Procedure : 2013/2138(BUD)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A7-0294/2013

Texts tabled :

A7-0294/2013

Debates :

Votes :

PV 08/10/2013 - 9.2

Texts adopted :

P7_TA(2013)0392

REPORT     
PDF 222kWORD 94k
23 September 2013
PE 514.825v02-00 A7-0294/2013

on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia from Italy)

(COM(2013)0470 – C7-0206/2013 – 2013/2138(BUD))

Committee on Budgets

Rapporteur: Garriga Polledo

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
 ANNEX: DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
 ANNEX II: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
 ANNEX III: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia from Italy)

(COM(2013)0470 – C7-0206/2013 – 2013/2138(BUD))

The European Parliament,

–   having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0470 – C7-0206/2013),

–   having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA of 17 May 2006)(1), and in particular point 28 thereof,

–   having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF Regulation)(2),

–   having regard to the trilogue procedure provided for in point 28 of the IIA of 17 May 2006,

–   having regard to the letter of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,

–   having regard to the letter of the Committee on Regional Development,

–   having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A7-0294/2013),

A. whereas the European Union has set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market;

B.  whereas the scope of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to 31 December 2011 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis;

C. whereas the Union’s financial assistance to workers made redundant should be dynamic and made available as quickly and efficiently as possible, in accordance with the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008, and having due regard for the IIA of 17 May 2006 in respect of the adoption of decisions to mobilise the EGF;

D. whereas Italy submitted application EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia for a financial contribution from the EGF, following 529 redundancies in Lombardia with 480 workers targeted for EFG co-funded measures, during the reference period from 20 March 2011 to 20 December 2011;

E.  whereas the application fulfils the eligibility criteria set up by the EGF Regulation;

1.  Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation;

2.  Notes with regret that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 30 December 2011 and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 28 June 2013; regrets the lengthy evaluation period of 18 months;

3.  Notes that Lombardia, Italy's most prosperous region producing one fifth of Italy's GDP, needs to tackle major structural challenges aggravated by the economic and financial crisis; welcomes the fact the Lombardia for the second time avails itself of EGF help to deal with economic and social difficulties;

4.  Calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures, recalls that early EGF interventions in Italy suffered from relatively low rate of budget implementation mainly due to low participation rates;

5.  Stresses that the Commission has already recognised the impact of the economic and financial crisis on the ICT sector and that the EGF has supported workers dismissed in this sector (cases: EGF/2011/016 IT/Agile and EGF/2010/012 NL/Noord Holland);

6.  Notes that the Italian ICT sector has been suffering from strong competition from low-cost countries over the past decade; the need to reorganise the sector because of the rapid emergence of new technologies, such as cloud computing, various types of e-services, social networks, etc., has been recognised as a challenge for some years; the digital gap between Italy and leading European countries as well as other countries in the world has further widened because of the economic slow-down caused by the crisis; all of these developments have led to the downsizing of ICT personnel in Italian businesses in the years from 2009 onwards;

7.  Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised measures on 1 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;

8.  Notes that to limit the social impact of the dismissals in ICT sector, extensive use was made of social safety nets such as the wage compensation fund (CIG) which provided financial benefits to workers in compensation of salary payments; notes with satisfaction that the Italian authorities have not requested any EGF support to finance subsistence allowances;

9.  Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 480 workers into employment such as interview techniques, profiling of skills, pathway definition, monitoring, coordination and management of the personal intervention plan, tutoring and occupational guidance, exploration of job opportunities with new employers, matching of skills and jobs, mentoring during the first phase of a new employment, advice and support towards self-employment, and tutoring and support during traineeship;

10. Notes that training and re-training measures are not included in the coordinated package of personalised services given the fact that those measures will be financed through regional sources;

11. Welcomes the fact that the social partners, and in particular the involvement of trade unions at local level (CGIL, CISL, UIL, CISAL)(3), were consulted on the design of the measures of the coordinated EGF package, and that a policy of equality of women and men as well as the principle non-discrimination will be applied during the various stages of the implementation of and in access to the EGF;

12. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the needs of the dismissed workers but also to the actual business environment;

13. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services, consulted with the social partners, contains measures relating to career advice and planning, mentoring, matching of skills and jobs as well as support for self-employment and traineeship;

14. Notes that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds; stresses that the Italian authorities confirm that the eligible actions do not receive assistance from other EU financial instruments; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of those data in its annual reports in order to ensure full respect of the existing regulations and that no duplication of Union-funded services can occur;

15. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved;

16. Stresses that, in accordance with Article 6 of the EGF Regulation, it shall be ensured that the EGF supports the reintegration of individual redundant workers into stable employment; stresses, furthermore, that EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to durable, long-term employment; reiterates that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures restructuring companies or sectors;

17. Welcomes the agreement reached in the Council on reintroducing in the EGF regulation, for the period 2014-2020, the crisis mobilisation criterion, which allows for the provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current financial and economic crisis in addition to those losing their job because of changes in global trade patterns;

18. Approves the decision annexed to this resolution;

19. Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;

20. Instructs its President to forward this resolution, including its annex, to the Council and the Commission.

(1)

OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(2)

OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(3)

CGIL (Confederazione generale italiana del lavoro), CISL (Confederazione italiana sindacati lavoratori), UIL (Unione italiana del lavoro), CISAL (Confederazione Italiana Sindacati Autonomi Lavoratori)


ANNEX: DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of ...

on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia from Italy)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management(1), and in particular point 28 thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund(2), and in particular Article 12(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission(3),

Whereas:

(1)      The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.

(2)      The scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to 30 December 2011 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis.

(3)      The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the EGF within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.

(4)      Italy submitted an application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in the enterprises Anovo Italia S.p.A. and Jabil CM S.r.l, on 30 December 2011 and supplemented it by additional information up to 12 March 2013. This application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission, therefore, proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 1 164 930.

(5)      The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application submitted by Italy,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 1 164 930 in commitment and payment appropriations.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament                      For the Council

The President                                                The President

(1)

          OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(2)

          OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(3)

          OJ C […], […], p. […].


EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

I. Background

The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns.

According to the provisions of point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management(1) and of the Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006(2), the Fund may not exceed a maximum amount of EUR 500 million, drawn from any margin under the global expenditure ceiling from the previous year, and/or from the cancelled commitment appropriations from the previous two years, excluding those related to Heading 1b. The appropriate amounts are entered into the budget as a provision as soon as the sufficient margins and/or cancelled commitments have been identified.

As concerns the procedure, in order to activate the Fund the Commission, in case of a positive assessment of an application, presents to the budgetary authority a proposal for mobilisation of the Fund and, at the same time, a corresponding request for transfer. In parallel, a trilogue could be organised in order to find an agreement on the use of the Fund and the amounts required. The trilogue can take a simplified form.

II. The Lombardia application and the Commission's proposal

On 28 June 2013, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Italy to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant in Anovo Italia S.p.A. and Jabil CM S.r.l. due to major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation.

This is the fifth application to be examined under the 2013 budget and refers to the mobilisation of a total amount of EUR 1 164 930 from the EGF for Italy. It concerns 529 redundancies in Anovo Italia S.p.A. and Jabil CM S.r.l., Italian ICT enterprises, with 480 workers targeted for EFG co-funded measures during the reference period from 20 March 2011 to 20 December 2011. The 322 redundancies in Jabil CM S.r.l. were calculated in accordance with the first indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006). The 207 redundancies in Anovo Italia S.p.A.were calculated in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006

The application was sent to the Commission 30 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 12 March 2013. The Commission has concluded that the application meets the conditions for deploying the EGF as set out in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

The Italian authorities argue that that the decreased ICT demand and investment by both consumers and enterprises caused by the crisis contributed significantly to the slow-down in the Italian ICT and electronic components sector (Nace 26)(3) from 2009 onwards(4)

The Italian authorities state that the ICT sector in Italy had done rather well in the period from 2005 to 2008 achieving a reasonable level of economic activity, in particular when compared to other sectors of the Italian economy, and this despite strong competition from ICT companies in countries with low production costs over the past decade (see next point). As a result of the crisis, however, the positive trend of the years up to 2008 was reversed, showing negative growth rates in the various ICT branches - example IT branch: – 9,% in 2009, – 2.5% in 2010, – 4.1% in 2011 (negative growth rates in comparison to the respective previous years).

The Italian ICT sector has been suffering from strong competition from low-cost countries over the past decade, and the need to reorganise the sector because of the rapid emergence of new technologies, such as cloud computing, various types of e-services, social networks, etc., has been recognised as a challenge for some years. The digital gap between Italy and leading European countries as well as other countries in the world has further widened because of the economic slow-down caused by the crisis. All these developments have led to the downsizing of ICT personnel in Italian enterprises in the years from 2009 onwards.

