REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity
5.6.2008 - (COM(2007)0531 – C6‑0320/2007 – 2007/0198(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Rapporteur: Alejo Vidal-Quadras
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity
(COM(2007)0531 – C6‑0320/2007 – 2007/0198(COD))
(Codecision procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0531),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6‑0320/2007),
– having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A6‑0228/2008),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) However, at present, the right to sell electricity in any Member State on equal terms, without discrimination or disadvantage cannot be guaranteed to any company in the Community. In particular, non-discriminatory network access and an equally effective level of regulatory supervision in each Member State do not yet exist. |
(3) However, at present, the right to sell electricity in any Member State on equal terms, without discrimination or disadvantage cannot be guaranteed to any company in the Community. In particular, non-discriminatory network access and an equally effective level of regulatory supervision in each Member State do not yet exist and isolated markets endure. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) The Communication of the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled "An Energy Policy for Europe" highlighted the importance of completing the internal market in electricity and to create a level playing field for all electricity companies in the Community. The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on prospects for the internal gas and electricity market and the Communication from the Commission "Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 into the European gas and electricity sectors (Final Report)" showed that the present rules and measures do not provide the necessary framework to achieve the objective of a well functioning internal market. |
(4) The Communication of the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled "An Energy Policy for Europe" highlighted the importance of completing the internal market in electricity and to create a level playing field for all electricity companies in the Community. The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on prospects for the internal gas and electricity market and the Communication from the Commission "Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 into the European gas and electricity sectors (Final Report)" showed that the present rules and measures neither provide the necessary framework nor provide for the creation of physical connections to achieve the objective of a well-functioning, efficient and open internal market. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) In particular, increased cooperation and coordination among transmission system operators is required to ensure progressive compatibility of the technical and commercial codes for providing and managing effective access to the transmission networks across borders, and to ensure coordinated and sufficiently forward looking planning and sound technical evolution of the transmission system in the Community, with due regard to the environment, and promote energy efficiency and research and innovation notably with respect to ensuring penetration of renewables and dissemination of low carbon technology. Transmission system operators should operate their networks according to these compatible technical and market codes. |
(6) In particular, the creation of physical connections and increased cooperation and coordination among transmission system operators are required to ensure progressive compatibility of the technical and commercial codes for providing and managing effective and transparent access to the transmission networks across borders, and to ensure coordinated and sufficiently forward looking planning and sound technical evolution of the transmission system in the Community, with due regard to the environment, and promote energy efficiency and research and innovation notably with respect to ensuring penetration of renewables and dissemination of low carbon technology. Transmission system operators should operate their networks according to these compatible technical and market codes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) In order to ensure an optimal management of the electricity transmission network and to allow trading and supplying electricity to retail customers across borders in the Community a European network of the transmission system operators should be established. Its tasks should be carried out in compliance with Community competition rules which remain applicable to the decisions of the European network of the transmission system operators. Its tasks should be well-defined and their working method should be such as to ensure efficiency, representativity and transparency. Given that more effective progress may be achieved through an approach at regional level, transmission system operators should set up regional structures within the overall cooperation structure, whilst ensuring that results at regional level are compatible with codes and investment plans at Community level. Cooperation within such regional structures presupposes effective unbundling of network activities from production and supply activities in the absence of which regional cooperation between transmission system operators gives rise to a risk of anti-competitive conduct. |
(7) In order to ensure an optimal management of the electricity transmission network and to allow trading and supplying electricity to retail customers across borders in the Community a European network of the transmission system operators should be established. Its tasks should be carried out in compliance with Community competition rules which remain applicable to the decisions of the European network of the transmission system operators. Its tasks should be well-defined and their working method should be such as to ensure efficiency, representativity and transparency. Given that more effective progress may be achieved through an approach at regional level, transmission system operators should set up regional structures within the overall cooperation structure, whilst ensuring that results at regional level are compatible with codes and investment plans at Community level. Member States should promote cooperation and monitor the effectiveness of the network at regional level. Cooperation at regional level should be compatible with progress towards a competitive and efficient internal market for electricity. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) All market participants have an interest in the work expected of the European network of transmission system operators. The consultation process is therefore essential and existing structures that are set up to facilitate and streamline the consultation process, such as the Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity (UCTE), should play an important role. |
deleted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public consultations at EU level are currently undertaken by ERGEG. Therefore the Agency should undertake this task as it has already well established rules and experience in carrying out public consultations. Moreover the Agency acts in the interest of all market participants, while TSOs are potentially an interested party. In order to ensure efficiency of the process, it should be emphasised that the creation of too many consultation bodies might lead to duplication of consultation processes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(8a) In order to ensure greater transparency regarding the entire electricity transmission network in the European Union, the Commission should draw up, publish and regularly update a road map. All feasible electricity transmission networks and possible regional connections should be included in that road map. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) Market monitoring undertaken over recent years by the national regulatory authorities and by the Commission has shown that current transparency requirements and rules on access to infrastructure are not sufficient. |
