Procedure : 2013/2139(BUD)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A7-0292/2013

Texts tabled :

A7-0292/2013

Debates :

Votes :

PV 08/10/2013 - 9.3

Texts adopted :

P7_TA(2013)0393

REPORT     
PDF 225kWORD 95k
23 September 2013
PE 514.824v02-00 A7-0292/2013

on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili from Italy)

(COM(2013)0469 – C7-0207/2013 – 2013/2139(BUD))

Committee on Budgets

Rapporteur: Dominique Riquet

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
 ANNEX: DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
 ANNEX II: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
 ANNEX III: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON Regional Development
 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili from Italy)

(COM(2013)0469 – C7-0207/2013 – 2013/2139(BUD))

The European Parliament,

–   having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0469 – C7-0207/2013),

–   having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management(1) (IIA of 17 May 2006), and in particular point 28 thereof,

–   having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund(2) (EGF Regulation),

–   having regard to the trilogue procedure provided for in point 28 of the IIA of 17 May 2006,

–   having regard to the letter of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,

-    having regard to the letter of the Committee on Regional Development,

–   having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A7-0292/2013),

A. whereas the European Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market;

B.  whereas the scope of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to 31 December 2011 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis;

C  whereas the Union’s financial assistance to workers made redundant should be dynamic and made available as quickly and efficiently as possible, in accordance with the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008, and having due regard for the IIA of 17 May 2006 in respect of the adoption of decisions to mobilise the EGF;

D. whereas Italy submitted application EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili for a financial contribution from the EGF, following 1030 redundancies in De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A. with 1010 workers targeted for EFG co-funded measures, during the reference period from 5 July 2012 to 28 August 2012;

E.  whereas the application fulfils the eligibility criteria set up by the EGF Regulation;

1.  Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that Italy is, therefore, entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation;

2.  Notes that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 5 November 2012 and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 28 June 2013; welcomes the relatively speedy evaluation period of 7 months;

3.  Notes that the 1 030 redundancies in De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A., an autombile manufacturer in Italy, were caused by the changes in the geographical patterns of consumption, in particular the rapid growth in Asian markets from which Union producers are less able to benefit, being traditionally less well positioned on these markets than elsewhere, together with the tightening of credit which followed the economic and financial crisis and put an extra burden on the enterprise, which was unable to find a profitable solution and entered into liquidation proceedings in April 2012;

4.  Stresses that the Commission has already recognised the impact of the economic and financial crisis on the automotive sector and that this sector had the largest number of applications (16) for EGF support, of which 7 are based on trade related globalisation(3);

5.  Calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures, recalls that early EGF interventions in Italy suffered from relatively low rate of budget implementation mainly due to low participation rates;

6.  Emphasises the fact that the De Tomaso Automobili redundancies are spread in the regions of Piemonte and Toscana, and in particular in the provinces of Torino and Livorno where the production plants of De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A. were located;

7.  Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised measures on 15 January 2013, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;

8.  Notes that the dismissals were covered by the wage compensation fund (CIG), Italian social safety net, which provided financial benefits to workers in compensation of salary payments; notes that the Italian authorities have requested EGF support to finance subsistence allowances, however, of additional value to usual welfare payments available under Italian labour law for unemployed;

9.  Recalls that the EGF should in the future be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as occupational orientation programs, and its financial contribution to allowances should always be of additional nature and in parallel to what is available to dismissed workers by virtue of national law or collective agreements; recalls in this context the conclusion of the Court of Auditors in the Special Report No 7/2013 on EGF that "One third of EGF funding compensates national workers' income support schemes, with no EU added value" and the recommendation that such measures should be limited in the future;

10. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 1 010 workers into employment such as vocational guidance, outplacement and job search assistance, training, re-training and vocational training, accompanying measures towards business creation, contribution to business start-up, hiring benefit, job-search allowance, contributions towards special expenses such as contribution for carers of dependent persons and contribution to commuting expenses;

11. Welcomes the fact that the social partners, and in particular the trade unions at local level were consulted on the design of the measures of the coordinated EGF package, and that a policy of equality of women and men as well as the principle non-discrimination will be applied during the various stages of the implementation of and in access to the EGF;

12. Welcomes the fact that the social partners were consulted on the design of the package and the a steering committee will monitor the implementation of the package;

13. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the needs of the dismissed workers but also to the actual business environment;

