REPORT on amendment of Rule 29 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure - Formation of political groups
2.6.2008 - (2006/2201(REG))
Committee on Constitutional Affairs
Rapporteur: Richard Corbett
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
on amendment of Rule 29 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure - Formation of political groups
The European Parliament,
- having regard to the proposal for amendment of its Rules of Procedure (B6-0420/2006),
– having regard to Rules 201 and 202 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A6‑0206/2008),
1. Decides to amend its Rules of Procedure as shown below;
2. Decides that the amendment will enter into force on the first day of the first part-session following the European elections in the year 2009;
3. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and Commission, for information.
Present text | Amendments |
Amendment 1 Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 29 - paragraph 2 a (new) | |
Present text |
Amendment |
|
2a. Where a group falls below the required threshold, the President, with the agreement of the Conference of Presidents, may allow it to continue to exist until Parliament's next constitutive sitting, provided the following conditions are met: |
|
- the members continue to represent at least one-fifth of the Member States; |
|
- the group has been in existence for a period longer than one year. |
|
The President shall not apply this derogation where there is sufficient evidence to suspect that it is being abused. |
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
In the discussions so far in the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the possible revision of Rule 29 (formation of political groups) three issues have emerged. They all concern a possible revision of paragraph two concerning the minimum size of a political group.
(1) Number of member states
The rule currently requires a political group to comprise members "elected in at least one fifth of the member states". The statute on European political parties refers to "one quarter" of the member states being the relevant criterion. It has been suggested that our internal parliamentary rules should reflect the legislation that has been adopted regarding European political parties. If we were to change Parliament's rules to refer to one quarter, this would mean that a group would currently require MEPs from seven member states instead of six. Neither of these figures would change in the event of Croatian accession.
(2) Number of members
The minimum number of MEPs required to form a political group is currently twenty. This represents a mere 2.55% of the membership of the European Parliament. The attached table shows that in 21 of the 25 national parliaments which have rules on political groups, a higher threshold is required in at least one parliamentary chamber, going as high as 8.5% (Luxembourg), 8.1% (Austrian Bundesrat) or 7% (Polish Senat), but generally above the 4% level (15 Member States).
The question arises as to whether the European Parliament's threshold should be raised to something closer to the average practice of national parliaments. If the figure were fixed at 30 Members out of 750 in the next parliament that would correspond to a figure of 4% which would still be less than the average for national parliaments.
An amendment aiming at raising the minimum number of members needed for establishing a political group was tabled by the Rapporteur, but the Committee rejected it by a very narrow vote.
(3) Maintaining a group that slips below the threshold after it has been created
Mr Bonde and others have drawn attention to the difficult situation that can arise when a group has been created with just enough members to reach the minimum threshold. It is then extremely vulnerable to political pressure from a small group of members - even a single member - who can threaten to leave the group, thereby destroying it unless he/she gets their way on a particular matter.
Consideration should therefore be given to allowing a group to continue to exist, at least for a period of time, if after its creation it slips below the threshold needed. For instance, if 30 members are required to form a political group, such a group could continue to exist for up to a year provided that it had at least 25 members. However, for such a rule to be introduced, it should be accompanied by measures to ensure that members cannot be successively "lent to" different groups to help with their creation, then moving on to constitute other groups again and again.
