Procedure : 2017/2281(INI)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A8-0322/2018

Texts tabled :

A8-0322/2018

Debates :

PV 13/11/2018 - 11
CRE 13/11/2018 - 11

Votes :

PV 14/11/2018 - 14.10

Texts adopted :

P8_TA(2018)0458

REPORT     
PDF 424kWORD 74k
15 October 2018
PE 622.300v02-00 A8-0322/2018

on the implementation of the EU Association Agreement with Moldova

(2017/2281(INI))

Committee on Foreign Affairs

Rapporteur: Petras Auštrevičius

AMENDMENTS
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT - SUMMARY OF FACTS AND FINDINGS
 MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
 OPINION of the Committee on International Trade
 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT - SUMMARY OF FACTS AND FINDINGS

Four years after the signing by the EU of three Association Agreements (AA) including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine and two years after their full entry into force, the European Parliament has decided to evaluate the level of implementation of these agreements, in line with its strong commitment to its closest Eastern partners and to their deepening relations with the EU.

In preparation for this report, on top of its regular and frequent meetings with Moldovan authorities, opposition leaders and civil society representatives as well as European Commission and EEAS representatives, the Foreign Affairs Committee undertook a fact-finding mission to Moldova in April 2018 and commissioned three expert studies published over the last 6 months - on electoral reform, on the level of implementation of the AA and on the institutional framework for this implementation.

The findings of the Foreign Affairs Committee provide a contrasted image of the implementation of the Association Agreement with Moldova. There have incontestably been positive developments in a number of areas covered by the AA/DCFTA, notably the resolute actions taken to systemically improve the financial sector and hence minimise the risk of a repetition of a large-scale bank fraud such as the one unveiled in 2014, as well as the growing cooperation in the field of energy and the impressive increase in bilateral trade through the implementation of the DCFTA. However, these developments have been overshadowed by an increasing backsliding on core values related to democratic standards - values which are an ‘essential element’ of the AA and to which are also linked both the EU’s financial assistance to the Moldovan state and the visa-free regime for the Moldovan citizens.

In this report, the Foreign Affairs Committee highlights in particular its concerns about:

1. Elections: the electoral reform that is not in line with OCSE/ODHIR and Venice Commission recommendations, the annulment of recent local elections for the mayor of Chisinau on dubious grounds and in a non-transparent way, pressure on opposition leaders or local authorities (notably mayors), excessive and non-transparent party financing,

2. Rule of Law: the lack of independence of the Judiciary, the influence exerted by business interests and some political leaders, the limited progress in fighting corruption - including through recent tax reforms that may increase the risk of money laundering - and in prosecuting all those responsible for the $1 billion bank fraud or for cases of large-scale money laundering, the disproportionate criminal proceedings against political opponents, their lawyers and/or their families as well as human rights defenders, independent judges, journalists and critics of the Moldovan authorities;

3. Media and civil society: the monopolisation of media and advertising market, the weakening of independent news outlets, the overdue implementation of the new audio visual code, the attempts to limit the freedom of action and discredit representatives of civil society.

Whilst calling on the Moldovan authorities to address these concerns as a matter of urgency in line with AA and other bilateral commitments, the report also outlines the European Parliament’s position in response to these developments:

1. Any decision on future Macro Financial Assistance disbursement should only take place after the parliamentary elections scheduled for February 2019 and on condition that they are conducted in line with internationally recognised standards and assessed by specialised international bodies - in this context, the European Parliament reiterates its readiness to observe the next parliamentary elections;

2. The payment of all budget support programs should also remain on hold until meaningful progress in democratic standards takes place;

3. In the meantime, funds should be reallocated to support civil society and independent media in Moldova, as well as the private sector and local authorities;

4. The suspension clauses to EU-Moldova agreements are recalled, notably Articles 2 and 455 of the AA and the anti-corruption and anti-money laundering benchmarks related to the visa liberalisation.

Finally, the report addresses the institutional framework in place to implement the AA, both from the Moldovan and the EU side, with a focus on capacity in terms of human resources and expertise, to ensure full implementation of relevant legislation and the monitoring thereof. In particular, a dedicated EU Support Group for Moldova is proposed, subject to progress on democratic standards, in order to increase the delivery of expertise to the Moldovan state.

EU-Moldova relations are of course the subject of democratic debate both in the EU and in Moldova. Nevertheless, in the EU, limited cases of political stances motivated by national considerations and so-called ‘geopolitical’ arguments do not distract the vast majority in its determination to focus on what matters for the EU and Moldovan citizens: the fulfilment of mutual commitments to uphold common values of democracy, Rule of Law, good governance and the protection of Human Rights and fundamental freedoms.  


MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

on the implementation of the EU Association Agreement with Moldova

(2017/2281(INI))

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to Article 8 and to Title V, notably Articles 21, 22, 36 and 37, of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), as well as to Part Five of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),

–  having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, which fully entered into force on 1 July 2016,

–  having regard to its previous resolutions, notably those of 5 July 2018 on the political crisis in Moldova following the invalidation of the mayoral elections in Chișinău(1), of 15 November 2017 on the Eastern Partnership in the run-up to the November 2017 Summit(2), of 4 July 2017 on providing macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova(3) and of 21 January 2016 on Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine(4),

–  having regard to the signing, in November 2017, of a Memorandum of Understanding, a Loan Facility Agreement and a Grant Agreement on micro-financial assistance worth EUR 100 million for the period 2017-2018,

–  having regard to the Moldovan National Action Plan on the Implementation of the Moldova-European Union Association Agreement in 2017-2019 (NAPIAA),

–  having regard to the European Commission and European External Action Service (EEAS) joint staff working document on the Association Implementation Report on Moldova of 3 April 2018 (SWD(2018)0094),

–  having regard to the Joint Declarations of the Eastern Partnership Summits, most recently that of 24 November 2017 in Brussels,

–  having regard to the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council on the Republic of Moldova of 26 February 2018,

–  having regard to the report of Transparency International entitled ’The State of Corruption: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine’, published on 2 July 2015,

–  having regard to the opinions and recommendations of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and of the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission, notably that of the 15 March 2018 on the electoral reform in Moldova,

–  having regard to the recommendations by and activities of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum and other representatives of civil society in Moldova,

–  having regard to the outcome of the mission of the Committee on Foreign Affairs to Moldova on 3 and 4 April 2018,

–  having regard to the expert studies drawn up for the Committee on Foreign Affairs, including the study on ‘The electoral reforms in three association countries of the Eastern Neighbourhood – Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova and their impact on political developments in these countries’, published on 26 October 2017(5), the European Implementation Assessment entitled ‘Association agreements between the EU and Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine’, published on 28 June 2018(6) and the comparative study entitled ‘The Development of an Institutional Framework for the Implementation of the Association Agreements in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine’, published in July 2018(7),

–  having regard to Rule 52 of its Rules of Procedure, as well as Article 1(1)(e) of, and Annex 3 to, the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 12 December 2002 on the procedure for granting authorisation to draw up own-initiative reports,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0322/2018),

A.  whereas political and economic relations between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova have deepened in the framework of the Eastern Partnership and in particular with the signing, on 27 June 2014, and entry into force, on 1 July 2016, of the EU-Moldova Association Agreement (AA) including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA);

B.  whereas the AA is based on common values which include ‘respect for the democratic principles, human rights and fundamental freedoms, as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and as defined in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the Charter of Paris for a New Europe of 1990’;

C.  whereas, through this agreement, Moldova committed to major domestic reforms on the basis of EU laws and practice, in a wide range of areas conducive to good governance, economic development and strengthened cooperation with the EU; whereas, in support of these efforts, the EU committed to provide substantial financial and budgetary assistance to Moldova, amounting to EUR 1.14 billion of allocated funds since 2007, plus regional programme funding;

D.  whereas the DCFTA allows for privileged access for goods and services from Moldova to the EU market; whereas, as a consequence of the DCFTA, EU-Moldova trade increased by 20% in 2017, to EUR 4 billion; whereas the EU is currently Moldova’s biggest trading partner, accounting for over 55 % of total trade; whereas the EU is also the biggest investor in Moldova; whereas initial data for 2018 confirms the positive trend; whereas Moldova’s preferences utilisation rate of 90 % shows how the DCFTA has been beneficial to Moldovan businesses, workers and citizens; whereas progress has been made in essential areas such as sanitary and phytosanitary measures, technical barriers to trade, customs and public procurement; whereas domestic advisory groups (DAGs) were set up in accordance with the provisions of the trade and sustainable development chapter and have met three times to date;

E.  whereas, in exchange for reforms in Moldova in the areas of justice and security including in the fight against corruption, the EU also agreed in 2014 to visa-free travel to the Schengen area for Moldovan citizens holding a biometric passport; whereas more than 1.5 million Moldovan citizens have benefited from this visa-free regime over the first four years of its implementation;

