32

Ergebnis(se)

Wort/Wörter
Art der Veröffentlichung
Politikbereich
Verfasser
Schlagwortliste
Datum

Politische Maßnahmen der EU im Interesse der Bürger: Terrorismusbekämpfung

28-06-2019

Angesichts der zunehmenden Bedrohung durch den Terrorismus weltweit engagiert sich die Europäische Union (EU) mehr denn je bei der Terrorismusbekämpfung. Für die Bekämpfung von Kriminalität und die Wahrung der Sicherheit sind zwar in erster Linie die Mitgliedstaaten verantwortlich; die EU bietet allerdings Instrumente für die Zusammenarbeit, die Koordinierung und (in gewissem Umfang) die Harmonisierung sowie finanzielle Unterstützung, um gegen dieses grenzüberschreitende Phänomen vorzugehen. Darüber ...

Angesichts der zunehmenden Bedrohung durch den Terrorismus weltweit engagiert sich die Europäische Union (EU) mehr denn je bei der Terrorismusbekämpfung. Für die Bekämpfung von Kriminalität und die Wahrung der Sicherheit sind zwar in erster Linie die Mitgliedstaaten verantwortlich; die EU bietet allerdings Instrumente für die Zusammenarbeit, die Koordinierung und (in gewissem Umfang) die Harmonisierung sowie finanzielle Unterstützung, um gegen dieses grenzüberschreitende Phänomen vorzugehen. Darüber hinaus ist das Handeln der EU über ihre eigenen Grenzen hinweg von der Prämisse geprägt, dass ein Zusammenhang besteht zwischen Entwicklung und Stabilität sowie zwischen interner und externer Sicherheit. Die Ausgaben der EU für die Terrorismusbekämpfung sind im Laufe der Jahre gestiegen und sollen dies auch in Zukunft tun; so soll die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den nationalen Strafverfolgungsbehörden verbessert und die für die Sicherheit zuständigen EU-Einrichtungen wie Europol und eu-LISA stärker unterstützt werden können. Auch die für die Zusammenarbeit mit Drittstaaten vorgesehenen Mittel wurden aufgestockt, unter anderem durch das Stabilitäts- und Friedensinstrument (IcSP). Seit 2014 wurden zahlreiche neue Vorschriften und Instrumente verabschiedet: Die betroffenen Bereiche reichen von der Vereinheitlichung der Begriffsbestimmungen terroristischer Straftaten und der entsprechenden Sanktionen über den Informations- und Datenaustausch, den Grenzschutz und die Bekämpfung der Terrorismusfinanzierung bis hin zur Regulierung von Feuerwaffen. Zur Bewertung der Wirksamkeit der bestehenden Instrumente und zur Bestimmung von Lücken und möglichen künftige Vorgehensweisen hat das Europäisches Parlament den Sonderausschuss Terrorismus (TERR) eingerichtet, der im November 2018 seinen Bericht vorlegte. Der Sonderausschuss TERR gab umfassende Empfehlungen für umgehende und längerfristige Maßnahmen zur Terrorismusprävention, Bekämpfung der Ursachen, zum Schutz der Unionsbürger und zur bestmöglichen Unterstützung der Opfer ab. Im Einklang mit diesen Empfehlungen werden sich die zukünftigen EU-Maßnahmen zur Terrorismusbekämpfung sehr wahrscheinlich auf die Reaktion auf existierende und neue Bedrohungen, die Bekämpfung von Radikalisierung – unter anderem durch die Verhinderung der Verbreitung von Terrorpropaganda im Internet – und die Steigerung der Widerstandsfähigkeit kritischer Infrastruktur konzentrieren. Die zu erwartenden Entwicklungen umfassen darüber hinaus einen besseren Informationsaustausch, einschließlich geplanter Interoperabilität, zwischen den sicherheits- und grenzbezogenen EU-Datenbanken sowie die Ermittlung und Verfolgung terroristischer Straftaten auf EU-Ebene durch die vorgeschlagene Erweiterung des Mandats der jüngst eingerichteten Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft. Dies ist die aktualisierte Fassung eines Briefings, das vor der Europawahl 2019 veröffentlicht wurde.