(9) Market monitoring undertaken over recent years by the national regulatory authorities and by the Commission has shown that current transparency requirements and rules on access to infrastructure are not sufficient to secure a genuine well-functioning, open and efficient internal market. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clarification of the text. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) Equal access to information on the physical status of the system is necessary to enable all market participants to assess the overall demand and supply situation and identify the reasons for movements in the wholesale price. This includes more precise information on electricity generation, supply and demand, network capacity, flows and maintenance, balancing and reserve capacity. |
(10) Equal access to information on the physical status and efficiency of the system is necessary to enable all market participants to assess the overall demand and supply situation and identify the reasons for movements in the wholesale price. This includes more precise information on electricity generation, supply and demand, network capacity, flows and maintenance, balancing and reserve capacity. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) To enhance trust in the market, its participants need to be sure that abusive behaviour can be sanctioned. Competent authorities should be enabled to effectively investigate allegations of market abuse. Therefore access to data to the competent authorities is necessary that provides information on operational decisions made by supply undertakings. In the electricity market many relevant decisions are made by the generators, who should keep this information available to the competent authorities for fixed period of time. Small generators with no real possibility to distort the market should be exempt from this obligation. |
(11) To enhance trust in the market, its participants need to be sure that abusive behaviour can be sanctioned effectively. The competent authorities should be given the competence effectively to investigate allegations of market abuse. Therefore, access by the competent authorities to data that provides information on operational decisions made by supply undertakings is necessary. In the electricity market, many relevant decisions are made by the generators, who should keep that information available to and easily accessible by the competent authorities for a fixed period of time. The competent authorities should, furthermore, regularly monitor the compliance of the transmission system operators with the rules. Small generators with no real ability to distort the market should be exempt from this obligation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Competent authorities should have easy access to important information from supply undertakings and shall monitor that the supply undertakings comply with the rules, in order to ensure a non-discriminatory, transparent and effective market. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) Competition for household-consumers requires that suppliers not be blocked when they want to enter new retail markets. Therefore rules and responsibilities governing the supply chain need to be known to all market parties, and they need to be harmonised with a view to enhancing Community market integration. |
(12) Competition for household-consumers requires that suppliers not be blocked when they want to enter new retail markets. Therefore rules and responsibilities governing the supply chain need to be known to all market parties, and they need to be harmonised with a view to enhancing Community market integration. The competent authorities should regularly monitor the compliance of market participants with the rules. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The addition is necessary in order to clarify a responsibility for the Complement authority, and to ensure the enforcement of the rules. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The provisions on the harmonisation of a retail market for electricity should be deleted or expressed solely in the proposal for a directive amending directive 2003/54/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity (COM/2007/0528 final). The proposal on cross-border exchanges and access to networks (COM 2007-531) should concentrate on wholesale markets and security of supply. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to ensure that TSO´s will facilitate market integration, it must be established that promoting market integration is an explicit task of ENTSO. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2b – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consultation at EU level until now has been a task of ERGEG. This task should be given to the future Agency, which is entrusted with safeguarding the public interest. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – Point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Articles 2 e a and 2 e b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2f | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2g | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The competencies of the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity should be limited to network related issues. Therefore, Article 2c paragraph 3 subparagraph g should be deleted since rules for trading do not deal with such network related issues. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2 h | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2h a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The regulation does not stipulate how cooperation with third-country TSOs at a technical level will be carried out. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 5 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 6 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amends existing Article 6, paragraph 1 of Regulation 1228/2003 by adding 2 new subparagraphs) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The formal approval of congestion management procedures by regulators should be clearly stated in the Regulation 1228/2003 in order to ensure an efficient implementation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 5 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 6 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The current version of EC’s proposals encompasses extension of the exemption provisions to the newly proposed art. 8 of the Electricity Directive on ownership unbundling. In order to ensure a flawless interpretation of the norm, extension of the exemption to Art. 10 (which disciplines the ISO-option for transmission systems subject to ownership unbundling) has to be clarified. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References to Articles of the Electricity Directive are adapted to revised Directive 2003/54/EC. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7 – paragraph 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 6 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7-a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7 a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The objective of harmonised cross border retail markets is not necessary for the development of well functioning regional and Community wholesale markets, which should remain the priority. The implications of such a regulatory objective need to be fully assessed, and the costs and benefits carefully analysed, since it is probable there would be significant stranded costs, outweighing the benefits. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 8 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 12 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Changes wording of paragraph 1, article 12 of Regulation (EC) 1228/2003) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
According to the Council of European Energy Regulators, the current state of implementation of Regulation 1228/2003 shows shortcomings because of missing effective sanctions implemented by Member States. Effective use of the enforcement powers of regulators should be ensured in order to sanction non-compliance with requirements of the Regulation. |
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Introduction
1. The Rapporteur welcomes the third liberalisation package for the European Union’s energy markets as it offers, in his opinion, a complete and coherent legislative proposal in which the majority of the recommendations adopted by the European Parliament in June 2007 have been included in the proposals.