The Italian authorities argue that the strong decline of the ICT sector in Italy as a result of the crisis hit also the two enterprises which are the object of this proposal: Anovo Italia S.p.A. (Varese province) and Jabil CM S.r.l. (Milano province). Their already difficult situation was further exacerbated, and their conversion and re-organisation efforts undertaken in the past years failed, leading eventually to their closure and the dismissal of the workers.

The co-ordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded includes measures for the reintegration of 480 workers into employment such as interview techniques, profiling of skills, pathway definition, monitoring, coordination and management of the personal intervention plan, tutoring and occupational guidance, exploration of job opportunities with new employers, matching of skills and jobs, mentoring during the first phase of a new employment, advice and support towards self-employment, and tutoring and support during traineeship.

According to the Italian authorities, the measures initiated on 15 March 2012 combine to form a co-ordinated package of personalised services and represent active labour market measures with the aim of re-integrating the workers into the labour market.

As regards the criteria contained in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, the Italian authorities in their application:

· confirmed that the financial contribution from the EGF does not replace measures which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements;

· demonstrated that the actions provide support for individual workers and are not to be used for restructuring companies or sectors;

· confirmed that the eligible actions referred to above do not receive assistance from other EU financial instruments.

Concerning management and control systems, Italy has notified the Commission that the financial contribution will be managed as follows: The Ministerio del lavoro e delle politiche sociali – Direzione Generale per le Politiche attive e Passive del lavoro (MLPS – DG PAPL) is the managing, certifying and audit authority (MLPS – DG PAPL Ufficio A as managing authority; MLPS – DG PAPL Ufficio B as certifying authority and MLPS – DG PAPL Ufficio C as audit authority). Regione Lombardia will be the intermediate body for the managing authority at regional level. Italy has described in its EGF application (part I) a detailed management and control system specifying the respective responsibilities of the actors involved at national and regional levels.

III. Procedure

In order to mobilise the Fund, the Commission has submitted to the Budget Authority a transfer request for a global amount of EUR 1 164 930 from the EGF reserve (40 02 43) to the EGF budget line (04 05 01).

This is the fifth proposal for the mobilisation of the Fund submitted to the Budget Authority in 2013. The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.

The trilogue on the Commission's proposal for a Decision on the mobilisation of the EGF could take a simplified form, as provided for in Article 12(5) of the legal base, unless there is no agreement between the Parliament and the Council.

According to an internal agreement, the Employment and Social Affairs Committee should be associated to the process, in order to provide constructive support and contribution to the assessment of the applications from the Fund.

(1)

OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(2)

OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(3)

The Nace 26 sector includes a variety of activities, including manufacture of computer and electronic products, of optical and electrical appliances, measuring instruments, watches and clocks as well as service activities related to the production of software, consultancy and related activities.

(4)

Sources quoted by Italy: Assinform – Italian Association of Information & Communications Technologies (www.assinform.it); 2009 report of Osservatorio ICT & PMI della School of Management del Politecnico di Milano (www.osservatori.net); ISTAT (http://www.istat.it/).


ANNEX II: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS

M. Alain Lamassoure

President of the Committee on budgets

ASP 13E158

Subject: Opinion on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) for the case EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia from Italy (COM(2013)0470 final)

Dear Chair,

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) as well as its Working Group on the EGF examined the mobilisation of the EGF for the case EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia and adopted the following opinion.

The EMPL committee and the Working Group on the EGF are in favour of the mobilisation of the Fund concerning this request. In this respect, the EMPL committee presents some remarks without, however, putting into question the transfer of the payments.

The deliberations of the EMPL committee are based on the following considerations:

A) Whereas this application is based on Article 2 (b) of the EGF regulation and targets for support 480 workers of the total of 529 workers dismissed within the reference period between 20 March 2011 and 20 December 2011 in two enterprises operating in the NACE revision 2 division 26 "Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products" in the NUTS II region of Lombardia;

B) Whereas the Italian authorities argue that the redundancies were caused by the global financial and economic crises which resulted in sudden drop in demand and investment in ICT;

C) Whereas the Italian authorities show that various ICT branches in Italy contracted in the course of 2009, 2010 and 2011;

D) Whereas the Italian authorities claim that the two enterprises Anovo Italia S.p.A and Jabil CM S.r.l. were already in difficult situation in the context of strong competition from low-cost countries and that the impact of economic and financial crisis caused their closure and the dismissal of workers;