14. Calls on the Member States to include in future applications the following information concerning the training measures to be supported by EGF: types of training provided, in which sectors and if the offer matches the anticipated skills needs in the region/locality and if is aligned with future economic prospects of the region;

15. Notes that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds; stresses that the Italian authorities confirm that the eligible actions do not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of those data in its annual reports in order to ensure full respect of the existing regulations and guarantee that no duplication of Union-funded services can occur;

16. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural arrangements to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved;

17. Stresses that, in accordance with Article 6 of the EGF Regulation, it shall be ensured that the EGF supports the reintegration of individual redundant workers into stable employment; stresses, furthermore, that EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment; reiterates that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements, nor measures restructuring companies or sectors;

18. Approves the decision annexed to this resolution;

19. Welcomes the agreement reached in the Council on reintroducing in the EGF regulation, for the period 2014-2020, the crisis mobilisation criterion, which allows for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current financial and economic crisis in addition to those losing their job because of changes in global trade patterns;

20. Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;

21. Instructs its President to forward this resolution, including its annex, to the Council and the Commission.

(1)

OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(2)

OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(3)

EGF/2012/008 De Tomaso Automobili (the case object of this proposal for decision), EGF/2012/005 Saab Automotive COM(2012)622, EGF/2009/013 Karmann COM(2010)007, EGF/2008/004 Castilla y Leon Aragon COM(2009)150, EGF/2008/002 Delphi CMO(2008)547, EGF/2007/010 Lisboa Alentejo COM(2008)94, EGF/2007/001 PSA Suppliers COM(2007)415.


ANNEX: DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of ...

on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili from Italy)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management(1), and in particular point 28 thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund(2), and in particular Article 12(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)      The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.

(2)      The scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to 30 December 2011 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis.

(3)      The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the EGF within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.

(4)      Italy submitted an application on 5 November 2012 to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in the enterprise De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A., and supplemented it by additional information up to 5 March 2013. This application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions set out in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission therefore proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 2 594 672.

(5)      The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application submitted by Italy,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 2 594 672 in commitment and payment appropriations.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at ,

For the European Parliament                      For the Council

The President                                                The President

(1)

OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(2)

OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.


EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

I. Background

The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns.

According to the provisions of point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management(1) and of the Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006(2), the Fund may not exceed a maximum amount of EUR 500 million, drawn from any margin under the global expenditure ceiling from the previous year, and/or from the cancelled commitment appropriations from the previous two years, excluding those related to Heading 1b. The appropriate amounts are entered into the budget as a provision as soon as the sufficient margins and/or cancelled commitments have been identified.

As concerns the procedure, in order to activate the Fund the Commission, in case of a positive assessment of an application, presents to the budgetary authority a proposal for mobilisation of the Fund and, at the same time, a corresponding request for transfer. In parallel, a trilogue could be organised in order to find an agreement on the use of the Fund and the amounts required. The trilogue can take a simplified form.

II. The Tomaso Automobili S.p.A. application and the Commission's proposal

On 28 June 2013, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Italy to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant in De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A. due to major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation.

This is the sixth application to be examined under the 2013 budget and refers to the mobilisation of a total amount of EUR 2 594 672 from the EGF for Italy. It concerns 1 030 redundancies in De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A., an Italian automobile manufacturer, with 1 010 workers targeted for EFG co-funded measures the during the reference period from 05 July 2012 to 28 August 2012. All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

The application was sent to the Commission 05 November 2012, supplemented by additional information up to 05 March 2013. The Commission has concluded that the application meets the conditions for deploying the EGF as set out in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

The Italian authorities argue that that globally, car production increased by 22,4 % in 2010 (after a 9,6 % downturn in 2009(3)). In total, 58,3 million cars were manufactured in 2010. The EU was the biggest producer, accounting for 26 % of world car production, while the second biggest, China, produced 13,9 million units. Chinese car production increased by 33,8 % in 2010 while car production in Europe grew by only 8,3 %. In the same year (2010), Japan, the world’s third largest producer, manufactured 21,1% more cars than in 2009, followed by South Korea (+22,4 %), Brazil (+9,8 %), India (+29,4 %) and the US (+24,4 %). These figures make it clear that growth in automobile manufacturing in the EU lags well behind that of its major competitors, thus leading to a loss of EU market share in the sector.