2. In this sense, he agrees with the inclusion of stronger and more independent powers for the regulators, the increased requirements for transparency in the market, the improved framework for cooperation at European level between national regulators as well as between Transmission Systems Operators, the emphasis given to the further development of interconnection capacity between Member States and the proposal of ownership unbundling as the most effective, but not the only, mean to encourage investments and avoid discrimination towards new entrants.
3. He also shares the proposed creation of an Agency of European Regulators although he has reservations on the present structure and decision-making power of this new body.
4. Regarding the Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges, the Rapporteur thinks that the main problem with the legislative proposal lies in the current division of competences between the different actors which leads to a confused and somehow cumbersome decision-making process. This document will highlight the main concerns of the Rapporteur with regards to this particular proposal.
Structure of responsibilities
5. As stated above, the Rapporteur considers that the key problem in this dossier is that the current structure of responsibilities presented in the Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges does not correspond to the actual and natural division of competences at national level as the Transmission System Operators are given a quasi-regulatory status while the Regulatory Agency seems to be reduced to the role of an advisory body.
6. In particular, he believes that several of the eleven tasks that Transmission System Operators (TSOs) have to fulfil should be in the hands of the regulatory authorities instead.
7. Indeed, while the Rapporteur shares the Commission’s idea of establishing a bottom-up approach in what regards the development of technical codes since the TSOs are best suited to do so and have a direct interest in simplifying and harmonising such rules at European level, he believes that other codes such as those relating to trading and market transparency should follow a different approach where the Agency, as an independent authority, should be responsible for drafting the guidelines in close cooperation with market participants and, needless to say, TSOs, and for adopting them.
8. Furthermore, the voluntary nature of the implementation of the above mentioned codes and rules raises some questions as to whether there is any added value to the current system of TSO cooperation at European level. The Rapporteur firmly believes that some rules and codes that will derive from the implementation of this Regulation should have a compulsory nature.
9. Finally, the Rapporteur thinks that, in line with the attribution to the Agency of drafting and adopting market codes, this regulatory authority should be in charge of carrying out the stakeholder consultation instead of the TSOs, according to the process carried out at national level.
The Agency
10. The Rapporteur is aware of the limitations the Commission’s legal service opinion has placed on the powers given to the Agency of European Regulators. However, he is of the opinion that most of the uncertainties and confusion in the structure of powers derives precisely from this lack of competences. For this reason, the Rapporteur would like the Committee to ask the Parliament’s legal service to study whether the Agency’s powers could be extended to be able to deliver final regulatory decisions, in accordance with the European Parliament’s resolution of June 2007 on the liberalisation of the energy markets.
11. Should that not be possible, then the Rapporteur believes that Parliament should reflect on whether the proposed model would answer the problems to reach a common view that arise at present between national regulators and if it could be acceptable as an intermediary step towards a true European Regulator.
12. The European Parliament expressed in the recent past its wish to establish a European body of national regulators that would be granted decision-making powers for cross-border issues between Member States while the national regulators would remain responsible for decisions of matters within their national territory. The Parliament's position intended to put an end to the situations of deadlock between national regulators we see at the present time; that is why the Commission's proposal as it stands today does give the Agency the competence of solving this current and potential difficulties. The Rapporteur believes that an independent Agency, with the adequate competences for cross border issues, would promote the development of a true EU energy regulation, more efficiently and with more transparency.
13. The Rapporteur is also concerned by the dissolution of the existing ERGEG and the implications it might have in terms of independence since the Agency as currently proposed will be excessively dependent on the European Commission.
Unbundling requirements under the European Network of Transmission System Operators
14. The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal to formalise the existing cooperation framework of Transmission System Operators so as to promote integration at European level and to develop full harmonisation of technical rules between the 27 Member States.
15. In order to make the ENTSO model work properly, and regardless of the level of unbundling required in each Member State – that is, unbundled TSO or ISO -, the Rapporteur believes that every Transmission System Operator within ENTSO should be treated equally in what concerns their obligations as system operator and in ensuring non-discriminatory access to the grid.