A new neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument: Proposal for a new regulation

19-03-2019

In the context of the Commission's proposal for a multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the 2021-2027 period, the Commission published a proposal for a regulation establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) on 14 June 2018, with a proposed budget of €89.2 billion (in current prices). The AFET and DEVE committees adopted their joint report on the proposal on 4 March 2019. MEPs have agreed to accept a single instrument, but call for a stronger role ...

In the context of the Commission's proposal for a multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the 2021-2027 period, the Commission published a proposal for a regulation establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) on 14 June 2018, with a proposed budget of €89.2 billion (in current prices). The AFET and DEVE committees adopted their joint report on the proposal on 4 March 2019. MEPs have agreed to accept a single instrument, but call for a stronger role for Parliament on secondary policy choices, through delegated acts. The committees want the budget for the instrument to be increased by nearly €4 billion, to €93.154 billion. MEPs also specifically call for an increase in the funds allocated to human rights and democracy activities, the percentage of funding that fulfils the criteria for official development assistance, and funds that support climate and environmental objectives. Moreover, MEPs are calling for the introduction of climate and gender mainstreaming targets, the earmarking of certain financial allocations, the suspension of assistance in case of human rights violations, and the reduction of the emerging challenges and priorities cushion to €7 billion. Parliament is expected to vote on its first-reading position during the March II plenary session. Third edition. The 'Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.

Kooperationsabkommen zwischen der Europäischen Union und Afghanistan

06-03-2019

Das EU-Afghanistan Kooperationsabkommen über Partnerschaft und Entwicklung wurde im Februar 2017 von der EU und Afghanistan unterzeichnet. Das Kooperationsabkommen über Partnerschaft und Entwicklung ist die erste vertragliche Beziehung zwischen der Europäischen Union und Afghanistan und legt den rechtlichen Rahmen für die Zusammenarbeit zwischen der EU und Afghanistan fest. Für das vollständige Inkrafttreten dieses gemischten Abkommens bedarf es der Zustimmung des Europäischen Parlaments und der ...

Das EU-Afghanistan Kooperationsabkommen über Partnerschaft und Entwicklung wurde im Februar 2017 von der EU und Afghanistan unterzeichnet. Das Kooperationsabkommen über Partnerschaft und Entwicklung ist die erste vertragliche Beziehung zwischen der Europäischen Union und Afghanistan und legt den rechtlichen Rahmen für die Zusammenarbeit zwischen der EU und Afghanistan fest. Für das vollständige Inkrafttreten dieses gemischten Abkommens bedarf es der Zustimmung des Europäischen Parlaments und der Ratifizierung durch die nationalen Parlamente sowie bestimmte regionale Parlamente der EU-Mitgliedstaaten. Das Europäische Parlament stimmt voraussichtlich auf seiner März-I-Plenartagung über den Entwurf des Beschlusses des Rates über den Abschluss des Abkommens ab.

The first EU-Arab League summit: A new step in EU-Arab relations

22-02-2019

On 24 and 25 February 2019, heads of state or government from the European Union (EU) and the League of Arab States (LAS) will meet in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, for the first-ever EU-LAS summit. The summit comes at a time of heightened EU interest in developing closer cooperation with its main regional counterpart in the Arab world. The meeting will be co-chaired by Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and European Council President, Donald Tusk, who will represent the EU alongside European Commission ...

