11

résultat(s)

Mot(s)
Type de publication
Domaine politique
Mot-clé
Date

Paix et sécurité en 2019: Évaluation des efforts déployés par l’Union européenne pour soutenir la paix en Colombie

03-06-2019

La présente étude thématique, la deuxième de la collection « Paix et sécurité », porte sur les efforts déployés par l’Union européenne (UE) en vue de soutenir la paix en Colombie. Chaque année, les études publiées dans cette collection évaluent les résultats obtenus par l’Union dans le domaine de la paix et de la sécurité dans une région donnée. La présente étude d’impact examine l’action menée par l’Union européenne au cours du conflit qui a sévi pendant 50 ans en Colombie et met l’accent sur la ...

La présente étude thématique, la deuxième de la collection « Paix et sécurité », porte sur les efforts déployés par l’Union européenne (UE) en vue de soutenir la paix en Colombie. Chaque année, les études publiées dans cette collection évaluent les résultats obtenus par l’Union dans le domaine de la paix et de la sécurité dans une région donnée. La présente étude d’impact examine l’action menée par l’Union européenne au cours du conflit qui a sévi pendant 50 ans en Colombie et met l’accent sur la consolidation de la paix depuis la conclusion, en 2016, de l’accord final de paix entre le gouvernement et le principal groupe armé du pays, les Forces armées révolutionnaires de Colombie - Armée du peuple (FARC-EP). L’Union a mobilisé un large éventail d’instruments civils en Colombie : la diplomatie bilatérale et multilatérale, l’aide humanitaire et l’aide au développement, et les relations commerciales. Après avoir situé le conflit dans son contexte géopolitique, la présente étude analyse la démarche adoptée par l'Union pour favoriser la paix en Colombie et la manière dont elle l'a mise en œuvre, la contribution du Parlement européen, ainsi que les risques qui sont apparus depuis la signature de l’accord de paix et les moyens de les atténuer. Une étude distincte publiée en parallèle donne un aperçu de l’action actuelle de l’Union en matière de paix et de sécurité et présente l’indice Normandie pour la paix 2019. Ces études ont été rédigées en vue de leur présentation au Forum mondial Normandie pour la paix, qui se tiendra en juin 2019.

The Generalised Scheme of Preferences Regulation (No 978/2012): European Implementation Assessment

19-12-2018

This evaluation of the EU Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) focuses on the incentives in the GSP provisions that aim to push beneficiaries to comply with human rights and the extent to which these have been implemented and have had an impact on poverty reduction and good governance. The annexed economic evaluation of the GSP Regulation examines three inter-related questions: how beneficiaries have graduated from the GSP and what role preferences have played; how trade relations between the ...

This evaluation of the EU Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) focuses on the incentives in the GSP provisions that aim to push beneficiaries to comply with human rights and the extent to which these have been implemented and have had an impact on poverty reduction and good governance. The annexed economic evaluation of the GSP Regulation examines three inter-related questions: how beneficiaries have graduated from the GSP and what role preferences have played; how trade relations between the countries that have recently graduated from the GSP and those that still benefit from it are affected; and what the impact of changes in the rules of origin has been.

The Trade Pillar in the EU-Central America Association Agreement: European Implementation Assessment

24-10-2018

The EU-Central America Association Agreement was signed in June 2012 and its trade pillar has been provisionally in force since December 2013. This evaluation assesses specifically the implementation of the trade and sustainable development (TSD) chapter of the trade pillar of this agreement during the five years of its operation. After briefly outlining the trade interests of this agreement, this study situates sustainable development by explaining its legal foundations in the Association Agreement ...

The EU-Central America Association Agreement was signed in June 2012 and its trade pillar has been provisionally in force since December 2013. This evaluation assesses specifically the implementation of the trade and sustainable development (TSD) chapter of the trade pillar of this agreement during the five years of its operation. After briefly outlining the trade interests of this agreement, this study situates sustainable development by explaining its legal foundations in the Association Agreement and reviewing the ex-ante impact assessment conclusions on the issue. It then focuses on the monitoring mechanisms of the Association Agreement, including the European Commission annual reports, Parliament's oversight work, the civil society dialogue, and the results of the meetings of the specialised committee and annual Association Committee and Association Council meetings. Through this review it identifies strengths and shortcomings in the implementation of the TSD chapter and ends by suggesting a number of ways to enhance efforts to support sustainable development in Central America.