Investments
16. The Commission’s proposals for the presentation of a 10 year investment plan by TSOs is in accord with already existing obligations at Member State level, so the Rapporteur welcomes the objective of adding a European dimension to it, in particular regarding the upgrading and improvement of transmission capacity between Member States.
17. However, it is important that this plan is adopted by the regulatory body and not just submitted for review.
Transparency
18. The Rapporteur is convinced that rules on transparency should be developed, in consultation with the TSOs, by the regulatory body and not only reviewed by the Agency. While he welcomes the development of guidelines at EU level, he would prefer to see these guidelines become binding on the most important elements.
19. He would also like to point out that in some parts of the Regulation, transparency seems to be mistaken with monitoring and reporting, so he would like to differentiate these parts accordingly in his report.
Harmonisation
20. The Rapporteur believes that harmonisation is not being put at the forefront of the proposal. The existence of 27 different regulatory frameworks is one of the main obstacles to integration of the energy markets. Therefore, the Rapporteur believes that the voluntary nature of the harmonisation of technical and market rules will not be sufficient to overcome the existing barriers to cross-border trade between Member States derived from insufficient integration. For this reason, he thinks that harmonisation of technical codes as well as of the regulatory framework should be one of the core objectives of the package.
Regional markets
21. The Rapporteur welcomes the inclusion in the Regulations and Directives of the development of regional markets as a positive step towards integration. Indeed, the recent progress in this field, as well as already well established ones such as the Nordic market, could provide a solid basis to compare different models and to possibly extrapolate some of these experiences at an EU level.
Interconnection levels
22. The Rapporteur welcomes the appointment of special Coordinators to speed the development of the main four interconnection projects between Member States that have been stalling. He believes that they can have a positive influence in speeding up these processes by mediating between all actors and interested parties.
23. However, these individual cases, while important in nature, are only a small part of the problem and many political, technical and administrative obstacles still remain throughout the European Union to increasing interconnection capacity between Member States even where these projects are economically and technically viable.
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (8.5.2008)
for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity
(COM(2007)0531 – C6‑0320/2007 – 2007/0198(COD))
Draftswoman: Mariela Velichkova Baeva
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The proposal of the European Commission for a third legislative liberalization energy package focuses on the integration and completion of a competitive, transparent, solidarity-based and non-discriminatory single EU energy market. To achieve these goals all impediments should be approached with due care and by all stakeholders and be removed to speed up the process of integration and harmonization.
The concepts of Ownership Unbundling and Independent System Operator as an alternative are supposed to contribute to a better environment for competition and reduction of energy prices as well as easier entrance of new players on the market – this complex of factors being crucial for the benefit of consumers and economies. Solutions should be elaborated taking into consideration the availability of the current legal frameworks of 27 Member States and the obstacles stemming from this status-quo and should be based on empirically verifiable data. Vital options should furthermore be promoted for enhancing regional cooperation and investment estimations and planning. For the optimal use of the infrastructure and interconnection capacity it has to be taken into account that in some cases further network investment considerably depends on previous investment portfolio.
The proposal for a regulation of competitive energy markets should be more balanced in terms of non-infringement of the fundamental market principles and not turn out to be counter-productive and damage market liquidity as well as investment intentions. The control mechanisms are already in place considering the competition law that has been enacted by the authorities on a national and European level. The power of the regulators should be to an extent of non-intervention in market mechanisms and provide for effective control of the costs of the enterprises for the benefit of consumers. Reporting of the companies might be beneficial to further market development as well and ensure transparency.
Rules are needed for the cooperation among the national regulators and the harmonization of their powers as well as enhanced independence on a national level.
The restructuring of the energy market on a national level envisages full independence and autonomy of Transmission System Operators (TSOs) as an aspect of the process thus ensuring the free and non-discriminatory access to the grid of all market participants. Equal treatment of publicly and privately held TSOs is of considerable importance.
Furthermore, a stronger TSO cooperation is needed in the framework of the European Network of Transmission System Operators (ENTSO). The expansion or improvement of cross-border infrastructure as well as further integration of the European energy markets might be achieved via such an appropriate base for coordination of current and future network investments to make regional markets more coherent.
It has to be taken into consideration that the income from congestion management is predominately used to reduce national tariffs. Presumably, any change of this procedure might result in grid tariffs jumping up.