ANNEX 1
Political groups in national parliaments
Country |
Total number of Members in Parliament / Chamber |
Minimum number of Members for political group |
% of total |
|
Austria |
|
|
|
|
Nationalrat |
183 |
5 |
2,7 % |
|
Bundesrat |
62 |
5 |
8,1 % |
|
Belgium |
|
|
|
|
La Chambre |
150 |
5 |
3,3 % |
|
Le Sénat |
71 |
2 |
2,8 % |
|
Bulgaria |
239 |
10 |
4,2 % |
|
Cyprus |
According to the Constitution 80 (of which 56 Greek Cypriots; the Turkish Cypriots left in 1963); currently de facto 56 |
7 (out of 56) |
12 % |
|
Czech Republic |
|
|
|
|
Chamber of Deputies |
200 |
10[1] |
5 % |
|
Senate |
81 |
5 |
6,2 % |
|
Denmark |
179 |
4[2] |
2,2 % |
|
Estonia |
101 |
5 |
5 % |
|
Finland |
200 |
n/r |
n/r |
|
France Assemblée |
577 |
20 |
3,5 % |
|
Sénat |
331 |
15 |
4,5 % |
|
Germany |
598 (plus potential overhang mandates) 16th German Bundestag: 614 |
30 plus x 16th German Bundestag: 31 |
5 % |
|
Greece |
300 |
10 |
3,3 % |
|
Hungary |
386 |
15 |
3,9 % |
|
Ireland |
166 |
7 |
4,2 % |
|
Italy |
|
|
|
|
Camera dei Deputati |
630 |
20 |
3,2 % |
|
Senato |
315[3] |
10 |
3,2 % |
|
Latvia |
100 |
5 |
5 % |
|
Lithuania |
141 |
7 |
5 % |
|
Luxembourg |
60 |
5 |
8,3 % |
|
Malta |
|
n/r |
n/r |
|
Netherlands |
|
|
|
|
House of representatives |
150 |
1 |
0,7 % |
|
Senate |
75 |
1 |
1,3 % |
|
Poland |
|
|
|
|
Sejm |
460 |
15[4] |
3,3 % |
|
Senat |
100 |
7 |
7 % |
|
Portugal |
230 |
2 |
0,9 % |
|
Romania |
|
|
|
|
Chamber of Deputies |
332 |
10 |
3 % |
|
Senate |
137 |
7 |
5,1 % |
|
Slovakia |
150 |
8 |
5,3 % |
|
Slovenia |
90 |
3 |
3,3 % |
|
Spain |
|
|
|
|
Congreso |
350 |
15[5] |
4,3 % |
|
Senado |
259 |
10 |
3,9 % |
|
Sweden |
349 |
14[6] |
4 % |
|
United Kingdom |
646 |
n/r |
n/r |
|
n/r = not relevant
- [1] This figure applies to the constitution of a new group during the parliamentary term. After elections a lower threshold of 3 members applies (1,5%).
- [2] There is no threshold in the Rules of Procedure but groups of less than 4 members would obtain less financial support. Since no party having obtained less than 2% of the vote will have seats in the Folketing there is a practical limit of 4 members in most cases.
- [3] The Italian Senate is composed of 315 elected Senators, but some Senators may be appointed for life by the President of the Republic. The total number of Senatori is hence greater than 315 and varies over time.
- [4] In the Polish chambers a distinction is made between "clubs" and "groups". The establishment of groups is possible with a minimum of 3 members (representing 0,65% in the Sejm, 3% in the Senate).
- [5] A lower threshold of 5 members (1,42%) is applied for parties having obtained either 15% of the vote in the region/constituencies where they presented candidates or 5% of the nationwide caucus/party coalition of which they were part.
- [6] In theory, 1, if a PP gets more than 12 % of votes in one constituency. This has never happened yet in Swedish elections. The threshold is 4 % of votes in the whole country, which equals about 14 seats
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE
Date adopted |
27.5.2008 |
|
|
|
||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
15 13 0 |
||||
Members present for the final vote |
Jim Allister, Richard Corbett, Brian Crowley, Hanne Dahl, Andrew Duff, Ingo Friedrich, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Timothy Kirkhope, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Ashley Mote, Borut Pahor, Rihards Pīks, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Johannes Voggenhuber, Dushana Zdravkova |
|||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Graham Booth, Costas Botopoulos, Klaus Hänsch, György Schöpflin, Mauro Zani |
|||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote |
Philip Claeys, Ingeborg Gräßle, Sepp Kusstatscher, Michael Henry Nattrass, Renate Weber |
|||||