Paix et sécurité en 2018: Évaluation des mesures de l’UE en faveur de la consolidation de la paix dans les Balkans occidentaux

22-05-2018

Cette première étude thématique de la collection « Paix et sécurité » porte sur les mesures prises par l’Union européenne (UE) pour consolider la paix dans les Balkans occidentaux. Chaque année, les études publiées dans cette collection examineront les résultats obtenus par l’UE dans le domaine de la paix et de la sécurité dans une région donnée. La présente étude analyse l’action de l’UE dans les Balkans occidentaux afin de déterminer dans quelle mesure l’Union est parvenue à transformer et à renforcer ...

Cette première étude thématique de la collection « Paix et sécurité » porte sur les mesures prises par l’Union européenne (UE) pour consolider la paix dans les Balkans occidentaux. Chaque année, les études publiées dans cette collection examineront les résultats obtenus par l’UE dans le domaine de la paix et de la sécurité dans une région donnée. La présente étude analyse l’action de l’UE dans les Balkans occidentaux afin de déterminer dans quelle mesure l’Union est parvenue à transformer et à renforcer la gouvernance, l’économie et la résilience dans la région. L’étude s’articule autour de trois principales phases, connexes, parfois redondantes, de la consolidation de la paix après un conflit, à savoir les phases de stabilisation, de consolidation de l’État et d’élargissement de l’UE, afin d’expliquer les forces, les faiblesses et les limites de l’action de l’UE. Elle se conclut par une évaluation de la nouvelle stratégie de l’UE pour la région des Balkans occidentaux afin de déterminer dans quelle mesure elle peut corriger les défauts du passé et contribuer à faire progresser la région vers une paix réelle, sans exclusive et durable. Une étude parallèle, publiée séparément, donne un aperçu de l’action actuelle de l’UE en matière de paix et de sécurité et des perspectives d’avenir. Ces études ont été rédigées en vue de leur présentation au Forum mondial Normandie pour la Paix, en juin 2018.

EU external financing instruments and the post-2020 architecture: European Implementation Assessment

28-02-2018

This study evaluates the performance of the EU external financing instruments (EFIs) in the light of the results of the European Commission’s mid-term review and discussions on their post-2020 architecture. This evaluation finds that the existing architecture and geographic/thematic coverage of the EFIs has, overall, been relevant to the EU policy objectives set in 2014. However, they were less responsive to recipients’ needs, and implementation weaknesses persist. At the strategic level, weaknesses ...

This study evaluates the performance of the EU external financing instruments (EFIs) in the light of the results of the European Commission’s mid-term review and discussions on their post-2020 architecture. This evaluation finds that the existing architecture and geographic/thematic coverage of the EFIs has, overall, been relevant to the EU policy objectives set in 2014. However, they were less responsive to recipients’ needs, and implementation weaknesses persist. At the strategic level, weaknesses in EFIs that need attention in the post-2020 architecture include: balancing short-term expediency with long-term needs; ensuring EU security needs and interests do not marginalise EU values; and safeguarding the development-oriented agenda of EFIs. At an operational level, the EFIs need to overcome the ‘silo’ approach to implementation, and develop solid monitoring and evaluation systems that assess the EFIs’ impact in recipient countries. This study provides options for tackling these limitations, including the need to integrate simplification, ensure sustainability of EU action, strengthen flexibility while remaining consistent and committed to EU fundamental values, create multi-actor partnerships, link EU action to EU strategies, and strengthen EU strategic communication. The annexed expert paper found that EU support to civil society in Turkey, Ukraine and Egypt has improved in recent years, but it still struggles to meet new challenges. Neither radical simplification of the EFIs nor a dedicated civil society instrument would necessarily improve civil society support, and may involve serious drawbacks. The EU’s most pressing challenges are to link civil society more effectively to reform-oriented aid; find ways to support new civic actors; temper the current assault on civil society organisations; and to find more nuanced ways to link civil society to strategic goals.

Auteur externe

Annex: EU Support to Civil Society in Turkey, Ukraine and Egypt: Mapping reforms to the external financing instruments, written by Professor Richard Youngs, Carnegie Europe.