F.  whereas the EU has repeatedly expressed concern as regards the deterioration of democratic standards through recent decisions by the Moldovan authorities, including the June 2018 invalidation of the local elections in Chișinău on dubious grounds and in a non-transparent way, the July 2017 electoral reform adopted despite the negative recommendations of the ODIHR and the Venice Commission, the lack of progress in the prosecution of those responsible for the USD 1 billion bank fraud unveiled in 2014 and the increase in breaches of human rights, notably targeting independent judges, journalists and political opponents;

G.  whereas, as a result of these developments, in 2017, the EU did not pay the last two instalments under the budget support programme for justice sector reforms because the Moldovan authorities showed insufficient commitment to reforming this sector and, in 2018, the EU suspended the disbursement of the first instalment of the macro-financial assistance due to the non-fulfilment of the political conditions annexed to the 4 July 2017 decision of the European Parliament and of the Council which specified that ‘a pre-condition for granting macro-financial assistance is that the beneficiary country respects effective democratic mechanisms, including a multi-party parliamentary system and the rule of law and guarantees respect for human rights’;

H.  whereas, since these decisions, more recent developments have further raised concerns, notably the so-called ‘fiscal reform package’ adopted in July 2018, the tax amnesty scheme of which increases the risk of money laundering, as well as the further pressure exerted on the opposition and its peaceful demonstrations and on small independent media outlets struggling to maintain their activities despite the adoption, in July 2018, of the new Audiovisual Media Services Code;

I.  whereas Transparency International ranked Moldova 122nd out of 180 in its 2017 Corruption Perceptions Index, together with Azerbaijan and Mali; whereas Reporters Without Borders ranked Moldova 81st out of 180 in its World Press Freedom Index, down from 56th place in 2014;

General principles and common values

1.  Underlines the importance of the AA/DCFTA, and takes note of the progress achieved by Moldova to date; insists, however, that full implementation of the AA/DCFTA, with regard, in particular, to political reforms, must be a top priority, enabling a further deepening of the country’s relations with the EU, for the benefit of all Moldovan citizens, as well as unlocking additional perspectives in line with the Eastern Partnership Plus (EaP+) policy advocated by Parliament;

2.  Praises the courageous agents for positive change in Moldova, notably those leading the efforts, which should be pursued, in line with the calls from the EU and International Monetary Fund (IMF) to reform the banking sector following the 2014 bank fraud worth USD 1 billion (equal to 12 % of GDP); welcomes the IMF’s successful evaluation of July 2018 of the implementation of the IMF-supported programme; calls on Moldovan politicians and the judiciary as a whole to join in with these efforts to reform the country and fight corruption in line with the commitments of the AA, as a lack of political will is one of the main bottlenecks for credible reform; calls on all political forces to engage in constructive dialogue in the interest of the country;

3.  Expresses grave concern about backsliding in relation to democratic standards in Moldova, with core values, to which Moldova had subscribed notably as part of the AA, such as democracy – including fair and transparent elections respecting the will of the citizens, as well as a multi-party democratic system – and the rule of law – including the independence and impartiality of the judiciary – being undermined by the ruling political leaders colluding with business interests and unopposed by much of the political class and the judiciary, resulting in the Republic of Moldova being a state captured by oligarchic interests with a concentration of economic and political power in the hands of a small group of people exerting their influence on parliament, the government, political parties, the state administration, the police, the judiciary and the media and leading to highly unsatisfactory implementation of legislation with little benefit for the citizens; reiterates its determination to focus on the fulfilment of commitments to uphold common values rather than unconvincing so-called ‘geopolitical’ arguments;

4.  Regrets the deliberate violation of the political conditions relating to democratic standards in Moldova, in particular the recent changes in national electoral legislation, which did not address some of the key recommendations of the joint opinion of the ODIHR and the Venice Commission, as well as the suspension of Dorin Chirtoacă from the Chișinău mayor’s office and the invalidation of the election of Andrei Năstase, which have led the EU to put on hold its disbursement of macro-financial assistance (MFA) and outstanding payments of budget support;

5.  Reiterates its position that any decision on future MFA disbursement should only take place after the parliamentary elections scheduled for February 2019 and on condition that they are conducted in line with internationally recognised standards and assessed by specialised international bodies, and that the payment of all budget support programmes should remain on hold until meaningful progress in democratic standards takes place including reform of the judiciary and judicial action against the persons responsible for the bank fraud in line with the European Parliament resolution of 5 July 2018; calls, in the meantime, on the Commission and the EEAS to continue reallocating funds to support civil society and independent media in Moldova, as well as the private sector and local authorities, including through new partnership and development projects, preferably coordinated with assistance from other EU countries and to coordinate efforts with other organisations such as the IMF to ensure greater coherence in terms of financial assistance conditionality; awaits with caution the outcome of the review of electoral legislation by the Moldovan Parliament’s Legal Committee for appointments and immunities; calls on the European Commission to develop a mechanism to monitor reforms, including clear benchmarks;

