Procedure : 2016/0274(COD)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A8-0132/2017

Texts tabled :

A8-0132/2017

Debates :

PV 07/02/2018 - 16
CRE 07/02/2018 - 16

Votes :

PV 08/02/2018 - 12.7

Texts adopted :

P8_TA(2018)0037

REPORT     ***I
PDF 643kWORD 105k
30 March 2017
PE 599.626v02-00 A8-0132/2017

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions

(COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))

Committee on Budgets

Rapporteur: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial

Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Nirj Deva, Committee on Development

(*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure

AMENDMENTS
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
 OPINION of the Committee on Development(*)
 OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
 OPINION of the Committee on International Trade
 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions

(COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0582),

–  having regard to Article 294(2) and Articles 209 and 212 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8-0374/2016),

–  having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–  having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on International Trade (A8-0132/2017),

1.  Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

2.  Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

3.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Amendment     1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(2)  The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors.

(2)  The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors. The annual payment should not be to the detriment of existing activities under heading 4.

Amendment  2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(4)  The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migration.

(4)  The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing the migratory pressures stemming from poverty, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities, climate change and the long term consequences of forced displacement.

Amendment    3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(5)  The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record.

(5)  The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments and should be carried out under the highest standards of transparency and democratic accountability. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and further strengthening its track record. The transfer of management should lead to cost savings for the general budget of the Union and should enable the Commission to provide to the European Parliament better and more accurate information about the management and situation of the Guarantee Fund.

Amendment    4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 7

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Commission shall ensure the financial management of the Fund. The Commission shall manage and invest the resources of the Guarantee Fund in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and shall follow appropriate prudential rules.’

The Commission shall ensure the financial management of the Fund in accordance with this Regulation and with the internal rules and procedures of the Fund. In addition, the Commission shall manage and invest the resources of the Guarantee Fund in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and shall follow appropriate prudential rules, while taking into account the principles guiding the Union's external action. The Commission shall explain to the European Parliament how the management of the Fund is integrated into its broader development strategy.

Amendment    5

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 8 – paragraph 1

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

By 31 March of each year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors, in the context of the financial statements of the Commission, the required information on the situation of the Guarantee Fund.

By 31 March of each year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors, in the context of the financial statements of the Commission, all required information on the situation of the Guarantee Fund.

Amendment    6

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 8 – paragraph 2

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

In addition, it shall, by 31 May of each year, submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors an annual report on the management of the Guarantee Fund in the previous calendar year. The annual report shall contain the presentation of the financial position of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year, the financial flows during the previous calendar year as well as the significant transactions and any relevant information on the financial accounts. The report shall also include information about the financial management and performance and the risk of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year.’

In addition, it shall, by 31 May of each year, submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors an annual report on the management of the Guarantee Fund in the previous calendar year and an assessment of the adequacy of the 9 % target amount and of the 10 % threshold referred to in Article 3, and of the asset management of the Guarantee Fund by the Commission. That annual report shall contain the presentation of the financial position and functioning of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year, the financial flows during the previous calendar year as well as the significant transactions and any relevant information on the financial accounts, such as detailed information on the outstanding capital of guaranteed loans or the Guarantee Fund's assets in difficult market environments, as well as conclusions and lessons learned. The report shall also include information about the financial management and performance and the risk of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year.’


OPINION of the Committee on Development(*) (24.3.2017)

for the Committee on Budgets

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions

(COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))

Rapporteur: Nirj Deva

SHORT JUSTIFICATION

The Guarantee Fund for External Action (GFEA) protects the EU budget from shocks that might otherwise occur in case of defaults on loans that are guaranteed by the EU. It is intended to cover the activation of general budget guarantees for third countries in order to avoid possible disruptions to the implementation of the budget in the event of default. The Commission entrusted so far the financial management of the GFEA to the EIB, however the funds in it remain the property of the EU.

The Commission’s proposal to take over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB is part of a larger plan to eventually internalise all asset management. Taking into account the fact that the Commission already manages seven billion euros, it is of the opinion that it already has the staff and expertise to manage the fund, while saving the yearly fees paid to the EIB for the asset management; in 2015 the fee amounted to EUR 861 000. The Commission claims that the transfer of the asset management to the Commission would generate over a full MFF period savings allowing the financing of a volume of investments of EUR 66 million.

While the Rapporteur agrees in principle with the Commission’s proposal to take over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Rapporteur believes it of crucial importance that the European Parliament and the Court of Auditors monitor the Guarantee Fund and the transition of the asset management to the Commission. To that effect, the Rapporteur believes that an external impact assessment and evaluation by the Court of Auditors should take place two years after the transfer of the asset management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB to the Commission. In the event of a significant performance gap, the asset management of the Guarantee Fund shall be moved back to the EIB.