An important focus of decision-making should be the fact that there is a fundamental lack of allocation of generation capacity all over Europe. If a clever allocation scheme for generation is devised, financial resources might be saved from directing them to strengthen the grid. Congestions might be solved, and national economies might enjoy a more viable development.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Text proposed by the Commission[1] | Amendments by Parliament | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 1 – introductory part | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The Directive gives too broad powers to ENTSO in providing that it adopts technical and market codes. However before adopting them, extensive consultations have to be conducted to ensure that the positions of Market Stakeholders are duly taken into consideration. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (a) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The Directive gives too broad powers to ENTSO in providing that it adopts technical and market codes. However before adopting them, extensive consultations have to be conducted to ensure that the positions of Market Stakeholders are duly taken into consideration. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (b) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The Directive gives too broad powers to ENTSO in providing that it adopts technical and market codes. However before adopting them, extensive consultations have to be conducted to ensure that the positions of Market Stakeholders are duly taken into consideration. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (c) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The Directive gives too broad powers to ENTSO in providing that it adopts technical and market codes. However before adopting them, extensive consultations have to be conducted to ensure that the positions of Market Stakeholders are duly taken into consideration. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (d) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (e) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (f) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 3 – point (g) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
It is not the task of ENTSO to develop e.g. standardised trading contracts. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The Community-wide 10-year network investment plan to be published by ENTSO should include the regional dimension of the market. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2e – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
In the interests of competition (to ensure non-discrimination, effective competition and the efficient functioning of the single market), the Agency should be given more power to regulate ENTSO. To achieve this aim, the Agency should provide formal advice to the Commission at the beginning of the regulatory process in the form of strategic guidelines, on which the ENTSO may prepare technical codes. This process will avoid the possibility of the TSOs being self-regulated. The same process should also apply for the 10-year investment plan (Article 2c(1c)). | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2e – paragraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
In the interests of competition (to ensure non-discrimination, effective competition and the efficient functioning of the single market), the Agency should be given more power to regulate ENTSO. To achieve this aim, the Agency should provide formal advice to the Commission at the beginning of the regulatory process in the form of strategic guidelines, on which the ENTSO may prepare technical codes. This process will avoid the possibility of the TSOs being self-regulated. The same process should also apply for the 10-year investment plan (Article 2c(1c)). | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2e – paragraph 1 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
In the interests of competition (to ensure non-discrimination, effective competition and the efficient functioning of the single market), the Agency should be given more power to regulate ENTSO. To achieve this aim, the Agency should provide formal advice to the Commission at the beginning of the regulatory process in the form of strategic guidelines, on which the ENTSO may prepare technical codes. This process will avoid the possibility of the TSOs being self-regulated. The same process should also apply for the 10-year investment plan (Article 2c(1c)). | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2e – paragraph 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The proposed Directive gives too much power to ENTSO.. The monitoring of the above mentioned codes need to be fair and objective, to ensure non-discrimination, effective competition and the efficient functioning of the market. Therefore, it cannot be entrusted to the TSOs themselves but should constitute a task of the Agency. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
For proper unbundling, Transport System Operators should be able to take investment decisions. For a functional energy market, coordination should be ensured at the European level. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2h – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
Access to interconnection capacity should be optimized via yearly, monthly and daily capacity tenders on borders. This should be done in order to tackle the limitations due to high transit flows through the interconnections. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 2h – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
Access to interconnection capacity should be optimized via yearly, monthly and daily capacity tenders on borders. This should be done in order to tackle the limitations due to high transit flows through the interconnections. Limiting the geographical scope might set barriers to free electricity trade within the sought-for integrated electricity market. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 – point (b) Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 5 – paragraph 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
It is practically impossible to keep all information needed to verify all operational dispatching decisions and bidding behaviour at power exchanges. Furthermore, the proposed provision would treat generation companies and independent traders differently in requesting only from generation companies to keep at the disposal of regulators necessary information for the verification of their bidding behaviour and of operational dispatching decisions. This asymmetric treatment does not appear to be justified. Confidentiality of restricted information has to be considered. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 – point (b) Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 5 – paragraph 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
It is practically impossible to keep all information needed to verify all operational dispatching decisions and bidding behaviour at power exchanges. Furthermore, the proposed provision would treat generation companies and independent traders differently in requesting only from generation companies to keep at the disposal of regulators necessary information for the verification of their bidding behaviour and of operational dispatching decisions. This asymmetric treatment does not appear to be justified. Confidentiality of restricted information has to be considered. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 5 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