EU Humanitarian aid: Lessons identified and the way forward

29-01-2018

The new uncertain geopolitical context has had a far-reaching impact, including on European Union (EU) humanitarian aid. The EU has faced a rising number of terrorist attacks across Europe that has created an atmosphere of fear, while the United Kingdom (UK)'s decision to withdraw from the EU has challenged the European project as we know it. The EU institutions and its Member States, as well as international institutions have been challenged in their response to refugees seeking asylum, and to the ...

The new uncertain geopolitical context has had a far-reaching impact, including on European Union (EU) humanitarian aid. The EU has faced a rising number of terrorist attacks across Europe that has created an atmosphere of fear, while the United Kingdom (UK)'s decision to withdraw from the EU has challenged the European project as we know it. The EU institutions and its Member States, as well as international institutions have been challenged in their response to refugees seeking asylum, and to the humanitarian crises in the Mediterranean. Equally, the election of President Trump has ushered in a new era of United States (US) unilateralism, creating a gap on the global agenda. This briefing aims to provide an assessment of recent developments in the area of EU humanitarian aid and outline elements that would be pertinent to consider in policy-making when reflecting on how to move forward on the post-2020 architecture of the EU external financing instruments, which affect EU humanitarian aid, and the needs surrounding the new EU budget.

EU Gender Action Plan 2016-2020 at year one: European Implementation Assessment

11-10-2017

The EU’s Gender Action Plan 2016-2020 (referred to as GAP II) is the Union’s framework for promoting gender equality and women and girls’ empowerment in external relations in third and partner countries, as well as in international fora and agendas. GAP II is significant, as it constitutes the manifestation of the principles related to gender parity outlined in the new European Consensus on Development. Its goals are also key to the successful achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs ...

The EU’s Gender Action Plan 2016-2020 (referred to as GAP II) is the Union’s framework for promoting gender equality and women and girls’ empowerment in external relations in third and partner countries, as well as in international fora and agendas. GAP II is significant, as it constitutes the manifestation of the principles related to gender parity outlined in the new European Consensus on Development. Its goals are also key to the successful achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Against this background, this European Implementation Assessment seeks to provide an initial assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of GAP II at its first milestone: the end of its first year of operation in third countries. Given the short timeframe of the evaluation, this study presents some preliminary findings on the achievements and shortcomings in the application of GAP II, but also aims to assess the new framework itself. Moreover, it provides Members with a number of opportunities for action and recommendations for improving EU performance on promoting and protecting gender parity and women’s empowerment in partner countries.

Fraude fiscale, blanchiment de capitaux et transparence fiscale dans les pays et territoires d’outre-mer de l’Union: Évaluation ex post de l’impact

20-04-2017

Cette étude vise à présenter le cadre juridique, politique et institutionnel régissant les pratiques extraterritoriales dans les pays et territoires d’outre-mer (PTOM) de l’Union européenne, qui relèvent de la souveraineté de quatre États membres: le Danemark, la France, les Pays-Bas et le Royaume-Uni. Les dispositions institutionnelles des PTOM avec les États membres de l’Union dont ils dépendent déterminent directement la possibilité ou non d’élaborer des politiques et d’adopter des réglementations ...

Cette étude vise à présenter le cadre juridique, politique et institutionnel régissant les pratiques extraterritoriales dans les pays et territoires d’outre-mer (PTOM) de l’Union européenne, qui relèvent de la souveraineté de quatre États membres: le Danemark, la France, les Pays-Bas et le Royaume-Uni. Les dispositions institutionnelles des PTOM avec les États membres de l’Union dont ils dépendent déterminent directement la possibilité ou non d’élaborer des politiques et d’adopter des réglementations, notamment en matière de fiscalité et de blanchiment de capitaux. Indépendamment du niveau de contrôle que les États membres de l’Union exercent sur leurs PTOM, l’application de la loi par les autorités locales suscite des inquiétudes dans certains PTOM britanniques et néerlandais en raison de leurs faiblesses structurelles et de leurs ressources financières et humaines limitées. Dans le cas des PTOM français, le caractère sous-optimal des mesures de contrôle ainsi que le manque d’informations complexifient la surveillance des activités financières.

