specific needs of regions and of their target recipients, thereby significantly improving access to finance for a wide range of socio-economic actors on the ground;

15. Stresses the importance of increasing administrative capacity – but without increasing the administrative burden – in the Member States, at regional and local level and among stakeholders in order to make full and effective use of the funding that will be allocated to energy projects (including in the areas of energy efficiency and renewable energy) under cohesion policy, to overcome barriers to effective synergies between the Structural Funds and other funds and to support effective policy design and implementation; calls on the Member States to make further efforts to attract and retain qualified staff to manage EU funds;

16. Welcomes the new proposal on the Connecting Europe Facility as an additional and complementary instrument to cohesion policy, aimed at addressing the extensive need for investment in modernising and expanding Europe’s energy infrastructure, thereby contributing to the Europe 2020 strategy targets; urges the Commission to maximise the degree of coordination between the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, on the one hand, and the Connecting Europe Facility, on the other.

RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

Date adopted	5.11.2012
Result of final vote	+: –: 0:	43 1 2
Members present for the final vote	Gabriele Albertini, Josefa Andrés Barea, Jean-Pierre Audy, Ivo Belet, Jan Březina, Giles Chichester, Jürgen Creutzmann, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Christian Ehler, Vicky Ford, Adam Gierek, Fiona Hall, Jacky Hénin, Kent Johansson, Romana Jordan, Krišjānis Kariņš, Béla Kovács, Angelika Niebler, Jaroslav Paška, Aldo Patriciello, Vittorio Prodi, Miloslav Ransdorf, Herbert Reul, Michèle Rivasi, Amalia Sartori, Salvador Sedó i Alabart, Francisco Sosa Wagner, Britta Thomsen, Evžen Tošenovský, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Marita Ulvskog, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Substitute(s) present for the final vote	Yves Cochet, Ioan Enciu, Roger Helmer, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Gunnar Hökmark, Yannick Jadot, Werner Langen, Zofija Mazej Kukovič, Franck Proust, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote	Phil Bennion, Christian Engström

RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

Date adopted	18.12.2012
Result of final vote	+: –: 0:	22 17 2
Members present for the final vote	François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Charalampos Angourakis, Victor Boştinaru, John Bufton, Nikos Chrysogelos, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Mojca Kleva Kekuš, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jacek Olgierd Kurski, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Vladimír Maňka, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Miroslav Mikolášik, Ana Miranda, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Younous Omarjee, Markus Pieper, Georgios Stavrakakis, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Justina Vitkauskaite, Oldřich Vlasák, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Substitute(s) present for the final vote	Ivars Godmanis, Karin Kadenbach, Evgeni Kirilov, Lena Kolarska-Bobińska, Maurice Ponga, Elisabeth Schroedter, Derek Vaughan
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote	Olle Ludvigsson