Currently Transmission System Operators use the income from congestion management predominately to reduce national tariffs. Any change of this procedure will result in grid tariffs jumping up. | ||||||||||||||||
Additionally, obligating Transmission System Operators to finance new interconnection capacities by auction income will hinder them to receive an adequate return on investment. Otherwise, Transmission System Operators have no incentive to build new interconnection capacities. That would be contradictory to Directive 2005/89 (Security of Supply), Art. 6 (1(a)). | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 5 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point (b a) (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
Currently Transmission System Operators use the income from congestion management predominately to reduce national tariffs. Any change of this procedure will result in grid tariffs jumping up. | ||||||||||||||||
Additionally, obliging Transmission System Operators to finance new interconnection capacities by auction income will hinder them to receive an adequate return on investment. Otherwise, Transmission System Operators have no incentive to build new interconnection capacities. That would be contradictory to Directive 2005/89 (Security of Supply), Art. 6 (1(a)). | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point (a a) (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
Balancing of the power and investment portfolio. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 Article 7a – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The methods are market-based, flexible to be tailor-made to specific market situations and envisaged perspectives, contribute to the security of supply, transparency of activity and accountability of the stakeholders. Alternative utilization of resources of other facilities should be envisaged in order to ensure efficient and secure electricity supplies during peak demand periods. |
PROCEDURE
Title |
Conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity |
|||||||
References |
COM(2007)0531 – C6-0320/2007 – 2007/0198(COD) |
|||||||
Committee responsible |
ITRE |
|||||||
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
ECON 11.10.2007 |
|
|
|
||||
Drafts(wo)man Date appointed |
Mariela Velichkova Baeva 23.10.2007 |
|
|
|||||
Discussed in committee |
29.1.2008 |
26.2.2008 |
1.4.2008 |
|
||||
Date adopted |
6.5.2008 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
36 1 0 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Manuel António dos Santos, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Robert Goebbels, Donata Gottardi, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Guntars Krasts, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Andrea Losco, Astrid Lulling, Florencio Luque Aguilar, Gay Mitchell, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Bernhard Rapkay, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček, Ieke van den Burg, Cornelis Visser |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Valdis Dombrovskis, Harald Ettl, Ján Hudacký, Alain Lipietz, Diamanto Manolakou, Gianni Pittella, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Andreas Schwab |
|||||||
- [1] Not yet published in OJ.
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (9.4.2008)
for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity
(COM(2007)0531 – C6‑0320/2007 – 2007/0198(COD))
Draftsman: Leopold Józef Rutowicz
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council serves to implement the decisions made by the Council and Parliament, which in a resolution of 10 July 2007 expressed strong support for a common energy policy. This policy requires:
· effective separation of supply and production activities from the network operation;
· further harmonisation of the powers and enhanced independence of the national energy regulators;
· establishment of an independent mechanism for cooperation among national regulators;
· creation of a mechanism for transmission system operators to improve the coordination of network operation and grid security, cross-border trade and grid operation;
· greater transparency in energy market operations.
The Regulation creates the practical conditions for achieving the above objectives by setting up the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators to monitor the execution of the tasks earmarked for the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity. Implementation of the Regulation will create the conditions for improved competitiveness, better quality of supplies, energy conservation and improved energy security.
Electricity differs fundamentally from other traded goods, because it is a network-based product that is impossible or very costly to store. That is why the energy economy requires the introduction of independent mechanisms for cooperation and decision-making at the level of national regulators and regulation within the framework of the European market. That is why the introduction of formal structures for cooperation in this area under the amended Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity is justified. These changes do not resolve all the problems of cross-border exchanges in electricity, but they introduce measures which in a limited way should increase efficiency and adapt network operations to market needs. The detailed technical and market codes included among the tasks of the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity and the activities of the agency monitoring the execution of these tasks should ensure the added value for the European economy. The above measures should facilitate the emergence of well-functioning and transparent cross-border retail and wholesale markets.
The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity should help to regulate the internal electricity market, with due regard for the interests of consumers and operators, by means of:
· lower transmission costs and greater competitiveness, so that energy can be provided to consumers at lower prices while ensuring stability and security of energy supplies;
· setting up the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators and the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity through coordination of national transmission systems. This should ensure better functioning of the European market and national systems by reducing energy transmission losses and promoting the development of small-scale energy based on renewable energy sources;
· development of electricity transmission networks, which will also lead to the necessary development of nuclear power stations, ensuring energy supplies at reasonably stable and low prices, and thereby undoubtedly enhancing the competitiveness and development of the European economy, while at the same time reducing CO2 emissions. A sharp increase in oil or gas prices and heavy dependence on the political situation for supplies of these resources could threaten to destabilise the European economy and lead to a fall in real incomes.