The Italian authorities further refer to European motor vehicle production statistics(4) to demonstrate a decrease of the EU market share between 2004 and 2010. The EU-27 market share in the world production of motor vehicles decreased from 28,4 % in 2004 to 26,3 % in 2010. In the same period, the production of passenger cars, in absolute terms, increased by 6,7 % in the EU-27, against a growth rate of 32,2 % worldwide. This decrease in EU market share is part of a longer trend, as has been stated by the Commission in its assessments of previous EGF automotive cases based on trade related globalisation (in 2001, the EU-27 share in world car production was still 33,7 %). The declining share of the European market as a proportion of the world market for passenger cars is also borne out by the Cars 21 final report, published on 6 June 2012(5). The main driving force of this redistribution of world market shares are the geographical patterns of consumption, in particular the rapid growth in Asian markets which EU producers are less able to benefit from, being traditionally less well positioned on these markets than elsewhere.

The co-ordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 1 010 workers into employment such as vocational guidance, outplacement and job search assistance, training, re-training and vocational training, accompanying measures towards business creation, contribution to business start-up, hiring benefit, job-search allowance, contributions towards special expenses such as contribution for carers of dependent persons and contribution to commuting expenses;

According to the Italian authorities, the measures initiated on 15 January 2013 combine to form a co-ordinated package of personalised services and represent active labour market measures with the aim of re-integrating the workers into the labour market.

As regards the criteria contained in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, the Italian authorities in their application:

· confirmed that the financial contribution from the EGF does not replace measures which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements;

· demonstrated that the actions provide support for individual workers and are not to be used for restructuring companies or sectors;

· confirmed that the eligible actions referred to above do not receive assistance from other EU financial instruments.

Concerning management and control systems, Italy has notified the Commission that the financial contribution will be managed as follows: The Ministerio del lavoro e delle politiche sociali – Direzione Generale per le Politiche attive e Passive del lavoro (MLPS – DG PAPL) is the managing, certifying and audit authority (MLPS – DG PAPL Ufficio A as managing authority; MLPS – DG PAPL Ufficio B as certifying authority and MLPS – DG PAPL Ufficio C as audit authority). The Regione Piemonte and the Regione Toscana will be the intermediate bodies for the managing authority.

III. Procedure

In order to mobilise the Fund, the Commission has submitted to the Budget Authority a transfer request for a global amount of EUR 2 594 672 from the EGF reserve (40 02 43) to the EGF budget line (04 05 01).

This is the sixth proposal for the mobilisation of the Fund submitted to the Budget Authority in 2013. The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

The trilogue on the Commission's proposal for a Decision on the mobilisation of the EGF could take a simplified form, as provided for in Article 12(5) of the legal base, unless there is no agreement between the Parliament and the Council.

According to an internal agreement, the Employment and Social Affairs Committee should be associated to the process, in order to provide constructive support and contribution to the assessment of the applications from the Fund.

(1)

OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(2)

OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(3)

International Organisation of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers OICA www.oica.net

(4)

European Automobile Manufacturers' Association ACEA. www.acea.be.

(5)

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/automotive/files/cars-21-final-report-2012_en.pdf


ANNEX II: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS

M. Alain Lamassoure

President of the Committee on budgets

ASP 13E158

Subject: Opinion on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) for the case EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili from Italy (COM(2013)0469 final)

Dear Chair,

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) as well as its Working Group on the EGF examined the mobilisation of the EGF for the case EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili and adopted the following opinion.

The EMPL committee and the Working Group on the EGF are in favour of the mobilisation of the Fund concerning this request. In this respect, the EMPL committee presents some remarks without, however, putting into question the transfer of the payments.

The deliberations of the EMPL committee are based on the following considerations:

A) Whereas this application is based on Article 2 (a) of the EGF regulation and targets for support 1010 workers of the total of 1030 workers dismissed within the reference period between 5 July 2012 and 28 August 2012 in one enterprise De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A;

B) Whereas the Italian authorities argue that the redundancies were caused by major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation which impacted European car industry and equally Italian producers;

C) Whereas the Italian authorities show that EU market share in motor vehicle production decreased between 2004 and 2010 and the production of passenger cars in absolute terms, increased by 6,7% in the EU-27 while worldwide market grew by 32,2% showing strong growth on Asian markets, where European producers are disadvantaged;

D) Whereas the Italian authorities claim that weak growth in demand for luxury cars and the tightening of credit caused by the economic and financial crisis led to the bankruptcy of De Tomaso Automobili;