Auteur externe

Prof. Alexandre Maitrot de la Motte of the University of Paris-Est Creteil, Prof. Dr H.E. Bröring, Prof. Dr O.O. Cherednychenko, Prof. Dr H.G. Hoogers and G. Karapetian LL.M. (Department of Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Public Administration/Groningen Centre for European Financial Services Law (GCEFSL), University of Groningen), Dr Peter Clegg of the University of the West of England

EU-US trade and investment relations: Effects on tax evasion, money laundering and tax transparency

06-03-2017

This ex-post impact assessment analyses EU-US trade and investment relations to assess whether and, if so, to what extent these relations have impacted on issues related to tax evasion, money laundering and tax transparency. The EU and US economies are highly intertwined, generating together half the world’s gross domestic product and more than 30 % of global trade. Overall, trade and investment relations between the European Union and the United States do not seem to have impacted on US efforts ...

This ex-post impact assessment analyses EU-US trade and investment relations to assess whether and, if so, to what extent these relations have impacted on issues related to tax evasion, money laundering and tax transparency. The EU and US economies are highly intertwined, generating together half the world’s gross domestic product and more than 30 % of global trade. Overall, trade and investment relations between the European Union and the United States do not seem to have impacted on US efforts to combat tax evasion, strengthen anti-money laundering legislation, and its implementation, and boost tax transparency. While some progress has been made in the ongoing negotiation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which also aims to establish regulatory cooperation between the EU and the USA on financial services, progress has been below expectations. The United States has set up mechanisms for information exchange with EU Member States, has signed tax treaties with almost all EU Member States, and has developed a robust legal framework to address money laundering and combat terrorism financing. Despite being largely compliant with the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force, however, challenges remain on questions of beneficial ownership, cross-border exchange of information, privacy issues, and designated non-financial businesses and professions.

The effects of human rights related clauses in the EU-Mexico Global Agreement and the EU-Chile Association Agreement

10-02-2017

The democracy clause in the EU-Mexico Global Agreement and by extension the EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement calls for respect for fundamental human rights. If these are breached, a sanctioning clause can be invoked. The widely reported violations of human rights in Mexico are tackled through political dialogue. The agreement includes cooperation articles on social policy, the results of which are non-binding. Against this background, it is difficult to make a clear link between the potential effects ...

The democracy clause in the EU-Mexico Global Agreement and by extension the EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement calls for respect for fundamental human rights. If these are breached, a sanctioning clause can be invoked. The widely reported violations of human rights in Mexico are tackled through political dialogue. The agreement includes cooperation articles on social policy, the results of which are non-binding. Against this background, it is difficult to make a clear link between the potential effects of human rights related clauses in the Global Agreement on the human rights situation in Mexico. The EU-Chile Association Agreement (AA) also includes a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement, which is subject to the democracy clause. More developed than that in the Global Agreement, this clause calls for respect for fundamental human rights; sustainable economic and social development; and commits parties to good governance. The AA also includes a suspension clause in case of breach of the democracy clause, and cooperation provisions, the results of which are non-binding. While these are more detailed than the ones in the Global Agreement, the impact of the EU-Chile AA on the human rights situation in Chile has been limited in its extent and to specific aspects of the social policy agenda. In both cases, the monitoring mechanisms of the EU agreements have generally been implemented properly – even if civil society participation in Chile was institutionalised late. These mechanisms have played an important role in nurturing cooperation, but the incentives created have not translated into sufficient pressure for the implementation of human rights related reforms. Rather than the EU FTAs per se impacting on ensuring the respect of human rights in Mexico and Chile, it is the cumulative effect of the liberalisation of trade in the two countries, the EU-Mexico Strategic Partnership, the role of all global players, and cooperation with international donors that have encouraged reform. Ultimately, whether or not reforms in favour of respect of human rights have been adopted and implemented was the result of domestic politics in Mexico and Chile.

Partenaires

Restez connectés

email update imageSystème d'alertes email

Le système d'alertes email, qui envoie directement les dernières informations à votre adresse électronique, vous permet de suivre toutes les personnes et tous les événements liés au Parlement. Ceci inclut les dernières nouvelles des députés, les services d'information ou le Think Tank.

Le système est accessible partout sur le site du Parlement. Pour vous abonner et recevoir les notifications du Think Tank, il suffit de communiquer votre adresse email, de sélectionner le thème qui vous intéresse, d'indiquer la fréquence (quotidienne, hebdomadaire ou mensuelle) et de confirmer votre enregistrement en cliquant sur le lien envoyé par email.

RSS imageFlux RSS

Ne manquez aucune information ou mise à jour du site du Parlement européen grâce à notre flux RSS.

Veuillez cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous afin de configurer votre flux.