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment    1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(4)  The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migration.

(4)  The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing migratory pressures stemming from poverty, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities, climate change and the long term consequences of forced displacement.

Amendment     2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(5)  The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record.

(5)  The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments, and should be carried out in accordance with the highest standards of transparency and democratic accountability. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record.

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Title

Guarantee Fund for external actions

References

COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD)

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

BUDG

6.10.2016

 

 

 

Opinion by

       Date announced in plenary

DEVE

6.10.2016

Rapporteur

       Date appointed

Nirj Deva

16.12.2016

Discussed in committee

28.2.2017

 

 

 

Date adopted

21.3.2017

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

19

2

0

Members present for the final vote

Raymond Finch, Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Enrique Guerrero Salom, György Hölvényi, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Arne Lietz, Linda McAvan, Norbert Neuser, Maurice Ponga, Lola Sánchez Caldentey, Eleni Theocharous, Paavo Väyrynen, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Željana Zovko

Substitutes present for the final vote

Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Frank Engel, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Florent Marcellesi, Louis Michel, Jan Zahradil

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Martina Werner

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

19

+

ALDE

Louis Michel, Paavo Väyrynen

ECR

Eleni Theocharous, Jan Zahradil

PPE

Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Frank Engel, György Hölvényi, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Maurice Ponga, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Željana Zovko

S&D

Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Arne Lietz, Linda McAvan, Norbert Neuser, Martina Werner

VERTS/ALE

Florent Marcellesi

2

-

EFDD

Raymond Finch

GUE/NGL

Lola Sánchez Caldentey

0

0

 

 

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention


OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (22.3.2017)

for the Committee on Budgets

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions

(COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))

Rapporteur: Eduard Kukan

SHORT JUSTIFICATION

The Commission proposal amends the Regulation establishing the Guarantee Fund for external actions in the context of the revision of the External Lending Mandate of the European Investment Bank, bringing some technical adjustments.

The Rapporteur agrees with these adjustments, with the exception of the proposed transfer of the management of the Guarantee Fund to the Commission.

It is the Rapporteur’s belief that for the on-going period, the Guarantee Fund should remain under the management of the European Investment Bank. The rapporteur is of the opinion that re-internalization of the Guarantee Fund to the Commission would need to be properly prepared within a broader framework of management of the EU’s financial toolbox under the next Multiannual Financial Framework.

At the moment the rapporteur has not received conclusive evidence that moving the Fund under the management of the Commission would bring significant advantages and would not create unnecessary overlaps between the EU institutions. The Rapporteur is of the opinion that potential costs and benefits should be evaluated in more detail before such change is made.

Therefore, it is also Rapporteur’s opinion that broader discussion on future structure of the external lending should start well in advance the next financial period running from 2020.

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment     1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(2)  The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors.

(2)  The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union, which cannot go to the detriment of existing activities under heading IV, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors.

Amendment    2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(5)  The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record.

(5)  The possibility of transferring the financial management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB to the Commission should be evaluated in terms of associated costs and benefits in order to ensure maximum efficiency of the use of Union financial resources in view of the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework.

Amendment    3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 7

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3)  Article 7 is replaced by the following:

deleted

‘Article 7

 

The Commission shall ensure the financial management of the Fund. The Commission shall manage and invest the resources of the Guarantee Fund in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and shall follow appropriate prudential rules.; ’

 

Amendment    4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

By 30 June 2018, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report evaluating the possibility of transferring the asset management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB to the Commission. Where appropriate, that report shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal.

Amendment     5

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 8 – paragraph 2 b (new)

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

 

As of 31 May 2018, the annual report shall also include information about the financial management and performance, the risk of the Guarantee Fund and an assessment of the adequacy of the 9 % target and of the 10 % threshold/ceiling for the Fund.