6.  Recalls the contents of Articles 2 and 455 of the AA, in accordance with which respect for democratic principles constitutes an essential element of the AA, which, if violated, may also lead to the suspension of rights related to this agreement; recalls that much effort is needed to continue fulfilling the anti-corruption and anti-money laundering benchmarks; demands that any future agreement is also conditional on a reform of the judiciary and thorough investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the USD 1 billion fraud; recalls also the anti-corruption and anti-money laundering benchmarks related to the visa liberalisation policy;

Institutional framework in place to implement the Agreement

7.  Welcomes the adoption of many laws in line with Moldova’s commitments as part of the AA; underlines nevertheless the importance of swift and full implementation of these laws in order to reach the ultimate objective of the AA of delivering tangible and sustainable improvements to the living conditions of ordinary citizens in Moldova;

8.  Calls for stronger involvement of the Parliament, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Moldova in providing high-level political oversight and scrutiny of the implementation of the AA, notably through the continued streamlining of relevant parliamentary and governmental structures and the enhancement of their administrative capacities, and the coordination and synchronisation of line ministries' plans and their full and effective implementation;

9.  Welcomes the establishment of the interparliamentary assembly of Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine and its first meeting held on 8-9 June 2018 in Kyiv; encourages this assembly to also scrutinise the implementation of the Association Agreements;

10.  Urges the Moldovan authorities to put more effort into AA implementation and organise its actions – notably through the National Action Plan for the Implementation of the Association Agreement (NAPIAA) itself – according to specific sectors and the specific results to be generated, rather than according to articles of the AA, in order to develop a detailed prioritisation and sequencing of measures, driven by impact assessment and drawn up by dedicated expert units;

11.  Calls on the EEAS and the Commission to set up, subject to progress on democratic standards, a dedicated EU Support Group for Moldova, in order to increase the delivery of expertise, notably on the approximation of Moldovan legislation with that of the EU, and to coordinate, when the conditions are fulfilled, the delivery of financial assistance to Moldova in support of the implementation of the AA;

12.  Urges the EEAS and the Commission to boost internal capabilities to step up monitoring of the implementation of the AA, notably through a significant increase in dedicated human resources, as well as to move towards a qualitative assessment of progress, notably through the introduction of screening processes to assess the level of alignment with the EU acquis that is actually achieved as required by the AA;

13.  Welcomes the enhanced ministerial-level dialogue with Moldova and other associated partners on association-related reforms in the area of trade and supports, subject to progress on democratic standards, the launch of such dialogues in other areas covered by the AA, including political issues, justice, freedom and security, and sectoral cooperation;

14.  Recalls and supports the opinion of the Venice Commission on electoral reform in Moldova, according to which the change towards a mixed electoral system for parliamentary elections lacked consensus (other than from the Democratic and Socialist parties) and may lead to candidates being unduly influenced by business interests; reiterates, therefore, its call on the Moldovan authorities to improve the electoral system in order to ensure that future elections reflect the will of the Moldovan citizens rather than of a select few; calls on the Moldovan authorities also to fully implement the ODIHR recommendations, notably on party financing and media freedom and pluralism; reaffirms Parliament’s readiness to observe Moldova’s next parliamentary elections;

Political dialogue and reform, cooperation in the field of common foreign and security policy (CFSP)

15.  Expresses concern about last minute changes to the Audiovisual Media Services Code adopted in July 2018 that were not subjected to consultations with civil society; urges the Moldovan authorities to fully implement the Code in line with European standards of media freedom and pluralism as recommended by the European Commission and the Venice Commission; emphasises the importance of genuine consultations with civil society and independent media in this process and of adopting a new law on advertising; stresses the need to avoid all attempts to undermine media pluralism, notably those that would further encourage the cartelisation of the media market and related advertising market; urges the Moldovan authorities to adopt the new law on advertising following a genuine consultation with civil society; notes with concern that, currently, the media is highly monopolised and subordinate to the country’s political and business groups; calls for transparency of media ownership and the provision of dedicated assistance to independent media, especially local outlets, to in order comply with the Code’s requirements regarding obligatory local content; stresses the importance of ensuring genuine independence of the media regulatory agency;