On 24 and 25 February 2019, heads of state or government from the European Union (EU) and the League of Arab States (LAS) will meet in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, for the first-ever EU-LAS summit. The summit comes at a time of heightened EU interest in developing closer cooperation with its main regional counterpart in the Arab world. The meeting will be co-chaired by Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and European Council President, Donald Tusk, who will represent the EU alongside European Commission President, Jean-Claude Juncker. A large number of EU and LAS heads of state or government have confirmed their attendance. A wide range of issues and common challenges will be on the agenda, including multilateralism, trade, investment and economic cooperation, technology, migration, climate change, security and the situation in the region. Since 2011, EU-LAS meetings have been taking place regularly at different levels in the context of a political and strategic dialogue. The most recent ministerial meeting, which brought together 10 EU and 15 Arab League foreign ministers, took place in Brussels on 4 February 2019. Moreover, working groups have been gathering in between meetings of senior officials to discuss political and security matters of shared concern. The EU and the LAS share positions on a range of issues, including support for a political transition in Syria, the two-state solution under the Middle East peace process, and the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of both Israel and a future Palestinian state. The two partners also cooperate to find solutions to the war in Yemen and the conflict in Libya. The summit is taking place at a time of intensified talks with Egypt and other North African countries to address the issue of migration. It is also seen as part of a broader effort to build closer ties with Africa. In September 2018, Commission President Juncker urged the EU to strike a new alliance with Africa to boost investment and create millions of jobs. The EU holds regular summits with other regional players, including the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and the African Union (AU).

Nuclear Safety outside the EU: Proposal for a new Council regulation

20-02-2019

In the context of the Commission's proposal for a multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the 2021-2027 period, the Commission published a proposal for a Council regulation establishing a European instrument for nuclear safety complementing the neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument on the basis of the Euratom Treaty on 14 June 2018. The proposed regulation will replace Council Regulation (Euratom) No 237/2014 of 13 December 2013 establishing an instrument for nuclear ...

In the context of the Commission's proposal for a multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the 2021-2027 period, the Commission published a proposal for a Council regulation establishing a European instrument for nuclear safety complementing the neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument on the basis of the Euratom Treaty on 14 June 2018. The proposed regulation will replace Council Regulation (Euratom) No 237/2014 of 13 December 2013 establishing an instrument for nuclear safety cooperation (INSC). The proposed regulation will continue to fund the important activities carried out under the current regulation, namely to support the promotion of a high level of nuclear safety and radiation protection and the application of effective and efficient safeguards of nuclear materials in third countries, building on the activities under the Euratom Treaty. First edition. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.

The end of the INF Treaty? A pillar of European security architecture at risk

04-02-2019

The US administration announced on 1 February 2019 that it was suspending its obligations under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, with effect from 2 February 2019, and that it was giving Russia six months' notice of complete withdrawal. Russia reacted by announcing that it was also suspending its obligations under the Treaty. Both parties said they would begin developing new nuclear-capable missiles banned by the treaty. The 1987 INF Treaty is a landmark nuclear-arms-control treaty ...

The US administration announced on 1 February 2019 that it was suspending its obligations under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, with effect from 2 February 2019, and that it was giving Russia six months' notice of complete withdrawal. Russia reacted by announcing that it was also suspending its obligations under the Treaty. Both parties said they would begin developing new nuclear-capable missiles banned by the treaty. The 1987 INF Treaty is a landmark nuclear-arms-control treaty between the United States (US) and the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) that eliminated and prohibited ground-launched intermediate ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5 500 km. The US announcement follows years of allegations that the Russian Federation has acted in breach of the agreement. Russia, for its part, has also accused the US of violating the treaty. Both deny the allegations. Moreover, both parties consider that the agreement puts their countries at a strategic disadvantage vis-à-vis other nuclear powers, especially China. The parties' announcements undermine a cornerstone of the European security order. The signing of the INF Treaty in 1987 led to the removal and destruction of nearly 3 000 US and Soviet short-, medium- and intermediate-range nuclear-capable missiles stationed in or aimed at Europe. The EU has called on the US to consider the consequences of its possible withdrawal from the INF for its own security, the security of its allies and that of the whole world. The EU has also called on both the US and Russia to remain engaged in constructive dialogue to preserve the INF Treaty, and on Russia to address the serious concerns regarding its compliance with the treaty. NATO considers Russia to be in violation of the INF Treaty, and the alliance has called on Russia to return urgently to full and verifiable compliance with the agreement. Any redeployment of intermediate-range missiles will put Europe once more in the line of fire of strategic nuclear weapons. If the INF Treaty is abrogated, Europeans will be faced with stark choices all carrying inherent security risks, including engaging in a deployment race with Russia, or refusing re-deployment of US missiles on European soil, potentially leaving European countries exposed to Russian intimidation. Efforts over the next six months will focus on preserving the INF Treaty against all odds.