Accordingly, the amendment of the Regulation will have a direct bearing on improved organisation of the electricity market and access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity, while the benefits to consumers will be determined by the detailed technical and market codes set out and advocated in the Regulation and their proper implementation.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(4) The Communication of the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled "An Energy Policy for Europe" highlighted the importance of completing the internal market in electricity and to create a level playing field for all electricity companies in the Community. The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on prospects for the internal gas and electricity market and the Communication from the Commission "Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 into the European gas and electricity sectors (Final Report)" showed that the present rules and measures do not provide the necessary framework to achieve the objective of a well functioning internal market. |
(4) The Communication of the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled "An Energy Policy for Europe" highlighted the importance of completing the internal market in electricity and to create a level playing field for all electricity companies in the Community. The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on prospects for the internal gas and electricity market and the Communication from the Commission "Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 into the European gas and electricity sectors (Final Report)" showed that the present rules and measures do not provide the necessary framework to achieve the objective of a well functioning, effective and open internal market. | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
It is important to ensure an effective and open internal market, not just a well functioning market. It is important to have a market which is open for new entrants and to have effective competition for all participants. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 6 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(6) In particular, increased cooperation and coordination among transmission system operators is required to ensure progressive compatibility of the technical and commercial codes for providing and managing effective access to the transmission networks across borders, and to ensure coordinated and sufficiently forward looking planning and sound technical evolution of the transmission system in the Community, with due regard to the environment, and promote energy efficiency and research and innovation notably with respect to ensuring penetration of renewables and dissemination of low carbon technology. Transmission system operators should operate their networks according to these compatible technical and market codes. |
(6) In particular, increased cooperation and coordination among transmission system operators is required to ensure compatibility of the technical and commercial codes for providing and managing effective and transparent access to the transmission networks across borders, and to ensure coordinated and sufficiently forward looking planning and sound technical evolution of the transmission system in the Community, with due regard to the environment, and promote energy efficiency and research and innovation notably with respect to ensuring penetration of renewables and dissemination of low carbon technology. Transmission system operators should operate their networks according to these compatible technical and market codes. | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
A transparent access to the transmission networks across borders is crucial for the development of an efficient and open market. Lack of transparent access can create barriers and have an impact of the level of competition. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 7 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(7) In order to ensure an optimal management of the electricity transmission network and to allow trading and supplying electricity to retail customers across borders in the Community a European network of the transmission system operators should be established. Its tasks should be carried out in compliance with Community competition rules which remain applicable to the decisions of the European network of the transmission system operators. Its tasks should be well-defined and their working method should be such as to ensure efficiency, representativity and transparency. Given that more effective progress may be achieved through an approach at regional level, transmission system operators should set up regional structures within the overall cooperation structure, whilst ensuring that results at regional level are compatible with codes and investment plans at Community level. Cooperation within such regional structures presupposes effective unbundling of network activities from production and supply activities in the absence of which regional cooperation between transmission system operators gives rise to a risk of anti-competitive conduct. |
(7) In order to ensure an optimal management of the electricity transmission network and to allow trading and supplying electricity to retail customers across borders in the Community a European network of the transmission system operators should be established. Its tasks should be carried out in compliance with Community competition rules which remain applicable to the decisions of the European network of the transmission system operators. Its tasks should be well-defined and their working method should be such as to ensure efficiency, representativity and transparency. Given that more effective progress may be achieved through an approach at regional level, transmission system operators should set up regional structures within the overall cooperation structure, whilst ensuring that results at regional level are compatible with codes and investment plans at Community level. Member States should promote cooperation at regional level, and monitor the effectiveness of the network at that level. Cooperation at regional level should be compatible with progress towards a competitive and efficient European electricity market. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(7a) Cooperation at regional level between Member States and neighbouring countries with a European perspective should be promoted so as to ensure stability and security of supply, as well as the effectiveness of networks at that level. | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
The promotion of cooperation at regional level between Member States and neighbouring countries with a European perspective is very important for stability of countries and ensuring high level of regional economic cooperation. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(8a) Regarding the consultation process, consumers and consumer organisations should engage more decisively in the implementation of the tasks of the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, in particular in preparing technical and market codes and its annual work programme. | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Consumers and consumer organisations should also be engaged in the consultation process, because they are important stakeholders, since they are household end users. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 b (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(8b) To ensure greater transparency of the situation regarding the entire electricity transmission network in Europe, the Commission should draw up, publish and update a road map for the electricity network in Europe. All feasible electricity transmission networks and possible regional connections should be included in this road map. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 9 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(9) Market monitoring undertaken over recent years by the national regulatory authorities and by the Commission has shown that current transparency requirements and rules on access to infrastructure are not sufficient. |
