Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
2 December 2016
E-009186-16
Question for written answer
to the Commission
Rule 130
Ramón Jáuregui Atondo (S&D) , Jonás Fernández (S&D)

 Subject:  Impact of reforming the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) on public funds in the EU
 Answer(s) 

The Commission published its proposal for a CCCTB directive on 25 October 2016. The legislative proposal is heavily influenced by a number of assumptions but the impact study on this proposal states that implementation of the directive is likely to result in EU GDP from corporate tax revenue falling by 0.27%. With the public now demanding that globalisation cease to favour the select few, the impact of a proposal such as this on public funds should be positive, or at the very least neutral. One of the adverse effects on countries of tax evasion and avoidance is the amount of revenue lost due to less tax being collected; it stands to reason therefore that the proposal should reduce harmful tax competition without tax revenue being lost.

1. Why does the impact study conclude that harmonisation of the tax base will entail losses in tax revenue?

2. Would it not be fairer and more logical to harmonise bases that do not entail a reduction in corporate tax revenue?

Original language of question: ES 
Last updated: 4 January 2017Legal notice