E) Whereas 88,12 % of the workers targeted by the measures are men and 11,88 % are women; whereas 88,91% of the workers are between 24 and 54 years old and 11,09% of workers are older than 55 years;

F) Whereas 93,37% of the dismissed workers are plant and machine operators and assemblers;

Therefore, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to integrate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution concerning the Italian application:

1. Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2 (a) of the EGF regulation (1927/2006) are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under this regulation;

2. Notes that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 5 November 2012 and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 28 June 2013; welcomes the relatively speedy evaluation period of 7 months;

3. Stresses that the Commission has already recognised the impact of the economic and financial crisis on the automotive sector and that this sector had the largest number of applications (16) for EGF support;

4. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised measures on 15 January 2013, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;

5. Calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures, recalls that early EGF interventions in Italy suffered from relatively low rate of budget implementation mainly due to low participation rates;

6. Notes that the dismissals were covered by the wage compensation fund (CIG), Italian social safety net, which provided financial benefits to workers in compensation of salary payments; notes that the Italian authorities have requested EGF support to finance subsistence allowances, however, of additional value to usual welfare payments available under Italian labour law for unemployed;

7. Recalls that the EGF should in the future be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as occupational orientation programs, and its financial contribution to allowances should always be of additional nature and in parallel to what is available to dismissed workers by virtue of national law or collective agreements; recalls in this context the conclusion of the Court of Auditors in the Special Report No 7/2013 on EGF that "One third of EGF funding compensates national workers’ income support schemes, with no EU added value" and the recommendation that such measures should be limited in the future;

8. Welcomes the fact that the social partners were consulted on the design of the package and the a steering committee will monitor the implementation of the package;

9. Calls on the Member States to include in future applications the following information concerning the training measures to be supported by EGF: types of training provided, in which sectors and if the offer matches the anticipated skills needs in the region/locality and if is aligned with future economic prospects of the region.

Yours sincerely,

Pervenche Berès


ANNEX III: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON Regional Development

Mr Alain LAMASSOURE

Chairman

Committee on Budgets

European Parliament

Bât. Altiero Spinelli,13E205B-1047 Brussels

Subject:

Proposal on a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili from Italy)

COM(2013)0469- C7-0207/2013 - 2013/2139(BUD)

Proposal on a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia from Italy)

COM(2013)0470- C7-0206/2013 - 2013/2138(BUD)

Dear Mr. Lamassoure,

The European Commission has informed the European Parliament, in its proposals for decisions of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, that on the basis of two applications to mobilise the Fund submitted by Italy under Article 2(a) and Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) 1927/2006, and in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, and with Article 12(3) of the above-mentioned Regulation, it proposes the mobilisation of that Fund as follows:

1. Regarding the application submitted by Italy under Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) 1927/2006, in respect of 1 030 redundancies in De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A., the Commission proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 2 594 672;

2. Regarding the application submitted by Italy under Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) 1927/2006, in respect of 529 redundancies in two enterprises operating in the NACE Revision 2 Division 26 ('Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products') in the NUTS II region of Lombardia (ITC4), the Commission proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 1 164 930.

In order to avoid undue delay in approving these measures, we are pleased to inform you that the Committee on Regional Development has no objection to the proposed mobilisations of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to allocate the above-mentioned amounts as proposed by the Commission, and in accordance with the rules laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 and in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.

Yours sincerely,

Danuta Hübner


RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

Date adopted

18.9.2013

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

33

2

0

Members present for the final vote

Marta Andreasen, Reimer Böge, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Jean Louis Cottigny, Jean-Luc Dehaene, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazábal Rubial, Ivars Godmanis, Lucas Hartong, Jutta Haug, Monika Hohlmeier, Jan Kozłowski, Alain Lamassoure, Claudio Morganti, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Dominique Riquet, László Surján, Helga Trüpel, Derek Vaughan, Angelika Werthmann

Substitute(s) present for the final vote

Alexander Alvaro, Frédéric Daerden, Jürgen Klute, Paul Rübig, Peter Šťastný, Nils Torvalds, Catherine Trautmann, Adina-Ioana Vălean

Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote

Elena Oana Antonescu, Andrzej Grzyb, Ivana Maletić, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Traian Ungureanu, Iuliu Winkler

Last updated: 26 September 2013Legal notice