EU-Bestimmungen für die Waffenausfuhrkontrolle

07-11-2018

Der Gemeinsame Standpunkt der EU zu Waffenausfuhren ist die einzige auf regionaler Ebene getroffene rechtsverbindliche Regelung zur Ausfuhr konventioneller Waffen. Während der Gemeinsame Standpunkt den Informationsaustausch und die Transparenz der Waffenausfuhren der Mitgliedstaaten verbessert hat, gibt es weiterhin Spielraum, die Konvergenz der nationalen Rüstungsexportpolitik zu erhöhen und die in dem EU-Text festgelegten Kriterien genauer einzuhalten. Nach der Veröffentlichung des 19. EU-Jahresbericht ...

Der Gemeinsame Standpunkt der EU zu Waffenausfuhren ist die einzige auf regionaler Ebene getroffene rechtsverbindliche Regelung zur Ausfuhr konventioneller Waffen. Während der Gemeinsame Standpunkt den Informationsaustausch und die Transparenz der Waffenausfuhren der Mitgliedstaaten verbessert hat, gibt es weiterhin Spielraum, die Konvergenz der nationalen Rüstungsexportpolitik zu erhöhen und die in dem EU-Text festgelegten Kriterien genauer einzuhalten. Nach der Veröffentlichung des 19. EU-Jahresbericht über Waffenausfuhren im Februar 2018 soll das Europäische Parlament nun während seiner November-I-Plenartagung einen Bericht über die Umsetzung des Gemeinsamen Standpunkts erörtern.

Updating the Blocking Regulation: The EU's answer to US extraterritorial sanctions

07-06-2018

On 8 May 2018, President Trump announced the unilateral US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the landmark nuclear agreement signed by Iran and the E3/EU+3 – France, Germany, the UK and the EU plus China, Russia and the USA – in 2015. He also announced that the US would re-impose sanctions on Iran that had been lifted as part of the implementation of the JCPOA. These sanctions have extraterritorial effect, essentially making it illegal for EU companies and financial institutions ...

On 8 May 2018, President Trump announced the unilateral US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the landmark nuclear agreement signed by Iran and the E3/EU+3 – France, Germany, the UK and the EU plus China, Russia and the USA – in 2015. He also announced that the US would re-impose sanctions on Iran that had been lifted as part of the implementation of the JCPOA. These sanctions have extraterritorial effect, essentially making it illegal for EU companies and financial institutions to engage in a wide range of economic and commercial activities with Iran. Companies that disregard the US secondary sanctions face major fines and/or criminal charges in the US, or even exclusion from the US market. US sanctions will be reinstated after a 90- or 180-day wind-down period, to allow companies to make the necessary arrangements. Following the signing of the JCPOA in 2015, European companies have entered into important commercial and investment agreements with Iranian counterparts, worth billions of euros. Many of these companies also have important commercial ties with the US. Faced with the prospect of penalties in the US, several EU companies have already announced that they are ending their dealings with Iran, unless a way can be found to exempt or shield them from US secondary sanctions. In response, the Commission adopted a delegated act on 6 June 2018 to update the annex to the 'Blocking Regulation', which was adopted in 1996 to protect EU businesses against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country. The Blocking Regulation forbids EU persons from complying with extraterritorial sanctions, allows companies to recover damages arising from such sanctions, and nullifies the effect in the EU of any foreign court judgment based on them. The effectiveness of the regulation as a mechanism to offset US sanctions has been questioned, however its adoption sends an important political message. Parliament now has two months to object to the delegated act, but may signal earlier that it will not do so, thus allowing the measure to come into force earlier than the end of the two-month period.

Future of the Iran nuclear deal: How much can US pressure isolate Iran?