16.  Welcomes the reform efforts in the areas of public administration and public financial management and encourages further steps to be taken to increase transparency;

17.  Welcomes the good cooperation on CFSP matters, notably the high rate of alignment with the CFSP Declarations and the participation in common security and defence policy (CSDP) missions and operations, as well as Moldova’s cooperation with NATO; takes note of the progress in adopting a new National Defence Strategy and the Action Plan for its implementation for 2017-2021, following the withdrawal of the National Security Strategy by the President of Moldova; welcomes the entry into force of the EU-Moldova agreement on the exchange of classified information;

18.  Commends the Moldovan authorities for the incremental improvement of relations with Tiraspol, notably with the implementation of confidence-building measures including the opening of the Gura Bîcului-Bîcioc bridge and the signing of six additional protocols, improving the lives of citizens on both sides of the Nistru river; reiterates the EU’s firm commitment to and support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Moldova and the efforts to reach a peaceful solution to the Transnistrian issue; supports unconditionally the efforts of the OSCE, the EU and other stakeholders and encourages the authorities to cooperate in particular with SMEs from Transnistria, to further build on this level of engagement, to make additional efforts in promoting human rights and to abide by all ECHR decisions; calls on the Moldovan authorities to undertake additional efforts for the implementation of an amended law of the special legal status of Gagauzia;

Rule of law and good governance

19.  Urges the authorities to ensure the independence, impartiality and effectiveness of the judiciary and specialised anti-corruption institutions, including the Superior Council of Prosecutors, the National Anticorruption Centre and the Anticorruption Prosecutor Office, the National Integrity Authority and the Criminal Assets Recovery Agency, notably through maintaining the allocation of adequate resources to guarantee transparent selection procedures with the participation of independent expert recruiters and adopting constitutional amendments, in line with recommendations of the Venice Commission, aimed notably at removing the initial five-year appointment term for judges, changing the composition and strengthening the role of the Superior Council of Magistracy and removing the Moldovan Parliament’s powers to appoint judges of the Supreme Court; remains deeply concerned with the selective justice practices of the Moldovan judiciary and points out that, according to the latest Transparency International reports, it suffers from limited independence from the executive and is used as an instrument against political opponents and business interests; notes the importance of establishing a solid track record of investigations in corruption cases, including into high-level profiles;

20.  Welcomes legislative amendments adopted in July 2018 meant to strengthen merit-based selection and promotion of judges, as well as their accountability;

21.  Reiterates its calls, based on the findings and recommendations of the first and second Kroll reports, which should be published in full, for a swift and transparent prosecution of all those responsible for the USD 1 billion bank fraud unveiled in 2014, as well as the recovery of stolen assets; takes note of the strategy on asset recovery adopted by the Moldovan authorities but notes with concern that the investigation into this case has been conducted rather ineffectively; stresses the need for the courts to stop failing to follow up on solid evidence and to promptly examine the cases that are pending or undergoing investigation, notably that of Ilhan Shor, in open hearings; emphasises that the political choice to bail out the banks with public finances further increased the severe loss of trust in Moldovan politics; calls on the Council to consider personal sanctions and on relevant EU Member States to provide support to the investigation;

22.  Expresses concern about the increased risk of money laundering following the hasty adoption of the so-called ‘fiscal reform package’ in July 2018, which includes a tax amnesty scheme which may legalise assets acquired illicitly; calls for the package to be amended in order to close such loopholes and, in the meantime, commits to remaining very attentive to its implementation, in coordination with the Commission, EEAS and other international organisations;

23.  Stresses the need also to address and deter other occurrences of organised crime, including arms smuggling, human trafficking and large-scale money laundering, notably from Russia; underlines the responsibility of judges in upholding the rule of law and stresses that lawfully convicted judges should carry out their sentences;

24.  Calls for direct online consultations of the electronic declarations of senior political and administrative individuals’ assets to be enabled, following Ukraine’s example;

25.  Calls on the Moldovan authorities to respect international principles and uphold best practices that guarantee an enabling environment for civil society; underlines the essential role of civil society in monitoring the implementation of reforms as well as in promoting the transparency and accountability of public institutions; expects, in particular, that no future legislation will curb either national or foreign funding for Moldovan NGOs and CSOs, or will unduly increase the administrative and reporting burden on them; regrets that, in a number of cases, citizens’ participation has been restricted, for example with the rejection by the Central Electoral Commission in March 2018 of the application to organise a referendum over changes to the electoral system;

Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms

26.  Expresses concern about signs of a further shrinking of space for the country’s civil society, and calls on the authorities to immediately halt undue or disproportionate criminal proceedings, some of which have been brought about through fabricated accusations, and selective justice against political opponents, their lawyers and/or their families; criticises the fact that process monitoring by EU Member States or the EEAS delegation is increasingly inhibited by the exclusion of the public from trials; expresses specific concerns about proceedings that target human rights defenders, independent judges such as Domnica Manole and Gheorghe Balan, journalists and critics of the government or of the President of the Democratic Party of Moldova, Vladimir Plahotniuc; urges the authorities to guarantee the right to a fair trial and the respect of human rights in detention premises; stresses the need for effective investigations into allegations of torture in detention and psychiatric institutions; calls on the authorities also to guarantee freedom of assembly and expression and, in particular, the holding of peaceful demonstrations, and for the strict respect of this fundamental right in accordance with international standards;

27.  Welcomes the adoption of a new National Gender Equality Strategy in 2017, and calls on the authorities to ensure its full implementation;

28.  Calls on the authorities to significantly step up efforts to uphold human rights and fundamental freedoms, notably for vulnerable groups, by fighting hate speech, violence, social exclusion and discrimination, which all remain of great concern, against LGBTQI people, persons with disabilities and minorities such as the Roma population, as well as hate speech and discrimination based on gender or political affiliation;

29.  Strongly condemns the recent extradition/abduction of Turkish citizens to Turkey due to their alleged links to the Gülen movement, in violation of the rule of law and basic human rights; urges the Moldovan authorities to ensure that any extradition requests coming from third countries are processed in a transparent manner while following judicial procedures fully in line with European principles and standards;

Trade and economic cooperation

30.  Welcomes the significant increase in Moldovan imports into the EU as a result of the entry into force of the DCFTA and the fact that the EU is the largest investor in Moldova but deplores the fact that this has not lead to an improvement in the social and economic situation of citizens; warns that failure to make progress in improving the standard of living of the population threatens the citizens’ approval of the country’s pro-European orientation;

31.  Recalls the importance of an independent judiciary and of the fight against corruption as well as a decrease in administrative and bureaucratic burdens in improving the investment and business climate;

32.  Encourages further progress in the areas of sanitary and phytosanitary standards and the protection of geographical indications;

33.  Calls for effective compliance with trade and sustainable development clauses and international commitments, and specifically the proper implementation of ILO core conventions.

34.  Considers regulatory approximation with the EU acquis to be the key dimension of the DCFTA because actual access to the EU market and reform very much depend on the appropriate implementation and enforcement of relevant legislation; is aware of the significant challenge this represents for governance, institutions and public administration in Moldova and encourages the Commission to provide adequate technical and financial support;

Energy and other areas of cooperation

35.  Welcomes the promulgation of the Energy Law in 2017 as a further step towards the transposition of the Third Energy Package and encourages concrete steps to ensuring the independence of the energy regulatory agency ANRE; acknowledges Moldova’s efforts towards promoting renewable energy sources and energy efficiency and considers it crucial to strengthen agro-ecological farming methods in the framework of sustainable rural development;

36.  Calls for more determined action in the areas of environmental protection, notably as regards the management of water from the Nistru river, waste management and climate change, notably in terms of implementing and coordinating legislation;

Institutional provisions

37.  Calls for the EU, the Member States and Moldova to further increase communication efforts on the implementation of the AA and the expected benefits to the citizens of Moldova of related reforms and of closer integration with the European Union; highlights the need to fight Russian disinformation through fact-based and accessible quality information in all of the main languages used in Moldova;

38.  Reiterates its resolve to increase its monitoring of the implementation of international agreements with the EU’s eastern partners; calls once more on the Commission and the EEAS to transmit to the Parliament and the Council more frequent and regular written reports on the implementation of these agreements;

39.  Considers that the practice of involving Moldovan authorities from the stage of drafting relevant legislation is useful in that it makes the process more inclusive and reduces transition costs for Moldova, and calls on the Commission to make full use of the ex-ante consultation processes;

40.  Notes that the evaluation of DCFTA implementation is very much focused on trade flows and trade irritants; calls on the Commission to monitor and assess the implementation of the DCFTA in an appropriate manner, paying special attention to transposition and implementation of the acquis, as well as to the impact on Moldovan society, and to ensure public and comprehensive annual reporting, including on the technical and financial support provided by the EU;

41.  Calls on the EEAS and the Commission to publish all the annual association implementation reports at the same time and to simultaneously publish a comparative evaluation of the level of progress towards AA/DCFTA implementation by each associated partner, against specific benchmarks;

42.  Resolves to draw up annual reports on the implementation of the Association Agreements;

°

°  °

43.  Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council, the European Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and to the President, Government and Parliament of the Republic of Moldova.