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Title

Guarantee Fund for external actions

References

COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD)

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

BUDG

6.10.2016

 

 

 

Opinion by

       Date announced in plenary

AFET

6.10.2016

Rapporteur

       Date appointed

Eduard Kukan

2.12.2016

Discussed in committee

9.2.2017

 

 

 

Date adopted

21.3.2017

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

43

3

5

Members present for the final vote

Lars Adaktusson, Francisco Assis, Bas Belder, Goffredo Maria Bettini, Victor Boştinaru, Klaus Buchner, James Carver, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Javier Couso Permuy, Andi Cristea, Arnaud Danjean, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Eugen Freund, Michael Gahler, Iveta Grigule, Sandra Kalniete, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Tunne Kelam, Andrey Kovatchev, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Arne Lietz, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Andrejs Mamikins, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Alex Mayer, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Demetris Papadakis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Tonino Picula, Julia Pitera, Jozo Radoš, Jordi Solé, Jaromír Štětina, Dubravka Šuica, Charles Tannock, László Tőkés, Geoffrey Van Orden, Boris Zala

Substitutes present for the final vote

Neena Gill, Marek Jurek, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Eleni Theocharous, Traian Ungureanu, Bodil Valero

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Heidi Hautala, Romana Tomc, Ivan Štefanec

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

43

+

ALDE

Iveta Grigule, Jozo Radoš, Marietje Schaake

ECR

Bas Belder, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Marek Jurek, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Charles Tannock, Eleni Theocharous, Geoffrey Van Orden

GUE/NGL

Javier Couso Permuy, Sabine Lösing, Helmut Scholz

PPE

Lars Adaktusson, Arnaud Danjean, Michael Gahler, Sandra Kalniete, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Tunne Kelam, Andrey Kovatchev, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Julia Pitera, Romana Tomc, László Tőkés, Traian Ungureanu, Ivan Štefanec, Jaromír Štětina, Dubravka Šuica

S&D

Francisco Assis, Goffredo Maria Bettini, Victor Boştinaru, Andi Cristea, Eugen Freund, Neena Gill, Arne Lietz, Andrejs Mamikins, Alex Mayer, Demetris Papadakis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Tonino Picula, Boris Zala

3

-

EFDD

James Carver, Fabio Massimo Castaldo

PPE

José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra

5

0

Verts/ALE

Klaus Buchner, Heidi Hautala, Ulrike Lunacek, Jordi Solé, Bodil Valero

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention


OPINION of the Committee on International Trade (22.3.2017)

for the Committee on Budgets

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions

(COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD))

Rapporteur: Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl

SHORT JUSTIFICATION

The proposal amends Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions and forms part of the ambitious External Investment Plan announced by the Commission on 7 June 2016 with the aim to further consolidate the European Agenda on Migration. The proposal introduces 4 amendments to the existing Regulation.

1. It adds the risk premium revenues generated under the financing operations of the EIB as a new fourth source of income for the Guarantee Fund.

2. The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% (instead of currently 9%) of the total outstanding of loans will be paid back to the budget. This aims at giving higher financial capabilities to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB operations related to migration crisis.

3. The management of the assets of the Guarantee Fund shall be transferred from the EIB to the Commission. The Commission is already entrusted with the management of the Guarantee Fund for the EFSI. The proposed transfer aims at further consolidating the asset management activities of the Commission.

4. The Commission will annually submit to the Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors a detailed report on the situation and management of the Guarantee Fund. This could bring better and more accurate information based on the existing structures between these Institutions.

The rapporteur generally agrees with these adjustments with the exception of the following amendments.

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment    1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(5)  The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record.

(5)  The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities as well as to coordinate all external financing aspects of the European Agenda on Migration, building on existing structures and further strengthening its track record. The transfer of management should lead to cost savings for the Union Budget and better and more accurate information about the management and situation of the Guarantee Fund provided by the Commission to the European Parliament.

Amendment    2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 7

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Commission shall ensure the financial management of the Fund. The Commission shall manage and invest the resources of the Guarantee Fund in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and shall follow appropriate prudential rules.’

The Commission shall ensure the financial management of the Fund in accordance with this Regulation and with the internal rules and procedures of the Fund. In addition, the Commission shall manage and invest the resources of the Guarantee Fund in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and shall follow appropriate prudential rules, while taking into account the principles guiding the Union's external action. The Commission shall explain to the European Parliament how the management of the Fund is embedded in its broader development strategy.

Amendment    3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

Article 8

 

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

By 31 March of each year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors, in the context of the financial statements of the Commission, the required information on the situation of the Guarantee Fund.

By 31 March of each year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors, in the context of the financial statements of the Commission, all required information on the situation of the Guarantee Fund.

In addition, it shall, by 31 May of each year, submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors an annual report on the management of the Guarantee Fund in the previous calendar year. The annual report shall contain the presentation of the financial position of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year, the financial flows during the previous calendar year as well as the significant transactions and any relevant information on the financial accounts. The report shall also include information about the financial management and performance and the risk of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year.’