E) Whereas 60,4 % of the workers targeted by the measures are men and 39,6 % are women; whereas 93,8% of the workers are between 24 and 54 years old and 4,6% of workers are older than 55 years;

F) Whereas 48,5% of the dismissed workers are plant and machine operators and assemblers, 31,9% are craft and related trades workers and 11,9% are support workers/clerks;

Therefore, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to integrate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution concerning the Italian application:

1. Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2 (b) of the EGF regulation (1927/2006) are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under this regulation;

2. Notes with regret that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 30 December 2011 and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 28 June 2013; regrets the lengthy evaluation period of 18 months;

3. Stresses that the Commission has already recognised the impact of the economic and financial crisis on the ICT sector and that the EGF has supported workers dismissed in this sector (cases: EGF/2011/016 IT/Agile and EGF/2010/012 NL/Noord Holland);

4. Notes that Lombardia, Italy's most prosperous region producing one fifth of Italy's GDP, needs to tackle major structural challenges aggravated by the economic and financial crisis; welcomes the fact the Lombardia for the second time avails itself of EGF help to deal with economic and social difficulties;

5. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised measures on 1 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;

6. Calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures, recalls that early EGF interventions in Italy suffered from relatively low rate of budget implementation mainly due to low participation rates;

7. Notes that to limit the social impact of the dismissals in ICT sector, extensive use was made of social safety nets such as the wage compensation fund (CIG) which provided financial benefits to workers in compensation of salary payments; notes with satisfaction that the Italian authorities have not requested any EGF support to finance subsistence allowances;

8. Notes that training and re-training measures are not included in the coordinated package of personalised services given the fact that those measures will be financed through regional sources;

9. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services, consulted with the social partners, contains measures relating to career advice and planning, mentoring, matching of skills and jobs as well as support for self-employment and traineeship;

Yours sincerely,

Pervenche Berès


ANNEX III: LETTER OF COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Mr Alain LAMASSOURE

Chairman

Committee on Budgets

European Parliament

Bât. Altiero Spinelli,13E205B-1047 Brussels

Subject:

Proposal on a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2012/008 IT/De Tomaso Automobili from Italy)

COM(2013)0469- C7-0207/2013 - 2013/2139(BUD)

Proposal on a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/025 IT/Lombardia from Italy)

COM(2013)0470- C7-0206/2013 - 2013/2138(BUD)

Dear Mr. Lamassoure,

The European Commission has informed the European Parliament, in its proposals for decisions of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, that on the basis of two applications to mobilise the Fund submitted by Italy under Article 2(a) and Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) 1927/2006, and in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, and with Article 12(3) of the above-mentioned Regulation, it proposes the mobilisation of that Fund as follows:

1. Regarding the application submitted by Italy under Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) 1927/2006, in respect of 1 030 redundancies in De Tomaso Automobili S.p.A., the Commission proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 2 594 672;

2. Regarding the application submitted by Italy under Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) 1927/2006, in respect of 529 redundancies in two enterprises operating in the NACE Revision 2 Division 26 ('Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products') in the NUTS II region of Lombardia (ITC4), the Commission proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 1 164 930.

In order to avoid undue delay in approving these measures, we are pleased to inform you that the Committee on Regional Development has no objection to the proposed mobilisations of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to allocate the above-mentioned amounts as proposed by the Commission, and in accordance with the rules laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 and in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.

Yours sincerely,

Danuta Hübner


RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE

Date adopted

18.9.2013

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

33

2

0

Members present for the final vote

Marta Andreasen, Reimer Böge, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Jean Louis Cottigny, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazábal Rubial, Ivars Godmanis, Lucas Hartong, Jutta Haug, Monika Hohlmeier, Jan Kozłowski, Alain Lamassoure, Claudio Morganti, Vojtěch Mynář, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Dominique Riquet, László Surján, Helga Trüpel, Derek Vaughan, Angelika Werthmann

Substitute(s) present for the final vote

Alexander Alvaro, Frédéric Daerden, Jürgen Klute, Paul Rübig, Peter Šťastný, Nils Torvalds, Catherine Trautmann, Adina-Ioana Vălean

Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote

Elena Oana Antonescu, Andrzej Grzyb, Ivana Maletić, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Traian Ungureanu, Iuliu Winkler

Last updated: 26 September 2013Legal notice