(1)

Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0303.

(2)

Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0440.

(3)

Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0283.

(4)

OJ C 11, 12.1.2018, p. 82.

(5)

Study entitled ‘The electoral reforms in three association countries of the Eastern Neighbourhood – Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova’, European Parliament, 26 October 2017.

(6)

European Implementation Assessment entitled ‘Association agreements between the EU and Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine’, European Parliament, 28 June 2018.

(7)

Study entitled ‘The Development of an Institutional Framework for the Implementation of the Association Agreements in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine’, European Parliament, July 2018.


OPINION of the Committee on International Trade (21.6.2018)

for the Committee on Foreign Affairs

on implementation of the EU association agreement with Moldova

(2017/2281(INI))

Rapporteur for opinion: David Martin

SUGGESTIONS

The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:

A.  whereas the EU-Moldova Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) has been applied since 2014;

B.  whereas Moldova’s exports to the EU have increased by more than 15 % since the entry into force of the DCFTA and Moldova currently relies on the EU for 66 % of its exports;

C.  whereas Moldova’s preferences utilisation rate of 90 % shows how the DCFTA has been beneficial to Moldovan businesses, workers and citizens;

D.  whereas the effective implementation of the DCFTA is conditional upon Moldova’s continued efforts to step up reforms in the rule of law, governance, institutional capacity and public administration, including in trade-related areas;

E.  whereas progress has been made in essential areas such as sanitary and phytosanitary measures, technical barriers to trade, customs and public procurement;

F.  whereas domestic advisory groups (DAGs) were set up in accordance with the provisions of the trade and sustainable development chapter and have met three times to date;

1.  Welcomes the significant increase in Moldovan imports into the EU as a result of the entry into force of the DCFTA; underlines that the DCFTA should be a driver of economic diversification and, accordingly, encourages the Commission to support Moldova in identifying key areas that should be prioritised in DCFTA implementation; considers that the trade liberalisation dimension should be carefully managed with a view to minimising costs while maximising benefits for Moldova;

2.  Welcomes the creation of some 1 500 jobs through support for small businesses and reiterates the need to continue incentivising the SME and start-up sectors, especially given their important contribution to economic growth, employment, innovation and business creativity;

3.  Underlines that the ultimate objective of the DCFTA is to make tangible and sustainable improvements to the living conditions of ordinary citizens in Moldova as the country remains one of the poorest in Europe, and as such urges the authorities to undergo effective reform processes in order to improve standards of living to this end;

4.  Expects Moldova to continue its reform path not only in strictly trade-related areas such as restructuring of the financial and energy sectors, but also in the rule of law, public administration, the justice sector, the management and efficiency of public finances, media freedom, gender equality and women empowerment, and stepping up the fight against corruption; recalls also the importance of effective implementation of newly introduced reforms and legal instruments; calls for concrete steps in all the sectors mentioned, in line with the expectations emphasised in Parliament’s resolution on macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova(1), recalling the various debates on the situation in Moldova and Parliament’s pleas for transparent reform efforts and strict conditionalities linked to tangible results in areas identified as needing improvement; commends the decision to transpose the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive;

5.  Considers regulatory approximation with the EU acquis the key dimension of the DCFTA because actual access to the EU market and reform very much depend on the appropriate implementation and enforcement of relevant legislation; is aware of the significant challenge this represents for governance, institutions and public administration in Moldova and encourages the Commission to provide adequate technical and financial support; urges the Commission to consider the setting up of a support group for Moldova, similarly to the one created for Ukraine;

6.  Considers that the practice of involving Moldovan authorities from the stage of drafting relevant legislation is useful in that it makes the process more inclusive and reduces transition costs for Moldova, and calls on the Commission to make full use of the ex-ante consultation processes;

7.  Underlines the key role played by DAGs in monitoring the DCFTA, and recalls that appropriate funding and a balanced representation of civil society should be ensured by the Parties;

8.  Notes that the evaluation of DCFTA implementation is very much focused on trade flows and trade irritants; calls on the Commission to monitor and assess the implementation of the DCFTA in an appropriate manner, paying special attention to transposition and implementation of the acquis, as well as to the impact on Moldovan society, and to ensure public and comprehensive annual reporting, including on the technical and financial support provided by the EU;

9.  Calls for effective compliance with trade and sustainable development clauses and international commitments, and specifically the proper implementation of ILO core conventions.