In addition, it shall, by 31 May of each year, submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors an annual report on the management of the Guarantee Fund in the previous calendar year. That annual report shall contain the presentation of the financial position and functioning of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year, the financial flows during the previous calendar year as well as the significant transactions and any relevant information on the financial accounts, such as detailed information on the outstanding capital of guaranteed loans or the Guarantee Fund's assets in difficult market environments, as well as conclusions and lessons learned. The report shall also include information about the financial management and performance and the risk of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year. Furthermore, the report shall provide detailed information on the use of the Fund and the improvements generated by the financed projects in recipient countries.

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Title

Guarantee Fund for external actions

References

COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD)

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

BUDG

6.10.2016

 

 

 

Opinion by

       Date announced in plenary

INTA

19.1.2017

Rapporteur

       Date appointed

Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl

9.11.2016

Discussed in committee

28.2.2017

 

 

 

Date adopted

21.3.2017

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

30

5

3

Members present for the final vote

William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Maria Arena, Tiziana Beghin, David Borrelli, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Salvatore Cicu, Marielle de Sarnez, Karoline Graswander-Hainz, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emmanuel Maurel, Anne-Marie Mineur, Sorin Moisă, Franz Obermayr, Artis Pabriks, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Viviane Reding, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Tokia Saïfi, Matteo Salvini, Marietje Schaake, Joachim Schuster, Joachim Starbatty, Adam Szejnfeld, Hannu Takkula, Iuliu Winkler, Jan Zahradil

Substitutes present for the final vote

Klaus Buchner, Agnes Jongerius, Stelios Kouloglou, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Jarosław Wałęsa

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Philippe Loiseau, Jordi Solé

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

30

+

ALDE

Marietje Schaake, Hannu Takkula, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Marielle de Sarnez

ECR

David Campbell Bannerman, Joachim Starbatty, Jan Zahradil

EFDD

Tiziana Beghin

GUE/NGL

Stelios Kouloglou

PPE

Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Daniel Caspary, Salvatore Cicu, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Artis Pabriks, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Viviane Reding, Tokia Saïfi, Adam Szejnfeld, Jarosław Wałęsa, Iuliu Winkler

S&D

Maria Arena, Karoline Graswander-Hainz, Agnes Jongerius, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emmanuel Maurel, Sorin Moisă, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Joachim Schuster

5

-

EFDD

William (The Earl of) Dartmouth

ENF

Philippe Loiseau, Franz Obermayr, Matteo Salvini

GUE/NGL

Anne-Marie Mineur

3

0

EFDD

David Borrelli

Verts/ALE

Klaus Buchner, Jordi Solé

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention


PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Title

Guarantee Fund for external actions

References

COM(2016)0582 – C8-0374/2016 – 2016/0274(COD)

Date submitted to Parliament

14.9.2016

 

 

 

Committee responsible

       Date announced in plenary

BUDG

6.10.2016

 

 

 

Committees asked for opinions

       Date announced in plenary

AFET

6.10.2016

DEVE

6.10.2016

INTA

19.1.2017

LIBE

6.10.2016

Not delivering opinions

       Date of decision

LIBE

4.10.2016

 

 

 

Rapporteurs

       Date appointed

Eider Gardiazabal Rubial

10.10.2016

 

 

 

Date adopted

27.3.2017

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

27

2

1

Members present for the final vote

Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis, Reimer Böge, Lefteris Christoforou, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Iris Hoffmann, Monika Hohlmeier, Bernd Kölmel, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Clare Moody, Siegfried Mureşan, Jan Olbrycht, Paul Rübig, Patricija Šulin, Eleftherios Synadinos, Inese Vaidere, Tiemo Wölken, Stanisław Żółtek

Substitutes present for the final vote

Nicola Caputo, Heidi Hautala, Ivana Maletić, Marco Valli

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Iratxe García Pérez, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Arndt Kohn, Luigi Morgano, Fernando Ruas, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso

Date tabled

30.3.2017


FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

27

+

ALDE

Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis

ECR

Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Bernd Kölmel

PPE

Reimer Böge, Lefteris Christoforou, Ingeborg Gräßle, Monika Hohlmeier, Ivana Maletić, Siegfried Mureşan, Jan Olbrycht, Fernando Ruas, Paul Rübig, Inese Vaidere, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso, Patricija Šulin

S&D

Nicola Caputo, Iratxe García Pérez, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Jens Geier, Iris Hoffmann, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Arndt Kohn, Clare Moody, Luigi Morgano, Tiemo Wölken

Verts/ALE

Heidi Hautala

2

-

ENF

Stanisław Żółtek

NI

Eleftherios Synadinos

1

0

EFDD

Marco Valli

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention

Last updated: 30 March 2017Legal notice