REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay on certain aspects of air services

    20.9.2006 - (COM(2006)0064 – C6‑0249/2006 – 2006/0016(CNS)) - *

    Committee on Transport and Tourism
    Rapporteur: Paolo Costa

    Procedure : 2006/0016(CNS)
    Document stages in plenary
    Document selected :  
    A6-0296/2006
    Texts tabled :
    A6-0296/2006
    Debates :
    Texts adopted :

    DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

    on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay on certain aspects of air services

    (COM(2006)0064 - C6-0249/2006 - 2006/0016(CNS))

    (Consultation procedure)

    The European Parliament,

    –   having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2006)0064)[1]1,

    –   having regard to Articles 80(2) and 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,

    –   having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0249/2006),

    –   having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

    –   having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0296/2006),

    1.  Approves conclusion of the agreement;

    2.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay.

    • [1] 1 Not yet published in OJ.

    EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

    As ruled by the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the Community has exclusive competence with respect to various aspects of external aviation which were traditionally governed by bilateral air services agreements between Member States and third countries.

    Consequently, the Council authorised the Commission in June 2003 to open negotiations with third countries in order to replace certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with Community agreements.

    Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the Oriental Republic of Uruguay that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Uruguay.

    These changes concern:

    Art. 2 (designation clause): To avoid discrimination between Community air carriers, the traditional designation clauses, referring to air carriers of the Member State party to the bilateral agreement, are replaced by a Community designation clause, referring to all Community carriers and EEA carriers.

    Art. 4 (taxation of aviation fuel): Whereas traditional bilateral agreements tend to exempt aircraft fuel in general from taxation, Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity permits such taxation for operations within the territory of the Community. Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of Uruguay operating within the territory of the Community. Furthermore Uruguay is entitled to impose taxes on fuel supplied in its territory for use in aircraft of a designated air carrier of a Member State operating within the territory of Uruguay.

    Art. 5 (pricing): Resolves conflicts between the bilateral agreements and Council Regulation (EEC) 2409/92 on fares and rates for air services, which prohibits third country carriers from being price leaders on air services for carriage wholly within the Community.

    Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements and their articles which are referred to in Article 1 to 5 of the proposed Agreement; these are the agreements between Uruguay and Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

    Annex 3 lists the other states referred to in Article 2: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway - which fall under the Agreement on the European Economic Area - and Switzerland falling under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation.

    The Agreement negotiated by the Commission should be signed and provisionally applied. The proposed Council Decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to notify Uruguay that the internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement have been completed.

    Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement under the consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph 7, which reads as follows:

    "Parliament shall give its opinion on, or its assent to, the conclusion, renewal or amendment of an international agreement or a financial protocol concluded by the European Community in a single vote by a majority of the votes cast without amendments to the text of the agreement or protocol being admissible."

    On the basis of the above your rapporteur suggests that the TRAN committee should give a favourable opinion on the conclusion of this Agreement.

    PROCEDURE

    Title

    Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay on certain aspects of air services

    References

    COM(2006)0064 – C6-0249/2006 – 2006/0016(CNS)

    Date of consulting Parliament

    20.7.2006

    Committee responsible
      Date announced in plenary

    TRAN
    5.9.2006

    Committee(s) asked for opinion(s)
      Date announced in plenary

     

     

     

     

     

    Not delivering opinion(s)
      Date of decision

     

     

     

     

     

    Enhanced cooperation
      Date announced in plenary

     

     

     

     

     

    Rapporteur(s)
      Date appointed

    Paolo Costa
    20.6.2006

     

    Previous rapporteur(s)

     

     

    Simplified procedure – date of decision  Date of decision

    Rule 43(1) / Rule 43(2)

    Legal basis disputed
      Date of JURI opinion

     

     

     

    Financial endowment amended
      Date of BUDG opinion

     

     

     

    Parliament to consult European Economic and Social Committee
    – date decided in plenary

     

    Parliament to consult Committee of the Regions – date decided in plenary

     

    Discussed in committee

    13.9.2006

     

     

     

     

    Date adopted

    13.9.2006

    Result of final vote

    +:

    –:

    0:

    36

    0

    1

    Members present for the final vote

    Gabriele Albertini, Margrete Auken, Philip Bradbourn, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jörg Leichtfried, Fernand Le Rachinel, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Marta Vincenzi

    Substitute(s) present for the final vote

    Zsolt László Becsey, Helmuth Markov, Willem Schuth, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García

    Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote

    Brian Simpson

    Date tabled

    20.9.2006

     

    Comments (available in one language only)

    ...