(9) Market monitoring undertaken over recent years by the national regulatory authorities and by the Commission has shown that current transparency requirements and rules on access to infrastructure are not sufficient in order to secure a genuine, open and effective internal market. | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Clarification of the text. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 11 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(11) To enhance trust in the market, its participants need to be sure that abusive behaviour can be sanctioned. Competent authorities should be enabled to effectively investigate allegations of market abuse. Therefore access to data to the competent authorities is necessary that provides information on operational decisions made by supply undertakings. In the electricity market many relevant decisions are made by the generators, who should keep this information available to the competent authorities for fixed period of time. Small generators with no real possibility to distort the market should be exempt from this obligation. |
(11) To enhance trust in the market, its participants need to be sure that abusive behaviour can be sanctioned effectively. Competent authorities should be enabled to effectively investigate allegations of market abuse. Therefore access by the competent authorities to data that provides information on operational decisions made by supply undertakings is necessary. In the electricity market many relevant decisions are made by the generators, who should keep this information available to and easily accessible by the competent authorities for a fixed period of time. Furthermore, the competent authorities should regularly monitor system operators' compliance with the rules. Small generators with no real possibility to distort the market should be exempt from this obligation. | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
The Competent authorities should have easy access to important information from supply undertakings and shall monitor that the supply undertakings comply with the rules, in order to ensure a non-discriminatory, transparent and effective market. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 12 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(12) Competition for household-consumers requires that suppliers not be blocked when they want to enter new retail markets. Therefore rules and responsibilities governing the supply chain need to be known to all market parties, and they need to be harmonised with a view to enhancing Community market integration. |
(12) Competition for household-consumers requires that suppliers not be blocked when they want to enter new retail markets. Therefore rules and responsibilities governing the supply chain need to be known to all market parties, and they need to be harmonised with a view to enhancing Community market integration. The competent authorities should regularly monitor market actors' compliance with the rules. | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
The addition is necessary in order to clarify a responsibility for the Complement authority, and to ensure the enforcement of the rules. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 3 – point b | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Small and medium-sized enterprises often suffer from discrimination in the energy market | |||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 3 – point g | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Small and medium-sized enterprises often suffer from discrimination in the energy market | |||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
In many cases, large-scale investments and the development of the related networks require more than 10 years from conception to completion | |||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 2c – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 2d – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 2e – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 2f – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point (3) Regulation EC 1228/2003 Article 2h – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
The Member States' promotion of the network and the obligation to monitor the effectiveness of the network is very important in ensuring a true internal cross border market and cooperation. | |||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC) n° 1228/2003 Article 5 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point (7) Regulation EC 1228/2003 Article 7a – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
To secure that cross border retail markets will work effectively as well. |
PROCEDURE
Title |
Conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity |
|||||||
References |
COM(2007)0531 – C6-0320/2007 – 2007/0198(COD) |
|||||||
Committee responsible |
ITRE |
|||||||
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
IMCO 11.10.2007 |
|
|
|
||||
Drafts(wo)man Date appointed |
Leopold Józef Rutowicz 31.1.2008 |
|
|
|||||
Discussed in committee |
28.2.2008 |
2.4.2008 |
|
|
||||
Date adopted |
8.4.2008 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
39 0 2 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Gabriela Creţu, Mia De Vits, Janelly Fourtou, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Anna Hedh, Edit Herczog, Iliana Malinova Iotova, Pierre Jonckheer, Alexander Lambsdorff, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, Catherine Neris, Zita Pleštinská, Giovanni Rivera, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Marianne Thyssen, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler, Marian Zlotea |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Emmanouil Angelakas, Colm Burke, Giovanna Corda, Bert Doorn, Brigitte Fouré, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Olle Schmidt |
|||||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote |
Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Bogusław Sonik, Janusz Wojciechowski |
|||||||
PROCEDURE
Title |
Conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity |
|||||||
References |
COM(2007)0531 – C6-0320/2007 – 2007/0198(COD) |
|||||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
19.9.2007 |
|||||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 11.10.2007 |
|||||||
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary |
ECON 11.10.2007 |
ENVI 11.10.2007 |
IMCO 11.10.2007 |
|
||||
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
ENVI 9.10.2007 |
|
|
|
||||
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed |
Alejo Vidal-Quadras 9.10.2007 |
|
|
|||||
Discussed in committee |
21.11.2007 |
19.12.2007 |
23.1.2008 |
29.1.2008 |
||||
|
31.1.2008 |
27.2.2008 |
26.3.2008 |
6.5.2008 |
||||
Date adopted |
28.5.2008 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
46 0 4 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Dragoş Florin David, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lena Ek, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Eugenijus Maldeikis, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Patrizia Toia, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Dominique Vlasto |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Gabriele Albertini, Ivo Belet, Manuel António dos Santos, Robert Goebbels, Satu Hassi, Pierre Pribetich, Bernhard Rapkay, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Lambert van Nistelrooij |
|||||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote |
Emmanouil Angelakas, Nicolae Vlad Popa |
|||||||