25-05-2018

In July 2015, Iran and the E3/EU+3 – France, Germany, the UK and the EU plus China, Russia and the USA – signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a landmark agreement to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for the termination of restrictive measures against Iran. Following certification by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that Iran had complied with its nuclear dismantlement commitments, implementation of the JCPOA commenced on 16 January ...

In July 2015, Iran and the E3/EU+3 – France, Germany, the UK and the EU plus China, Russia and the USA – signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a landmark agreement to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for the termination of restrictive measures against Iran. Following certification by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that Iran had complied with its nuclear dismantlement commitments, implementation of the JCPOA commenced on 16 January 2016. On that day, known as Implementation Day, all nuclear-related UN, US and EU sanctions on Iran were lifted. President Trump, who took office in January 2017, has consistently called the JCPOA 'a terrible deal'. In January 2018, he announced that the US would cease implementing the JCPOA in May 2018 unless Congress and US allies successfully addressed what he called the agreement's 'disastrous flaws'. During the short period given by President Trump, the US worked with EU allies on a 'supplemental agreement', to address the perceived weaknesses of the JCPOA. However, sufficient common ground could not be reached and on 8 May, President Trump announced that the US was leaving the nuclear deal with Iran and would (re)-impose sanctions. These block American firms from doing business in Iran, and bar foreign firms that do business with Iran from accessing the entire US banking and financial system. In addition, companies that violate the sanctions risk huge fines. The E3/EU have repeatedly stressed their support for the continued full and effective implementation of the JCPOA by all sides, pointing to the fact that it imposes very tough nuclear inspections and that the IAEA has confirmed 10 times that Iran is abiding by its commitments under the agreement. Russia and China have likewise expressed their unwavering support for the agreement. Iran has given the EU 60 days to ensure the continued implementation of the JCPOA, in particular its trade and economic aspects. The US has threatened to impose sanctions on European companies that continue to do business in Iran, but also signalled willingness to continue working on a 'supplemental agreement'.

Renewed chemical attack in Syria

12-04-2018

As the conflict in Syria enters its eighth year, Parliament is due to debate the situation, following a recent escalation. The Assad regime is suspected of having carried out a toxic gas attack on the besieged town of Douma near Damascus on 7 April 2018, killing around 80 people and injuring hundreds. The United Nations Security Council debated the attack during an emergency meeting on 9 April 2018, during which Russia denied Syrian regime responsibility for the attack. The EU has strongly condemned ...

As the conflict in Syria enters its eighth year, Parliament is due to debate the situation, following a recent escalation. The Assad regime is suspected of having carried out a toxic gas attack on the besieged town of Douma near Damascus on 7 April 2018, killing around 80 people and injuring hundreds. The United Nations Security Council debated the attack during an emergency meeting on 9 April 2018, during which Russia denied Syrian regime responsibility for the attack. The EU has strongly condemned the latest use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict, and the United States, France and the United Kingdom have signalled their willingness to respond with air-strikes in order to uphold the global ban on the use of chemical weapons.

Partner

Bleiben Sie in Verbindung

email update imageAktuelle Informationen per E-Mail

Sie können sich per E-Mail aktuelle Mitteilungen über Personen und Ereignisse im Zusammenhang mit dem Europäischen Parlament zusenden lassen. Dazu zählen aktuelle Informationen der Mitglieder, der Informationsdienststellen oder des Think Tank.

Dieser Dienst kann auf der gesamten Website des Europäischen Parlaments genutzt werden. Sie können den Dienst abonnieren und Mitteilungen des Think Tank erhalten, indem Sie einfach Ihre E-Mail-Adresse angeben, ein Thema auswählen, zu dem Sie Informationen erhalten möchten, die Häufigkeit der Mitteilungen (täglich, wöchentlich oder monatlich) festlegen und abschließend zur Bestätigung auf den Link klicken, der Ihnen zu diesem Zweck per E-Mail geschickt wird.

RSS imageRSS-Feeds

Über den RSS-Feed bleiben Sie immer auf dem Laufenden und werden über alle Aktualisierungen auf der Website des Europäischen Parlaments informiert.

Klicken Sie auf den folgenden Link, um den RSS-Feed zu konfigurieren.