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Date adopted

21.6.2018

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

31

3

1

Members present for the final vote

William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Tiziana Beghin, Salvatore Cicu, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Eleonora Forenza, Nadja Hirsch, Yannick Jadot, France Jamet, Elsi Katainen, Patricia Lalonde, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emmanuel Maurel, Anne-Marie Mineur, Sorin Moisă, Alessia Maria Mosca, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Tokia Saïfi, Adam Szejnfeld

Substitutes present for the final vote

Goffredo Maria Bettini, Reimer Böge, Klaus Buchner, Dita Charanzová, Danuta Maria Hübner, Sajjad Karim, Sander Loones

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Czesław Hoc, John Howarth, Dietmar Köster, Kosma Złotowski

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

31

+

ALDE

Dita Charanzová, Nadja Hirsch, Elsi Katainen, Patricia Lalonde

ECR

Czesław Hoc, Sajjad Karim, Sander Loones

EFDD

Tiziana Beghin, William (The Earl of) Dartmouth

GUE/NGL

Eleonora Forenza, Lola Sánchez Caldentey

PPE

Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Reimer Böge, Salvatore Cicu, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Danuta Maria Hübner, Sorin Moisă, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Tokia Saïfi, Adam Szejnfeld

S&D

Goffredo Maria Bettini, John Howarth, Dietmar Köster, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emmanuel Maurel, Alessia Maria Mosca, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández

VERTS/ALE

Klaus Buchner, Yannick Jadot

3

-

ENF

France Jamet, Danilo Oscar Lancini

GUE/NGL

Anne-Marie Mineur

1

0

ECR

Kosma Złotowski

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention

(1)

Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0283.


INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Date adopted

9.10.2018

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

31

5

17

Members present for the final vote

Michèle Alliot-Marie, Francisco Assis, Petras Auštrevičius, Goffredo Maria Bettini, Victor Boştinaru, Klaus Buchner, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Lorenzo Cesa, Javier Couso Permuy, Andi Cristea, Georgios Epitideios, Knut Fleckenstein, Eugen Freund, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Tunne Kelam, Wajid Khan, Andrey Kovatchev, Eduard Kukan, Arne Lietz, Barbara Lochbihler, Sabine Lösing, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Clare Moody, Javier Nart, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Tonino Picula, Cristian Dan Preda, Jozo Radoš, Michel Reimon, Sofia Sakorafa, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Jordi Solé, Dobromir Sośnierz, Dubravka Šuica, Charles Tannock, László Tőkés, Ivo Vajgl, Anders Primdahl Vistisen, Boris Zala

Substitutes present for the final vote

Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Norica Nicolai, Gilles Pargneaux, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Helmut Scholz, Igor Šoltes, Bodil Valero, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Željana Zovko

Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote

Ivan Štefanec


FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

31

+

ALDE

Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Jozo Radoš, Ivo Vajgl

ECR

Charles Tannock, Anders Primdahl Vistisen

EFDD

Fabio Massimo Castaldo

PPE

Michèle Alliot-Marie, Lorenzo Cesa, Andrzej Grzyb, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Tunne Kelam, Andrey Kovatchev, Eduard Kukan, David McAllister, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Francisco José Millán Mon, Cristian Dan Preda, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Ivan Štefanec, Dubravka Šuica, László Tőkés, Željana Zovko

S&D

Francisco Assis, Ana Gomes

VERTS/ALE

Klaus Buchner, Barbara Lochbihler, Michel Reimon, Jordi Solé, Igor Šoltes, Bodil Valero

5

-

ALDE

Norica Nicolai

ENF

Jean-Luc Schaffhauser

NI

Georgios Epitideios, Dobromir Sośnierz

S&D

Ioan Mircea Paşcu

17

0

GUE/NGL

Javier Couso Permuy, Sabine Lösing, Sofia Sakorafa, Helmut Scholz, Marie-Christine Vergiat

S&D

Goffredo Maria Bettini, Victor Boştinaru, Andi Cristea, Knut Fleckenstein, Eugen Freund, Wajid Khan, Arne Lietz, Clare Moody, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Gilles Pargneaux, Tonino Picula, Boris Zala

Key to symbols:

+  :  in favour

-  :  against

0  :  abstention

Last updated: 23 October 2018Legal notice